50,000 errors in Bible

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
TrueReligion
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1385
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:03 am

50,000 errors in Bible

Post #1

Post by TrueReligion »

The Jehovah's Witnesses in their "AWAKE!" Magazine dated 8 September, 1957, carried this startling headline " "50000 ERRORS IN THE BIBLE?" (See below for the reproduction).

http://www.jamaat.net/bible/AwakeArticle(1957).html

What the christians have to say in this, is still remaining or they are removed? if removed? how many remaining now?

Then how come it becomes word of God?

User avatar
handofnergal
Apprentice
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 9:38 pm
Location: Mount Vernon, NY

Post #101

Post by handofnergal »

Why would anyone claiming to be inspired by any kind of all-powerful being need to contradict himself so much?

why didn't any of the prophets give humanity a working germ theory or something useful, like medicines, a pulley, or geometry?

prophets always give us stupid stuff like holy texts that are confusing and repulsive and brainwash people with cognitive dissonance.

You know very well why the holy texts have contradictions but are too chicken to say why...the scribes didn't have spellcheck or editors, and God is an imaginary being.
TrueReligion wrote: Its debate site, where statements dont work, what all you said, is your statements without proof and evidence,
My proof that there are no mention of germs and pulleys in the Bible is the Bible itself. There are no mentions of them in it, the prophets gave us useless knowledge, you may say that that's an opinion, but it's based on what is (and isnt) in the Bible.
TrueReligion wrote:bring proof of something lie or contradiction in book,
I gave you a link for a website with a bunch, you just gloseed over it and then cherry picked a few from it. Why should we do all the work for you? How about this: why is it that the geneology of Christ is only mentioned in two gospels (Luke and Matthew) and they don't even match up? We'll start with those
TrueReligion wrote:and bring your proof as well if universe came in existence by itself and man was created by chance.
I cant prove that because it might not have, and with all due rspect, that is a straw man misrepresentation of our side - the only people claiming that we believe in random chance is your side.

TrueReligion
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1385
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:03 am

Post #102

Post by TrueReligion »

handofnergal wrote:Why would anyone claiming to be inspired by any kind of all-powerful being need to contradict himself so much?

why didn't any of the prophets give humanity a working germ theory or something useful, like medicines, a pulley, or geometry?

prophets always give us stupid stuff like holy texts that are confusing and repulsive and brainwash people with cognitive dissonance.

You know very well why the holy texts have contradictions but are too chicken to say why...the scribes didn't have spellcheck or editors, and God is an imaginary being.
TrueReligion wrote: Its debate site, where statements dont work, what all you said, is your statements without proof and evidence,
My proof that there are no mention of germs and pulleys in the Bible is the Bible itself. There are no mentions of them in it, the prophets gave us useless knowledge, you may say that that's an opinion, but it's based on what is (and isnt) in the Bible.

So you mean the prophets should have given you nuclear formula? or told people how to make super computer,and give a good antivirus program?
Prophets gave good teachings and morals of life, if follow those path, life will be much simpler and peace will prevail for sure.

TrueReligion wrote:bring proof of something lie or contradiction in book,
I gave you a link for a website with a bunch, you just gloseed over it and then cherry picked a few from it. Why should we do all the work for you? How about this: why is it that the geneology of Christ is only mentioned in two gospels (Luke and Matthew) and they don't even match up? We'll start with those

I'am not talking about bible, I can post many of contradictons and errors of them, you give me site name, but where should I reply to those contradictions? on that site itselfor to you here?
TrueReligion wrote:and bring your proof as well if universe came in existence by itself and man was created by chance.
I cant prove that because it might not have, and with all due rspect, that is a straw man misrepresentation of our side - the only people claiming that we believe in random chance is your side.
So tell me sir, as athiests claim that humans came by slow process , and etcetc, so which 1 came 1st? man or woman? wats the proof specify that also please.

User avatar
Cathar1950
Site Supporter
Posts: 10503
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 12:12 pm
Location: Michigan(616)
Been thanked: 2 times

Post #103

Post by Cathar1950 »

TrueReligion wrote:
handofnergal wrote:Why would anyone claiming to be inspired by any kind of all-powerful being need to contradict himself so much?

why didn't any of the prophets give humanity a working germ theory or something useful, like medicines, a pulley, or geometry?

prophets always give us stupid stuff like holy texts that are confusing and repulsive and brainwash people with cognitive dissonance.

