Can the Resurrection of Jesus be Defended

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Tired of the Nonsense
Site Supporter
Posts: 5680
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:01 pm
Location: USA
Been thanked: 1 time

Can the Resurrection of Jesus be Defended

Post #1

Post by Tired of the Nonsense »

Tired of the Nonsense wrote: There are no (Christians present) in actual point of fact. None that will support the story of the death and resurrection of Jesus as a point of "logic, reason and critical thinking." Unless there happens to be a Christian newbe present that I am unaware of who wishes to tackle the job. None of the Christian regulars here will defend the story of the resurrection beyond a "The Bible says it, I believe it, that settles it," defense.
SelectThis! wrote:
Not so. None is all. I would defend it gladly. Logic and reason reveals what is most evident and what the Bible reveals is absolutely most evident. Start the thread up if you dare. Bring your best arguments.

aglassdarkly
Scholar
Posts: 499
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:16 pm

Post #411

Post by aglassdarkly »

Tired of the Nonsense wrote:
aglassdarkly wrote: The subject of this string is the resurrection of Jesus, not resurrections in general. I've responded to what you have said about the resurrection of Jesus. Your questions about a hypothetical missing corpse is unrelated and irrelevant.
Are you suggesting that in a discussion of reason, fact and logic concerning the resurrection of Jesus from the dead there is no place for a discussion of the truth and feasibility of resurrections in general?
Such a discussion would only serve to generalize, but this debate hovers around uniqueness.

And let's stop pretending this is about reason, fact, and logic. I'd like it to be, but it sure hasn't been. I've shown your position to be illogical, complete with a circular argument, hasty generalization, and more. You haven't refuted it. Your argument that Jesus never resurrected is inconsistent because it takes some passages as authoritative and true, while subjectively dismissing other passages because they don't fit your theory. It's confirmation bias at its worst. You haven't refuted it. When it comes to facts, Mithrae and I have shown that your original contention about Matthew 27:64 is factually false.
Tired of the Nonsense wrote:
aglassdarkly wrote: Matthew 26:64 doesn't say anything about the intentions of the disciples, only the beliefs of the priests regarding possible intentions of the disciples.

I'm just waiting for you to finally acknowledge something that is clear to everyone else, thereby proving that you are able to engage in a debate, not just an argument where you plug your ears and ramble to drown out the choir of criticism. Admit that Matthew 27:64 doesn't say that the disciples were intending to take the body and that it doesn't say they spread a rumor about his resurrection. Then we can continue. If it's so difficult to get you to admit something so obvious, the rest of the debate (which will undoubtedly become less obvious, and require more charity) is pointless.
I have said over and over that the priests believed that the disciples INTENDED to relocate the body of Jesus, according to Matt. 27:64.
Here's what you originally said:
Tired of the Nonsense wrote:
aglassdarkly wrote: If Jesus died and stayed dead, that means someone lied.


Yes it does... [edited for time]... Let's turn to Gospel Matthew.

27:64 "lest his disciples come by night, and steal him away, and say unto the people, He is risen from the dead: so the last error shall be worse than the first."

An explanation for the origins of Christianity are tidily contained in this single verse. The body of Jesus did indeed turn up missing, and his disciples did indeed spread the rumor of his resurrection from the dead. It's all right there in front of us in black and white.
You later elaborated, saying:
Tired of the Nonsense wrote: The "fragment" I quoted was chosen to make a specific point about the disciples and their intention to promote a hoax by taking the body of Jesus.
So let's not be revisionist and try to make it seem like you haven't been arguing that Matthew 27:64 plainly says the disciples intended on perpetrating a hoax by taking Jesus' body and later telling everyone he rose from the dead.

