Wootah wrote:
Hell seems to me a logically necessary fact of a loving God existing that creates free willed creatures and those creatures choosing not God.
So, God creates free will and then punishes those for eternity who use their free will, how is that loving?
imagine a parent who says he loves you and then knowingly lets a peadophile live with you.
That isn't the same thing at all. It's more like a parent who sets you free to live your life as you choose, but then puts a gun to your head if you don't choose to worship, serve and praise them your entire life.
i believe in hell like i believe i should warn someone when a piano is about to fall on them.
Again, that isn't even remotely the same thing. If it was, then God would have a massive warehouse of pianos in which He is dropping on everyone, right after telling them to go ahead and walk on the street.
if asking them to move is a fallacy then i submit the definition of the fallacy needs some work.
The fallacy is in the explanation and works just fine.
From the wiki.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_baculum
An ad baculum argument is fallacious when the punishment is not meaningfully related to the conclusion being drawn. Many ad baculum arguments are not fallacies.[1] For example:
If you drive while drunk, you will be put in jail.
You want to avoid going to jail.
Therefore you should not drive while drunk.
This is called a non-fallacious ad baculum.
Then, based on your logic, using the free will your God gave us is the same as driving drunk. If God didn't want us to use free will, why did He give it to us?