˒ĕlōhı̂m: Plural Persons, or Majesty?

Pointless Posts, Raves n Rants, Obscure Opinions

Moderator: Moderators

YourWordIsTruth
Student
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:41 am
Been thanked: 2 times

˒ĕlōhı̂m: Plural Persons, or Majesty?

Post #1

Post by YourWordIsTruth »

˒ĕlōhı̂m: Plural Persons, or Majesty?

 
The very first verse in the Holy Bible reads, “In the beginning ˒ĕlōhı̂m Created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1)

“˒ĕlōhı̂m” is not a Name of God, but more a description or identity of the Supreme Divine Being in the Old Testament. “˒ĕlōhı̂m”, is masculine in gender, and plural in number. It has most probably from the root “˒ēl”, or “˒ĕlōah”, both are also masculine, but singular.

How are we to understand the plural form “˒ĕlōhı̂m”? The Jews understand it to mean:

“The most common of the originally appellative names of God is Elohim (אלהים), plural in form though commonly construed with a singular verb or adjective. This is, most probably, to be explained as the plural of majesty or excellence, expressing high dignity or greatness” (Jewish Encyclopedia)

The Jews, it must be remembered, do not accept that the God of the Old Testament, is a “Plurality of Persons”. To them, God is just the One Person, Who is the Father.

Those who also reject that the God of the Bible is more than One Person, and anti-Trinitarian, are known as Unitarian, who, like the Jews, believe that God is just the One Person, Who is the Father.

The plural “˒ĕlōhı̂m”, as we are told here, by the Jews and Unitarians, is used to show the “Majesty”, and “Greatness”, and “Excellence”, of the God of the Old Testament. Some Hebrew grammarians call the plural “˒ĕlōhı̂m”, the “plural of Majesty”. There is no evidence in the entire Old Testament, to support this definition. It has been thought up by those, like the Jews and Unitarians, and others who reject that the God of the Bible is more than One Person. The evidence from the Old Testament, will show that “plural of Majesty”, is no more than human conjecture.

In the first place, “˒ĕlōhı̂m”, is not a unique word, that is used only for The One True God of the Old Testament. It is not the same as the Name of God, “Yehôvâh”, which is only used for The One True God of the Old Testament, and is always in the singular. Why was not the singular, “˒ēl”, or “˒ĕlōah”, not used in every instance in the Old Testament, for The One True God, as opposed to the false “˒ĕlōhı̂m”, idols, and human judges? Are we to assume, that it is only when “˒ĕlōhı̂m”, is used for “God”, that it means “plural of majesty”; but, the singular “˒ēl”, and “˒ĕlōah”, when used for “God”, does not mean, “Majesty”, or “Greatness”, or “Excellence”? We shall see, that there are clear places in the Old Testament, where the singular “˒ēl”, and “˒ĕlōah” are used, and the meaning does mean, “Majesty”, or “Greatness”, or “Excellence”.

Secondly, there are many instances in the Old Testament, where “˒ĕlōhı̂m”, is used for false “gods”. In Exodus chapter 20, when The Ten Commandments were Written by God:

“And God (˒ĕlōhı̂m) spoke all these words, saying, “I am the LORD (Yehôvâh) your God (˒ĕlōhı̂m)...“You shall have no other gods (˒ĕlōhı̂m) beside Me” (verses 1-3)

And verse 23, “You shall not make gods (˒ĕlōhı̂m) of silver to be with me, nor shall you make for yourselves gods (˒ĕlōhı̂m) of gold”

Does “˒ĕlōhı̂m” in all of these uses mean, “plural of Majesty”?

Another good example, is Psalm 82, which shows that the plural “˒ĕlōhı̂m”, cannot be used as “plural of majesty”.

Verse 1 reads: “God (˒ĕlōhı̂m) has taken His place in the divine council; in the midst of the gods (˒ĕlōhı̂m) He holds judgment”

In verse 6 it says, “I said, “You are gods (˒ĕlōhı̂m), sons of the Most High, all of you”

verse 8, “Arise, O God (˒ĕlōhı̂m), judge the earth; for you shall inherit all the nations!”

Here we have “˒ĕlōhı̂m” used twice for The One True God of the Bible; and once for false “gods”, and once for “judges”. Each time it is the same plural “˒ĕlōhı̂m”. Are we to understand that the same meaning, “plural of majesty”, is applied to the false gods, and human judges?

