A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
marketandchurch
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:51 am
Location: The People's Republic Of Portland

A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1

Post by marketandchurch »

This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #321

Post by ttruscott »

Nickman wrote:
pokeegeorge wrote: [Replying to post 311 by Nickman]

Not if Jesus is not God...
God would still be the one who planned the sacrifice.

Ummm, guys, Jesus was GOD.... seems easy to me,

peace, ted
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #322

Post by ttruscott »

pokeegeorge wrote:
...
and HE made us men that we Acts 17:26-27 ...should seek God,


You mean HE made SOME of us men that we AS ELECT should seek God...

And then there is this: Revelation 3:20 Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.

You mean 'if any man WHO IS ELECT hear my voice and open the door...

This is your Calvinism speaking, which gets in the way of many verses as rendered...


Hi pokeegeorge,
When you suggest I mean: "You mean HE made SOME of us men that we AS ELECT should seek God..." Technically, I must disagree... making men to seek HIM is indeed about the elect but if "making men" is a roundabout way of saying creating all the spirits in MY image, then no, HE made every spirit in creation to seek HIM but some would not.

Closer, I do believe we cannot open to HIM without HIS grace...being all addicted to sin and all. But I am not a Calvinist thinking they are among the worst Christians of all along with the Arminians, and Catholics and every other so called Christian that believes our loving GOD created evil by putting some people into the sin of Adam without their consent, (and then lie about it...).

Peace, Ted
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

User avatar
Nickman
Site Supporter
Posts: 5443
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Idaho
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #323

Post by Nickman »

ttruscott wrote:
Nickman wrote:
pokeegeorge wrote: [Replying to post 311 by Nickman]

Not if Jesus is not God...
God would still be the one who planned the sacrifice.

Ummm, guys, Jesus was GOD.... seems easy to me,

peace, ted
If you believe that Athanasius theology. Other Christians don't believe that idea, using the same book to confirm their beliefs.

User avatar
Choir Loft
Banned
Banned
Posts: 547
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:57 am
Location: Tampa

Post #324

Post by Choir Loft »

The dialogue at this point has become very convoluted. The answer to the primary post is quite simple. Restated it says;

"A good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell."

There are several self-contradictory implications in these eleven words.

First of all, how would you define 'decent atheist'?

Decency implies compatibility to some sort of common morality. As we all know, Atheists do not subscribe to Christian based morality - or any metaphysically based morality for that matter. To what standard, then are we going to peg the question if not the answer. It's rather like talking about apple juice when the questioner asks how to squeeze an orange. The two are not alike, therefore an answer common to both cannot be discerned.

The Bible states that God is not a respecter of men. That means that human definitions of morality don't have any currency in the halls of heaven. The morality of the community and the nation fall short of the morality of God.

"Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal."
- Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.

God's law is superior to that of man and states what man shall and shall not do. 'You shall not commit adultery', is a good example. Human law allows and even encourages adultery.

The end result of all this is that the definition of what is 'good' or 'decent' cannot be determined by human standards with regard to God. The Bible states this over and over again. With regard to human morality, God thus remains invisible. He cannot be seen in the laws and culture of man.

A good God would allow everyone, not just atheists, to go to hell.

Such a god would do this because a godless eternity is exactly what men want. Therefore, to give men what they want is only right and just.

But God is more than just. He is merciful as well and in this can God be truly seen.

Unfortunately the Atheist does not believe in either God or God's mercy, therefore he cannot avail himself of that which has been offered. Hence he determines his own eternal fate by rejecting God and God's mercy. Neither can he discern God or any of God's works because the atheist cannot provide an adequate definition of what he's looking for. (I'm not just picking on atheists here. No man can see God by means of his own definitions and criteria.)

Why then is there such a problem with divine judgment? Seems to me that those who want God get God. Those who don't get the fire. One cannot have it both ways on earth or in heaven.

The fool demands something that he has already rejected. How can it be otherwise?

and that's just me, hollering from the choir loft...
R.I.P. AMERICAN REPUBLIC
[June 21, 1788 - October 26, 2001]

- Here lies Liberty -
Born in the spring,
died in the fall.
Stabbed in the back,
forsaken by all.

fatherlearningtolove
Apprentice
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:33 pm
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Contact:

Post #325

Post by fatherlearningtolove »

[Replying to post 322 by Choir Loft]

Oh my. Where to even start. This kind of thinking gives me a sick feeling in the pit of my stomach these days. But I can't be too critical, because it's the thinking I grew up with. Though I eventually rejected it, it took quite a bit to bring me to the point where I saw it for what it truly is.

