Anglo-Israelism.

[McCulloch]

For debate:

1. Is there any evidence to support the idea that the people of Western European descent, particularly those in Great Britain, are the direct lineal descendants of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel?
2. Are there any linguistic links between the Hebrew language and English, Welsh, Cornish or Manx?
3. Could the British Royal Family be directly descended from the line of King David?
4. Is it possible that the Stone of Jacob (Genesis 28:18) is the Stone of Scone, used for centuries in the coronation of the monarchs of Scotland, later British monarchs? Do the British Empire and the American republic feature in Jewish or Christian prophetic literature?
5. Is mixed-race marriage a sin?

[christian1488]

I'm with johnpaul.
Can this thread be locked and the persons in question banned for hate speech? (and for mangling language and logic). We don't need neo nazi's here, by whatever name they call themselves. Let them poison some other more appropriate forum.

Read my latest post(Post 90),I posted from the Talmud...links included in the post...


I hardly think posting from the Talmud is hate speech unless the talmud itself is ''hate''

Read my latest post....

[Malachi-Zede-El]

I'm with johnpaul.
Can this thread be locked and the persons in question banned for hate speech? (and for mangling language and logic). We don't need neo nazi's here, by whatever name they call themselves. Let them poison some other more appropriate forum.

Read my latest post(Post 90),I posted from the Talmud...links included in the post...


I hardly think posting from the Talmud is hate speech unless the talmud itself is ''hate''

Read my latest post....

You make so very good points , Tools used to Sabotage your post , Hate speechs / Anti-jew / they hate us because we are God Chosen people of the world, / We have the right to Say / Do / Whatever / We Want / If Your Not With Us Your Against .

[JohnPaul]

I'm with johnpaul.
Can this thread be locked and the persons in question banned for hate speech? (and for mangling language and logic). We don't need neo nazi's here, by whatever name they call themselves. Let them poison some other more appropriate forum.

Read my latest post(Post 90),I posted from the Talmud...links included in the post...


I hardly think posting from the Talmud is hate speech unless the talmud itself is ''hate''

Read my latest post....

You make so very good points , Tools used to Sabotage your post , Hate speechs / Anti-jew / they hate us because we are God Chosen people of the world, / We have the right to Say / Do / Whatever / We Want / If Your Not With Us Your Against .

You nuts peoples! You crazy peoples! You talk crazy! I against you! 100 percent! I have right say I spit in you direction!

[dianaiad]

You nuts peoples! You crazy peoples! You talk crazy! I against you! 100 percent! I have right say I spit in you direction!

Now why have I just been forcibly reminded of Monty Python?

[Confused]

I'm with johnpaul.
Can this thread be locked and the persons in question banned for hate speech? (and for mangling language and logic). We don't need neo nazi's here, by whatever name they call themselves. Let them poison some other more appropriate forum.

Read my latest post(Post 90),I posted from the Talmud...links included in the post...


I hardly think posting from the Talmud is hate speech unless the talmud itself is ''hate''

Read my latest post....

You make so very good points , Tools used to Sabotage your post , Hate speechs / Anti-jew / they hate us because we are God Chosen people of the world, / We have the right to Say / Do / Whatever / We Want / If Your Not With Us Your Against .

You nuts peoples! You crazy peoples! You talk crazy! I against you! 100 percent! I have right say I spit in you direction!

Moderator Warning


Responding to a sarcastic uncivil post with another sarcastic uncivil post makes you as guilty as the first poster. Please, report the posts and don't respond to them.
Please review our Rules.

______________

Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.

[Confused]

Moderator Action
After reviewing the past several pages of this thread, it seems to have devolved into a lot of reported posts, blaming, and uncivil comments. I am locking it until further notice. If other moderators review it and find cause for some redemption of the thread, it may be unlocked at some future point. Until then, there are several members to blame for the fate of this thread. Please review the forum rules and please take note that each person responsible has been recorded in the moderators discussion forum.


