It's Beginning to Feel a Lot Like Mithras
Moderator: Moderators
It's Beginning to Feel a Lot Like Mithras
Post #1The Christian-Jewish propaganda does NOT say anything about celebrating the Divine Leader's birthday. We were only instructed to pretend to eat his flesh and drink his blood, for example.
I propose that Christianity has been a fraud from the very start.
Is stealing the birthdays of other supposed god-men part of the fraudulence …?
"God" … just whatever humans imagine it to be.
"Scripture" … just whatever humans write it to be.
"Scripture" … just whatever humans write it to be.
-
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 25089
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:38 pm
- Location: Bible Belt USA
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 73 times
Post #21
.
Wait a minute.
Before comparing the birth date of Jesus to that of other proposed deities, was Jesus born on December 25th?
Wait a minute.
Before comparing the birth date of Jesus to that of other proposed deities, was Jesus born on December 25th?
.
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
Post #22
[Replying to Zzyzx]
We can’t say for certain. Africanus was the first to write about the date of Jesus’ birth, at least of the surviving documents. He seemed to use theological, as opposed to historical, reasoning. This is not to say that he didn’t have historical evidence, but it wasn’t the focus of his writing.
I have heard it said that “scholars� have established the Jesus was born in the Spring, the Summer, and the Fall, as well as the traditional date in December.
Either the traditional date or sometime in fall, probably mid-October, seem to be the strongest arguments to me. None of the arguments are indisputable, and it would not particularly bother me to find out that I am wrong about the date.
We can’t say for certain. Africanus was the first to write about the date of Jesus’ birth, at least of the surviving documents. He seemed to use theological, as opposed to historical, reasoning. This is not to say that he didn’t have historical evidence, but it wasn’t the focus of his writing.
I have heard it said that “scholars� have established the Jesus was born in the Spring, the Summer, and the Fall, as well as the traditional date in December.
Either the traditional date or sometime in fall, probably mid-October, seem to be the strongest arguments to me. None of the arguments are indisputable, and it would not particularly bother me to find out that I am wrong about the date.
Understand that you might believe. Believe that you might understand. –Augustine of Hippo
-
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 25089
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:38 pm
- Location: Bible Belt USA
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 73 times
Post #23
.
From a Catholic source:
From a Catholic source:
There were celebrations in various cultures at or around the Winter Solstice -- 'rebirth' of the sun (increasing length of daylight period and increasing sun angle in the northern hemisphere)The first Christians were not concerned with the date of Christ’s birth nor with celebrating it. Origen (d. 255), Irenaeus (d. 202), and Tertullian (d. 220) do not include Christmas or its date on their lists of feasts and celebrations.
The earliest attempts to date the birth of Christ produced various results:
Circa 200, Clement of Alexandria noted that Christians in Egypt believed Jesus was born on May 20.
De paschæ computus, written in 243, notes the some groups of Christians celebrated the feast of Christ’s birth on March 28 and others on April 19/20.
The writings of Theophilus (d.181) and Hippolytus (d. 240) mention that Christ was born on December 25.
Fourth- and fifth-century writings mention December 25 as an ancient and widespread feast of Christ’s birth.
Many ancient writings, especially in the East, place the celebration on January 6 but usually combined with what we now celebrate separately with the Epiphany.
The Church chose December 25 due to its ancient origin and widespread acceptance. No other date was accepted by more Christians for a longer or older period of time. However, we should note that although the Church chooses this date to celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ, it is not declaring de fide that it is the literal date he was born.
https://www.catholic.com
.
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
Non-Theist
ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence
Post #24
Zzyzx wrote: .
From a Catholic source:
There were celebrations in various cultures at or around the Winter Solstice -- 'rebirth' of the sun (increasing length of daylight period and increasing sun angle in the northern hemisphere)The first Christians were not concerned with the date of Christ’s birth nor with celebrating it. Origen (d. 255), Irenaeus (d. 202), and Tertullian (d. 220) do not include Christmas or its date on their lists of feasts and celebrations.
The earliest attempts to date the birth of Christ produced various results:
Circa 200, Clement of Alexandria noted that Christians in Egypt believed Jesus was born on May 20.
De paschæ computus, written in 243, notes the some groups of Christians celebrated the feast of Christ’s birth on March 28 and others on April 19/20.
The writings of Theophilus (d.181) and Hippolytus (d. 240) mention that Christ was born on December 25.
Fourth- and fifth-century writings mention December 25 as an ancient and widespread feast of Christ’s birth.
Many ancient writings, especially in the East, place the celebration on January 6 but usually combined with what we now celebrate separately with the Epiphany.
The Church chose December 25 due to its ancient origin and widespread acceptance. No other date was accepted by more Christians for a longer or older period of time. However, we should note that although the Church chooses this date to celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ, it is not declaring de fide that it is the literal date he was born.
https://www.catholic.com
Quite so …!
Few quick factoids:
1 We can't establish that there ever WAS a Human Jesus, let alone a Magic Jesus.
2 Jesus' propagandists say NOTHING about holding a birthday party for him.
3 Other cultures were holding birthday parties for gods and godmen WAY before the Jesus godman entered the writings of humans.
4 Quite some time AFTER the Jesus character fluttered back up to the ceiling of the Genesis One Dome of Heaven to assemble his legions of genocidal angels (according to certain "understandings" of the propaganda) certain Christians decided - without "scriptural" precedent of authority - to give THEIR boy a birthday party.
"God" … just whatever humans imagine it to be.
"Scripture" … just whatever humans write it to be.
