At what stage does the foetus become a person?

Creationism, Evolution, and other science issues

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20984
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 218 times
Been thanked: 393 times
Contact:

At what stage does the foetus become a person?

Post #1

Post by otseng »

From Murder of abortion provider George Tiller:
bernee51 wrote:
MagusYanam wrote:
bernee51 wrote:At what stage in gestation does the foetus become a 'full human being'?
If pressed on the issue, I would argue that it is not until a baby is able to understand some form of language with explicit lexical content that it attains the full status of personhood with all the rights due to it. But that would take far too long to explain here.
I am tending toward a detemination based on when the complex neo-cortex develops to a stage where it supports self aware consciousness.
For debate:
At what stage in gestation does the foetus become a 'full human being'?

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: At what stage does the foetus become a person?

Post #2

Post by Goat »

otseng wrote:From Murder of abortion provider George Tiller:
bernee51 wrote:
MagusYanam wrote:
bernee51 wrote:At what stage in gestation does the foetus become a 'full human being'?
If pressed on the issue, I would argue that it is not until a baby is able to understand some form of language with explicit lexical content that it attains the full status of personhood with all the rights due to it. But that would take far too long to explain here.
I am tending toward a detemination based on when the complex neo-cortex develops to a stage where it supports self aware consciousness.
For debate:
At what stage in gestation does the foetus become a 'full human being'?
There has been great debate about this for many years. I would say that when it becomes viable outside the womb without mechanical intervention... or if it gets outside the womb and can breath on it's own.. even badly.

The typical date given is 24 weeks.. although there is a great bit of debate about the weeks 21 to 24. I suspect some individuals mature faster in the womb than others.

I think that it is perfectly reasonable to restrict abortion after 21 weeks unless the woman's health or well being is at risk (and not just psychological)... or the fetus is deformed or not otherwise viable.

I am sure it is very rare that a woman that is 21+ weeks along suddenly changes her mind about pregnancy, and that the so called 'late term abortions' are considered a terrible tragedy by the women who need them.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: At what stage does the foetus become a person?

Post #3

Post by McCulloch »

bernee51 wrote:I am tending toward a detemination based on when the complex neo-cortex develops to a stage where it supports self aware consciousness.
goat wrote:There has been great debate about this for many years. I would say that when it becomes viable outside the womb without mechanical intervention... or if it gets outside the womb and can breath on it's own.. even badly.
I'd go with Bernee on this one. It seems more consistent with our definition of death. I'm not dead just because I am no longer viable, without mechanical intervention, but I am dead when my neo-cortex no longer can support self-aware consciousness.
goat wrote:I think that it is perfectly reasonable to restrict abortion after 21 weeks unless the woman's health or well being is at risk (and not just psychological) ... or the fetus is deformed or not otherwise viable.
I would not minimize the impact of psychological factors. However, I would agree that it would be reasonable to impose greater restrictions for abortions after 21 weeks than earlier, but only after the barriers to abortion are removed for those before 22 weeks.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

User avatar
MagusYanam
Guru
Posts: 1562
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:57 pm
Location: Providence, RI (East Side)

Post #4

Post by MagusYanam »

McCulloch wrote:I'd go with Bernee on this one. It seems more consistent with our definition of death. I'm not dead just because I am no longer viable, without mechanical intervention, but I am dead when my neo-cortex no longer can support self-aware consciousness.
Fine, but my point in the other thread is that we cannot know that self-aware consciousness is there until a baby actually starts responding to spoken language and understanding specific lexical content. It is through language that we begin to grasp what we are capable of beyond stimulus-response (pain, pleasure, hunger, &c.). That was why I was reluctant to place personhood on a pre-linguistic stage of human development.
If I am capable of grasping God objectively, I do not believe, but precisely because I cannot do this I must believe.

- Søren Kierkegaard

My blog

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20984
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 218 times
Been thanked: 393 times
Contact:

Post #5

Post by otseng »

So, it seems like there's a consensus that after 21 weeks, it is a person. This is better than I originally expected. So, let me ask a followup question. If it is a person at 21 weeks, would the baby have the same rights as any other person?

Gonzo
Apprentice
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 3:17 pm

Post #6

Post by Gonzo »

No, children don't even have all the rights of adults.

User avatar
Cathar1950
Site Supporter
Posts: 10503
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 12:12 pm
Location: Michigan(616)
Been thanked: 2 times

Post #7

Post by Cathar1950 »

otseng wrote:So, it seems like there's a consensus that after 21 weeks, it is a person. This is better than I originally expected. So, let me ask a followup question. If it is a person at 21 weeks, would the baby have the same rights as any other person?
What consensus would that be? I am willing for the sake of your question to let a questionable consensus stand as when they are a person isn't really relevant to your question. I would think they would have the same rights as a baby or a corporation. I can't really disagree as I have no idea when a human is a person or what a person might actually be, Corporations are persons, masks such as the Trinity are persons but what really makes a person?

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20984
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 218 times
Been thanked: 393 times
Contact:

Post #8

Post by otseng »

OK, I'll be more specific, does a 21 week baby in utero have the same rights as a baby after being born?

User avatar
Cathar1950
Site Supporter
Posts: 10503
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 12:12 pm
Location: Michigan(616)
Been thanked: 2 times

Post #9

Post by Cathar1950 »

otseng wrote:OK, I'll be more specific, does a 21 week baby in utero have the same rights as a baby after being born?
I guess you would have to check the books or laws on that one.
Can it survive without its mother?

Do they give funerals to a fetus that is 21 weeks old?

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Post #10

Post by Goat »

otseng wrote:So, it seems like there's a consensus that after 21 weeks, it is a person. This is better than I originally expected. So, let me ask a followup question. If it is a person at 21 weeks, would the baby have the same rights as any other person?
No, not quite.. it is not yet born. It still is connected to someone else's nervous system, and has not experinced 'the breath of life'.

While I will agree that abortions should be much more restrictive, non-viable or deformed feotus should be able to be aborted at the consent of the mother, and
also if the health of the mother is at high risk
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

Post Reply