Here's the link to an article which inspired my creation of this debate topic:
https://newatlas.com/science/artificial ... nteresting
"Artificial cells created that imitate basic functions of living cells"
There are disagreements within the scientific community on precisely what constitutes a 'living' thing, and clearly these artificial cells are not alive. However, the experiment shows success in replicating some important attributes of life.
A general theistic position might declare "All life comes from God", but if some 'cellular gene engineer' of the future succeeded in creating a basic cell that ate, grew, replicated and all the other generally agreed things that life does - could it be recognised as life? And wouldn't that falsify that bolded theistic claim?
The Affirmative:
The creation of life is possible by means other than a god.
Artificial life: can it be created?
Moderator: Moderators
- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 5993
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6608 times
- Been thanked: 3209 times
Re: Artificial life: can it be created?
Post #61There is no one characteristic. It just has to be convincing. Everyone has a different threshold of 'gullibility'. Some people are convinced by the fact that they read about God in an old book. Others need a miracle like a god telling them where their car keys can be found after they prayed for help. In reality, the vast majority of theists did not actually reach their position through the evaluation of any evidence anyway. They were inculcated with their belief from a very young age. The whole evidence schtick comes later when some of them want to somehow rationalise that belief. I don't know what would convince me that a god exists. All I can say is that nothing so far has managed to achieve it. Perhaps a personal miracle in which the laws of the universe are broken, or something that I personally consider to be an impossible event occurs that I actually witness. Hearsay, second-hand stories and anecdotes simply don't cut it. But then, I don't really know where my threshold of 'gullibility' lies.
George Orwell:: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 5993
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6608 times
- Been thanked: 3209 times
Re: Artificial life: can it be created?
Post #62I don't need to apply any test. If I am not convinced then the alleged evidence was clearly not convincing to me. That much is self-evident.Inquirer wrote: ↑Tue Aug 16, 2022 11:34 amBut that's not logical, unless you can explain the test you apply to decide if something is "convincing" its all well and good to say "Bah, that's not convincing" but unless you have a rational process for doing that evaluation it can be no more that whim, belief surely?DrNoGods wrote: ↑Mon Aug 15, 2022 8:39 pm [Replying to Inquirer in post #37]
How about the simple and unambiguous answer that the evidence they've been shown is not convincing. That's all the justification that is needed.... currently I'm asking atheists to justify the claim "I've never been shown evidence for God" this is what they say so why can't they justify it? If they can't justify why do they keep saying it? faith? belief? prejudice?
George Orwell:: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
- DrNoGods
- Prodigy
- Posts: 2716
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:18 pm
- Location: Nevada
- Has thanked: 593 times
- Been thanked: 1642 times
Re: Artificial life: can it be created?
Post #63[Replying to William in post #61]
I suppose the next step would be to try and figure out which of the many proposed gods were responsible, what its rules were for considering the same fate for myself and others, and how to communicate with it. But these things are so far into the hypothetical question realm that it is hardly worth pondering because no genuinely dead human has reappeared as a living human outside of stories on old holy books. If I believed those kinds of stories were factual, I'd have a ready answer to your question.Lets say mother did rise from the dead.
After the celebrations and your conversion to theism...what then?
In human affairs the sources of success are ever to be found in the fountains of quick resolve and swift stroke; and it seems to be a law, inflexible and inexorable, that he who will not risk cannot win.
John Paul Jones, 1779
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.
Mark Twain
John Paul Jones, 1779
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.
Mark Twain
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8488
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2141 times
- Been thanked: 2293 times
Re: Artificial life: can it be created?
Post #64[Replying to Diagoras in post #1]
We seem to have drifted off topic slightly, so I want to get back to your O.P. which I find very thought provoking. If artificial life were created, then it would definitely disprove the notion that, "All life comes from God." Of course, that position is a bit questionable even without the creation of artificial life. Unless one states that God created itself, which would prove logically problematic, then a living God would be an exception to the claim.
I don't think that's the main focus of your query though. I think I understand your use of the term "artificial life", but at least at some point in the process it would cease to be artificial and would simply be viewed of as "life." Unless one wanted to argue that God created matter and thus the basic building blocks of this life or that God created humans, so it's an extension of his creating activity, we'd have to admit that God didn't create it.
Tcg
We seem to have drifted off topic slightly, so I want to get back to your O.P. which I find very thought provoking. If artificial life were created, then it would definitely disprove the notion that, "All life comes from God." Of course, that position is a bit questionable even without the creation of artificial life. Unless one states that God created itself, which would prove logically problematic, then a living God would be an exception to the claim.