But if you want to take a softer position, maybe in an attempt to salvage some credibility, I welcome it. Thank you for admitting that Matthew 27:64 speaks to the priests' beliefs, not the actual intentions of the disciples. Was that so hard?
Tired of the Nonsense wrote:
Tired of the Nonsense wrote: You are a Christian with a podium and a ready audience. If you have a case to make you should be falling all over yourself to make it.
aglassdarkly wrote: I did. And if you were trying to be at all accurate to the Christian claim, you wouldn't need someone else to point out the distinctiveness of the claim.
Then present it again.
I'm not really sure why you want me to repeat myself. Just read post #2 again.

Anyway, I'm assuming we can put Matthew 27:64 to bed, tuck it in and say "I'm glad we came to agree." I'll move on to your second response to my argument, but if I get the sense that you just want to repeat your nonsense, I've got better things to do.
Tired of the Nonsense wrote:
aglassdarkly wrote: Somehow that lie got spread around and some people believed it. How could that happen? Let's say the 11 apostles decided to make up the story. They go around telling everyone that Jesus rose from the grave... let's even say they stole the body so it would seem true. People are like "Oh yeah, he's alive? Where?" And Peter says "Well, he appeared to a bunch of people in the next town over, but he's not here anymore."
That's about right. On the day of Pentecost the disciples of Jesus began spreading the story of the "risen" Jesus. Who claimed to have seen the risen Jesus? The disciples, according to the disciples.

"And where is he NOW?" the crowds might rightly have asked. "Show us the risen man that we might believe!"

"Oh, he's not here NOW. He flew away, off up into the clouds. But we saw him and you can believe us."

Says who? Says the disciples! These would be those same individuals whom the chief priests suspected intended to move the body of Jesus and then spread the story of his resurrection from the dead. It seems the priests may well have, finally, gotten a grasp on the situation when they went to visit Pilate.
If the disciples lied, it seems absolutely absurd for anyone to believe them. What's more obvious, I wonder... that a dead man's corpse magically reanimated and flew away to be with God or that these dudes are lying to us? Which option seems more reasonable?

But a bunch of people ended up believing them. If the resurrection didn't happen, it makes NO SENSE for people to believe such a crazy bold-faced lie.

User avatar
assisigirl
Guru
Posts: 1180
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 5:50 am

Post #412

Post by assisigirl »

Hi TOTN, it is not my intention to fracture the thread. In truth, aglassdarkly is back asking the same question again. SelectThis! talks about love but then covers it in a matrix of scripture and code. You are what concerns me here TOTN as your opinion might be imagined to be atheistic disbelief. I feel it is not.


TOTN asserts: But I AM a member in good standing of something far larger. It's called the universe. Because in every real way I am the universe contemplating itself. Which is itself a very high standard of existence indeed.

assisigirl: This is theism, the belief in a 'contemplative ' universe. Where did you buy, one of them? Where is the connect between your 'conspiracy theory' based on NT fiction and the reality of the world now, today? What are you logically saying. What is your contemplative insight here, TOTN. What can we extract from this that is useful even if it is only the expose of a lie. Have you achieved this yet? I do not think so? What your efforts here amount to, is an exhibition of scepticism.

User avatar
SelectThis!
Apprentice
Posts: 106
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:55 pm
Location: Southwest Missouri

Post #413

Post by SelectThis! »

[Replying to post 406 by ReligionSlayer]
Am sure you are sincere. However, your post has no substance.
How does it show that your God has been resurrected?

How does it show that Vicarious redemption is not immoral and illogical:
Vicarious redemption: Kill person X, because person Y did something "unavoidable".


Person Y is humanity.
We did something unavoidable because God knew in advance we would sin, before he even created Adam.Eve or any human (if you reject Original sin that is).
I am glad you asked in this manner. In mathematics, debt can only be walked back by payment. In this case, addition and subtraction by our own works is not enough. Multiplication is necessary. The only way for this type of debt to be walked back is by taking two negatives and multiplying.

In mathematics, if you owe three people $10, then you are negative $30 (3 X -10 = $-30). If they then say, "We forgive you for this debt because we love you," then you are free from that debt by another negative. You have just had three subtractions of -10, making you three positives of $10 (-3 X -$10). Your debt is -30 + 30 = $0. God follows his own law.

