The Delusion of Evolution

[Neandertal Ned]

There is plenty of evidence that the so-called "process" of evoution is more of a delusion than a real biological process. It is a delusion in the sense that you can only imagine a species of one genus "evolving" into the species of an entirely different animal genus by "natural selection" alone since no one has ever observed it to happen "naturally" in real life. Until physically demonstrated to have ever happened on earth let alone that is physically possible nowadays or at some distant time in the future, it can only be called a mass delusion on the part of the so-called "scientific community."

http://atheismisdead.blogspot.com/2009/ ... ution.html

http://www.god-book.com/TheEvolutionDelusion.htm



http://evolutiondelusion.blogspot.com/

Do you have any doubts or objections to evolution being classified as a mass delusion or modern myth?

[Neandertal Ned]

Speak for yourself. I have never looked like a hairy knuckle-walking nonhuman ape at any time. Neither has my African-American wife.

Me neither. My ancestors probably did. So what?

Probably? You're not sure?

For all I know there might be a possibility that we are a result of aliens interfering with the genome of course, however unlikely.

Are you offended because we don't see you as a super duper extra specially made creature by a god while the rest of us obviously evolved?

I'm not offended by your claim that you do not see me or my wife as "super duper, extra, specially made" creatures by a god, but by your vulgar insistance on dragging us down to your level of self-imaging when referring to our ancestors.

That is the same thing isn't it?

No. I claim that we are all equally created in the image and likeness of God. You choose to reject that claim and instead, attempt to impose Darwin's ancestral image and likeness of African apes on everyone. My claim elevates you and your ancestors to have been created in the image and likeness of God while the Darwinist image of your ancestors, which you choose to believe in, is that of a grunting or snorting nonhuman beast.

It isn't dignified enough for you super duper, extra, specially made creatures by a god to be compared with lowly ape-descendants like us?

Darwinists choose to see themselves as the "lowly ape-descendants" you claim to be. You can't blame others for the choices you make.

You think you are on some superior level to us being created by a god and all, right?

No, but I see no reason to reject a godly image for the "lowly ape-descendant" you prefer to describe yourself as.

You see, it's not about us dragging you down to our level, it's about you elevating yourself high above your station having such an inflated opinion of yourself that you think you must have been created by a god.

Is that the way you see things "down" there on your "level?" You need to come up for a breath of fresh air.

I think we all can see where you're coming from now. Having evolved is simply not good enough for you.

Having never "evolved" myself, I certainly didn't come from where you claim that your ancestors did, and don't have to believe in the Darwinist delusion and scientific myth that anyone evolved from nonhuman apes once upon a time in Africa.

[Artie]

Where do you draw the exact line then between especially created by God as human and created by God as just another animal? Which of them is what?

As you distinguished between them yourself, Man (human) was specially created by God as a living soul, and all other creatures were simply created as animals. You know that. Why play dumb?

OK. This one who is
Australopithecus Afarensis:



was created an animal

and this one Homo habilis:



was especially created by God to be a human. Obvious isn't it?

[Neandertal Ned]

Where do you draw the exact line then between especially created by God as human and created by God as just another animal? Which of them is what?

As you distinguished between them yourself, Man (human) was specially created by God as a living soul, and all other creatures were simply created as animals. You know that. Why play dumb?

OK. This one who is
Australopithecus Afarensis:



was created an animal

and this one Homo habilis:



was especially created by God to be a human. Obvious isn't it?

Artists love creating images of something they have never seen, Artie.

Hollywood makeup artists and evolutionary artists are no different.

http://spiritlessons.com/Documents/Jesu ... ctures.htm

[Artie]

Artists love creating images of something they have never seen, Artie.

We have skulls and forensics have come pretty far when it comes to reconstruction nowadays. Even though the reconstructions might be a bit off you still have to tell us why in the world anybody seeing those pictures should believe one of them was created as an animal and the other was an especially created human by a god. Diversion tactics won't work.

[Kommander]

Where do you draw the exact line then between especially created by God as human and created by God as just another animal? Which of them is what?

As you distinguished between them yourself, Man (human) was specially created by God as a living soul, and all other creatures were simply created as animals. You know that. Why play dumb?

OK. This one who is
Australopithecus Afarensis:




was created an animal

and this one Homo habilis:



was especially created by God to be a human. Obvious isn't it?

Artists love creating images of something they have never seen, Artie.

Hollywood makeup artists and evolutionary artists are no different.

http://spiritlessons.com/Documents/Jesu ... ctures.htm

actually, i think you'll find they are rather different. for a start, evolutionary sculptors have science and fossils to work with, so they have a set path in mind.
the other kind don't have said science, so just make up a plan, so are you seriously accusing these people of being charlatans?

[Artie]

actually, i think you'll find they are rather different. for a start, evolutionary sculptors have science and fossils to work with, so they have a set path in mind.
the other kind don't have said science, so just make up a plan, so are you seriously accusing these people of being charlatans?

He accuses practically every biologist and every other person working on or believing in evolution or evolution related research living or dead to be involved in a worldwide conspiracy with the sole purpose of robbing him of his great privilege of having been especially created by a god, if I understand him correctly.

[Goat]

As you distinguished between them yourself, Man (human) was specially created by God as a living soul, and all other creatures were simply created as animals. You know that. Why play dumb?

Please provide objective and tangible evidence that 1) man was specifically created by God, that man has a 'living soul', and that God exists.

[Kommander]

actually, i think you'll find they are rather different. for a start, evolutionary sculptors have science and fossils to work with, so they have a set path in mind.
the other kind don't have said science, so just make up a plan, so are you seriously accusing these people of being charlatans?

He accuses practically every biologist and every other person working on or believing in evolution or evolution related research living or dead to be involved in a worldwide conspiracy with the sole purpose of robbing him of his great privilege of having been especially created by a god, if I understand him correctly.

i know, and that alone bothers me. does this man have any tangible evidence?

[Artie]

i know, and that alone bothers me. does this man have any tangible evidence?

The OP says "It is a delusion in the sense that you can only imagine a species of one genus "evolving" into the species of an entirely different animal genus by "natural selection" alone since no one has ever observed it to happen "naturally" in real life. Until physically demonstrated to have ever happened on earth let alone that is physically possible nowadays or at some distant time in the future, it can only be called a mass delusion on the part of the so-called "scientific community.""

I can just use his logic and say creation is a delusion "since no one has ever observed it happen in real life. Until physically demonstrated to have ever happened on earth let alone that it is physically possible nowadays or at some distant time in the future, creation can only be called a mass delusion on the part of the so-called Christian community."

[Neandertal Ned]

Artists love creating images of something they have never seen, Artie.

We have skulls and forensics have come pretty far when it comes to reconstruction nowadays.

Too far. Your Lucy looks more human than your phony Handy Man reconstruction. These reconstructions of yours are Darwinist fantasies and frauds.

Even though the reconstructions might be a bit off you still have to tell us why in the world anybody seeing those pictures should believe one of them was created as an animal and the other was an especially created human by a god.

Your phony synthetic models are obviously HUMAN constructs and neither is an animal or was ever created by anyone but some Darwinist artist.

Diversion tactics won't work.

They don't work for you either. Get real.