In other places we also have “˒ĕlōhı̂m”, used for humans who are “judges”

Exodus 21:6, “then his master must bring him to the judges (˒ĕlōhı̂m)” (KJV, NKJV, NET)

Exodus 22:8, 9, “then the owner of the house will be brought before the judges (˒ĕlōhı̂m)...come before the judges (˒ĕlōhı̂m), and the one whom the judges (˒ĕlōhı̂m) declare guilty ” (KJV, NKJV, NET)

“˒ĕlōhı̂m”, is also used for false idols, as in Genesis 31:30, 32 “And now you have gone away because you longed greatly for your father's house, but why did you steal my gods (˒ĕlōhı̂m)?...Anyone with whom you find your gods (˒ĕlōhı̂m) shall not live”. Genesis 35:2,4 “So Jacob said to his household and to all who were with him, “Put away the foreign gods (˒ĕlōhı̂m) that are among you and purify yourselves and change your garments...So they gave to Jacob all the foreign gods (˒ĕlōhı̂m) that they had”. Exodus 32:31, “So Moses returned to the LORD and said, “Alas, this people has sinned a great sin. They have made for themselves gods (˒ĕlōhı̂m) of gold”

In Exodus 7:1, God tells Moses, “And the LORD said unto Moses, See, I have made thee a god (˒ĕlōhı̂m) to Pharaoh: and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet”

“˒ĕlōhı̂m” is used about 2600 times in the Old Testament for The One True God. However, as we can see, it is also used for false gods, false idols, human judges, etc. If, as those who argue that we are to understand the plural form of “˒ĕlōhı̂m”, to describe God’s “Majesty”, and “Greatness”, and “Excellence”; then are we to take these same meanings, for the false gods, false idols, human judges, etc? How exactly, can these be “majestic” or “great” or “excellent”? It is absurd!

I shall give examples from the Old Testament, where both the singular forms, “˒ēl”, and “˒ĕlōah”, and used for Almighty God, to describe His “Majesty”, and “Greatness”, and “Excellence”. So, why could these words have been used in every instance in the Old Testament, for The One True God? This would have made it very clear, that GOD in the Old Testament, is just One Person, Who is the Father.

For the singular, “˒ēl”, there are examples that show it is used to decrible God’s “Majesty”, and “Greatness”, and “Excellence”:

Genesis 14:18-22, “And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the Most High (‛elyôn) God (˒ēl). And he blessed him and said, “Blessed be Abram by God ('êl) Most High (‛elyôn), Possessor of heaven and earth. And blessed be the Most High (‛elyôn) God (˒ēl)... But Abram said to the king of Sodom, “I have lifted my hand to the LORD (yehôvâh), God (˒ēl) Most High, Possessor of heaven and earth”

Deuteronomy 7:21, “You shall not be in dread of them, for the LORD (yehôvâh) your God (˒ĕlōhı̂m) is in your midst, a great and awesome God (˒ēl)”

Joshua 22:22, “The LORD (yehôvâh) God (˒ēl) of gods (˒ĕlōhı̂m), the LORD (yehôvâh) God (˒ēl) of gods (˒ĕlōhı̂m), he knoweth, and Israel he shall know; if it be in rebellion, or if in transgression against the LORD (yehôvâh), (save us not this day,)”

2 Samuel 22:33, “This God (˒ēl) is my strong refuge and has made my way blameless”

Psalm 18:2, “The LORD (yehôvâh) is my rock, and my fortress, and my deliverer; my God (˒ēl), my strength, in whom I will trust; my buckler, and the horn of my salvation, and my high tower”

Psalm 90:2, “Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever you had formed the earth and the world, from Everlasting to Everlasting you are God (˒ēl)”

Psalm 95:3, “For the LORD (yehôvâh) is a great God (˒ēl), and a great King above all gods (˒ĕlōhı̂m)”

Jeremiah 32:18, “Thou shewest lovingkindness unto thousands, and recompensest the iniquity of the fathers into the bosom of their children after them: the Great (gâdôl), the Mighty (gibwōr) God,(˒ēl) the LORD (yehôvâh) of hosts, is His Name”

Isaiah 9:6, is a Prophecy of The Messiah, Jesus Christ. One of Names by which He will be called, is “’êl gib·bō·wr”, translated even in the New World Translation, as “Mighty God”. The same Hebrew is found in chapter 10:21; Jeremiah 32:18; Deuteronomy 10:17. It is clear that there are Two distinct Persons Who are Mighty God.

