I feel like we've been beating around the bush for... 6000 years!
Can you please either provide some evidence for your supernatural beliefs, or admit that you have no evidence?
If you believe there once was a talking donkey (Numbers 22) could you please provide evidence?
If you believe there once was a zombie invasion in Jerusalem (Mat 27) could you please provide evidence?
If you believe in the flying horse (Islam) could you please provide evidence?
Walking on water, virgin births, radioactive spiders who give you superpowers, turning water into wine, turning iron into gold, demons, goblins, ghosts, hobbits, elves, angels, unicorns and Santa.
Can you PLEASE provide evidence?
Let's cut to the chase. Do you have any evidence?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Banned
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:18 pm
Post #971
Didn't he just give you evidence ?instantc wrote:Let me get this right now, your claim 'god experiences are a result of indoctrination' is substantiated by 'no-one has showed otherwise'. Do atheists have a monopoly of shifting the burden of proof?Clownboat wrote:It does as far as I am concerned, but only because I personally know of hundreds of these scenarios and not one that shows otherwise.instantc wrote:Non sequitur, your observation is consistent with your conclusion, but does not substantiate it at all.Clownboat wrote: All I can point to is that children know of god's due to being told about them. I don't know of any experience where a child experienced a god that they previously did not know about.
Due to this observation, I can conclude that god experiences seem to be a result of indoctrination.
Again, I am open to any evidence you have to suggest I am wrong here.
I am open to any evidence to suggest that you are right, unfortunately you haven't provided any, just the claim.
People seem to have to be told about God before they 'experience' him.
This should be ringing loud bells of mighty skepticism.
Show me a group of people with no possible access to the Bible, preachers, or any way of knowing God's message from any other sources except for divine revelation itself. If they then start to convey God's message as written down in the Bible, then we can talk.
Post #972
How exactly does the fact that people hear about God before they experience his presence show that the experience is not real but a result of the said indoctrination? As far as I can see this is a complete non sequitur.Dantalion wrote: Didn't he just give you evidence ?
People seem to have to be told about God before they 'experience' him.
This should be ringing loud bells of mighty skepticism.
You are implying that if God existed, he would reveal himself to people who haven't heard of him before. Do you have any arguments to back up your claim?Dantalion wrote: Show me a group of people with no possible access to the Bible, preachers, or any way of knowing God's message from any other sources except for divine revelation itself. If they then start to convey God's message as written down in the Bible, then we can talk.
Post #973
Well I wouldn't say that it SHOWS that, but it is a noteworthy argument nonetheless.How exactly does the fact that people hear about God before they experience his presence show that the experience is not real but a result of the said indoctrination? As far as I can see this is a complete non sequitur.
Unless you assert that the very first people ever to receive God's revelation somehow heard of him before, I'd say that's an argument for my claim yes, wouldn't you ?You are implying that if God existed, he would reveal himself to people who haven't heard of him before. Do you have any arguments to back up your claim?
- Danmark
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 12697
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:58 am
- Location: Seattle
- Been thanked: 1 time
Post #974
Non sequitur? Look at the evidence. There is a very strong correlation between the religion one chooses and how he was brought up. You can easily see this in terms of nations. Some are 98% Christian, others 98% Muslim. Do you suppose that is the result of chance and god simply reaching people on his own? That folks somehow 'experience' god differently in different countries and cultures irrespective of what they've heard from friends, family and the rest of the cultural milieu the are born into?instantc wrote:How exactly does the fact that people hear about God before they experience his presence show that the experience is not real but a result of the said indoctrination? As far as I can see this is a complete non sequitur.Dantalion wrote: Didn't he just give you evidence ?
People seem to have to be told about God before they 'experience' him.
This should be ringing loud bells of mighty skepticism.
Check out the By Proportion section at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_re ... opulations
I've posted these statistics several times on this forum and I've NEVER heard any explanation from Christians, let alone an explanation that reasonably argues for free will in the decision to adopt a religion.
Post #975
It is an interesting fact but doesn't indeed show anything. It might be somewhat convincing intuitionally but in the context of this debate it is not sufficient. The question was whether we can know for certainty that the said experiences are a result of indoctrination, as we can with regard to Santa Claus.Dantalion wrote:Well I wouldn't say that it SHOWS that, but it is a noteworthy argument nonetheless.How exactly does the fact that people hear about God before they experience his presence show that the experience is not real but a result of the said indoctrination? As far as I can see this is a complete non sequitur.
