A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
marketandchurch
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:51 am
Location: The People's Republic Of Portland

A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1

Post by marketandchurch »

This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #661

Post by JohnA »

myth-one.com wrote:
Nickman wrote:This deity would see things as if they already happened, i.e. looking into the past.
myth-one.com wrote:So this deity would look into a past which has not yet occurred. :-k
Nickman wrote:If they are omniscient then they know everything whether it be the past, present or future.
Myth-one.com wrote:No, if they are omniscient they know everything -- period.
Nickman wrote:And this is different from what I said, how?
Future: something that will exist or happen in time to come.

Nothing exists in the "future" by definition.

The result of an unmade choice (A, B, or C) cannot be found in any future until it is made in someone's present tense. When that occurs it becomes part of history, and will be available to the future only when that future time becomes present time.

If there was no free will choice to be made, then God would not have asked us to choose:
I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live: (Deuteronomy 30:19)

Because God cannot lie:
Titus 1:2 wrote:In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began;
If God cannot lie, and He states that we have the freedom to choose, then we have the freedom to choose.
Nickman wrote:I didn't write this. John A did and you quoted it as if I said this.
My mistake, sorry. I'm :confused2:

==========================================
(2nd attempt :lol: ) JohnA wrote:Where did he find time to create anything when he is where there is not time?
There is nowhere where there is not the passage of time.
JohnA wrote:As stated before (and S Hawking has a long video on this if you want to see it), is you have no time then you can not action anything, you need time to go from state A to state B, so a timeless god could not have created the universe since he had to time to create it.

How can this timeless deity know what is happening a universe that has time - how do you explain the timeless to time link? Again, a timeless deity can not be the creator. Not can this timeless deity 'look back' into future, or the past in a universe with time.
Timeless as you use it here, simply means neverending, everlasting, infinite, etc.

And while man cannot understand infinity -- in time or distance; there are examples of God creating things over time in the scriptures.

Yes, I think Nick is contracting himself with the looking back into future thing. I pointed it out to him as well, but he does not accept it.

Are you saying that your god is not timeless, but eternal (endless time, in one direction of time, the arrow of time)?
Well, we have some very good evidence (not conclusive yet) that the universe had a beginning (time = zero). If this is true, then your god can not be the creator.

The way around this for out is that the the universe has always existed, never had a start, and never will have an end That would give you a god that is always in time, and always been. But the problem with this is that the 2nd law of thermodynamics says that the universe will end at some time - we are running out of useful energy: entropy is increasing.


You still have not explained to me how humans have free-will when your god has perfect foreknowledge.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #662

Post by ttruscott »

JohnA wrote:
...

That also means that you can not claim any prophecies as these clearly rely on him KNOWING exactly what humans results of their decisions would be in order for the prophecy fulfillment to take place.

...
All people on earth are sinners is just another way of saying only sinners get sent to live on earth. Our time of free will was in sheol, pre-earth. wherein all of HIS creation self separated themselves into the three main groups, the reprobate Tares and the Elect and those elect who also chose to be evil in HIS sight and under need of redemption.

Since sin is enslaving and addicting no sinner has free will and since only sinners are sent to live on earth it adds up that all the verses against us having free will here on earth are to be read at face value.

The sinful elect have lives perfectly predestined to bring them to repentance, redemption and sanctification. The tares are used by HIS will to further HIS plans for the sinful elect.

So what's your objection to prophecy again? Sometimes it is better to ask than accuse.

Peace, Ted
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #663

Post by ttruscott »

JohnA wrote:
ttruscott wrote:
...
HE knew all the possibilities of such decision making as possibilities without knowing which one any person would choose.
Have your cake and eat it? I do not understand what you wrote above: It's contradictory.

...
HE knew all the possibilities of such decision making as possibilities without knowing which one any person would choose.

The future is all possibility not a reality until it happens and GOD knows all possibilities full and completely. HE creates reality out of possibility by decree.

Will an electron spin to the left or the right? Before it is created it is a possibility it may go in either direction but once HE decrees its creation and its spin it is reality.

HE decreed our creation with the ability to make true free will decisions.
HE did NOT decree the results of those decisions.
Therefore since HE did not decreed them to be real, the results were just possibilities. All the results of true free will decision making were just possibilities known perfectly by HIM until someone chose which possibility they believed in by which decision HE let them self create their chosen reality.

A practical example:

GOD wanted to create a Church, a congregation of people in full loving, holy communion with HIM in heaven BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO BE THERE WITH HIM IN THAT REALITY! They must have truly wanted love, holiness and heaven as HE defines it.