I don't think that's the main focus of your query though. I think I understand your use of the term "artificial life", but at least at some point in the process it would cease to be artificial and would simply be viewed of as "life." Unless one wanted to argue that God created matter and thus the basic building blocks of this life or that God created humans, so it's an extension of his creating activity, we'd have to admit that God didn't create it.
Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- wannabe
- Apprentice
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2015 4:01 am
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Artificial life: can it be created?
Post #65Artificial life : can it be created ?
Yes - However , will it love its creators ?
Scary stuff.
Yes - However , will it love its creators ?
Scary stuff.
:
:
Live to give , Give to live ( love Jesus )
: I believe a mans spirit is more than just his imagination.
I believe in forever. That's true even without religion.(or man)
: Live to give, give to life, Forgive to live.
:
Live to give , Give to live ( love Jesus )
: I believe a mans spirit is more than just his imagination.
I believe in forever. That's true even without religion.(or man)
: Live to give, give to life, Forgive to live.
- Inquirer
- Banned
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2022 6:03 pm
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 30 times
Re: Artificial life: can it be created?
Post #66I'm not here defending a claim I have made, I'm discussing how the atheists can claim "I've never seen evidence for God" - this is a definitive concrete proposition that seems unsupported, if you agree we can press on and explore this further but if you disagree, if you think that claim can be supported I'm all ears.DrNoGods wrote: ↑Tue Aug 16, 2022 2:21 pm [Replying to Inquirer in post #55]
From your response to Difflugia in post 56, it appears you are saying that (unlike coins vs. acorns), a god can't be defined well enough to be very obviously distinguished from something else. If the god can't be defined sufficiently, how could someone possibly evaluate any evidence presented for the existence of that god? That isn't logical.But that's not logical, unless you can explain the test you apply to decide if something is "convincing" its all well and good to say "Bah, that's not convincing" but unless you have a rational process for doing that evaluation it can be no more that whim, belief surely?
Yes but you're going around in circles, when you say "some observable action or event that only a god being could do" yet you do not have any means of evaluating observations to determine this do you?DrNoGods wrote: ↑Tue Aug 16, 2022 2:21 pm In post 34 Diagoras said:
"Not a trap - similar to asking me whether I’d believe in God if he suddenly appeared in front of me and a group of friends, and then performed a miracle."
My criterium would be along those lines (consistent with the Wikipedia statement I've posted many times now concerning empirical evidence). There would have to be some observable action or event that only a god being could do (consistent with that god's definition ... we have invented thousands of them after all with many different characteristics). If my mother had sat up in her casket at her funeral and started speaking I'd be convinced that a god being was involved even if it wasn't physically present, because I know this would be impossible otherwise. That would be convincing evidence. The bar is very high for (me) being convinced that any god being actually exists, because other explanations are far more reasonable and likely (IMO).
Why do you form the view that "my mother had sat up in her casket at her funeral and started speaking" would be evidence for God but literally everything else you've ever observed is not?
- Inquirer
- Banned
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2022 6:03 pm
- Has thanked: 23 times
- Been thanked: 30 times
Re: Artificial life: can it be created?
Post #67Very well so for atheists its undefined, arbitrary, whim, not a methodological process for deciding, this is what I wanted to demonstrate, so thank you. So if a theist observes something and says "This is convincing evidence for God" that argument is no less legitimate is it? Would you accept the claim God exists because I find X is convincing evidence for God? If not, then why?
Yes, and since there are clearly no definitive tests, no methodology, they are rational to do that surely?
That may or may not be true, but what if it is true? Surely if something "convinces" them then that's sufficient? after all you just said "It just has to be convincing".
Are you saying that beliefs acquired through childhood are always false?
Indeed, so you may well have seen evidence for God and simply not perceived it as such, do you agree with this?
How can you tell if a law of nature has been broken? surely the obvious reaction to that would be that the assumption it was law in the first place was wrong?brunumb wrote: ↑Tue Aug 16, 2022 6:10 pm All I can say is that nothing so far has managed to achieve it. Perhaps a personal miracle in which the laws of the universe are broken, or something that I personally consider to be an impossible event occurs that I actually witness. Hearsay, second-hand stories and anecdotes simply don't cut it. But then, I don't really know where my threshold of 'gullibility' lies.
- DrNoGods
- Prodigy
- Posts: 2716
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:18 pm
- Location: Nevada
- Has thanked: 593 times
- Been thanked: 1642 times
Re: Artificial life: can it be created?
