From a current thread:
Okay. I, for one, am open to hearing the official REAL story of creation. The version you prefer.bjs wrote: The reason for this is that I have found that the majority of non-Christians who want to debate the creation account in Genesis wildly misrepresent that account. They insist that passage must be precisely literal. They ignore context and literary style in order to create a version of the story that they find most useful for attacking beliefs they disagree with. They abandon accuracy for a perceived advantage in a debate.
Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory? Here's your chance to reach many people with the correct version of 'creation'.bjs wrote: I am sure that there are exceptions to this attitude among atheists, but those exceptions are rare enough that I have largely given up on the effort.
Question for debate: What is the real story of creation according to Genesis (or other sources)?