A dogmatic atheist flatly denies that there is a Divine Being.
A skeptical atheist doubts the ability of the human mind to determine, whether or not there is a God.
A critical atheist maintains that there is no valid proof for the existence of God.
Especially with the state that cosmology is in. I maintain that it is impossible for anyone to be a dogmatic atheist. If you think you are a dogmatic atheist then you must answer the question of what was there before this universe came into existence.
Question for debate: Is there such a thing as a dogmatic atheist?
Is there such a thing as a dogmatic atheist?
Moderator: Moderators
- EarthScienceguy
- Guru
- Posts: 2192
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:53 pm
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
- Contact:
- EarthScienceguy
- Guru
- Posts: 2192
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:53 pm
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
- Contact:
Re: Is there such a thing as a dogmatic atheist?
Post #31[Replying to Jose Fly in post #29]
This does not seem like much of a defense of atheism.So what's your view on the existence of Brahma, Vishnu, Allah, Odin, Zeus, etc.?
- Jose Fly
- Guru
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:30 pm
- Location: Out west somewhere
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 906 times
Re: Is there such a thing as a dogmatic atheist?
Post #32Because it wasn't intended to be one. How about answering the question now?EarthScienceguy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 01, 2022 2:47 pm [Replying to Jose Fly in post #29]
This does not seem like much of a defense of atheism.So what's your view on the existence of Brahma, Vishnu, Allah, Odin, Zeus, etc.?
Being apathetic is great....or not. I don't really care.
- EarthScienceguy
- Guru
- Posts: 2192
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:53 pm
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
- Contact:
Re: Is there such a thing as a dogmatic atheist?
Post #33[Replying to Jose Fly in post #32]
Can anyone defend the belief that there is no god?
That is outside of the OP. The OP is about defending atheism not a defense of theism. Can anyone make a convincing defense for atheism?Because it wasn't intended to be one. How about answering the question now?
Can anyone defend the belief that there is no god?
- Miles
- Savant
- Posts: 5179
- Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 4:19 pm
- Has thanked: 434 times
- Been thanked: 1614 times
Re: Is there such a thing as a dogmatic atheist?
Post #34Nope. It's in answer to your: ". . . my question is will anyone actually try to defend the dogmatic stance that there is no God?"EarthScienceguy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 01, 2022 2:39 pm [Replying to Miles in post #26]
That is your defense of dogmatic atheism.AH HA! Now we get a question, and the first one in our exchange no less, although it has nothing to do with your claim that "Because to say there is no god means you are proclaiming that you know what there was before this universe began." However, in answer to your question here; having seen some atheists take such a stance I believe some would indeed try to defend it. After all, Christians defend the existence of god with nothing more than unreliable oral folklore and the questionable writings of ancient scribes, plus the many failed arguments of more recent apologists.
But atheism never had any scientific underpinnings to lose. Do you not know what atheism is? .. FYI, It's either a denial of the existence of god because of a lack of convincing evidence, OR it's a lack of belief in the existence of god because of a lack of convincing evidence. Most atheists are of the latter variety.Atheism has lost is scientific underpinnings because of the failure of materialism to explain the universe.
Sure there is. It's for the same reason most theists say there are no woodland faeries, flying unicorns, or ogres. Or do you think faeries, flying unicorns, and ogres may actually exist?So there is no way for anyone to say that there is no God.
.
- Jose Fly
- Guru
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:30 pm
- Location: Out west somewhere
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 906 times
Re: Is there such a thing as a dogmatic atheist?
Post #35LOL....never ask a creationist questions unless you're prepared to spend lots of time chasing them around, trying to get them to answer.EarthScienceguy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 01, 2022 4:19 pm [Replying to Jose Fly in post #32]
That is outside of the OP. The OP is about defending atheism not a defense of theism. Can anyone make a convincing defense for atheism?Because it wasn't intended to be one. How about answering the question now?
Can anyone defend the belief that there is no god?
Given how often you've repeated this behavior of ducking and dodging questions and such, I always wonder if it's ever struck you that maybe, just maybe, it's an indication of the inherent weakness of your positions. I don't harbor any illusion that you've engaged in that sort of introspection of course.