You know very well why the holy texts have contradictions but are too chicken to say why...the scribes didn't have spellcheck or editors, and God is an imaginary being.
TrueReligion wrote: Its debate site, where statements dont work, what all you said, is your statements without proof and evidence,
My proof that there are no mention of germs and pulleys in the Bible is the Bible itself. There are no mentions of them in it, the prophets gave us useless knowledge, you may say that that's an opinion, but it's based on what is (and isnt) in the Bible.

So you mean the prophets should have given you nuclear formula? or told people how to make super computer,and give a good antivirus program?
Prophets gave good teachings and morals of life, if follow those path, life will be much simpler and peace will prevail for sure.

TrueReligion wrote:bring proof of something lie or contradiction in book,
I gave you a link for a website with a bunch, you just gloseed over it and then cherry picked a few from it. Why should we do all the work for you? How about this: why is it that the geneology of Christ is only mentioned in two gospels (Luke and Matthew) and they don't even match up? We'll start with those

I'am not talking about bible, I can post many of contradictons and errors of them, you give me site name, but where should I reply to those contradictions? on that site itselfor to you here?
TrueReligion wrote:and bring your proof as well if universe came in existence by itself and man was created by chance.
I cant prove that because it might not have, and with all due rspect, that is a straw man misrepresentation of our side - the only people claiming that we believe in random chance is your side.
So tell me sir, as athiests claim that humans came by slow process , and etcetc, so which 1 came 1st? man or woman? wats the proof specify that also please.
Which came first a female mouse or a male mouse?
They evolved together. First might have been asexual before there was a division of sex for reproduction.

Do you have some purpose for this silly question and how is it relevant?

TrueReligion
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1385
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:03 am

Post #104

Post by TrueReligion »

Cathar1950 wrote:
TrueReligion wrote:
handofnergal wrote:Why would anyone claiming to be inspired by any kind of all-powerful being need to contradict himself so much?

why didn't any of the prophets give humanity a working germ theory or something useful, like medicines, a pulley, or geometry?

prophets always give us stupid stuff like holy texts that are confusing and repulsive and brainwash people with cognitive dissonance.

You know very well why the holy texts have contradictions but are too chicken to say why...the scribes didn't have spellcheck or editors, and God is an imaginary being.
TrueReligion wrote: Its debate site, where statements dont work, what all you said, is your statements without proof and evidence,
My proof that there are no mention of germs and pulleys in the Bible is the Bible itself. There are no mentions of them in it, the prophets gave us useless knowledge, you may say that that's an opinion, but it's based on what is (and isnt) in the Bible.

So you mean the prophets should have given you nuclear formula? or told people how to make super computer,and give a good antivirus program?
Prophets gave good teachings and morals of life, if follow those path, life will be much simpler and peace will prevail for sure.

TrueReligion wrote:bring proof of something lie or contradiction in book,
I gave you a link for a website with a bunch, you just gloseed over it and then cherry picked a few from it. Why should we do all the work for you? How about this: why is it that the geneology of Christ is only mentioned in two gospels (Luke and Matthew) and they don't even match up? We'll start with those

I'am not talking about bible, I can post many of contradictons and errors of them, you give me site name, but where should I reply to those contradictions? on that site itselfor to you here?
TrueReligion wrote:and bring your proof as well if universe came in existence by itself and man was created by chance.
I cant prove that because it might not have, and with all due rspect, that is a straw man misrepresentation of our side - the only people claiming that we believe in random chance is your side.
So tell me sir, as athiests claim that humans came by slow process , and etcetc, so which 1 came 1st? man or woman? wats the proof specify that also please.
Which came first a female mouse or a male mouse?
They evolved together. First might have been asexual before there was a division of sex for reproduction.

Do you have some purpose for this silly question and how is it relevant?
Its for athiests, who deny unknowngly the existence of God,
Now if you are an athiest, and as you used the logic of "First might have been asexual before there was a division of sex for reproduction." This means its an assumption, so do athiests make their claim just by assumption,and never any evidence is produced by them.

Anyway back tothe topic, the errors in Bible till now no christian can defend, and again its proved that the Bible is changed by human minds and hands, for pety and money gain.

Post Reply