So, as there is quite a bit you've touched on here, I will ask one simple question: in what universe is "eternal conscious torment for all" loving/merciful? How can this possibly line up with a God whose very nature is love (I John 4:8,16)? Torment from which there is no possible escape does not sound like something that can be justified as loving, through any logic, no matter how twisted.
"The tree is known by its fruits. If you want to understand the social and political history of modern man, study hell."
- Thomas Merton, "New Seeds of Contemplation"

My blog

DanieltheDragon
Savant
Posts: 6224
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:37 pm
Location: Charlotte
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #326

Post by DanieltheDragon »

[Replying to post 322 by Choir Loft]
A good God would allow everyone, not just atheists, to go to hell.
this is a self defeating statement.

we ask what a good god is based on our morality. god morality is irrelevant to the question. For example kim jong-un is a just and good deity by his standards. to us we can agree he is not. So the question stands is god good for allowing an infinite punishment for a finite crime? In my opinion not good, based on the statement you just gave.

Is it moral to send a starving child to 50 years in prison for stealing an apple?

pokeegeorge
Sage
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:41 pm

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #327

Post by pokeegeorge »

[Replying to post 317 by Nickman]

If the suicide mission was of God, then it is neither suicide or has the negative effluviance which you put upon it.

Because Jesus also knew the glory promised before the foundation of the world.
He knew his bodily death was unto everlasting glory and life.

The Muslim THINKS this is true for himself. But his Allah never told him to kill innocents. So then he may not be in the next life with 57 virgins after all.

(Maybe that's a myth. How should I know).

pokeegeorge
Sage
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:41 pm

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #328

Post by pokeegeorge »

ttruscott wrote:
Nickman wrote:
pokeegeorge wrote: [Replying to post 311 by Nickman]

Not if Jesus is not God...
God would still be the one who planned the sacrifice.

Ummm, guys, Jesus was GOD.... seems easy to me,

peace, ted
Easy for you since you did not study the issue. The first three Creeds of the Christian Church DO NOT say Jesus is God. Ireneus' Rule of Faith. The Old Roman Symbol. And the Disciple's Creed.

So then they would naturally revert to DEFAULT which is the ancient view of all true monotheists, that Jesus cannot also be God with the Father.

Shema, boys and girls. The Great Command of the Judeo-Christian faith.

A Troubled Man
Guru
Posts: 2301
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:24 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #329

Post by A Troubled Man »

ttruscott wrote:
Ummm, guys, Jesus was GOD.... seems easy to me,

peace, ted
Gods can die? How does that work?

If Jesus was God, then He never died, it was all smoke and mirrors.

The Resurrection is therefore a lie.

pokeegeorge
Sage
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:41 pm

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #330

Post by pokeegeorge »

ttruscott wrote:
pokeegeorge wrote:
...
and HE made us men that we Acts 17:26-27 ...should seek God,


You mean HE made SOME of us men that we AS ELECT should seek God...

And then there is this: Revelation 3:20 Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.

You mean 'if any man WHO IS ELECT hear my voice and open the door...

This is your Calvinism speaking, which gets in the way of many verses as rendered...


Hi pokeegeorge,
When you suggest I mean: "You mean HE made SOME of us men that we AS ELECT should seek God..." Technically, I must disagree... making men to seek HIM is indeed about the elect but if "making men" is a roundabout way of saying creating all the spirits in MY image, then no, HE made every spirit in creation to seek HIM but some would not.

Closer, I do believe we cannot open to HIM without HIS grace...being all addicted to sin and all. But I am not a Calvinist thinking they are among the worst Christians of all along with the Arminians, and Catholics and every other so called Christian that believes our loving GOD created evil by putting some people into the sin of Adam without their consent, (and then lie about it...).

Peace, Ted


How about just looking at this biblically? The Bible says to use your will as much as you can for the commands of the Bible...the first command being Shema.

Being elect or non-elect has nothing to do with our will, since we cannot know absolutely if WE are elect or non-elect. A Calvinist sees ELECTION as unto salvation primarily...

Election is really unto covenant. And we as men must work out this covenant as best we can. Using our WILL which may not be in the end unencumbered. Yet all we have as men to grow the seed which you have said must come first.

Post Reply