A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
marketandchurch
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:51 am
Location: The People's Republic Of Portland

A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1

Post by marketandchurch »

This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20831
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 362 times
Contact:

Post #491

Post by otseng »

JohnA wrote: More dogma from loath, anchored in the fatuous.
Another con man trying to sell to the fool; you are selling to yourself.
JohnA wrote: You confronted your dogma and found it is a coward.
My questions linger answers from your incoherent dogma. Deal with it or run like your dogma: housing where only the intellectual bankrupt do.
I answered your furious fatuous drivel, why do you refuse to answer my great questions on your screwed-up dogma?
The religious area all the same: hide behind your dogma, until exposed then you run like babies with wet pants. How wet is yours, dear irrational dogma King?
JohnA wrote: Answer my questions, or join your dogma on the land of infinite repulsive stifling delusion, swimming in drought with that made up incompetent god anchored in agley puss.
:warning: Moderator Final Warning

This forum is for civil and respectful debate. Please read through the rules and abide by them.


______________

Moderator final warnings serve as the last strike towards users. Additional violations will result in a probation vote. Further infractions will lead to banishment. Any challenges or replies to moderator warnings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10001
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1214 times
Been thanked: 1609 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #492

Post by Clownboat »

Stan wrote: [Replying to post 448 by Clownboat]
No, just faith in God. It really doesn't matter to me if you share it or not. Absolutes are absolutes, despite peoples conceptions. I don't NEED to earn anything from people here who aren't even brave enough to use their own name of picture, and it is a two way street Clown.
Copernicus and Plato knew a truth long before anyone in this world believed them. They were NOT swayed by peer pressure either.
I don't understand, how does this even address what I said?
- (Here it is again) "I object to your claim that faith is evidence.
If you are a person that is capable of faith, all that is required is that you apply said faith to a religion. Congrats, you are not a follower of said religion. Faith can lead to any religion of your choosing, for that reason, faith cannot be evidence of a religion being true."
I didn't claim anything
(You claimed) Faith IS evidence.
(You claimed) Faith is absolutely required for belief.

Those are a couple things you claimed, which I addressed, which your reply does not seem to address back. Instead you spoke of Plato and Copernicus.
Faith also leads you to reject my God and my beliefs, so whose faith is the right one?
I don't have faith. Remember, I find faith to be foolish for the reasons I stated above that you chose not to address.
Jesus is TRUTH. Simple and absolute. Of course just like the contemporaries of Plato and Copernicus, you can't know until you accept Him and seek after Him. That you faithfully believe your perception of reality IS the only reality, shows just how narrow your view really is.
Let me guess, these claims are just more claims that you are not making.
:roll:
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10001
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1214 times
Been thanked: 1609 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #493

Post by Clownboat »

Stan wrote: [Replying to post 449 by Clownboat]

I don't know, did you already know this? I know SOME people think they KNOW everything.
This is the most recent claim that you have now made that I find ridiculous.
I have never met a person that has claimed to know everything. Maybe we run in different circles?

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10001
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1214 times
Been thanked: 1609 times

Post #494

Post by Clownboat »

Stan wrote: [Replying to post 450 by Clownboat]

No, I'm stating a fact.

The DNA analysis would have to be proven to be correct AND accurate.
There is also a mtDNA db that shows mankind has a common mother from North Africa some 50 thousand years ago, so I guess their guess is as good as your assertion.

How much scientific propaganda must you swallow before you begin to question IT?
Yes I do have a priori of God, and you obviously do NOT. God gave it to me as I submitted to Him. That is the way it works Clown, NOT the reverse.

Rom 10:17
So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
Former believer for 2 decades Stan. So I'm sorry, but I did have a priori belief that the Bible was true. (I fail to see how claiming to have this is a positive thing though, but still thought I would address your false statement).

I overcame it, you have yet to. For that reason, I don't find you qualified to tell me "how it works".
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10001
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1214 times
Been thanked: 1609 times

Post #495

Post by Clownboat »

fatherlearningtolove wrote: [Replying to post 462 by JohnA]

I would like you to try two thought exercises.

Exercise 1: I don't believe in George Washington. Prove to me that he exists. You can't do it. Oh, someone has wooden teeth? How do I know those were actually his? They could be anyone's! All that crap in the history books is myth!

Exercise 2: Did Robin Hood exist? Let's say you meet a history professor who has done his life's work on him, and believes that he did, but thinks most of our stories are legends. However, he still believes we can learn things from this character. Why would you spend hours on an internet forum trying to prove to him that he needs to give up his beliefs and admit that Robin Hood never existed? Especially since he's put so much work into it, and you haven't?