Fair enough, but you were implying that if God existed he would still at this date reveal himself to people who haven't heard of him.Dantalion wrote:Unless you assert that the very first people ever to receive God's revelation somehow heard of him before, I'd say that's an argument for my claim yes, wouldn't you ?You are implying that if God existed, he would reveal himself to people who haven't heard of him before. Do you have any arguments to back up your claim?
Post #976
The way in which one came to know certain theology doesn't necessarily say anything about the truth of that theology, in claiming so one commits a genetic fallacy. Just because certain theists cannot explain why God would allow this kind of geological distribution of religions doesn't mean that there is no explanation. I think you make a good point about the free will in the decision to pick a religion though.Danmark wrote:Non sequitur? Look at the evidence. There is a very strong correlation between the religion one chooses and how he was brought up. You can easily see this in terms of nations. Some are 98% Christian, others 98% Muslim. Do you suppose that is the result of chance and god simply reaching people on his own? That folks somehow 'experience' god differently in different countries and cultures irrespective of what they've heard from friends, family and the rest of the cultural milieu the are born into?instantc wrote:How exactly does the fact that people hear about God before they experience his presence show that the experience is not real but a result of the said indoctrination? As far as I can see this is a complete non sequitur.Dantalion wrote: Didn't he just give you evidence ?
People seem to have to be told about God before they 'experience' him.
This should be ringing loud bells of mighty skepticism.
Check out the By Proportion section at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_re ... opulations
I've posted these statistics several times on this forum and I've NEVER heard any explanation from Christians, let alone an explanation that reasonably argues for free will in the decision to adopt a religion.
Essentially you are just asking questions ('why does God mostly reveal himself to those born in Christian countries?' and so forth), while you should be making actual arguments. Just because Christians can't answer these questions doesn't mean that there are no answers. Similarly, we cannot at this point answer some theistic questions like 'how did the laws of physics come to be?' or 'how was life formed?', but that does not mean there are no natural answers to these questions.
- otseng
- Savant
- Posts: 20851
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Has thanked: 214 times
- Been thanked: 366 times
- Contact:
Post #978
Moderator CommentClownboat wrote: Then to finish off this crap of a post
Please avoid all profanity, even if you consider it to be mild.
Please review the Rules.
______________
Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
- Clownboat
- Savant
- Posts: 10038
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
- Has thanked: 1228 times
- Been thanked: 1621 times
Post #979
I was very clear about "my" observations and what it would take to change "my" mind about "my" observations. You even agreed that my observations are consistent with the conclusion.instantc wrote:Let me get this right now, your claim 'god experiences are a result of indoctrination' is substantiated by 'no-one has showed otherwise'. Do atheists have a monopoly of shifting the burden of proof?Clownboat wrote:It does as far as I am concerned, but only because I personally know of hundreds of these scenarios and not one that shows otherwise.instantc wrote:Non sequitur, your observation is consistent with your conclusion, but does not substantiate it at all.Clownboat wrote: All I can point to is that children know of god's due to being told about them. I don't know of any experience where a child experienced a god that they previously did not know about.
Due to this observation, I can conclude that god experiences seem to be a result of indoctrination.
Again, I am open to any evidence you have to suggest I am wrong here.
I am open to any evidence to suggest that you are right, unfortunately you haven't provided any, just the claim.
I am also not pointing to "no one has shown me otherwise" as evidence. Granted, this is a fact. I am pointing to 100's of scenarios where people had god experiences from gods they were already indoctrinated to believe in, and never once (so far) a scenario where someone had a god experience about a god they did not already believe to be real.
I'm sorry, but your complaints cannot make my observations go away.
I'm still open to any observations you have that would suggest otherwise.
And finally, I'm not an atheists.
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.
I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU
It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco
If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb
I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU
It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco
If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb
Post #980
Fair enough, your observations convince you intuitionally, even though they cannot objectively substantiate your conclusion.Clownboat wrote: I was very clear about "my" observations and what it would take to change "my" mind about "my" observations. You even agreed that my observations are consistent with the conclusion.
Granted, people seem to have God experiences after they have already been educated in the relevant theology. What is your point exactly? How is this related to the question whether or not the experiences are real?Clownboat wrote:I am pointing to 100's of scenarios where people had god experiences from gods they were already indoctrinated to believe in, and never once (so far) a scenario where someone had a god experience about a god they did not already believe to be real.