The same can be seen for the singular ˒ĕlōah:

Deuteronomy 32:15, 17, “then he forsook God (˒ĕlōah) which made him, and lightly esteemed the Rock of his salvation...They sacrificed unto devils, not to God (˒ĕlōah); to gods (˒ĕlōhı̂m) whom they knew not”

Job 11:7, “Canst thou by searching find out God (˒ĕlōah)? canst thou find out the Almighty (shadday) unto perfection?”

Job 22:26, “For then shalt thou have thy delight in the Almighty (shadday), and shalt lift up thy face unto God (˒ĕlōah)”

Job 27:10, “Will he delight himself in the Almighty (shadday)? will he always call upon God (˒ĕlōah)?”

Job 33:12, “Behold, in this thou art not just: I will answer thee, that God (˒ĕlōah) is Greater (râbâh) than man”

Psalm 18:31, “For who is God (˒ĕlōah) save the LORD (yehôvâh)? or who is a Rock save our God (˒ĕlōhı̂m)?”

Psalm 114:7, “Tremble, thou earth, at the presence of the Lord ('âdôn), at the presence of the God (˒ĕlōah) of Jacob”

Isaiah 44:8, “Fear not, nor be afraid; have I not told you from of old and declared it? And you are my witnesses! Is there a God (˒ĕlōah) besides me? There is no Rock; I know not any.”

In all of these examples, it is clear that both “˒ēl”, and “˒ĕlōah”, are used to describe “Majesty”, and “Greatness”, and “Excellence”, of The One True God of the Old Testament. So why would the plural “˒ĕlōhı̂m”, be used, for what the singular already does?

It is clear that the use of the plural “˒ĕlōhı̂m”, is not to describe the “Majesty”, and “Greatness”, and “Excellence”, of The One True God of the Old Testament, which is already done by the singular, “˒ēl”, and “˒ĕlōah”. There is also clear evidence in the Old Testament, to show that the plural “˒ĕlōhı̂m”, is used because The One True God of the Old Testament, is not One Person, Who is the Father.

If, as those who argue for Unitarianism, God is One Person, there can be no doubt, that Genesis 1:1, would have been written, “bərē’šîṯ bārā’ ’ĕl/˒ĕlōah ’ēṯ haššāmayim wə’ēṯ hā’āreṣ”, where the singular, “˒ēl”, or “˒ĕlōah”, would have been used instead of the plural “˒ĕlōhı̂m”; this would also agree with the singular verb, “bā·rā (Created)”. In the Book of Isaiah, we read, “Thus says God (hā·’êl, lit, The God), the LORD (yehôvâh), Who Created the heavens and stretched them out, Who spread out the earth and what comes from it, Who gives breath to the people on it and spirit to those who walk in it” (42:5). In referring to the Creation of the entire universe, as in Genesis 1:1, Isaiah uses the singular “’êl”, and not the plural “˒ĕlōhı̂m”.

From Genesis 1:2, onwards, we have a more detailed Account of the Creation of “the heavens and the earth”.

When we get to verses 26 and 27, it becomes clear why the plural “˒ĕlōhı̂m”, and not the singular “˒ēl”, or “˒ĕlōah”, is used in verse 1, and in over 2600 times in the Old Testament.

“Then God said, “Let Us Make man in Our Image, according to Our Likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”. So God Created man in His Own Image; in the Image of God He created him; male and female He created them”

In verse 26, we have “˒ĕlōhı̂m” (mas. plural), as the Speaker, Who says, “let US make (na-‘ă-śeh, plural) man, in OUR Image (bəṣaləmēnû, plural) , according to OUR Likeness (kiḏəmûṯēnû, plural)

It must be asked, if God were Unitarian, then surely we would have expected verse 26 to read:

“Then God said, I have Made man in My Image, according to My Likeness”

In verse 27 it goes on to say, “So God (ĕlōhı̂m) Created man in His Own Image (bə·ṣal·mōw) ; in the Image (bə·ṣe·lem) of God (ĕlōhı̂m) He created him”. As we read in Genesis 9:6, “for in the Image of God (bə·ṣe·lem ˒ĕlōhı̂m) made He man”. Why the plural in verse 26?

Those who reject the Plurality of Persons in “˒ĕlōhı̂m”, have suggested, as in the Jewish Palestinian Targum, “And the Lord said to the angels who ministered before Him, who had been created in the second day of the creation of the world, Let us make man in Our image, in Our likeness”. However, in verse 27, it reads, “And the Lord created man in His likeness: In the image of the Lord He created him”. In verse 26, God is supposed to be talking to His created “angels”, that He was going to Create humans, in OUR (God and His angels), Image and Likeness. But, in verse 27, and 9:6, it is clear, that humans are Created in the Image and Likeness of God, with no mention of the “angels”! Some have even suggested that God is here talking to His “divine council”. This is no more than human speculation, as there is not a single verse in the entire Old Testament, that even hints humans are Created in the Image and Likeness of God and His angels!

It is interesting, that in another Jewish Targum, The Jerusalem, verse 27 reads, “And the Word (Memra) of the Lord created man in His likeness, in the likeness of the presence of the Lord He created him, the male and his yoke-fellow He created them”. In the Targums, the “Memra of Yahweh”, is a Person, and Himself also Yahweh. Clear that the Jews themselves admit to Creation by more than One Person.

Some quote Malachi 2:10, as their “proof”, that the Father alone is the Creator; “Have we not all one Father (’e·ḥāḏ ’āḇ)? Has not one God (’e·ḥāḏ ’êl, sing) Created (bə·rā·’ā·nū) us? Why then are we faithless to one another, profaning the covenant of our fathers?”

Similarly, in Isaiah 51:13, “and have forgotten the LORD (Yehôvâh), your Maker (‘ō·śe·ḵā, sing), Who stretched out the heavens and laid the foundations of the earth”

But, in Job 35:10, it is very interesting, “But none says, ‘Where is God my Maker, who gives songs in the night”. Here “God” is “˒ĕlōah”, masculine, singular; and “Maker”, “‘ō·śāy”, masculine, plural, literally, “God my Makers”. Again, why the singular “˒ĕlōah”, with the plural, “‘ō·śāy”? It is clear from this, that “˒ĕlōah”, is used to show the “Essential Unity”; and “‘ō·śāy”, for the “Plurality of Persons”. There is not other explanation for this. We should have expected, the singular “‘ō·śê·nî”. 

This is also seen in Isaiah 54:5, “For your Maker (‘ō·śa·yiḵ, plural, your Makers) is your Husband (ḇō·‘ă·la·yiḵ, plural, your Husbands), the LORD of Hosts is His Name (šə·mōw, sing); and the Holy One of Israel is your Redeemer, the God of the whole earth he is called”. Why not as in Isaiah 51:13, where we read the singular?

Likewise, in Ecclesiastes 12:1, “Remember also your Creator in the days of your youth”

Here “your Creator”, “bō·wr·’e·ḵā”, is the masculine, plural, “your Creators”. Why the plural?

Genesis 46:3, “Then he said, “I am God (hā·’êl), the God (ĕ·lō·hê) of your father”

Literally, “I am the God, the Gods”

Exodus 20:5, “You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I the LORD your God am a jealous God”

“’ā·nō·ḵî Yehôvâh ’ĕ·lō·he·ḵā ’êl qan·nā”, literally, “I Yahweh your Gods God jealous” (also Deuteronomy 4:24, etc)

2 Samuel 22:32, “For who is God (’êl), but the LORD (Yehôvâh)? And who is a Rock, except our God (’ĕ·lō·hê·nū)?”

“God...Yahweh...Gods”

The singular ’êl, in these, and other passages, can only denote the “Essential Unity” of God; and the plural “˒ĕlōhı̂m”, the “Plurality of Persons”.

There is also clear evidence in the Old Testament, of more than One Person Who is The Creator.

In Job chapter 38 we read, “Then the Lord answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said...Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth?” (verses 1, 4)

And Isaiah 44:6, “This is what the LORD says, He who is the King of Israel and his Redeemer, the LORD of armies: ‘I am the first and I am the last, And there is no god besides Me”

Here we have “Yehôvâh”, as The Creator, and the Eternal God.

In Isaiah 48:12-13, it says:

“Listen to Me, Jacob, and Israel, the one called by Me: I am He; I am the first, I am also the last. My own hand founded the earth, and My right hand spread out the heavens; when I summoned them, they stood up together”

verse 16 reads,

“Approach Me and listen to this. From the beginning I have not spoken in secret; from the time anything existed, I was there.” And now the Lord God has sent Me and His Spirit”

Here the Speaker (1st Person, singular), Who is Himself The Creator and the Eternal God, says, that “’ă·ḏō·nāy Yehôvâh”, is SENDING (šə·lā·ḥa·nî, 3rd person, Another Person) Himself and the Spirit (wə·rū·ḥōw 3rd person, Another Person). Verse 17 confirms Who the Speaker is, “Thus saith the LORD, thy Redeemer, the Holy One of Israel; I am the LORD thy God which teacheth thee to profit, which leadeth thee by the way that thou shouldest go”

In Proverbs 9:10, we read, “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom, and the knowledge of the Holy One is insight”

“the LORD”, “Yehôvâh”, masculine, singular

“the Holy One”, “qə·ḏō·šîm”, masculine, plural, “the Holy Ones”

Proverbs 30:3, “I have not learned wisdom, nor have I knowledge of the Holy One”

“the Holy One”, “qə·ḏō·šîm”, masculine, plural, “the Holy Ones”

The evidence from the Old Testament is overwhelmingly against God being Unitarian. It is abundantly clear to those who want to know what the Bible really teaches, that “˒ĕlōhı̂m” is not a single Person.

User avatar
1213
Savant
Posts: 11472
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
Location: Finland
Has thanked: 327 times
Been thanked: 374 times

Re: ˒ĕlōhı̂m: Plural Persons, or Majesty?

Post #2

Post by 1213 »

YourWordIsTruth wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 4:19 am ....
“And God (˒ĕlōhı̂m) spoke all these words, saying, “I am the LORD (Yehôvâh) your God (˒ĕlōhı̂m)...“You shall have no other gods (˒ĕlōhı̂m) beside Me” (verses 1-3)
...
The evidence from the Old Testament is overwhelmingly against God being Unitarian. It is abundantly clear to those who want to know what the Bible really teaches, that “˒ĕlōhı̂m” is not a single Person.
Should I rather believe Jesus and Paul or you?

This is eternal life, that they should know you, the only true God, and him whom you sent, Jesus Christ.
John 17:3

For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus,
1 Timothy 2:5

And, is the word "Yehôvâh" plural? If not, why would the word "ĕlōhı̂m" be in all cases?

YourWordIsTruth
Student
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:41 am
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: ˒ĕlōhı̂m: Plural Persons, or Majesty?

Post #3

Post by YourWordIsTruth »

[Replying to 1213 in post #2]

Hi

The fact that the Bible begins with the masculine Plural, ˒ĕlōhı̂m, whereas the masculine singular could have been used, if the Godhead was only One Person, is clear that there is more than One Person Who is God

In Genesis 1:26, we have the use of the plural, "let US make man in OUR Image, after OUR Likeness", which is not addressed to the "angels", as the Jews wrongly assume, as there is not a single verse in the Bible, that even hints humans are Created in the Image and Likeness of Created angels!

I Isaiah 9:6, we have the Name of Jesus Christ in Prophecy, "’êl Gibbôr", which even the Jehovah's Witnesses translate as "Mighty God". In the next chapter, verse 21, we have Jehovah as "’êl Gibbôr". Two distinct Persons Who are equally called "’êl Gibbôr"

In Isaiah 48:16-17, in context, the Speaker Who is Sent, is clearly Yahweh, and He says that another Person, “Adonay Yahweh” (as in the Hebrew), has sent Him and the Spirit. Again, we have Two distinct Persons Who are equally called Yahweh.

In Zechariah 2:6-11, we have the Speaker Who is Yahweh, Who says that Another, Who is also Yahweh, has sent Him. Again Two Who are equally Yahweh.

In Malachi 3:1, the Speaker is "Yahweh of Hosts", Who speaks of His own Coming, in the Person of Jesus Christ, Who is also here called, "the Messenger of the Covenant". Isaiah 40:3, when read with Matthew 3:3, etc, is clear, that John the Baptist was the Forerunner of Yahweh, Who is Jesus Christ.

John 1:1 is also very clear, that Jesus Christ, Who is "the Word", and is "WITH God", showing a Personal distinction, is Himself, "God" (and the Word was God). In verse 18, in the best and oldest textual evidence, it reads, "God [the Father] no one has ever seen, the Unique God [Jesus Christ], Who is in the Bosom of the Father, He has made Him known". Two distinct Persons, who are equally GOD.

In Acts 5:3-4, we read of Ananias trying to deceive the Disciples, to which Peter says, that he was "lying to the Holy Spirit", which Peter goes on to say, was "lying to God". Clearly Another Person Who is God.