Being apathetic is great....or not. I don't really care.
- Diogenes
- Guru
- Posts: 1308
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2020 12:53 pm
- Location: Washington
- Has thanked: 864 times
- Been thanked: 1266 times
Re: Is there such a thing as a dogmatic atheist?
Post #36This is an odd debate topic in that a definition of a "dogmatic atheist" has been given; one who denies there is a divine being. The definition of a 'skeptical atheist' is even more problematic. The skeptic simply doubts there is a god; he is 'skeptical' of God's existence.EarthScienceguy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 28, 2022 3:05 pm A dogmatic atheist flatly denies that there is a Divine Being.
A skeptical atheist doubts the ability of the human mind to determine, whether or not there is a God.
A critical atheist maintains that there is no valid proof for the existence of God.
Especially with the state that cosmology is in. I maintain that it is impossible for anyone to be a dogmatic atheist. If you think you are a dogmatic atheist then you must answer the question of what was there before this universe came into existence.
Question for debate: Is there such a thing as a dogmatic atheist?
I'd say the definition offered for a 'critical atheist' is closest to what most atheists claim is their position.
But what is the point of asking if there are those who "flatly deny there is a divine being?"
I flatly deny there is a divine being but reject the label "dogmatic atheist." Christian theologians like Paul Tillich also deny God is a being. They assert God is much more than a mere 'being.' In fact, thinking of God as a being is a primitive concept that better fits gods like Zeus and Odin rather than a sophisticated "God" who does not merely exist, but is beyond existence; not a being, but 'the very ground of being,' to use Tillich's terminology.
The other thing that strikes me is 'Why are so many theists (apparently) obsessed with the definition of "atheist?"'
* * *
Something that puzzles me in the OP is the claim there are no 'dogmatic atheists.' I tend to agree in that being dogmatic about one's beliefs seems more the province of the theist or religionist.' The definition of 'dogmatic' is 'one who is inclined to lay down principles as incontrovertibly true' and is generally viewed as a fault. Atheists, I agree, tend to not be dogmatic. Rather they contend there is no evidence of a God (at least as defined by the dogmatic theist).
___________________________________
“Before You Embark On A Journey Of Revenge, Dig Two Graves”
— Confucius
“Before You Embark On A Journey Of Revenge, Dig Two Graves”
— Confucius
- EarthScienceguy
- Guru
- Posts: 2192
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:53 pm
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
- Contact:
Re: Is there such a thing as a dogmatic atheist?
Post #37[Replying to Diogenes in post #0]
You say you like the critical atheist but that is not an atheist that is the definition of an agnostic, someone that believes there is not enough information to know whether there is a god or not.
3 of the major cosmological theories describe the beginning of the universe and describe an esoteric universe in which nothing exists.
1. Alien program
2. Black hole
3. Boltzmann Brain
The other one describes a universe in which there are an infinite number of universes.
Multiverse
Notice nothing describes the universe that we observe. One universe
Because that is what atheist means an anti theist, or no theist, no God. I find it fascinating that there are very few if any atheists that will "flatly deny there is a divine being when that is what atheist means.This is an odd debate topic in that a definition of a "dogmatic atheist" has been given; one who denies there is a divine being. The definition of a 'skeptical atheist' is even more problematic. The skeptic simply doubts there is a god; he is 'skeptical' of God's existence.
I'd say the definition offered for a 'critical atheist' is closest to what most atheists claim is their position.
But what is the point of asking if there are those who "flatly deny there is a divine being?
You say you like the critical atheist but that is not an atheist that is the definition of an agnostic, someone that believes there is not enough information to know whether there is a god or not.
Why? Because you know that atheism has lost all of its scientific underpinnings.I flatly deny there is a divine being but reject the label "dogmatic atheist."
3 of the major cosmological theories describe the beginning of the universe and describe an esoteric universe in which nothing exists.
1. Alien program
2. Black hole
3. Boltzmann Brain
The other one describes a universe in which there are an infinite number of universes.
Multiverse
Notice nothing describes the universe that we observe. One universe
Tillich says that God is more than just a being. He does not deny the existence of God. He does not deny the personhood of God. So I am not sure what you are saying.Christian theologians like Paul Tillich also deny God is a being. They assert God is much more than a mere 'being.' In fact, thinking of God as a being is a primitive concept that better fits gods like Zeus and Odin rather than a sophisticated "God" who does not merely exist, but is beyond existence; not a being, but 'the very ground of being,' to use Tillich's terminology.
I am not sure why you think this. But there is no such thing as an atheist, it appears because no one really wants to try to defend their belief that there is no God. Especially, how a universe without a god explains what we observe in this universe.The other thing that strikes me is 'Why are so many theists (apparently) obsessed with the definition of "atheist?"'
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2572 times
Re: Is there such a thing as a dogmatic atheist?
Post #38Those who claim a god or gods exist can't show they speak truth. Atheism 101.EarthScienceguy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 01, 2022 4:19 pm [Replying to Jose Fly in post #32]
That is outside of the OP. The OP is about defending atheism not a defense of theism. Can anyone make a convincing defense for atheism?Because it wasn't intended to be one. How about answering the question now?
Can anyone defend the belief that there is no god?
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
- Clownboat
- Savant
- Posts: 9374
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
- Has thanked: 906 times
- Been thanked: 1258 times
Re: Is there such a thing as a dogmatic atheist?
Post #39This would be true only if it was known that there are in fact gods. How many gods are there and how did you come to this conclusion?
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.
I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU
It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco
If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb
I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU
It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco
If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb
- EarthScienceguy
- Guru
- Posts: 2192
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:53 pm
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
- Contact:
Re: Is there such a thing as a dogmatic atheist?
Post #40[Replying to Miles in post #0]
Your definition above describes atheism as a "psychological belief, it cannot be defined as a proposition at all even if thesim is a proposition" https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/
"if atheism is defined as a psychological state, then no proposition can count as a form of atheism because a proposition is not a psychological state." https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/
Anthony Kenny agnostic:
So you are not an atheist at all. You are an agnostic why do not just say you are an agnostic?But atheism never had any scientific underpinnings to lose. Do you not know what atheism is? .. FYI, It's either a denial of the existence of god because of a lack of convincing evidence, OR it's a lack of belief in the existence of god because of a lack of convincing evidence. Most atheists are of the latter variety.
Your definition above describes atheism as a "psychological belief, it cannot be defined as a proposition at all even if thesim is a proposition" https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/
"if atheism is defined as a psychological state, then no proposition can count as a form of atheism because a proposition is not a psychological state." https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/
Anthony Kenny agnostic:
Atheism philosophically is the belief that there is no god.written by the agnostic, Anthony Kenny (1983: 84–85):
I do not myself know of any argument for the existence of God which I find convincing; in all of them I think I can find flaws. Equally, I do not know of any argument against the existence of God which is totally convincing; in the arguments I know against the existence of God I can equally find flaws. So that my own position on the existence of God is agnostic.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/
So there is no way for anyone to say that there is no God. If you define atheism as a lack of belief in god.This definition is also found in multiple encyclopedias and dictionaries of philosophy. For example, in the Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, William L. Rowe (also an atheist) writes, “Atheism is the position that affirms the nonexistence of God. It proposes positive disbelief rather than mere suspension of belief” (2000: 62). The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy recognizes multiple senses of the word “atheism”, but is clear about which is standard in philosophy:
[Atheism is] the view that there are no gods. A widely used sense denotes merely not believing in god and is consistent with agnosticism [in the psychological sense]. A stricter sense denotes a belief that there is no god; this use has become standard. (Pojman 2015, emphasis added https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/
No it is not the same reason. Theists say dogmatically that yes there is a God. Theists say dogmatically that there is no such thing as woodland faeries, unicorns and the like. That is not what you are saying with your definition you are not saying that they do not exist you are saying that there is simply just not enough evidence for you to believe that they do not exist. So for you, there is a possibility that woodland faeries, unicorns, and ogres do exist according to your definition of atheism.Sure there is. It's for the same reason most theists say there are no woodland faeries, flying unicorns, or ogres.