Back to the Garden

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Tcg
Savant
Posts: 8667
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
Location: Third Stone
Has thanked: 2257 times
Been thanked: 2369 times

Back to the Garden

Post #1

Post by Tcg »

We are often admonished by some to not take literally the story of Adam and Eve in the Garden. It is to be understood as a story that represents a deeper truth we are told.

What would it mean if we could go back to the Garden?

What would we gain back that we have somehow lost?


Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.

- American Atheists


Not believing isn't the same as believing not.

- wiploc


I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.

- Irvin D. Yalom

JJ50
Banned
Banned
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 6:22 am

Post #2

Post by JJ50 »

There is no evidence that nonsense story was anymore than a fairy tale.

benchwarmer
Prodigy
Posts: 2510
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:40 am
Has thanked: 2337 times
Been thanked: 960 times

Re: Back to the Garden

Post #3

Post by benchwarmer »

[Replying to post 1 by Tcg]

Apparently we would lose the knowledge of good and evil. In other words, we would be able to do whatever we please and not be bothered whether something might be evil or not.

User avatar
marco
Savant
Posts: 12314
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: Scotland
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Back to the Garden

Post #4

Post by marco »

Tcg wrote:
What would it mean if we could go back to the Garden?

What would we gain back that we have somehow lost?



The word "Garden" tells us we are in poetry, and in poetry we can have wings and wondrous powers.

We have lost much of our hair and our sharp tusks. We speak, rather than grunt. We have allowed our female companions, sometimes, to pull us along by the hair and even be our equals. We still call some men Adam and some women Eve, but usually we put on clothes for going out to collect apples.


It takes a certain mysterious faith to regard Genesis as literal. I think this faith would be incompatible with human scientific progress.

User avatar
1213
Savant
Posts: 12735
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
Location: Finland
Has thanked: 443 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: Back to the Garden

Post #5

Post by 1213 »

Tcg wrote: ...What would it mean if we could go back to the Garden?
...
It was a place where evil would be expelled, therefore I would say it is a place without evil. It is also place where people didn’t have to work. That is why I would say, I would get peace in there, if I would have that opportunity.
My new book can be read freely from here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view

Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html

JJ50
Banned
Banned
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 6:22 am

Post #6

Post by JJ50 »

God supposedly created everything, so that would have included evil. It would have been an evil presence in that mythical garden.

User avatar
Tcg
Savant
Posts: 8667
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
Location: Third Stone
Has thanked: 2257 times
Been thanked: 2369 times

Re: Back to the Garden

Post #7

Post by Tcg »

marco wrote:
It takes a certain mysterious faith to regard Genesis as literal. I think this faith would be incompatible with human scientific progress.

I agree. What are we left with though? How do we determine the figurative truth the author intended to convey?


Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.

- American Atheists


Not believing isn't the same as believing not.

- wiploc


I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.

- Irvin D. Yalom

User avatar
Tcg
Savant
Posts: 8667
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
Location: Third Stone
Has thanked: 2257 times
Been thanked: 2369 times

Re: Back to the Garden

Post #8

Post by Tcg »

1213 wrote:
Tcg wrote: ...What would it mean if we could go back to the Garden?
...
It was a place where evil would be expelled, therefore I would say it is a place without evil
The serpent was there so I'm not sure this is correct.

It is also place where people didn’t have to work.
Actually, Adam was given the task of tending the Garden before the fall. The difference was that it was pleasantly productive work absent weeds and thorns and such.

That is why I would say, I would get peace in there, if I would have that opportunity.
Pleasant work would be peaceful until the serpent tempted you to distrust God.


Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.

- American Atheists


Not believing isn't the same as believing not.

- wiploc


I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.

- Irvin D. Yalom

User avatar
Tcg
Savant
Posts: 8667
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
Location: Third Stone
Has thanked: 2257 times
Been thanked: 2369 times

Post #9

Post by Tcg »

JJ50 wrote: God supposedly created everything, so that would have included evil. It would have been an evil presence in that mythical garden.

Yes indeed. It seems that is what the serpent represents. It's easy to focus on the beautiful Garden and overlook the lurking evil God planted.


Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.

- American Atheists


Not believing isn't the same as believing not.

- wiploc


I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.

- Irvin D. Yalom

User avatar
marco
Savant
Posts: 12314
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: Scotland
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Back to the Garden

Post #10

Post by marco »

Tcg wrote:

I agree. What are we left with though? How do we determine the figurative truth the author intended to convey?
Determining a figurative meaning is not a difficulty unless we take the text to be some divine communication. If we do then we might be disappointed in God for his failure to be crystal clear.

Though I prefer classical mythology where one has Prometheus bringing men fire and getting horribly punished, Genesis does try hard to be interesting. The idea is the same: God wants to withhold something from man and some bad being communicates it, causing God to be enraged. There is lots of humour in the Adam and Eve story that is absent from the serious Greek tale. The ridiculous hide-and-seek stuff with God shouting !I can see you!" would not appear in Greek mythology. Genesis comes closer to Hans Andersen without the rich narrative.

Post Reply