The negative suffered by Christ is applied to your own negative sin. It's payment and God must be just. His weights and measures are in order with ultimate truth. Again, another evidence God works for us and not against.

Another way to consider this is as an example. To most people, taking reward is the best path in life. We take reward at every turn. As a generalization, consider what happens when you smoke. If you smoke, you likely get cancer and sickness. The chain of bonds in the body breaks down quicker from the debt taken into the body. Simply put, taking reward causes debt. Every example you can think of, when taking reward, will end in suffering some result. On the flip side, go to the gym and suffer first for health to increase. Suffering first brings reward later. Work a job and you receive a reward. Pass that reward forward as an investment in your family and they rise to new life with you. Spend it on smokes, drugs and alcohol and your investment is taken as a reward. What happens when rewards are taken? Suffering as a result.

What was Christ's path that leads to life? Giving. It's a universal truth of altruism in the face of our universal ideology of Objectivism.

Again, truth shows what is most evident. In every situation, the Bible shows us the actual truth. It never hides when the truth hurts and never apologizes for judgment and justice of those who are unjust. Do you feel morally above God when he takes life in 1st and 2nd Samuel? Good. You only know this truth because God reveals it to the barbarians. Do you blast God for taking life of whole nations in the OT? Good, because he then gives it back as new life. You must be born again and baptism is our immersion back into the waters of life.

Do you see contradiction and unfulfilled prophecy in this verse?

Revelation 1:7

7 Look, he is coming with the clouds,[a]
and every eye will see him,
even those who pierced him;
and all peoples on earth will mourn because of him.
So shall it be! Amen.

The scoffer says, "You see there. Those who pierced him did not see him return. He did not come back in their generation!" Don't be so sure of your own perspective and frame of reference. Know the excluded middle to resolve paradox. Jesus said, "You must be born again." What did Paul say?

Acts 24

15 and I have the same hope in God as these men themselves have, that there will be a resurrection of both the righteous and the wicked. 16 So I strive always to keep my conscience clear before God and man.

Both the wicked AND righteous would be raised before the coming wrath. What is the coming wrath and how do we put out this fire of wrath? With water. Baptism is immersion into reality so we can repent (Turn from what causes wrath). Living water puts out fire.

Matthew 3

7 But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to where he was baptizing, he said to them: You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the coming wrath? 8 Produce fruit in keeping with repentance. 9 And do not think you can say to yourselves, We have Abraham as our father. I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham. 10 The ax is already at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.

11 I baptize you with water for repentance. But after me comes one who is more powerful than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with[c] the Holy Spirit and fire. 12 His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor, gathering his wheat into the barn and burning up the chaff with unquenchable fire.

Again, why is it so complicated as a story? Why such varying detail and how can this context possibly be so connected to ultimate universal truth? How can it connect so tightly to Eastern and Western tradition (The Way and the Truth)? Why won't it go away and why are we still discussing it so intently 2000 years later?

Like I said before. It's a mirror we see ourselves by. Light reveals what it hits and we can choose to face the mirror or walk away in pride. Either way, God knows our hearts by the light that reveals the reflection.

John 2

23 Now while he was in Jerusalem at the Passover Festival, many people saw the signs he was performing and believed in his name.[d] 24 But Jesus would not entrust himself to them, for he knew all people. 25 He did not need any testimony about mankind, for he knew what was in each person.

He won't entrust Himself to you until the union goes both ways. Love is the connecting point that allows multiplication of debt to payment. A small amount of love covers a multitude of sin. God will allow us to disagree, but he will never allow us to doubt the truth. All things will be revealed and patience is a virtue that is rewarded from the suffering that proceeds the revelation.

I choose patience.







.