"Scripture" … just whatever humans write it to be.
- JehovahsWitness
- Savant
- Posts: 21140
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:03 am
- Has thanked: 794 times
- Been thanked: 1129 times
- Contact:
Post #25
Zzyzx wrote: .
Wait a minute.
Before comparing the birth date of Jesus to that of other proposed deities, was Jesus born on December 25th?
Excellent question. There is no evidence (historical or biblical) that he was. The date seems to have been adopted based on other considerations, notably to displace /replace popular pagan festivities.
JW
INDEX: More bible based ANSWERS
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 81#p826681
"For if we live, we live to Jehovah, and if we die, we die to Jehovah. So both if we live and if we die, we belong to Jehovah" - Romans 14:8
Post #26
I am trying to understand how you reached your conclusion for the source you cited. Your source lists five dates; one in January, one in May, one in March, one in April, and one in December. Three of the five dates are nowhere near the Winter Solstice.Zzyzx wrote: .
From a Catholic source:
There were celebrations in various cultures at or around the Winter Solstice -- 'rebirth' of the sun (increasing length of daylight period and increasing sun angle in the northern hemisphere)The first Christians were not concerned with the date of Christ’s birth nor with celebrating it. Origen (d. 255), Irenaeus (d. 202), and Tertullian (d. 220) do not include Christmas or its date on their lists of feasts and celebrations.
The earliest attempts to date the birth of Christ produced various results:
Circa 200, Clement of Alexandria noted that Christians in Egypt believed Jesus was born on May 20.
De paschæ computus, written in 243, notes the some groups of Christians celebrated the feast of Christ’s birth on March 28 and others on April 19/20.
The writings of Theophilus (d.181) and Hippolytus (d. 240) mention that Christ was born on December 25.
Fourth- and fifth-century writings mention December 25 as an ancient and widespread feast of Christ’s birth.
Many ancient writings, especially in the East, place the celebration on January 6 but usually combined with what we now celebrate separately with the Epiphany.
The Church chose December 25 due to its ancient origin and widespread acceptance. No other date was accepted by more Christians for a longer or older period of time. However, we should note that although the Church chooses this date to celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ, it is not declaring de fide that it is the literal date he was born.
https://www.catholic.com
This would seem to contradict the idea that dates where chosen because of the “rebirth of the sun.�
Can you explain your reasoning?
(Also, don't say "A Catholic source." If you have a source, just cite it.)
Understand that you might believe. Believe that you might understand. –Augustine of Hippo
Post #27
The actual date is not the important issue here.
The important issue is that the naughty Christian elves STOLE
And passed their stealings off as their own.
FRAUDULENCE
In my view.
No presents for THOSE naughty Christians …
From a character every bit as real and imaginary as the Jesus character.
The important issue is that the naughty Christian elves STOLE
And passed their stealings off as their own.
FRAUDULENCE
In my view.
No presents for THOSE naughty Christians …
From a character every bit as real and imaginary as the Jesus character.
"God" … just whatever humans imagine it to be.
"Scripture" … just whatever humans write it to be.
"Scripture" … just whatever humans write it to be.
Post #28
Why do you continue to repeat the claim? It has been refuted, you have not even attempted to address the evidence against it, and even the sources you cite say that your claim has been refuted. Why continue to make the claim?SallyF wrote: The important issue is that the naughty Christian elves STOLE
And passed their stealings off as their own.
FRAUDULENCE
Understand that you might believe. Believe that you might understand. –Augustine of Hippo
Post #29
Here ya go …bjs wrote:Why do you continue to repeat the claim? It has been refuted, you have not even attempted to address the evidence against it, and even the sources you cite say that your claim has been refuted. Why continue to make the claim?SallyF wrote: The important issue is that the naughty Christian elves STOLE
And passed their stealings off as their own.
FRAUDULENCE
Our friends in the Watchtower have got it all over you on this one …
And they are backed up by the largest version of Christianity on the planet:
Why don’t Jehovah’s Witnesses celebrate Christmas?
Jesus commanded that we commemorate his death, not his birth.—Luke 22:19, 20.
Jesus’ apostles and early disciples did not celebrate Christmas. The New Catholic Encyclopedia says that “the Nativity feast was instituted no earlier than 243 [C.E.],� more than a century after the last of the apostles died.
There is no proof that Jesus was born on December 25; his birth date is not recorded in the Bible.
We believe that Christmas is not approved by God because it is rooted in pagan customs and rites.—2 Corinthians 6:17.
Why make Christmas an issue?
Many still celebrate Christmas despite knowing about its pagan roots and lack of support from the Bible. Such persons could ask: Why should Christians take such an unpopular stance? Why make it an issue?
The Bible encourages us to think for ourselves, to use our “power of reason.� (Romans 12:1, 2) It teaches us to value the truth. (John 4:23, 24) So while we are interested in how others view us, we adhere to Bible principles even if it means that we become unpopular.
Although we choose not to celebrate Christmas ourselves, we respect each person’s right to decide for himself in this matter. We do not interfere in the Christmas celebrations of others. https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesse ... christmas/
"God" … just whatever humans imagine it to be.
"Scripture" … just whatever humans write it to be.
"Scripture" … just whatever humans write it to be.
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8495
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2147 times
- Been thanked: 2295 times
Post #30
"I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly." Unless it is related to Christmas. In that case, they should have no fun at all.SallyF wrote:
Although we choose not to celebrate Christmas ourselves, we respect each person’s right to decide for himself in this matter. We do not interfere in the Christmas celebrations of others. https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesse ... christmas/
Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom