Since we only see life come from living beings reproducing said life, the onus is on the abiogenesist to demonstrate the opposite is possible. And no, not showing some ideal condition in the labs leading to the formation of molecular RNA or whatnot; rather, that it is plausible for a primordial earth environment to emanate life. As this has never been demonstrated, I do not believe life originated from non-life, and therefore I look to an Origin of life that is also living.
If one wants to deny the validity of miracles, that they break what is empirically verifiable of Nature's laws, then in the same manner one must accept this same logic. Otherwise, one would have to admit at least one miracle: life coming from non-life.
Argument Against Miracles, Argument Against Abiogenesis
Moderator: Moderators
-
Dimmesdale
- Sage
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2017 7:19 pm
- Location: Vaikuntha Dham
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 89 times
Argument Against Miracles, Argument Against Abiogenesis
Post #1"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough." - Albert Einstein
-
Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8495
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2148 times
- Been thanked: 2295 times
Re: Argument Against Miracles, Argument Against Abiogenesis
Post #2[Replying to Dimmesdale in post #1]
Moderator Action
Moved to Random Ramblings. Please review the Rules and Tips on starting a debate topic.
Moderator Action
Moved to Random Ramblings. Please review the Rules and Tips on starting a debate topic.