User avatar
Tired of the Nonsense
Site Supporter
Posts: 5680
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:01 pm
Location: USA
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #414

Post by Tired of the Nonsense »

assisigirl wrote: TOTN asserts: But I AM a member in good standing of something far larger. It's called the universe. Because in every real way I am the universe contemplating itself. Which is itself a very high standard of existence indeed.

assisigirl: This is theism, the belief in a 'contemplative ' universe. Where did you buy, one of them? Where is the connect between your 'conspiracy theory' based on NT fiction and the reality of the world now, today? What are you logically saying. What is your contemplative insight here, TOTN. What can we extract from this that is useful even if it is only the expose of a lie. Have you achieved this yet? I do not think so? What your efforts here amount to, is an exhibition of scepticism.
Let me first say that skepticism is a good and necessary thing. I am not suggesting that one should not be open minded. But a healthy dose of skepticism is vital to enable one to separate the fact from bull stuff. And there is an amazing about of bull stuff to be separated from. Because fact it limited to what it is, but bull stuff is only limited by the imagination.

the-ism [thee-iz-uhm] noun
1. the belief in one God as the creator and ruler of the universe, without rejection of revelation ( distinguished from deism ).
2. belief in the existence of a god or gods ( opposed to atheism ).
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/theism++?s=t

The observation that I am the universe contemplating itself has absolutely nothing to do with the existence of any God or gods and is therefore NOT theistic in nature. I reject the notion of the supernatural entirely as purely a product of the imagination and therefore without physical reality. Probably. Humans are fallible and can only know things to a high degree of certainty, and so I could be wrong. However one of the products of the age of scientific discovery which has taken place, roughly, over the course of the last four centuries, has been the growing recognition that things happen for natural, understandable and predictable reasons. The ancients lived in a world where virtually everything around them was a product of the supernatural. It simply is not true however, and we understand that now. We are moving from ignorance to knowledge.

When I say I am the universe contemplating itself, this is what I mean. What we now understand about the universe is that it is made up of energy. Everything that is not nothing, is energy in one form or another. These forms include energetic bits, little blobs of energy in various forms much too small to see and only detectable at all with very high technology. These include the family of quarks, of which six are known, the family of leptons, which includes electrons, and the family of bosons, which include photons. Up quarks have a positive electrical charge, while down quarks have a negative electrical charge. As a result they are massively attracted to each other. They tend to clump together into groups of three, either forming a proton (+-+) with a net positive charge, or a neutron (-+-) with a net neutral charge. Under intense gravity or high speed collision protons and neutrons bond to form an object we call a nucleus. Electrons, being negatively charged, are attracted to the positively charged protons in the nucleus. A unit which contains one electron one proton and one neutron represents a perfect hydrogen atom. A unit which contains two protons, two neutrons and two electrons represents a perfect helium atom. A unit which contains three protons, three neutrons and three electrons represents a perfect lithium atom. And so on up the periodic chart of elements. Hydrogen and helium are gases at temperatures above about -430 F degrees. Lithium on the other hand is a metal. The physical properties of the elements change quite drastically depending on their composition you see.

And yet this is still energy. Energy locked into a form we call matter. A very large amount of energy in fact, according to the formula E=MC^2. Because mass, or matter, is energy. And energy according to all observation and experimentation, cannot be created or destroyed. It constantly reforms itself, but the total amount remains the same. It is therefore finite in amount but infinite in duration. It's always existed and it will always exist. And if it can't be a created then there can't be a creator.

So, stars and planets and living things, all are made up of matter which is one of the forms that energy takes. Of the living things in the universe that we know of, only humans have reached the level of awareness, and the state of technology necessary, to actually physically contemplate the universe at large. When I say that I am the universe contemplating itself I am not being metaphysical or philosophical. I am literally in every way made up of the stuff of the universe, and I am contemplating all of it. I am hardly alone in this endeavor of course. Because some choose to contemplate the natural physical universe at hand and seek physical answers through observation and experimentation. They are called "scientists." Others however prefer to contemplate the physical universe at hand and imagine answers that suit their intellectual or emotional needs. They are called religious. There was a time when these two groups were the same. Because for most of human history, make believe provided the only possible answer. But as the physical evidence has made itself apparent over the last few centuries there has been a divergence into two distinct groups. There is still some cross over between these two groups of course, but the difference between the group which base's it's view of the universe on physical evidence and the group which base's it's view of the universe on make believe has been steadily widening for the last century. In the US the number of people who no longer express a theology has reached about 20%. In Europe the number is well above 50%. And growing rapidly.

