A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
marketandchurch
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:51 am
Location: The People's Republic Of Portland

A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1

Post by marketandchurch »

This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

fatherlearningtolove
Apprentice
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:33 pm
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Contact:

Post #251

Post by fatherlearningtolove »

[Replying to post 248 by pokeegeorge]
The word used in the verses which talk about the "fear of the Lord" is not really the same as the modern english concept of fear - it is more akin to "awe" or "respect".

pokeegeorge
Sage
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:41 pm

Post #252

Post by pokeegeorge »

fatherlearningtolove wrote: [Replying to post 248 by pokeegeorge]
The word used in the verses which talk about the "fear of the Lord" is not really the same as the modern english concept of fear - it is more akin to "awe" or "respect".

Actually YOUR paradigm is the modern one. The fear presented in the Bible is fear plus TREMBLING.

So then fear minus trembling is not really biblical fear, eh? Don't try to pull a fast one on Pokie....he ain't so fast, but then again sometimes the turtle comes out ahead.

Phil 2

12 Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.

pokeegeorge
Sage
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:41 pm

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #253

Post by pokeegeorge »

[Replying to post 245 by Clownboat]



No, dear. Jesus knew the will of his Father was for him to sacrifice himself.

A man like Tom Hanks going back and back and back yet again for his comrades behind the lines to save them is the same kind of thing...almost certain suicide yet not done out of a self-loathing of life but love for his own...Jesus too did this out of love for his Father and for his fellow man.

To say otherwise is to miss the story altogether. Selah.

fatherlearningtolove
Apprentice
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:33 pm
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Contact:

Post #254

Post by fatherlearningtolove »

[Replying to post 250 by pokeegeorge]
Ah, but we have to let scripture interpret scripture, right? So how do you reconcile your view with I John 4:8, which says that perfect love casts out fear? In fact, "do not fear" is the most repeated command in the Bible - what say you to that?

What if "working out our own salvation" is not the way? What if we're supposed to let the infinite God, who is love (also I John 4:8, as well as verse 16), work out our salvation for us? And we put our hope and trust in that perfect love of God, and act upon love?

pokeegeorge
Sage
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:41 pm

Post #255

Post by pokeegeorge »

[Replying to post 252 by fatherlearningtolove]



"Perfect love" subjectively perceived only comes by the Holy Spirit. Then yes, there is no need to fear God...

...He is showing you HIS love since He is saying HE LOVES YOU.

But strictly speaking a Unitarian Universalist is not a PENTECOSTAL Unitarian, as I am, so there you go...

Didn't know this one, never Baptized in the Holy Spirit, were you?

Secondly:
What if "working out our own salvation" is not the way? What if we're supposed to let the infinite God, who is love (also I John 4:8, as well as verse 16), work out our salvation for us? And we put our hope and trust in that perfect love of God, and act upon love?
Why would Paul the author of FAITH vs. WORKS SALVATION say it then in Phillippians 2??

Schitzo?

fatherlearningtolove
Apprentice
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:33 pm
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Contact:

Post #256

Post by fatherlearningtolove »

pokeegeorge wrote: [Replying to post 252 by fatherlearningtolove]



"Perfect love" subjectively perceived only comes by the Holy Spirit. Then yes, there is no need to fear God...

...He is showing you HIS love since He is saying HE LOVES YOU.

But strictly speaking a Unitarian Universalist is not a PENTECOSTAL Unitarian, as I am, so there you go...

Didn't know this one, never Baptized in the Holy Spirit, were you?

Secondly:
What if "working out our own salvation" is not the way? What if we're supposed to let the infinite God, who is love (also I John 4:8, as well as verse 16), work out our salvation for us? And we put our hope and trust in that perfect love of God, and act upon love?
Why would Paul the author of FAITH vs. WORKS SALVATION say it then in Phillippians 2??

Schitzo?
You seem to be making assumptions about me, and trying to put labels on me that I have not put on myself. I'm not sure "Unitarian" applies to me, as I do not believe in relative truth, at least not in the sense that two opposites can be true. I do believe that the truth of God is present in other religions, though, as I've noticed some amazing parallels within other holy texts, and this fact actually strengthens my faith in God.

fatherlearningtolove
Apprentice
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:33 pm
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Contact:

Post #257

Post by fatherlearningtolove »

By the way - nickman, I see your private message and I wrote a long reply, but I'm too new to send it - don't have 15 posts yet. I will save it and send it as soon as I can, though....

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10034
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1223 times
Been thanked: 1621 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #258

Post by Clownboat »

pokeegeorge wrote: [Replying to post 245 by Clownboat]



No, dear. Jesus knew the will of his Father was for him to sacrifice himself.

A man like Tom Hanks going back and back and back yet again for his comrades behind the lines to save them is the same kind of thing...almost certain suicide yet not done out of a self-loathing of life but love for his own...Jesus too did this out of love for his Father and for his fellow man.

To say otherwise is to miss the story altogether. Selah.
Your basically saying that when Jesus committed suicide, he did not commit suicide, because his motivation for committing suicide was what he thought his father wanted for him.

Did my wives uncle commit suicide or not? He had the power to move off of the tracks, but obviously chose not to. Maybe he was motivated to stand on the tracks because that is what he thought god wanted him to do. (We really don't know). His motivation would have been the same as Jesus's (to do the will of a god).

1sui·cide noun \ˈsü-ə-ˌsīd\
: the act of killing yourself because you do not want to continue living

: a person who commits suicide

: an action that ruins or destroys your career, social position, etc.

Where does motive fit in?
My wives uncle did not kill himself, the train did.
Jesus, did not kill himself, the Romans did.

Uncle, could have moved off the tracks.
Jesus, could have not gone to the cross.
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

pokeegeorge
Sage
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:41 pm

Post #259

Post by pokeegeorge »

[Replying to post 254 by fatherlearningtolove]



Okay then, sorry about the Unitarian label...Plz resolve the bottom of my post...

If Paul did not have the word TREMBLE in his verse, then it would make your defn of FEAR much more palatable...

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10034
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1223 times
Been thanked: 1621 times

Post #260

Post by Clownboat »

Why would Paul the author of FAITH vs. WORKS SALVATION say it then in Phillippians 2??

Schitzo?
Possibly, but more likely a closet homosexual.
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

Post Reply