This would not necessarily be his reason, but it is one I found to be reasonable.

Flail: Only when Muslims and Christians stop teaching their children that God loves only them, and so despises the others so as to sentence them to eternal hell, will we have a chance to stop the violence and bloodshed. Please leave your children out of your superstitions.

Most believers here are not likely to change their beliefs, but maybe, just maybe some will not tell their children that their god loves them because they are special and anyone that does not serve that same god deserves to burn in hell for eternity. Maybe, just maybe they will choose to focus on Jesus's love instead.
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

User avatar
Stan
Scholar
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: Calgary

Post #496

Post by Stan »

Clownboat wrote:
Stan wrote: [Replying to post 450 by Clownboat]

No, I'm stating a fact.

The DNA analysis would have to be proven to be correct AND accurate.
There is also a mtDNA db that shows mankind has a common mother from North Africa some 50 thousand years ago, so I guess their guess is as good as your assertion.

How much scientific propaganda must you swallow before you begin to question IT?
Yes I do have a priori of God, and you obviously do NOT. God gave it to me as I submitted to Him. That is the way it works Clown, NOT the reverse.

Rom 10:17
So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
Former believer for 2 decades Stan. So I'm sorry, but I did have a priori belief that the Bible was true. (I fail to see how claiming to have this is a positive thing though, but still thought I would address your false statement).

I overcame it, you have yet to. For that reason, I don't find you qualified to tell me "how it works".
So you're telling me/us that you are now apostate after 20 years of trying to believe. I'll give you a quote from Yoda.

"Do, or do not, there is no try" Apparently even fictional sci-fi characters can get it right once in a while.

Maybe you don't really understand what 'priori' means?

I don't have to overcome anything, Jesus has overcome it all for me.

What is IT? Truth or propaganda? I know who the TRUTH is. I could care less about propaganda.
Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth.
2 Tim 2:15
8-)

User avatar
Stan
Scholar
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: Calgary

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #497

Post by Stan »

Clownboat wrote:
Stan wrote: [Replying to post 449 by Clownboat]

I don't know, did you already know this? I know SOME people think they KNOW everything.
This is the most recent claim that you have now made that I find ridiculous.
I have never met a person that has claimed to know everything. Maybe we run in different circles?

Do you actually practice prevaricating Clown?

Where did I say, "I know people who CLAIM to know everything." ?
Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth.
2 Tim 2:15
8-)

DanieltheDragon
Savant
Posts: 6224
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:37 pm
Location: Charlotte
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #498

Post by DanieltheDragon »

[Replying to post 494 by Stan]

for reference go to post 449. although it seems rich with sarcasm

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10001
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1214 times
Been thanked: 1609 times

Post #499

Post by Clownboat »

Stan wrote:
Clownboat wrote:
Stan wrote: [Replying to post 450 by Clownboat]

No, I'm stating a fact.

The DNA analysis would have to be proven to be correct AND accurate.
There is also a mtDNA db that shows mankind has a common mother from North Africa some 50 thousand years ago, so I guess their guess is as good as your assertion.

How much scientific propaganda must you swallow before you begin to question IT?
Yes I do have a priori of God, and you obviously do NOT. God gave it to me as I submitted to Him. That is the way it works Clown, NOT the reverse.

Rom 10:17
So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
Former believer for 2 decades Stan. So I'm sorry, but I did have a priori belief that the Bible was true. (I fail to see how claiming to have this is a positive thing though, but still thought I would address your false statement).

I overcame it, you have yet to. For that reason, I don't find you qualified to tell me "how it works".
So you're telling me/us that you are now apostate after 20 years of trying to believe. I'll give you a quote from Yoda.

"Do, or do not, there is no try" Apparently even fictional sci-fi characters can get it right once in a while.

Maybe you don't really understand what 'priori' means?

I don't have to overcome anything, Jesus has overcome it all for me.

What is IT? Truth or propaganda? I know who the TRUTH is. I could care less about propaganda.
Come on Stan. At least Jesus likely existed as a real person to some degree. You do him a disservice to compare him to Yoda.

I do appreciate comparing Yoda's words to that of an un-proven god concept though, that at least is reasonable.

Can you explain to us how Jesus overcame something for you? Please describe the process that was involved and show us how it is that Jesus did this overcoming for you.
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20831
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 362 times
Contact:

Post #500

Post by otseng »

Stan wrote: Do you actually practice prevaricating Clown?
Moderator Comment

Please do not make any personal comments.

Please review the Rules.


______________

Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.

Post Reply