A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
marketandchurch
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:51 am
Location: The People's Republic Of Portland

A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1

Post by marketandchurch »

This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10033
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1221 times
Been thanked: 1620 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #501

Post by Clownboat »

Stan wrote:
Clownboat wrote:
Stan wrote: [Replying to post 449 by Clownboat]

I don't know, did you already know this? I know SOME people think they KNOW everything.
This is the most recent claim that you have now made that I find ridiculous.
I have never met a person that has claimed to know everything. Maybe we run in different circles?

Do you actually practice prevaricating Clown?

Where did I say, "I know people who CLAIM to know everything." ?
You didn't say that Stan. Why would I try to prove something you didn't say?

Here is what you did say:
I know SOME people think they KNOW everything.
And you ask if I practice prevaricating? Gotta love irony huh?

I found it ridiculous because I have never met a person that claims to know everything. I then suggested that maybe we run in different circles. You know, you with people that claim to know everything, and me having never met a person that would make such a claim.

Whether you are avoiding telling the truth, or this is just a straw man is yet to be seen. I'm guessing you really don't know anyone that claims to know everything, and that your statement was just a bit of prevaricating, but you have yet to address that.

Do you really know some people that think they know everything? Keep in mind this all stemmed from you alluding to how far humans are from being all knowing, and that statement was made because you claimed I don't know what some undefined god's purpose for creating us was. (Post 429 for reference)

It seemed ridiculous from the start just by positing the idea of all knowing humans. But again, it could just be possible that we run in different circles.
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

User avatar
Stan
Scholar
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: Calgary

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #502

Post by Stan »

DanieltheDragon wrote: [Replying to post 494 by Stan]

for reference go to post 449. although it seems rich with sarcasm
Nothing to do with this Daniel.
Last edited by Stan on Tue Oct 01, 2013 3:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth.
2 Tim 2:15
8-)

User avatar
Stan
Scholar
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: Calgary

Post #503

Post by Stan »

Clownboat wrote:
Come on Stan. At least Jesus likely existed as a real person to some degree. You do him a disservice to compare him to Yoda.

I do appreciate comparing Yoda's words to that of an un-proven god concept though, that at least is reasonable.

Can you explain to us how Jesus overcame something for you? Please describe the process that was involved and show us how it is that Jesus did this overcoming for you.

Truth is truth no matter where it is found Clown. No sense wasting His Words on you seeing as you are now apostate.

and there is the equivocation again. First you tell me I'm doing a disservice to Jesus by comparing Him to Yoda (which I didn't) and then you say I'm comparing Yoda's words to God when I'm not either. If this is not prevarication, then what is?

I see no reason to explain anything further to you as you have no real desire to learn or understand given you have already admitted you are now apostate after having tried for 20 years to believe. Our conversation is finished here. You have been properly instructed.
Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth.
2 Tim 2:15
8-)

User avatar
Stan
Scholar
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: Calgary

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #504

Post by Stan »

Clownboat wrote: You didn't say that Stan. Why would I try to prove something you didn't say?
Here is what you did say:
I know SOME people think they KNOW everything.
Exactly, so WHY did you say this?
Clownboat wrote: I have never met a person that has claimed to know everything.

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck then it's a duck!
Clownboat wrote: I found it ridiculous because I have never met a person that claims to know everything. I then suggested that maybe we run in different circles. You know, you with people that claim to know everything, and me having never met a person that would make such a claim.
That's all good and well, and neither have I so why say it? Again you prevaricate here because I don't KNOW people who CLAIM to know everything as you keep saying I do. I know people who THINK they know everything.

Clownboat wrote: Whether you are avoiding telling the truth, or this is just a straw man is yet to be seen. I'm guessing you really don't know anyone that claims to know everything, and that your statement was just a bit of prevaricating, but you have yet to address that.
There can only be two reason why you insist on prevaricating in this fashion, and neither one is conducive to productive discussion so I won't discuss this with you ANY more.

Please play your games with someone else.
Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth.
2 Tim 2:15
8-)

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10033
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1221 times
Been thanked: 1620 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #505

Post by Clownboat »

Stan wrote:
Clownboat wrote: You didn't say that Stan. Why would I try to prove something you didn't say?
Here is what you did say:
I know SOME people think they KNOW everything.
Exactly, so WHY did you say this?
Clownboat wrote: I have never met a person that has claimed to know everything.

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and looks like a duck then it's a duck!
Clownboat wrote: I found it ridiculous because I have never met a person that claims to know everything. I then suggested that maybe we run in different circles. You know, you with people that claim to know everything, and me having never met a person that would make such a claim.
That's all good and well, and neither have I so why say it? Again you prevaricate here because I don't KNOW people who CLAIM to know everything as you keep saying I do. I know people who THINK they know everything.

Clownboat wrote: Whether you are avoiding telling the truth, or this is just a straw man is yet to be seen. I'm guessing you really don't know anyone that claims to know everything, and that your statement was just a bit of prevaricating, but you have yet to address that.
There can only be two reason why you insist on prevaricating in this fashion, and neither one is conducive to productive discussion so I won't discuss this with you ANY more.

Please play your games with someone else.
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. - Socrates

All this fuss from you, and then you once again admit to knowing people that think they know everything. :blink:
I know people who THINK they know everything.
I will maintain that I have never met such a person and apparently will have to go to my grave not knowing if that is due to who we hang out with, or some other un-known reason. You seem unwilling to discuss this, and quite frankly, if I were in your shoes, I would exit stage left as well.

Be well Stan.
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

User avatar
help3434
Guru
Posts: 1509
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: United States
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #506

Post by help3434 »

[Replying to post 501 by Stan]

How do you know that they think they know everything if they don't claim it? Are you a mind reader?

User avatar
Stan
Scholar
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: Calgary

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #507

Post by Stan »

[Replying to post 502 by Clownboat]


Well at least you finally figured out what I did say. Now do you see the difference between THINK and CLAIM or have you really seen it all along?

I always amazes me how those that prevaricate so much end up doing it subconsciously without even realizing it.
Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth.
2 Tim 2:15
8-)

User avatar
Stan
Scholar
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: Calgary

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #508

Post by Stan »

help3434 wrote: [Replying to post 501 by Stan]

How do you know that they think they know everything if they don't claim it? Are you a mind reader?

Actions speak much louder than words.
Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who does not need to be ashamed and who correctly handles the word of truth.
2 Tim 2:15
8-)

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10033
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1221 times
Been thanked: 1620 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #509

Post by Clownboat »

Stan wrote: [Replying to post 502 by Clownboat]


Well at least you finally figured out what I did say. Now do you see the difference between THINK and CLAIM or have you really seen it all along?

I always amazes me how those that prevaricate so much end up doing it subconsciously without even realizing it.
You just don't get it Stan.
I don't care if you know people that "think" they know everything, or if you know people that "claim" to know everything. I'm curious either way as to why you know either of these types of people, because I have never ran in to either.

"Think" or "know", matters not. Get it?

And as someone else pointed out to you already:
How do you know that they think they know everything if they don't claim it? Are you a mind reader?
Now back to avoiding the question and calling me a liar, right?

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. - Socrates
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10033
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1221 times
Been thanked: 1620 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #510

Post by Clownboat »

Stan wrote:
help3434 wrote: [Replying to post 501 by Stan]

How do you know that they think they know everything if they don't claim it? Are you a mind reader?

Actions speak much louder than words.
I'm curious. What actions do you observe that cause you to know that someone either "thinks" or "claims" that they know everything?
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

Post Reply