______________

Moderator actions indicate that a thread/post has been moved, merged, or split. Such actions are taken at the discretion of a moderator.

[Confused]

I'm with johnpaul.
Can this thread be locked and the persons in question banned for hate speech? (and for mangling language and logic). We don't need neo nazi's here, by whatever name they call themselves. Let them poison some other more appropriate forum.

Read my latest post(Post 90),I posted from the Talmud...links included in the post...


I hardly think posting from the Talmud is hate speech unless the talmud itself is ''hate''

Read my latest post....

You make so very good points , Tools used to Sabotage your post , Hate speechs / Anti-jew / they hate us because we are God Chosen people of the world, / We have the right to Say / Do / Whatever / We Want / If Your Not With Us Your Against .

Moderator Final Warning
As you have already been issued a formal warning previously, I am recommending a vote on probation at this point.
Please review the Rules.


______________

Moderator final warnings serve as the last strike towards users. Additional violations will result in a probation vote. Further infractions will lead to banishment. Any challenges or replies to moderator warnings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.

[McCulloch]

However, the historians are not named, nor is any particular tradition cited.

Not really much to go on then. 19th century unattributed romantic drivel.

This lack of corroboration of the Jeremiah legend has caused some to doubt the validity of the entire story.

He does have a way with understatement!

Irish history begins, as the history of every civilisation does, after the Flood of Noahs day.

Reputable historians have dismissed Noah's flood as pure myth.

For three hundred years after that catastrophic event, Ireland was an uninhabited land. A claim to sovereignty over Ireland was made, according to historian Herman L. Hoeh who refers to Irish annals, by the Assyrian king Ninus, son of Bel, but the land was not colonised permanently.

Herman L. Hoeh was not an historian, he was an evangelist for Herbert W. Armstrong's World Wide Church of God.

In c. 2069 BCE, again according to Hoeh who uses Geoffrey Keatings History of Ireland as his source [a seventeenth century source], a Hebrew named Parthalon with his followers settled the land and established a kingdom, the country being divided into four parts after his death. The date, however, is open to some question.

Not just the date, the whole thing is open to question. There is no evidence of any Hebrew culture in Ireland in 2000 BCE.

The Partholanian (Parthalonian] story is clearly a variant of that of the eponymous ancestor of the British, Brutus [Greek: Peirithoos] the Trojan, with which it has been confused

The fanciful notion of the Trojan origin of the British peoples has been discounted by legitimate historians for quite some time now.

Brutus arrived in Britain c. 1103 BCE, according to one scholar.

Brutus or Brute of Troy is a legendary descendant of the Trojan hero neas, known in medival British legend as the eponymous founder and first king of Britain. This legend first appears in the Historia Britonum, a 9th century historical compilation attributed to Nennius, but is best known from the account given by the 12th century chronicler Geoffrey of Monmouth in his Historia Regum Britanniae. However, he is not mentioned in any classical text and is not considered to be historical. -- Wiki

In any event, the Parthalonians, whoever they may have been, ruled Ireland intermittently until 1709 BCE, when a tragedy befell them at the hands of Phoenician Formorians.

There is no evidence of any Phoenician settlements in Ireland. They were a sea-faring people, having established settlements all over the Mediterranean, but not much beyond.

The island was then invaded by Nemedians from Scythia who lived in Ireland until 1492 BCE, being ruled by the Formorians for much of this period. A portion of the Nemedians escaped during their sojourn in the land and returned in 1492 BCE as the Fir-Bolgs.

Nor Scythian. They were an Asian people who originated in the steppes north of Crimea.

In 1456 BCE, a contingent of the famous Tuatha (pronounced Too-ah) de Danaan (Tribe of Dan) arrived in Ireland and ruled for 440 years until 1016 BCE.

Tuatha D Danann means peoples of the goddess Danu. Danu, known as Dn to the Welshis the mother figure of the tales in the Mabinogion.

The evidence brought forth from Irish history and the Bible favours the identification of Iarbanel with Jeremiah.

No it does not.