Atheists are 'discriminated against'?

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
stubbornone
Banned
Banned
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:10 am

Atheists are 'discriminated against'?

Post #1

Post by stubbornone »

Well, here is the story:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/blake-pag ... 32279.html

"While there are certainly numerous problems with the developmental program at West Point and all service academies, the tipping point of my decision to resign was the realization that countless officers here and throughout the military are guilty of blatantly violating the oaths they swore to defend the Constitution. These men and women are criminals, complicit in light of day defiance of the Uniform Code of Military Justice through unconstitutional proselytism, discrimination against the non-religious and establishing formal policies to reward, encourage and even at times require sectarian religious participation."

Yep, in this 'long gray line' of hypocrisy and discrimination, our hero above lists ... not a single instance of this supposedly pervasive trend in the military. So, here are some things that our oppressed atheists have to ... painfully tolerate.

#1 - Prayers, those who are religious, and there are many different denominations BTW, will pray. Those who wish to pray collectively are allowed to do - freedom of religious expression is a protected right. Being unconscionably offended by someone else's expression of religion is ... aside from making you a total wanker ... also not about the US Constitution.

#2 - No doubt, just like our hero here, religious groups are afforded space and time to pray and organize, as does the author of this article. Somehow though, allowing others to practice their faith is intolerable to him? But his .. er, religious? views must be afforded sole consideration?

Beyond that, the military really doesn't give a hoop about your faith. It encourages you to have one, in anything, but only because it helps, scientifically proven, to deal with the rigors of combat. You want to be Pagan? More power too ya. You want to be atheist? Great, but we'd encourage you to explore secular humanism, if only to have a non-affiliative source that will help you deal with the emotional aspect of combat.

Somehow, this approach is ... intolerable to young atheists? Science and the effects of combat on human beings are to be rejected in favor of hyperbole?

Well, I for one hope the Army recoups its entire investment in this gravely discriminated dork - who is SO discriminated against that they allowed him into the school, trained him, educated him, allowed him to freely practice and organize his faith - indeed even be a student leader ... and this was intolerable disrespect because the Army didn't shut down everyone else's faith? Prevent the criticism of his precious choices?

Not only will this be an expensive life lesson, but when young atheist super hero joins the actual work force, he'll quickly discover that no employer anywhere appreciates a young crusader who pisses off all their religious clients. What then atheist hero?

The Army is there to win wars. Businesses are there to make money. This guy? Has a lot to learn about how the world works and the costs of excessive pride and rationalization.

I for one advocate that we let him learn that lesson. The last thing our boys need in combat is some wanker talking about how much worse he has it than everyone else around him.

stubbornone
Banned
Banned
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:10 am

Post #101

Post by stubbornone »

Danmark wrote:
stubbornone wrote:
I look forward to an actual argument from an atheist in this thread.
I suppose fleas look forward to arguments with dogs, but there is little in it for the dog.
So sayeth the flea.

And that is why is a good idea for an atheist child to resign from West Point because he is a victim of discrimination and really, despite atheists serving honorably and without issue, he just has no choice. :-k

Bust Nak
Savant
Posts: 9874
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 am
Location: Planet Earth
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 266 times

Post #102

Post by Bust Nak »

stubbornone wrote: I look forward to an actual argument from an atheist in this thread.
Then debate. I've been waiting for the best part of a week for you address my points here and here.

You don't have to answer every point, just focus on these two main points:

1) Mandatory Christian prayer session is a violation of Mr. Page religious freedom.
2) Seeking to stop Christian prayer session from being mandatory does not violate anyone's religious freedom.

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20844
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 363 times
Contact:

Post #103

Post by otseng »

Moderator Action

This thread had potential, but started off on the wrong foot and hasn't gotten much better.

In the future, avoid any name-calling and personal comments.

Closing the thread.


______________

Moderator actions indicate that a thread/post has been locked, moved, merged, or split.

Locked