Theists often get upset when people talk about God doing acts and referring to it as magic. But is there any real difference?
The first recorded act of God was creating light and what did he do? He made a verbal incantation: "Let there be light!"
Note: Abracadabra Hebrew meaning: “I will create as I speak,�
https://www.thejc.com/judaism/jewish-wo ... a-1.466709
So we have a god supposedly conjuring up things with magic words. Then we also have people claiming to have magical powers (some even claim those powers come from God himself).
Is there really any difference?
What are those differences?
Is God's power the same as magic?
Moderator: Moderators
- OnceConvinced
- Savant
- Posts: 8969
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm
- Location: New Zealand
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 67 times
- Contact:
Is God's power the same as magic?
Post #1Society and its morals evolve and will continue to evolve. The bible however remains the same and just requires more and more apologetics and claims of "metaphors" and "symbolism" to justify it.
Prayer is like rubbing an old bottle and hoping that a genie will pop out and grant you three wishes.
There is much about this world that is mind boggling and impressive, but I see no need whatsoever to put it down to magical super powered beings.
Check out my website: Recker's World
Post #2
Obviously this depends on how we define “magic� and how we define “God.�
However, if we stick with traditional definitions for these words, then magic is a human being attempting to influence the physical world by non-physical means. The acts of God, or “miracles,� are the work of a Being which exists outside physical universe and therefore, by definition, is not subject to the laws of physical laws of this universe.
So if our goal is accuracy, then calling the actions of God “magic� is certainly inaccurate. If our goal is something other than accuracy then that is a horse of a different color.
However, if we stick with traditional definitions for these words, then magic is a human being attempting to influence the physical world by non-physical means. The acts of God, or “miracles,� are the work of a Being which exists outside physical universe and therefore, by definition, is not subject to the laws of physical laws of this universe.
So if our goal is accuracy, then calling the actions of God “magic� is certainly inaccurate. If our goal is something other than accuracy then that is a horse of a different color.
Understand that you might believe. Believe that you might understand. –Augustine of Hippo
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8495
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2147 times
- Been thanked: 2295 times
Post #3
bjs wrote:
However, if we stick with traditional definitions for these words, then magic is a human being attempting to influence the physical world by non-physical means. The acts of God, or “miracles,� are the work of a Being which exists outside physical universe and therefore, by definition, is not subject to the laws of physical laws of this universe.
So magic is a being known to actually exist relying on that which is known only through rumor and imagination.
A miracle is a being known only through rumor and imagination performing works known only through rumor and imagination.
That certainly sums it up well.
Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
-
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 25089
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:38 pm
- Location: Bible Belt USA
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 73 times
Post #4
.
Notice that no ‘person’ is required. There are claims that fairies, leprechauns, gods, angels (and occasionally people) have power to influence events using mysterious or supernatural forces. Your suggested personal definition does not take precedence over Oxford Dictionary.
A more appropriate definition: magic is defined by the lexicographers at Oxford Dictionaries as The power of apparently influencing events by using mysterious or supernatural forces. www.lexico.com/en/definition/magicbjs wrote: Obviously this depends on how we define “magic� and how we define “God.�
However, if we stick with traditional definitions for these words, then magic is a human being attempting to influence the physical world by non-physical means.
Notice that no ‘person’ is required. There are claims that fairies, leprechauns, gods, angels (and occasionally people) have power to influence events using mysterious or supernatural forces. Your suggested personal definition does not take precedence over Oxford Dictionary.
There does not seem to be a generally accepted definition of ‘God’.bjs wrote: The acts of God, or “miracles,� are the work of a Being which exists outside physical universe and therefore, by definition, is not subject to the laws of physical laws of this universe.
How does the proposed ‘God’s’ supposed power differ from “influencing events by using mysterious or supernatural forces�?bjs wrote: So if our goal is accuracy, then calling the actions of God “magic� is certainly inaccurate. If our goal is something other than accuracy then that is a horse of a different color.
.
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
- Danmark
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 12697
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:58 am
- Location: Seattle
- Been thanked: 1 time
Post #5
"Of course it is." Both magic and God's intervention are supernatural and imagined phenomena with no explanation advanced by their proponents. If believers in 'magic' or 'god's miracles' could explain the mechanism of either imagined power, they could advance an argument. But they don't and can't, so they can't argue the point.
- 1213
- Savant
- Posts: 11467
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 327 times
- Been thanked: 374 times
Re: Is God's power the same as magic?
Post #6If that is counted magic, then I think anything people speak can be counted magic. And if saying “let there be light� is magic, I don’t know what is bad about that magic.OnceConvinced wrote: ...The first recorded act of God was creating light and what did he do? He made a verbal incantation: "Let there be light!"...
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 21142
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 794 times
- Been thanked: 1129 times
- Contact:
Re: Is God's power the same as magic?
Post #71213 wrote:If that is counted magic, then I think anything people speak can be counted magic. And if saying “let there be light� is magic, I don’t know what is bad about that magic.OnceConvinced wrote: ...The first recorded act of God was creating light and what did he do? He made a verbal incantation: "Let there be light!"...
Now I understand, when I say to my students "There will be silence in here right now!" and it goes all quiet, I've cast a spell on them. That explains a lot, who knew?!
JW
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
-
- Guru
- Posts: 2343
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:40 am
- Has thanked: 2005 times
- Been thanked: 781 times
Re: Is God's power the same as magic?
Post #8You appear to missing the point. It's not the saying of the words that is magic, it is the act of saying words and having something happen by non natural means. i.e. something that did not exist before (light) poofing into existence.1213 wrote:If that is counted magic, then I think anything people speak can be counted magic. And if saying “let there be light� is magic, I don’t know what is bad about that magic.OnceConvinced wrote: ...The first recorded act of God was creating light and what did he do? He made a verbal incantation: "Let there be light!"...
Example: "Let a jelly donut appear all by itself on my desk!" and POOF a jelly donut appears with no intervention from anyone or anything else. Magic.
Saying something and having it happen due to natural means is not magic.
- Danmark
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 12697
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:58 am
- Location: Seattle
- Been thanked: 1 time
Post #9
As a child I believed in the magical powers of God. I took Jesus seriously when he said we could move mountains around. As i got older, I notice the only 'miracles' were things that could be explained by natural causes. Amputated limbs and permanent teeth knocked out never grew back. God only healed spiritual stuff, or stuff that could be faked. I grew to have more faith in physicians than in the supernatural.
Post #10
bjs wrote:
Obviously this depends on how we define “magic� and how we define “God.�
However, if we stick with traditional definitions for these words, then magic is a human being attempting to influence the physical world by non-physical means. The acts of God, or “miracles,� are the work of a Being which exists outside physical universe and therefore, by definition, is not subject to the laws of physical laws of this universe.
Then it might be clearer if we restrict our attention to what humans do. I have seen people produce rabbits and doves from what appeared to be an empty hat and I call this magic. There is of course an explanation for it, but the performer was a good magician. If a man who appears to be blind is touched by someone and instantly sees, then I call this magic. I have no idea how it was done but a good explanation would be collusion. A miracle is a piece of magic attributed to divine interference. If one prays for deliverance from an attacker and a bolt of lightning strikes the attacker dead we can call this miracle or very good luck.
If we have what is called strong faith then a whole variety of inexplicable events become easily explained, as were thunder, lighning and eclipses in ancient times. Magic becomes miracle depending on how profoundly we believe in supernatural interference.