How did HE find all the people in HIS creation who would like to live that way, after HE taught them all about it and all about the alternatives? HE asked them to make a true free will decision to accept HIM as their GOD and to accept HIS purpose for their creation.

Before they chose it was possible any single person might choose either
1. to accept HIM as their GOD and HIS purposes for them
2. to reject HIM and HIS purposes

and since HE did not decree which choice they would make and by HIS sovereign decree allowed then to to freely choose what they wanted, they chose and self created the reality of their eternal relationship with HIM as their GOD or as their eternal enemy.

They made the possibilities into reality by their choice and HE did not know which possibility they would choose because HIS omniscience is from HIS decrees of creation and HE did not decree which way they would choose.

Now I know it is false and blasphemous to say that GOD knew who would go to hell before their creation but created them anyway so I find this to be satisfying though if it turns out the blasphemy is resolved somehow else I won't care too much because I know it will be put to rest in all good time.

If the orthodox version of omniscience means that HE must know who goes to hell but created them anyway then it must be replaced. It is blasphemous.

Peace, Ted
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #664

Post by JohnA »

ttruscott wrote:
JohnA wrote:
...

That also means that you can not claim any prophecies as these clearly rely on him KNOWING exactly what humans results of their decisions would be in order for the prophecy fulfillment to take place.

...
All people on earth are sinners is just another way of saying only sinners get sent to live on earth. Our time of free will was in sheol, pre-earth. wherein all of HIS creation self separated themselves into the three main groups, the reprobate Tares and the Elect and those elect who also chose to be evil in HIS sight and under need of redemption.

Since sin is enslaving and addicting no sinner has free will and since only sinners are sent to live on earth it adds up that all the verses against us having free will here on earth are to be read at face value.

The sinful elect have lives perfectly predestined to bring them to repentance, redemption and sanctification. The tares are used by HIS will to further HIS plans for the sinful elect.

So what's your objection to prophecy again? Sometimes it is better to ask than accuse.

Peace, Ted
All people on earth are sinners
That is just your opinion because you already falsely concluded that your god exists.
The problem that you have is that your god must have had something wrong with his plan when he created the humans. Surely he created them with foreknowledge that they would sin? if he did not have this foreknowledge then he is incompetent, because he created these humans in his image (with no knowledge of good and evil) and then blamed them when they did something 'wrong' (sinned) when he did not give them the tools.

So what's your objection to prophecy again?
I stated it already. if your god has no foreknowledge of what humans will do, then none of his prophecies can be fulfilled; it is merely chance if they do.

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #665

Post by JohnA »

ttruscott wrote:
JohnA wrote:
ttruscott wrote:
...
HE knew all the possibilities of such decision making as possibilities without knowing which one any person would choose.
Have your cake and eat it? I do not understand what you wrote above: It's contradictory.

...
HE knew all the possibilities of such decision making as possibilities without knowing which one any person would choose.

The future is all possibility not a reality until it happens and GOD knows all possibilities full and completely. HE creates reality out of possibility by decree.

Will an electron spin to the left or the right? Before it is created it is a possibility it may go in either direction but once HE decrees its creation and its spin it is reality.

HE decreed our creation with the ability to make true free will decisions.
HE did NOT decree the results of those decisions.
Therefore since HE did not decreed them to be real, the results were just possibilities. All the results of true free will decision making were just possibilities known perfectly by HIM until someone chose which possibility they believed in by which decision HE let them self create their chosen reality.

A practical example:

GOD wanted to create a Church, a congregation of people in full loving, holy communion with HIM in heaven BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO BE THERE WITH HIM IN THAT REALITY! They must have truly wanted love, holiness and heaven as HE defines it.

How did HE find all the people in HIS creation who would like to live that way, after HE taught them all about it and all about the alternatives? HE asked them to make a true free will decision to accept HIM as their GOD and to accept HIS purpose for their creation.

Before they chose it was possible any single person might choose either
1. to accept HIM as their GOD and HIS purposes for them
2. to reject HIM and HIS purposes

and since HE did not decree which choice they would make and by HIS sovereign decree allowed then to to freely choose what they wanted, they chose and self created the reality of their eternal relationship with HIM as their GOD or as their eternal enemy.

They made the possibilities into reality by their choice and HE did not know which possibility they would choose because HIS omniscience is from HIS decrees of creation and HE did not decree which way they would choose.

Now I know it is false and blasphemous to say that GOD knew who would go to hell before their creation but created them anyway so I find this to be satisfying though if it turns out the blasphemy is resolved somehow else I won't care too much because I know it will be put to rest in all good time.

If the orthodox version of omniscience means that HE must know who goes to hell but created them anyway then it must be replaced. It is blasphemous.