User avatar
Tired of the Nonsense
Site Supporter
Posts: 5680
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:01 pm
Location: USA
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #415

Post by Tired of the Nonsense »

Tired of the Nonsense wrote: Are you suggesting that in a discussion of reason, fact and logic concerning the resurrection of Jesus from the dead there is no place for a discussion of the truth and feasibility of resurrections in general?
aglassdarkly wrote: Such a discussion would only serve to generalize, but this debate hovers around uniqueness.
Uniqueness compared to WHAT? If we are unable to generalize, than how are we supposed to determine what is unique and what is commonplace? The Gospels do not reference the resurrection of Jesus as a unique event. Whole hoards of resurrected dead people came up out of their graves and wandered about, according to Gospel Matthew. According to your literature resurrections from the dead were commonplace. And quite naturally you would like to restrict the debate to only the reality that is presented in the NT. In other words, you are insisting that reason fact and logic be excluded from a discussion which was specifically created to examine the issue based on reason fact and logic. But we are not here to play that game. If you wish to play that game, go play with yourself. On the other hand, if you have a case to make concerning the unavoidable conclusion that Jesus was truly and actually resurrected from the dead , then please make it and stop posturing. And if you do finally overcome your timidity and decide to attempt to make such a case, you can count on reason fact and logic being employed to address it, in keeping with the stated subject matter of this string. If the real problem is that you can't handle contradiction, then you have no business being on a debate site. In which case you should go and debate yourself. That way you would at least have a 50/50 chance of not losing.

User avatar
assisigirl
Guru
Posts: 1180
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 5:50 am

Post #416

Post by assisigirl »

TOTN asserts:There is still some cross over between these two groups of course, but the difference between the group which base's it's view of the universe on physical evidence and the group which base's it's view of the universe on make believe has been steadily widening for the last century.

assisigirl reply: Refresh my memory TOTN, which one are you? You have been kicking a christian yarn up the road for 8000 views now????


The philosophy that is attached to Jesus is real. The alternative ugliness of human greed has been tried and it has failed, The God of Power, the god of Money, the god of Ego have all been shown to be false Gods. Jesus told people this as an obvious. He then announced a kingdom of Love as a new way. Absoulute love is a utopian ideal that can only be aspired to, it requires an epiphany of outlook that is described in many of his parables as being instant in nature. TOTN, your reservations regarding the validity of such a radical utopian view are well founded in logic. Man has been useless and stupid up to now. Why should he change. All logic points to this conclusion. The survival of the Jesus teachings after his death help point towards the following realism.

Jesus's ideas are our only hope.
What we are doing now is crap.
If we do not change we will destroy everything including ourselves.


This knowledge offers the hope of resurrection to mankind. What does arguing over a rolling stone in a fairy story offer. If you cannot see hope in the Resurrection narrative then I think that you do the early followers of Jesus a disservice as this hope sustained them after his death, IMHO.

What is real is that Jesus believed in people and people believed in him. He offered them the hope of a better life in a world of cruelty and stupidity. The teachings of Jesus are still here with us today and they still remain our only real option.IMHO.

Do not try to decipher the message of a working class, country faith healer through the mumbo jumbo of nonsense that is offered by SelectThis!. Imagine parking a red double decker bus against your front door and climbing out through a hole in the roof of your house just to go to the shop. Thats SelectThis! Pass!

aglassdarkly
Scholar
Posts: 499
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:16 pm

Post #417

Post by aglassdarkly »

Tired of the Nonsense wrote:
Tired of the Nonsense wrote: Are you suggesting that in a discussion of reason, fact and logic concerning the resurrection of Jesus from the dead there is no place for a discussion of the truth and feasibility of resurrections in general?
aglassdarkly wrote: Such a discussion would only serve to generalize, but this debate hovers around uniqueness.
Uniqueness compared to WHAT?
Unique compared to the hypothetical missing corpse that you keep wanting to talk about.

