Is god the source of all things spiritual

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
bernee51
Site Supporter
Posts: 7813
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Australia

Is god the source of all things spiritual

Post #1

Post by bernee51 »

This (god is the source of all things spiritual) is a claim made by a poster in another thread. I of the opinion that god belief (but obviously not god fact ;)) is perhaps necessary for early spiritual development. However as we as humans develop spiritually god belief is not only unnecessary but attachment to the mythic could in fact hinder spiritual growth.

What was stated in that thread, and I think, generally agreed upon, was that spirituality does develop, evolve. There are some major stages to spiritual unfolding. One can believe in spirit, have faith in spirit, directly experience spirit and become spirit.

Belief is the earliest and perhaps most common orientation to spirit. As belief requires images, symbols and concepts it clearly originates in the mental and, like the mental, it goes through several transitional stages.

Magic belief is egocentric in that there is a belief that the individual self can affect the physical world and other people. Voodoo and sympathetic magic (pointing the bone in Australian Aboriginal culture) fall into this category.

Then comes mythic belief. This is socio or ethnocentric, different people have different myths that are mutually exclusive. Here spiritual intuitions are invested in a physically disembodied god (or goddess) who has ultimate power over humanity. I think we can safely assume that there are some who post here who would fit in that group.

From here we go to rational belief that attempts to demythologise the belief structure and portray the deity, not as an anthropomorphic entity, but as an ultimate ground of being. Harvey comes to mindbut oft times he seems to have a foot in both camps.

The next stage is a transrational or vision-logic belief. A characteristic of vision-logic is the ability to conceptualize and compare different perspectives or points of view. This stage could be summed up as the Centauric Self (an integration of the body/mind). It is a worldcentric outlook that encompasses rational ethics, perspectivism, postconventional morality, mutual understanding and so on.

Bear in mind I am referring here to the spiritual. An individual could have a worldcentric outlook when it comes to, say, environmental issues but be firmly entrenched in a mythical belief system like christianity.

When belief loses its power to compel, which being mental, it will, faith will takeover. Years and years can be spent trying hard with mythic beliefs, which may give some meaning in a translative sense but not much happens in the way of spiritual transformation. In fact the beliefs become beset by rational arguments and doubts. Mere beliefs are spiritual empty calories, faith, in the short term, can provide some real nutrition. Faith will soldier on when belief becomes unbelievable for faith hears the call, albeit faintly, of some sense of a higher reality that is beyond belief.

Direct experience usually comes in the form of some peak experience. These are usually brief, often intense, sometimes unbidden, perhaps life changing glimpses into some aspect ones own higher potential. (Maslow researched and wrote extensively on this topic in the 70s). Most people remain at the level of belief or faith (usually mythical at that) but occasionally some will have a strong peak experience. This can have mixed results. If the person is firmly entrenched in the concrete-literal mythic level such an experience can result in a reborn fundamentalist: their particular mythic god-figure is the only one that can save the entire world. They will burn your body to save your soul. If the one having this does not translate this downward into a lower level it can open the door for such experiences to be more constant and enduring. This will not happen spontaneously, it will usually require many years of intense spiritual practice.

Becoming spiritthat I think is another issue and perhaps another post.

I obviously would concur some focus is required in order to define higher aspects. Christians I have spoken with argue that god alone is the reason for these higher aspects. I believe these higher aspects are aspects of humanity - those aspects that have lead, in the past, to people such as the Buddha, Christ, Ghandi, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King and other saints of society. The believer in the mythic will say that god has guided all these, or, in the case of Christ, were god.

If it was the higher aspects alone we were talking about I could (almost) comfortably call it god. But god is not just this. God, as Christians tell us, is endowed with a whole heap of other functions and qualities that I do not and cannot acknowledge.

Meanwhile spiritual evolution will continue unabated despite the best, and no doubt admirably motivated, efforts of the believers of the mythic to encourage us all to be just like them.
"Whatever you are totally ignorant of, assert to be the explanation of everything else"

William James quoting Dr. Hodgson

"When I see I am nothing, that is wisdom. When I see I am everything, that is love. My life is a movement between these two."

Nisargadatta Maharaj

User avatar
ST88
Site Supporter
Posts: 1785
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 11:38 pm
Location: San Diego

Post #2

Post by ST88 »

Thank you for that analysis, bernee51. I am wondering why you feel that some individuals who have had "peak" experiences are not ready for them. Do you mean to say that we are not totally in control of our spiritual existence, or is there something else about accepting the nature of the spiritual that makes it more difficult for us to interpret the experiences?

If the former, wouldn't it make sense that there is a separate entity who is controlling the spiritual if we are not? If the latter, wouldn't it make sense that these "peak" experiences would only be available to people who sought them?

User avatar
bernee51
Site Supporter
Posts: 7813
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Australia

Post #3

Post by bernee51 »

ST88 wrote:Thank you for that analysis, bernee51. I am wondering why you feel that some individuals who have had "peak" experiences are not ready for them. Do you mean to say that we are not totally in control of our spiritual existence, or is there something else about accepting the nature of the spiritual that makes it more difficult for us to interpret the experiences?
In the case of the former...yes we are not fully in control of our spiritual experience. There are many othe influences from within and without. From without - peer pressure, cultural expectations and so on. From within, the ego and identification withor attachment to the sense the individual self.

In the case of the latter. Say someone fully engaged in a mythic belief structure has a 'peak experience' - it coud be something as simple as an overwhelming sense of joy and wonder at a sunrise. This experience has the possibility of being translative, transforming or have no effect whatsoever. If this person is so engaged in the mythic that they cannot see beyond it this experience will be translative an serve to reinforce their mythic belief structure. How many times has the statement been made by ardent christians on this board..."you want evidence of god, look at a sunrise (or some such similar statement). A more spiritually attuned person, while having mythic beliefs may find that this experience moves them in the direction of a trasformation of their beliefs to a 'higher' level.
ST88 wrote: If the former, wouldn't it make sense that there is a separate entity who is controlling the spiritual if we are not? If the latter, wouldn't it make sense that these "peak" experiences would only be available to people who sought them?
There is something driving the search for the spiritual - the inate sense of the 'divine' that Huxley talks of. This, a 'Vedantic' would argue, is the Self - as opposed to the self. The Self is the screen on which all the dramas of the self with which we identify are played out - including spiritual beliefs. So in a way it is a seperate identity.

Peak experiences are available to all and it is in our nature to seek them. Few, however, may recognise them as such.
"Whatever you are totally ignorant of, assert to be the explanation of everything else"

William James quoting Dr. Hodgson

"When I see I am nothing, that is wisdom. When I see I am everything, that is love. My life is a movement between these two."

Nisargadatta Maharaj

User avatar
ST88
Site Supporter
Posts: 1785
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 11:38 pm
Location: San Diego

Post #4

Post by ST88 »

bernee51 wrote:yes we are not fully in control of our spiritual experience. There are many othe influences from within and without. From without - peer pressure, cultural expectations and so on. From within, the ego and identification withor attachment to the sense the individual self.
That's not exactly the question I had in mind. I was speaking about the alternate spiritual "plane" (for lack of a better phrase). Is there something in this plane (or the plane itself) that has any sort of control or influence on how we perceive it? Or is it merely another landscape to be explored? Or, still further yet, is "spirituality" a metaphor for understanding that which we can't explain but can experience?

I guess I'm trying to get at the differentiation between a collective spirituality and an individual spirituality. If it can be claimed that God is not necessary for what we might call "spirituality", then what is necessary?

Post Reply