Peace, Ted
Now I know it is false and blasphemous to say that GOD knew who would go to hell before their creation but created them anyway
Yes, you are arguing that your god is not all knowing, he has reduced omniscience. He knows all possibilities (options), but not the decisions (which option) any person would choose).
Therefore, you can not claim any prophecies. Your god's plan is not complete, he plays dice, he fills his head with pointless possibilities (options) that can not all play out.

This sounds to me like an incompetent god.
Why not just created those that he knows will end in heaven? Why have he created people at all when his aseity says he does not need us.

This is a strange god that you worship.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #666

Post by ttruscott »

JohnA wrote:
...

He knows all possibilities (options), but not the decisions (which option) any person would choose).
Therefore, you can not claim any prophecies. Your god's plan is not complete, he plays dice, he fills his head with pointless possibilities (options) that can not all play out.

...
When you read what I wrote and answer that and do no just keep pretending I wrote something else, I will continue. But not till then...

Peace, Ted

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #667

Post by JohnA »

ttruscott wrote:
JohnA wrote:
...

He knows all possibilities (options), but not the decisions (which option) any person would choose).
Therefore, you can not claim any prophecies. Your god's plan is not complete, he plays dice, he fills his head with pointless possibilities (options) that can not all play out.

...
When you read what I wrote and answer that and do no just keep pretending I wrote something else, I will continue. But not till then...

Peace, Ted
I can tell that you can not explain this contradiction. It's ok, it is a known contradiction and no real answer yet. Nobody can explain it. That may be because a maximally great being can not exist - its attributes are paradoxical.

User avatar
EduChris
Prodigy
Posts: 4615
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:34 pm
Location: U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #668

Post by EduChris »

marketandchurch wrote:...
  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.
Even within traditional fundamentalism, I don't think anyone teaches that people are sent to hell simply because they don't believe in Jesus; rather, people are sent to hell because they do not fulfill the requirement to live an entirely perfect life.

Given this, the real question is, "Who among all of humanity is eligible for mercy?" Christians will give various answers here. Almost all Christians agree that anyone who looks to Jesus as the perfect example of self-giving love, and who renounces his or her own selfish actions and desires, and who explicitly asks God for help and mercy on the basis of Jesus' sufferings on our behalf--that person will enjoy new and abundant life with God forever. Such a view does not negate other passages in the New Testament which seem to imply that God's mercy may be much broader--perhaps even broad enough to ultimately transform and renew the lives of those who have never heard of Jesus.
I am a work in process; I do not claim absolute knowledge or absolute certainty; I simply present the best working hypothesis I have at the moment, always pending new information and further insight.

α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ ν ξ ο π � σ ς τ υ φ χ ψ ω - Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ � Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω

DanieltheDragon
Savant
Posts: 6224
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:37 pm
Location: Charlotte
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #669

Post by DanieltheDragon »

[Replying to post 664 by EduChris]
Even within traditional fundamentalism, I don't think anyone teaches that people are sent to hell simply because they don't believe in Jesus; rather, people are sent to hell because they do not fulfill the requirement to live an entirely perfect life
Yes some people really do teach this. Furthermore your re-wording of it doesn't really change the implications of someone going to hell. An all knowing all powerful god is ultimately responsible for his creation free will or not. The mere existence of hell negates a loving merciful and just god.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #670

Post by ttruscott »

DanieltheDragon wrote:
...

The mere existence of hell negates a loving merciful and just god.

...
Pfffff... hell PROVES love and justice.

1. GOD created everyone in HIS image to fill heaven with true loving holy communion.
2. To allow HIS people to be able to truly love and be holy, HE had to allow free will.
3. He created everything in our reality for HIS good pleasure and HE takes no pleasure in the ways or death of the wicked.
4. When some of HIS people Chose to reject HIM as their god and chose to reject HIS promises of salvation and election to heaven, they put themselves outside of HIS pleasure, outside of HIS love and outside of HIS grace and all of HIS created reality for ever.

HIS love for the rest of creation that did not chose to become irrevocably evil never wavered but HE had to honour the free will choice of those who rejected HIM to accept the consequences of their decision even if they thought HE was lying, and HE had to honour HIS character of animosity and hatred toward evil where HE could not allow it in HIS creation.

To allow such evil to exist in HIS reality would have meant, as our lives here on earth do prove, that the church in heaven would be under constant relentless attack, mentally, spiritually and physically for eternity...not in HIS plan at all.

So hell proves HIS love and mercy for the ones who chose to accept HIM as their GOD and to accept HIS purpose of full loving holy communion in heaven for eternity for them. If you did not want that, you do not get that.

Simplistic statements make a good sound bite but they do not make a good understanding of reality.

Peace, Ted
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

Post Reply