[
Replying to achilles12604 in post #5]
Beowulf vs Leonidas . . .
The one is mythology who fought against rather fictional giants, while the other historical commander fought against a known as real military threat.
Alexander vs Robert E. Lee . . .
Hard. Evolution of military tactics for example was not yet really on the rise in Alex's time, but basic stuff in Bobbys time.
Jesus versus Paul versus Mahatma Gandhi
Jesus and Gandhi both seem to have gotten their worldviews from Jainism, a branch of Hinduism.
Paul of his Letters or the other Paul of acts may have been a sort of Joseph Smith, if you know what I mean.
Jesus and Paul both accepted slavery as natural comfort not to be spoken up against, while Gandhi showed to be an enemy of the black race which he found inferior.
All three in this were normal offsprings of their time of course.
“If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. But if you drown a man in a fish pond, he will never have to go hungry again
”
"Only Experts in Reformed Egyptian should be allowed to critique the Book of Mormon
"
"Joseph Smith can't possibly have been a deceiver.
For if he had been, the Angel Moroni never would have taken the risk of enthrusting him with the Golden Plates
"