A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
marketandchurch
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:51 am
Location: The People's Republic Of Portland

A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1

Post by marketandchurch »

This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

pokeegeorge
Sage
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:41 pm

Post #411

Post by pokeegeorge »

[Replying to post 406 by DanieltheDragon]


which brings us back to the question the op presented. There is a message of haves and have nots in the bible regardless of your belief in hell. why would a good god do this?
To test us. Life is a test and challenge. God has challenged us to be faithful and good.

fatherlearningtolove
Apprentice
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:33 pm
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Contact:

Post #412

Post by fatherlearningtolove »

[Replying to post 406 by DanieltheDragon]

You're right, and I do think there is a problem with the message. That's why I started exploring, and eventually became a universalist, a position I defend in great detail in this series of posts on my blog.
"The tree is known by its fruits. If you want to understand the social and political history of modern man, study hell."
- Thomas Merton, "New Seeds of Contemplation"

My blog

pokeegeorge
Sage
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:41 pm

Post #413

Post by pokeegeorge »

[Replying to post 401 by JohnA]


That is disgusting.
Your attitude of theism in a nutshell. We understand your POV.

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20961
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 216 times
Been thanked: 389 times
Contact:

Post #414

Post by otseng »

Choir Loft wrote: And if there is anything close to hate and misrepresentation you yourself are guilty for you have provided nothing here to substantiate your argument except your own venom.

Repent and be saved. Reject the mercy of Christ and His grace and you will die in your sins.

He who calls good evil and who sows the seeds of discontent shall reap judgment from his own mouth.

and that's just me, hollering from the choir loft....
:warning: Moderator Warning


Please avoid inflammatory remarks and also responding with preaching.

Please review our Rules.

______________

Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.

DanieltheDragon
Savant
Posts: 6224
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:37 pm
Location: Charlotte
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #415

Post by DanieltheDragon »

[Replying to post 409 by fatherlearningtolove]

that certainly is one option. However , personally for me it feels as one is creating their own personal deity. Which is a deal breaker for me.

fatherlearningtolove
Apprentice
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:33 pm
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Contact:

Post #416

Post by fatherlearningtolove »

[Replying to post 412 by DanieltheDragon]

How do you know that you aren't the one who is creating your own deity?
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do.
- Anne Lamott
"The tree is known by its fruits. If you want to understand the social and political history of modern man, study hell."
- Thomas Merton, "New Seeds of Contemplation"

My blog

DanieltheDragon
Savant
Posts: 6224
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:37 pm
Location: Charlotte
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #417

Post by DanieltheDragon »

fatherlearningtolove wrote: [Replying to post 412 by DanieltheDragon]

How do you know that you aren't the one who is creating your own deity?
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do.
- Anne Lamott

? this seems like a childish question, along the veins of "I am rubber your glue"

if I don't believe in any gods how am I creating one?

secondly I validated your belief and followed it up with my personal reason for not believing the universalist theology. This does not diminish your position. It is just a feeling I have towards pantheism and universalists

fatherlearningtolove
Apprentice
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:33 pm
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Contact:

Post #418

Post by fatherlearningtolove »

[Replying to post 414 by DanieltheDragon]

Ah, I see. Apologies.

Clarification: I am a panENtheist, not a pantheist.
"The tree is known by its fruits. If you want to understand the social and political history of modern man, study hell."
- Thomas Merton, "New Seeds of Contemplation"

My blog

DanieltheDragon
Savant
Posts: 6224
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:37 pm
Location: Charlotte
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #419

Post by DanieltheDragon »

[Replying to post 415 by fatherlearningtolove]

no worries I can see what I could be read as arrogance

fatherlearningtolove
Apprentice
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:33 pm
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Contact:

Post #420

Post by fatherlearningtolove »

[Replying to post 416 by DanieltheDragon]

One thing I would challenge your challenge with - do you think a universalist doesn't struggle really hard with questions like "what about Hitler?" Because, I gotta tell you, while I believe that Love can conquer all, I have definitely come face to face with some hard-hearted individuals, and it is TOUGH believing that somehow, in the end, Love will conquer them. But I HAVE to believe it's true - I HAVE to live as if it were. It's the only way to ensure moral integrity - to ensure that I'm not setting myself up as judge and jury. Because I've realized - no matter how hard the individual, there are reasons they are that way. They weren't born in a vacuum - they were influenced by their upbringing. Everyone who hurts others was hurt at some point in their life. I don't see any way of breaking out of that cycle except to completely refuse to participate in it.
"The tree is known by its fruits. If you want to understand the social and political history of modern man, study hell."
- Thomas Merton, "New Seeds of Contemplation"

My blog

Post Reply