In Acts 13:2, we read, "As they ministered to the Lord, and fasted", and it goes on to say that the Holy Spirit responds, "the Holy Spirit said, Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them". They were called and sent by the Holy Spirit.

etc, etc

User avatar
theophile
Guru
Posts: 1581
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 7:09 pm
Has thanked: 76 times
Been thanked: 126 times

Re: ˒ĕlōhı̂m: Plural Persons, or Majesty?

Post #4

Post by theophile »

YourWordIsTruth wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 4:19 am ˒It is abundantly clear to those who want to know what the Bible really teaches, that “˒ĕlōhı̂m” is not a single Person.
I think you're right: God has a plural aspect. I would argue that God is both one and many.

How is that possible? The answer is also in Genesis 1. A verse I'm surprised you didn't cite along with all the others:

"So God created mankind in his own image,
in the image of God he created them;
male and female he created them."

This is highly suggestive that the image of God is man and woman, which means God has a male and female aspect and, extending from this, some sort of relationship at God's core...

This gets even more color in Genesis 2, when that intended relationship, at least between humans, is further described:

"That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh."

In other words, marriage is the relationship / mechanism through which two (or many) become one. And we would be right, I think, to see elohim in the same way. i.e., as the union and becoming one of many so-called 'gods'.

But who was God's partner in Genesis 1? Surely there must be some other god that God joins with there if this theory holds any water? That too is a fairly obvious but disregarded fact (like the plurality of God). We see her in Genesis 1:2 where she is often glossed over and forgotten because she throws a wrench into any paternalistic theology:

"Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters."

The deep / sea and its waters strike a very feminine (womb-like) figure next to the spirit (seed!) of God, does it not? And we can almost feel the tension as the spirit of God hovers over her, and the two of them begin to create...

This becomes an even stronger account when we recognize the etymological link between tehom (the deep) and Tiamat - an actual sea goddess from the Enuma Elish, which the original audience would have known. (Hence we essentially have two 'gods' here becoming one, elohim, and that later refers to itself as an 'Us' as you note.)

And when we further notice that the whole of Genesis 1 is essentially these two working together every step of the way, then everything clicks into place. For instance, it is the land (which is of the deep), and not God, that brings forth vegetation and animals of every kind...

But all that said, you raise a good question on Yahweh, and what the difference is there. That's another matter, I think. But in short, my tendency is to liken Yahweh to Christ, i.e., as the light, or as the firstborn of this union. Both of whom are individual beings, but both of which are part of the greater cosmic material body that is the body of Christ. Which is to say, Yahweh, like Christ, is an actual material being in the world, one in the spirit of God (/married and of one flesh with God) with real power in the world to move things according to God's will. (The obvious counterpoint to which is that Yahweh is the Father, not the Son. But I don't think that's much of an issue as the Father was once a Son too, and both can be thought of as part of the same greater body through their union with the spirit).

The other tendency may be to liken Yahweh to the spirit of God, to the ruach elohim, which is God's original form in Genesis 1:2 that joins with the material deep. But I think that would be a mistake. Yahweh has way too much unexplained power to be that. i.e., to be considered a spirit, and to limit God's power to the spiritual.

User avatar
1213
Savant
Posts: 11472
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
Location: Finland
Has thanked: 327 times
Been thanked: 374 times

Re: ˒ĕlōhı̂m: Plural Persons, or Majesty?

Post #5

Post by 1213 »

YourWordIsTruth wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:07 am In Genesis 1:26, we have the use of the plural, "let US make man in OUR Image, after OUR Likeness", which is not addressed to the "angels", as the Jews wrongly assume, as there is not a single verse in the Bible, that even hints humans are Created in the Image and Likeness of Created angels!
in a way that Genesis 1:26 hints so.
YourWordIsTruth wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:07 am I Isaiah 9:6, we have the Name of Jesus Christ in Prophecy, "’êl Gibbôr", which even the Jehovah's Witnesses translate as "Mighty God". In the next chapter, verse 21, we have Jehovah as "’êl Gibbôr". Two distinct Persons Who are equally called "’êl Gibbôr"

In Isaiah 48:16-17, in context, the Speaker Who is Sent, is clearly Yahweh, and He says that another Person, “Adonay Yahweh” (as in the Hebrew), has sent Him and the Spirit. Again, we have Two distinct Persons Who are equally called Yahweh.

In Zechariah 2:6-11, we have the Speaker Who is Yahweh, Who says that Another, Who is also Yahweh, has sent Him. Again Two Who are equally Yahweh.

In Malachi 3:1, the Speaker is "Yahweh of Hosts", Who speaks of His own Coming, in the Person of Jesus Christ, Who is also here called, "the Messenger of the Covenant". Isaiah 40:3, when read with Matthew 3:3, etc, is clear, that John the Baptist was the Forerunner of Yahweh, Who is Jesus Christ.

John 1:1 is also very clear, that Jesus Christ, Who is "the Word", and is "WITH God", showing a Personal distinction, is Himself, "God" (and the Word was God). In verse 18, in the best and oldest textual evidence, it reads, "God [the Father] no one has ever seen, the Unique God [Jesus Christ], Who is in the Bosom of the Father, He has made Him known". Two distinct Persons, who are equally GOD.

In Acts 5:3-4, we read of Ananias trying to deceive the Disciples, to which Peter says, that he was "lying to the Holy Spirit", which Peter goes on to say, was "lying to God". Clearly Another Person Who is God.

In Acts 13:2, we read, "As they ministered to the Lord, and fasted", and it goes on to say that the Holy Spirit responds, "the Holy Spirit said, Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them". They were called and sent by the Holy Spirit.

etc, etc
It is interesting how you can interpret those to mean Jesus is the God. I think it is wrong.

YourWordIsTruth
Student
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:41 am
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: ˒ĕlōhı̂m: Plural Persons, or Majesty?

Post #6

Post by YourWordIsTruth »

1213 wrote: Thu Nov 24, 2022 4:58 am
YourWordIsTruth wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:07 am In Genesis 1:26, we have the use of the plural, "let US make man in OUR Image, after OUR Likeness", which is not addressed to the "angels", as the Jews wrongly assume, as there is not a single verse in the Bible, that even hints humans are Created in the Image and Likeness of Created angels!
in a way that Genesis 1:26 hints so.
YourWordIsTruth wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 5:07 am I Isaiah 9:6, we have the Name of Jesus Christ in Prophecy, "’êl Gibbôr", which even the Jehovah's Witnesses translate as "Mighty God". In the next chapter, verse 21, we have Jehovah as "’êl Gibbôr". Two distinct Persons Who are equally called "’êl Gibbôr"

In Isaiah 48:16-17, in context, the Speaker Who is Sent, is clearly Yahweh, and He says that another Person, “Adonay Yahweh” (as in the Hebrew), has sent Him and the Spirit. Again, we have Two distinct Persons Who are equally called Yahweh.

In Zechariah 2:6-11, we have the Speaker Who is Yahweh, Who says that Another, Who is also Yahweh, has sent Him. Again Two Who are equally Yahweh.

In Malachi 3:1, the Speaker is "Yahweh of Hosts", Who speaks of His own Coming, in the Person of Jesus Christ, Who is also here called, "the Messenger of the Covenant". Isaiah 40:3, when read with Matthew 3:3, etc, is clear, that John the Baptist was the Forerunner of Yahweh, Who is Jesus Christ.

John 1:1 is also very clear, that Jesus Christ, Who is "the Word", and is "WITH God", showing a Personal distinction, is Himself, "God" (and the Word was God). In verse 18, in the best and oldest textual evidence, it reads, "God [the Father] no one has ever seen, the Unique God [Jesus Christ], Who is in the Bosom of the Father, He has made Him known". Two distinct Persons, who are equally GOD.

In Acts 5:3-4, we read of Ananias trying to deceive the Disciples, to which Peter says, that he was "lying to the Holy Spirit", which Peter goes on to say, was "lying to God". Clearly Another Person Who is God.

In Acts 13:2, we read, "As they ministered to the Lord, and fasted", and it goes on to say that the Holy Spirit responds, "the Holy Spirit said, Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them". They were called and sent by the Holy Spirit.

etc, etc
It is interesting how you can interpret those to mean Jesus is the God. I think it is wrong.
How can it be wrong, for Jesus Christ to be called Yahweh, as the Bible verse quoted for Him show, and no be GOD? Yahweh is the Eternal Name for Almighty God, which is very clear from Exodus 3:14-15, where the Speaker is Jesus Christ, as the passage shows, as does Jesus' Words in John 8:24-25, 58 do.

User avatar
William
Savant
Posts: 14187
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
Location: Te Waipounamu
Has thanked: 912 times
Been thanked: 1644 times
Contact:

Re: ˒ĕlōhı̂m: Plural Persons, or Majesty?