Post #68[Replying to Inquirer in post #67]
You posted this in response to my acorns vs. coins comment (on your prior comment to that example from Difflugia), but the above has nothing whatsoever to do with that exchange. Myself (and others) have already given examples of support for the position that we've yet to see any convincining evidence for the existence of gods. Why ignore these and just repeat the same thing you've already gotten answers for?I'm not here defending a claim I have made, I'm discussing how the atheists can claim "I've never seen evidence for God" - this is a definitive concrete proposition that seems unsupported, if you agree we can press on and explore this further but if you disagree, if you think that claim can be supported I'm all ears.
For a god being that is completely defined in terms of what it is, what it can and can't do (back to the acorns vs. coins thing), then yes. But for some nebulous, undefined god "thing" without any concrete definition then no ... no one can because the problem is too ill defined.Yes but you're going around in circles, when you say "some observable action or event that only a god being could do" yet you do not have any means of evaluating observations to determine this do you?
This is dirt simple so I'm surprised you'd ask such an obvious question. Humans coming back from the dead has never been confirmed to have ever happened in the history of humans, and we have every reason to believe that it is not possible physiologically because of our understanding of what death is and what it entails. So if it did happen, that might be evidence for some kind of god being. "Everything else" I've observed has far more reasonable and believable explanations that don't require a force or intervention beyond anything known to exist. For things that we've yet to work out the mechanistic details of (eg. origin of the universe, how life arose on Earth, dark matter and dark energy, etc.) a default position that some god being is involved is not justified ... it is the lazy way out.Why do you form the view that "my mother had sat up in her casket at her funeral and started speaking" would be evidence for God but literally everything else you've ever observed is not?
In human affairs the sources of success are ever to be found in the fountains of quick resolve and swift stroke; and it seems to be a law, inflexible and inexorable, that he who will not risk cannot win.
John Paul Jones, 1779
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.
Mark Twain
John Paul Jones, 1779
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.
Mark Twain
- DrNoGods
- Prodigy
- Posts: 2716
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:18 pm
- Location: Nevada
- Has thanked: 593 times
- Been thanked: 1642 times
Re: Artificial life: can it be created?
Post #69[Replying to Inquirer in post #68]
How many gods to you think exist? Most people who capitalize the word God are monotheists who believe in only one god, but literally thousands of gods have been invented by humans. This is part of the problem in believing that any of them actually exist, or ever did. Are a billion Hindu's wrong today, or were the Greeks, Romans and Egyptians all wrong in the past? Or is the only criterium for demonstrating that a god exists is that someone, somewhere, believes in that god? If that is the case, then there is no point in asking for evidence that gods exist, or do not exist ... it is sufficient only for someone to believe that they do (ie. a private mental state). That kind of stuff is for the Philosophy section.Would you accept the claim God exists because I find X is convincing evidence for God?
In human affairs the sources of success are ever to be found in the fountains of quick resolve and swift stroke; and it seems to be a law, inflexible and inexorable, that he who will not risk cannot win.
John Paul Jones, 1779
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.
Mark Twain
John Paul Jones, 1779
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.
Mark Twain
- Clownboat
- Savant
- Posts: 9342
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
- Has thanked: 883 times
- Been thanked: 1242 times
Re: Artificial life: can it be created?
Post #70Do you believe in all the available god concepts?
What critieria did you use to evaluate all the other god concepts?
What evidence for Allah was shown to you, that you chose to reject? Or do you say you have never been shown evidence for Allah?
I'm trying to determine if your criteria is undefined, arbitrary, whim, not a methodological process for deciding, so thank you.
Just thought I would leave this one hear for the readers to take note of again.Inquirer wrote:Are you saying that beliefs acquired through childhood are always false?
Readers, does one follow from the other and does it not come across as a desperate attempt to dodge the point made about how religions survive by indoctrinating their children? This fact is probably uncomfortable I would imagine and I can see why there would be a desire to pretend it was never made.
The gods seem to have nothing to do with religions surviving though. Odd, no?
Remember, this cuts both ways. You may well have seen evidence for Allah and simply not perceived it. Futile line of reasoning and will get us nowhere. Showing good evidence might get us somewhere, but is there any good evidence for any of the gods? I surely haven't seen any convincing evidence for any god myself, but I'm open.Inquirer wrote:Indeed, so you may well have seen evidence for God and simply not perceived it as such, do you agree with this?
To the OP: When man invents artificial life, I submit that the claim that all life comes from a god will change to all initial life or some such move of the goal post. Nothing will come of it IMO.
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.
I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU
It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco
If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb
I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU
It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco
If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb