Why Evolutionary Theory Is Fundamentally Flawed

Creationism, Evolution, and other science issues

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
EarthScienceguy
Guru
Posts: 1125
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Evolutionary Theory Is Fundamentally Flawed

Post #21

Post by EarthScienceguy »

[Replying to post 19 by Divine Insight]
That's wrong. It's not because no transitional forms were found, but rather because every possible transitional form has not been found. Neither should we expect to find every possible transitional form.

If that's your argument against evolution, then you have no credible argument.
Which transitional forms where not found?

For_The_Kingdom
Guru
Posts: 1916
Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 3:29 pm

Post #22

Post by For_The_Kingdom »

Dogs produce dogs, cats produce cats, fish produce fish. Don't know what part of that isn't being understood, but visit your local farm or zoo for the proof. Or better yet, stick a male and female dog in a room, and tell me what you will get in a year or less.

User avatar
DrNoGods
Guru
Posts: 1227
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:18 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: Why Evolutionary Theory Is Fundamentally Flawed

Post #23

Post by DrNoGods »

[Replying to post 16 by EarthScienceguy]
If you want to go here we can go here.

Since Jesus was raised from the dead, that means Jesus is God and that creation actually happen.
Just more preaching and nothing to do with science. That's apparently all you are here for (ie. to preach). I'll pass.
But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown..
Carl Sagan

The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.
Mark Twain

User avatar
DrNoGods
Guru
Posts: 1227
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:18 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Post #24

Post by DrNoGods »

[Replying to post 22 by For_The_Kingdom]
Or better yet, stick a male and female dog in a room, and tell me what you will get in a year or less.


A year or less?? Let's see ... the average gestation period for a dog is about 60 days. So that would represent about 6 cycles per year if the dog was continuously pregnant. Do you really think that ToE says that speciation could happen in as little as 6 generations for a dog? Of course you would only get a dog in that kind of time period.

Try a large population of dogs on an island that undergoes sudden (eg. over a few thousand years) drastic climate change as well as drastic changes to the food sources and predator/prey mix. Come back to that island after 1 million years and see what the original dog population has turned into (if it exists at all). This is a more realistic example of when speciation might occur ... not "in a year or less." Seriously?
But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown..
Carl Sagan

The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.
Mark Twain

User avatar
Divine Insight
Savant
Posts: 18080
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: Here & Now
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Why Evolutionary Theory Is Fundamentally Flawed

Post #25

Post by Divine Insight »

EarthScienceguy wrote: [Replying to post 19 by Divine Insight]
That's wrong. It's not because no transitional forms were found, but rather because every possible transitional form has not been found. Neither should we expect to find every possible transitional form.

If that's your argument against evolution, then you have no credible argument.
Which transitional forms where not found?
The extremely detailed ones demanded by supporters of Creationism. No serious biologist would expect that kind of detail from fossil records to begin with.

There are plenty of transitional forms between species. So that isn't even in question.

Besides, fossil records are hardly the only evidence for evolution. They are just additional confirmation. In fact, it won't be long before biologists will be using DNA as their new record of evolution and will no longer need to use fossil records. The record of evolution is retained in our very own DNA. So in the very near future we'll be able to understand how things evolved to a much greater degree of detail than we currently have. So modern day young biologists are in for a real treat. They will get to discover the evidence of our evolution via DNA instead of digging up old fossils.

Religions that depend on evolution being false are about to take a serious nose dive. What you are supporting really isn't much different from Flat-Earth societies.
[center]Image
Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]

Bust Nak
Savant
Posts: 8680
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 am
Location: Planet Earth
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #26

Post by Bust Nak »

For_The_Kingdom wrote: Dogs produce dogs, cats produce cats, fish produce fish. Don't know what part of that isn't being understood, but visit your local farm or zoo for the proof. Or better yet, stick a male and female dog in a room, and tell me what you will get in a year or less.
A variations of the parental dogs, with mutation that may or may not contribute to the survival fitness of the offspring, i.e. exactly what evolution predicted would happen. Why? What do you think would happen?

User avatar
EarthScienceguy
Guru
Posts: 1125
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Evolutionary Theory Is Fundamentally Flawed

Post #27

Post by EarthScienceguy »

[Replying to post 23 by DrNoGods]
Just more preaching and nothing to do with science. That's apparently all you are here for (ie. to preach). I'll pass.
It is called HISTORICAL SCIENCE. And it was you who asked for proof that God exists by your statement. You ask a Christian for proof that God exist they are going to go to Jesus, because there is no greater evidence that that. So if you do not want proof then don't ask for it.

User avatar
EarthScienceguy
Guru
Posts: 1125
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Why Evolutionary Theory Is Fundamentally Flawed

Post #28

Post by EarthScienceguy »

[Replying to post 25 by Divine Insight]
The extremely detailed ones demanded by supporters of Creationism. No serious biologist would expect that kind of detail from fossil records to begin with.

There are plenty of transitional forms between species. So that isn't even in question.
Really?

That is not what texts book says.

"Most of the animal groups that are represented in the fossil record first appear, “fully formed� and identifiable as to their phylum, in the Cambrian, some 550 million years ago. These include such anatomically complex and distinctive types as trilobites, echinoderms, brachiopods, molluscs, and chordates. … The fossil record is therefore of no help with respect to the origin and early diversification of the various animal phyla…"

R.S.K. Barnes, P. Calow and P.J.W. Olive, The Invertebrates: A New Synthesis, pp. 9-10 (3rd ed., Blackwell Sci. Publications, 2001).

Many species remain virtually unchanged for millions of years, then suddenly disappear to be replaced by a quite different, but related, form. Moreover, most major groups of animals appear abruptly in the fossil record, fully formed, and with no fossils yet discovered that form a transition from their parent group.

C.P. Hickman, L.S. Roberts, and F.M. Hickman, Integrated Principles of Zoology, p. 866 (Times Mirror/Moseby College Publishing, 1988, 8th ed).


And papers.

Stefanie De Bodt, Steven Maere, and Yves Van de Peer, “Genome duplication and the origin of angiosperms,� Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20:591-597 (2005).
In spite of much research and analyses of different sources of data (e.g., fossil record and phylogenetic analyses using molecular and morphological characters), the origin of the angiosperms remains unclear. Angiosperms appear rather suddenly in the fossil record… with no obvious ancestors for a period of 80-90 million years before their appearance




Stephen Jay Gould, a well-known evolutionist and professor of geology and paleontology at Harvard University, has stated, "The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. The evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of the branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils."


From talk Origins
The theory of Punctuated Equilibria provides paleontologists with an explanation for the patterns which they find in the fossil record. This pattern includes the characteristically abrupt appearance of new species, the relative stability of morphology in widespread species, the distribution of transitional fossils when those are found, the apparent differences in morphology between ancestral and daughter species, and the pattern of extinction of species.

Need I go on. I can but I believe I made my point.

The Fossil record follows creationist predictions not evolutionary predictions. Creationist predict change according to Mendel's laws and that is exactly what we see in the fossil record. Every change outside of Mendel's laws are not seen in the fossil record.

This combined with Jeanson genetic paper describing all genetic changes happen in the last 5 to 10 thousand years and you also have proof of a young earth to boot. I thought I would throw that in for fun, to make the debate interesting.

User avatar
DrNoGods
Guru
Posts: 1227
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:18 pm
Location: Tucson, AZ
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: Why Evolutionary Theory Is Fundamentally Flawed

Post #29

Post by DrNoGods »

[Replying to post 27 by EarthScienceguy]
You ask a Christian for proof that God exist they are going to go to Jesus, because there is no greater evidence that that. So if you do not want proof then don't ask for it.


Providing "proof" that a god exists is not simply stating that it exists because some ancient holy book says so. That's how nearly all gods are described, but does absolutely nothing to show that any of them actually exist. It is circular reasoning (ie. god exists because he (or his "word") says so).

But you don't understand basic science (as proven by your defense of Humphreys' nonsense) so it isn't surprising that you think "proof" that the god you believe in exists is reference to the holy book that presents the story in the first place. No one has ever seen or heard this being, or any of its actions either directly or indirectly, so there is no reason to believe it exists.

Also, I didn't ask for proof that any god exists (that is your incorrect rephrasing of what I said). I commented that there is no evidence that gods exist, so no reason to believe that they do, and therefore no justification for using "god did it" as an explanation for anything. But of course you are happy to accept Humphreys' "god did it" assumptions as legitimate, which clearly shows that you don't understand how real science works and have been unable to support any of the points you've ever made from a real science perspective. All you do is resort to changing the subject when cornered, or referencing bible stories as if they were scientific evidence. Again, no science, all preaching.
Last edited by DrNoGods on Fri May 03, 2019 11:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown..
Carl Sagan

The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.
Mark Twain

User avatar
Divine Insight
Savant
Posts: 18080
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: Here & Now
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Why Evolutionary Theory Is Fundamentally Flawed

Post #30

Post by Divine Insight »

EarthScienceguy wrote: Many species remain virtually unchanged for millions of years, then suddenly disappear to be replaced by a quite different, but related, form.
So please explain how this is supposed to fit in with the idea that there exists a purposeful intentional creator who "designs" life forms.

What happened? Did he suddenly realize that the designs he had created weren't so hot after all and needed to change them? That would imply that the creator is not a very good designer and is instead designing from trial and error.

Your arguments against evolution are backfiring on you.

As is often pointed out in these types of Creationists arguments. Whining about evolution does nothing at all for your cause. If you don't have a better explanation to replace it then you have nothing.

And obviously you don't. So whining about evolution isn't getting you anywhere. There is so much wrong with the Yahweh and Jesus rumors. Those rumors cannot possibly be true.

In fact, I suggest that the very reason that Abrahamic theists turn to complaining about evolution is precisely because they know that they cannot defend their religious dogma. So to avoid that topic entirely they turn to trying to discredit evolution, like as if that would somehow make up for all the self-contradictions in their theology.

Even if evolution could be proven to be wrong, that's not going to justify the Biblical stories. So you have nothing to offer to replace evolution in any case.

Your complaint that fully formed species suddenly disappeared doesn't help a case for a purposeful intelligent designer. No purposefully designed species should have ever become extinct. Especially not the early hominids.

So what's you explanation for why your proposed intentional designer had created so many failed species? Did he not know what he was doing?

You'll need to make your complaints about evolution work for your proposed intelligent creator if you expect to make any progress at all.
[center]Image
Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]

Post Reply