Post #7

Post by William »

[Replying to YourWordIsTruth in post #6]
But who was God's partner in Genesis 1? Surely there must be some other god that God joins with there if this theory holds any water? That too is a fairly obvious but disregarded fact (like the plurality of God). We see her in Genesis 1:2 where she is often glossed over and forgotten because she throws a wrench into any paternalistic theology:

"Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters."

The deep / sea and its waters strike a very feminine (womb-like) figure next to the spirit (seed!) of God, does it not? And we can almost feel the tension as the spirit of God hovers over her, and the two of them begin to create...
What you are describing here is a relationship between the Sun {Sol - born first} and the Earth.

The 'seed' are Sols photons and react in a particular way with the Earth, producing carbon-based life forms.

User avatar
1213
Savant
Posts: 11472
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
Location: Finland
Has thanked: 327 times
Been thanked: 374 times

Re: ˒ĕlōhı̂m: Plural Persons, or Majesty?

Post #8

Post by 1213 »

YourWordIsTruth wrote: Thu Nov 24, 2022 7:23 am ...
How can it be wrong, for Jesus Christ to be called Yahweh,...
Because:

there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus,
1 Timothy 2:5

This is eternal life, that they should know you, the only true God, and him whom you sent, Jesus Christ.
John 17:3

...the Father is greater than I.
John 14:28

If you think Jesus is the God, why not believe what he says?

Also, I think it is good to know this connection Jesus makes, which points out that he is not Yahweh.

He said to them, “How then does David in the Spirit call him Lord, saying, ‘The Lord said to my Lord, Sit on my right hand, Until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet?’
Matt. 22:43-44
A Psalm of David. The LORD [=Yahweh] said unto my Lord [=Adonai], Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.
Ps. 110:1

YourWordIsTruth
Student
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2022 3:41 am
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: ˒ĕlōhı̂m: Plural Persons, or Majesty?

Post #9

Post by YourWordIsTruth »

1213 wrote: Fri Nov 25, 2022 4:15 am
YourWordIsTruth wrote: Thu Nov 24, 2022 7:23 am ...
How can it be wrong, for Jesus Christ to be called Yahweh,...
Because:

there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus,
1 Timothy 2:5

This is eternal life, that they should know you, the only true God, and him whom you sent, Jesus Christ.
John 17:3

...the Father is greater than I.
John 14:28

If you think Jesus is the God, why not believe what he says?

Also, I think it is good to know this connection Jesus makes, which points out that he is not Yahweh.

He said to them, “How then does David in the Spirit call him Lord, saying, ‘The Lord said to my Lord, Sit on my right hand, Until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet?’
Matt. 22:43-44
A Psalm of David. The LORD [=Yahweh] said unto my Lord [=Adonai], Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.
Ps. 110:1
Jesus Christ after His Birth, is the God-Man, and in this state, He humbled Himself to the Father, which is why He can say "the Father is greater than I", because He came as a Servant

In John 5:23, Jesus says that He must be EQUALLY Honored with the Father, which is impossible if He is any "less" than the Father!

"that all may honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which sent Him"

User avatar
1213
Savant
Posts: 11472
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
Location: Finland
Has thanked: 327 times
Been thanked: 374 times

Re: ˒ĕlōhı̂m: Plural Persons, or Majesty?

Post #10

Post by 1213 »

YourWordIsTruth wrote: Fri Nov 25, 2022 5:00 am ....
In John 5:23, Jesus says that He must be EQUALLY Honored with the Father, which is impossible if He is any "less" than the Father!
...
Sorry, I disagree with that. Also, by what the Bible tells, Jesus represents God, what you do to Jesus, you do also to Him who sent Jesus.

“The King will answer them, ‘Most assuredly I tell you, inasmuch as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers [The word for “brothers” here may be also correctly translated “brothers and sisters” or “siblings.”], you did it to me.’ Then he will say also to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire which is prepared for the devil and his angels; for I was hungry, and you didn’t give me food to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave me no drink; I was a stranger, and you didn’t take me in; naked, and you didn’t clothe me; sick, and in prison, and you didn’t visit me.’ “Then they will also answer, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and didn’t help you?’ “Then he will answer them, saying, ‘Most assuredly I tell you, inasmuch as you didn’t do it to one of the least of these, you didn’t do it to me.’ These will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.”
Matt. 25:40-46

Most assuredly I tell you, he who receives whomever I send, receives me; and he who receives me, receives him who sent me.”
John 13:20

Post Reply