Unique because people claim it happened.

Unique because LOTS of people believed it happened.

Unique because LOTS of people continue to believe it happened.

Unique because we have first and second-hand accounts of its occurrence.

Unique because people claim Jesus is the Son of God.

Unique because people claim He appeared to LOTS of people after His resurrection.

Unique because people chose to die rather than deny the claim.

Did you really need me to point out how the Christian claim that Jesus rose from the grave and ascended into heaven differ from your generalized hypothetical "missing corpse"? Are you even trying any more? In the early pages of the thread, you were diligent about responding to every argument and every objection. But now you ignore more than you address and your responses are becoming harder and harder to take seriously.

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20984
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 218 times
Been thanked: 393 times
Contact:

Post #418

Post by otseng »

SelectThis! wrote: I give you a revelation of a profound secret. You can see it if you look beyond your own pride. If not, it will be words, words, words to you. Agreement on details is dependent on the knowledge of the excluded middle. Let me show you the middle.
:warning: Moderator Warning


Your post does not comply with the guidelines on preaching. Further, do not make any comments of a personal nature.

Please review our Rules.

______________

Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.

User avatar
Tired of the Nonsense
Site Supporter
Posts: 5680
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:01 pm
Location: USA
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #419

Post by Tired of the Nonsense »

assisigirl wrote: TOTN asserts:There is still some cross over between these two groups of course, but the difference between the group which base's it's view of the universe on physical evidence and the group which base's it's view of the universe on make believe has been steadily widening for the last century.

assisigirl reply: Refresh my memory TOTN, which one are you? You have been kicking a christian yarn up the road for 8000 views now????
The Christian "yarn" that I have been "kicking up the road" during the course of this thread is the story of a man in ancient Israel who was cruelly executed by the authorities in a deplorable manner, and of a group of his friends and supporters who managed to turn the tables on the authorities by restoring the man's cause and good name, although not the man himself, through the act of relocating his body and using the empty grave and their own testimony to promote the story that the man had been resurrected from the dead. Taken entirely from the only documentation which exists, this completely natural explanation details the origins of Christianity as a very human endeavor with very human motivations and a very human agenda for doing so. But, in the way of real life then and now, no actual supernatural events occurred. Nor are any required to explain the origins of what would go on to be one of the world's greatest religious beliefs.
assisigirl wrote: The philosophy that is attached to Jesus is real. The alternative ugliness of human greed has been tried and it has failed, The God of Power, the god of Money, the god of Ego have all been shown to be false Gods. Jesus told people this as an obvious. He then announced a kingdom of Love as a new way. Absoulute love is a utopian ideal that can only be aspired to, it requires an epiphany of outlook that is described in many of his parables as being instant in nature. TOTN, your reservations regarding the validity of such a radical utopian view are well founded in logic. Man has been useless and stupid up to now. Why should he change. All logic points to this conclusion. The survival of the Jesus teachings after his death help point towards the following realism.
What exactly IS Jesus' philosophy of love? "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Or more specifically "Therefore all things whatsoever would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them" (Matthew 7:12). Christians of course claim the "Golden Rule" for their own, as if Jesus brought the idea into the world fresh and whole for Christians to wrap themselves in. But his same sentiment is found written in Leviticus centuries before Jesus was born. (19:18) "Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the LORD." It's found in Buddhism: "Hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful." (Udanavarga 5:18). It's found in Confusionism: "Never impose on others what you would not choose for yourself." " Confucius. Ancient Egypt: "An example from a Late Period (c. 664 BCE " 323 BCE) papyrus: "That which you hate to be done to you, do not do to another." Ancient Greece: "Do not do to your neighbor what you would take ill from him." " Pittacus(c. 640"568 BCE). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_Rule

Nowhere have I ever argued against this "message of love." I was raised on it, and I raised my own Children on it. No 10 commandments are required, only one. Because this is really the only moral imperative any of us needs; "If you wouldn't like it done to you THEN IT IS WRONG, don't do it!" We are societal creatures, and this is the only real lesson of love we need to get along.
assisigirl wrote: Jesus's ideas are our only hope.
What we are doing now is crap.
If we do not change we will destroy everything including ourselves.

You and I are nothing TOTN, and if we do not realize that then we will see nothing.
This view of humanity as "crap" and as hopelessly degraded, along with the hideous ongoing death wish which exists at the heart of Christianity in the overwhelming desire by the faithful for the monstrous slaughter which is to occur at Armageddon ushering in, FINALLY, the end of the world.... is a massively dangerous and potentially self fulfilling prophecy which is beyond, truly and simply beyond, despicable. And, now, finally, people are beginning to turn their backs on this ghastly and offensive self loathing "crap." Hopefully religion will become extinct before the religious manage to blow us all up in the name of God. Religions are a holdover from ancient ignorant superstitious people, they are by their very nature divisive and serve to inflame the mindless passions of the true believers to commit the most horrible of acts in the name of make believe. The sooner we get all of this ancient voodoo mumbo-jumbo crapola behind us the better.

User avatar
Tired of the Nonsense
Site Supporter
Posts: 5680
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:01 pm
Location: USA
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #420

Post by Tired of the Nonsense »

aglessdarkly wrote:
Such a discussion would only serve to generalize, but this debate hovers around uniqueness.
Tired of the Nonsense wrote: :
Uniqueness compared to WHAT?
aglessdarkly wrote:
Unique compared to the hypothetical missing corpse that you keep wanting to talk about.

Unique because people claim it happened.

Unique because LOTS of people believed it happened.

Unique because LOTS of people continue to believe it happened.

Unique because we have first and second-hand accounts of its occurrence.

Unique because people claim Jesus is the Son of God.

Unique because people claim He appeared to LOTS of people after His resurrection.

Unique because people chose to die rather than deny the claim.
How are these things unique if they happen all the time? The Gospels are full of resurrections from the dead.
aglessdarkly wrote:
Unique because we have first and second-hand accounts of its occurrence.
Which "first and second-hand accounts" are you referring to, specifically?
aglessdarkly wrote:
Did you really need me to point out how the Christian claim that Jesus rose from the grave and ascended into heaven differ from your generalized hypothetical "missing corpse"? Are you even trying any more? In the early pages of the thread, you were diligent about responding to every argument and every objection. But now you ignore more than you address and your responses are becoming harder and harder to take seriously.
Early in the discussion you were actually providing a cogent argument. But then you stopped providing an argument and began attacking me. At one point you indicated your intention to leave the discussion in howls of protest. Debate over, and not the first time a Christian has run from this particular field of battle, I might add. And then you made this statement: "The subject of this string is the resurrection of Jesus, not resurrections in general. I've responded to what you have said about the resurrection of Jesus. Your questions about a hypothetical missing corpse is unrelated and irrelevant." This is in fact more absurd then anything SelectThis! has contributed, especially in light of the fact that I started the string and entitled it, right up front: "Can the Resurrection of Jesus be Defended as points of reason, fact, and logic?" For you to declare your intention to only debate by your rules and that the subject matter of the debate standards specified in the OP of the string don't apply is comparable to declaring : "I know you are but what am I?" So I stopped taking you seriously at that point, and I perceive that most everyone else viewing the debate did as well. You crashed and burned publicly. You ARE the dismembered Black Knight. (That Monty Python/Batman crossover video was funny though, wasn't it!). You're done. Case closed. And I moved on to converse with others. But, just to be reasonable, I continued to offer you the opportunity to make your case. Which you have been transparently hesitant to do. Make a full case for the truth of your beliefs and I will address it in detail, because right now you appear to have nothing. Right now you appear to be simply throwing bricks to cover your retreat. But if you will simply make an argument I will give you all the counter argument you can handle in return.

Post Reply