A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
marketandchurch
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:51 am
Location: The People's Republic Of Portland

A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1

Post by marketandchurch »

This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

shnarkle
Guru
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:56 am

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #711

Post by shnarkle »

[Replying to post 704 by Elijah John]

So how do you know that Jesus actually said the things that are attributed to him in the Gospels? He did not write them himself.

shnarkle: I have no reason to doubt the veracity of the gospel accounts.
--------------------------------

Also, how about the verses attributed to Jesus saying that his second coming would be in the lifetime of his apostles?

shnarkle: False interpretation, look at the context again.
------------------------------
That did not happen. They all died and Jesus still has not returned. Does that make Jesus a false prophet of does it make the Gospel writers fallible?

shnarkle: It makes your interpretation false. It's a comprehension problem, look at the context again.
--------------------------------

And where in the Old testament does it say that the messiah would come twice, because he would not fulfill the messianic prophecies the first time around?

shnarkle: Look at the passage Jesus reads aloud in the synagogue. He only reads what has transpired up to that point. He stops mid sentence indicating just what prophecies had been fulfilled, and what prophecies were to come later.

shnarkle
Guru
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:56 am

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #712

Post by shnarkle »

marketandchurch wrote: This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person.

shnarkle: It isn't that God doesn't care, but that it doesn't matter how good anyone is it will never be good enough to get you into heaven. You can't save yourself. You can't meet God's standard of righteousness. There are still plenty of reasons to be a good person. There are still plenty of reasons to do the right thing.
-------------------------------
There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying?

shnarkle: Not sure where you're getting that idea. The US went to war with the axis powers for a number of reasons, but none of them were to bring people to Christ.
----------------------------
Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

shnarkle: Some people may come to Christ because of these things, but that is for God to decide.
-------------------------

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son.

shnarkle: I think you're either mistaken in what you heard or whatever you heard was wrong. God requires righteousness, holiness, justice; regardless of whether one believes in His Son or not. No one can meet that standard except His Son, and only those who are chosen by God will be enabled to obey and meet those standards. Just because one can't meet those standards doesn't mean that there's no point in doing the right thing anyways. The smart money is on doing the right thing. The benefits to doing the right thing far outweigh doing the wrong or immoral thing even if one is damned to hell for eternity.
------------------------------
------------------------------
Then one's goodness is pointless.

shnarkle: Not at all. The benefits are limitless.
-----------------------------
One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.
shnarkle: That would make many miserable including the perpetrator.
----------------------------


Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son.

shnarkle: I don't think you were challenging their faith, but instead proposing something that had nothing to do with their faith. You are presenting your own facts rather than the actual facts. You are assuming that there is such a thing as a decent person that God will look upon with mercy because they are such good people. That isn't the case. All people are fallen and degenerate to one degree or another.
---------------------------------
I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus.

shnarkle: They don't know what they're talking about imo. No one can accept Jesus unless "the Father draws them". The power of God must act on a person to save them. That power is what gives a person the ability to see and accept Christ.
----------------------------------


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.
shnarkle: As some have already pointed out, the New Testament is just what the Old Testament was pointing towards, or revealed. The covenants that God made throughout the Old Testament are essentially no different than what was made in the New Testament. Salvation regardless of when or where one lives is always the same. Those who endeavor to live exemplary lives of virtue to establish their own righteousness will have no place in the kingdom of God. They will never be able to meet God's standard of righteousness.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #713

Post by ttruscott »

help3434 wrote: [Replying to shnarkle]

So God only calls some people to heaven? I guess the bible was lying about God being no respecter of persons then.
You have it wrong - respecter of person mean to be biased in their favour. The calling of the elect is not favouritism but the fulfillment of a promise to redeem them and sanctify them to be ready to enter the heavenly state of communion if they should ever chose to become evil in HIS sight. Election means under HIS promise. Salvation is the fulfillment of that promise to sinners.

Oh, those not called? By their own true free will they rejected HIM as GOD and all HIS promises thereby self creating themselves as HIS eternal enemies unable to break the bonds of sin and called by new names, demons and devils.

Peace, Ted
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

User avatar
help3434
Guru
Posts: 1509
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: United States
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #714

Post by help3434 »

[Replying to post 707 by shnarkle]

If salvation was always the same, why doesn't the Old Testament say anything about salvation?

User avatar
help3434
Guru
Posts: 1509
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: United States
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #715

Post by help3434 »

[Replying to post 705 by shnarkle]

Why does God choose to save some people and condemn others? Why do Calvinists bother Evangelizing? How can you Calvinists worship such a capricious God? The Calvinist God is no more moral than the gods of the Greeks. People are sentient beings, not pieces of clay. If God thinks of us as pieces of clay how could God so love the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life? A Calvinistic world is less meaningful than a nihilistic world.

shnarkle
Guru
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:56 am

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #716

Post by shnarkle »

[Replying to help3434]

The promise of salvation begins with God's promise to Adam and Even in the garden and continues to be repeated throughout the Old Testament. Salvation is always through God. It is always God Who redeems humanity. It was God Who saved Noah and his family in the Ark. It was God Who led Lot from Sodom and certain destruction. It was God Who saved Jacob from the famine. It was God Who redeemed Israel from bondage in Egypt. It was God Who led the cult of Israel into the Promised land, etc.

It is God Who made these promises to Adam, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Isaac,Jacob, Moses, David, etc., and it is God Who fulfills those promises.

User avatar
Danmark
Site Supporter
Posts: 12697
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:58 am
Location: Seattle
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #717

Post by Danmark »

shnarkle wrote: [Replying to help3434]

The promise of salvation begins with God's promise to Adam and Even in the garden and continues to be repeated throughout the Old Testament. Salvation is always through God. It is always God Who redeems humanity. It was God Who saved Noah and his family in the Ark. It was God Who led Lot from Sodom and certain destruction. It was God Who saved Jacob from the famine. It was God Who redeemed Israel from bondage in Egypt. It was God Who led the cult of Israel into the Promised land, etc.

It is God Who made these promises to Adam, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Isaac,Jacob, Moses, David, etc., and it is God Who fulfills those promises.
And if these things are true that it was God who flooded the world. it was God who destroyed everyone in those cities. it was God who brought famine. it was God who enslaved Israel in Egypt. it was God who enabled the land grab displacing and enslaving and killing the previous land owners.

It is God who brings iniquity and suffering into the world at his whim.

User avatar
help3434
Guru
Posts: 1509
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: United States
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #718

Post by help3434 »

[Replying to post 711 by shnarkle]

Those are all examples of saving from physical death. Please show in the Old Testament where it talks about being saved to live in an afterlife.

shnarkle
Guru
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:56 am

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #719

Post by shnarkle »

[Replying to Danmark]

The text doesn't say that it is God that brings iniquity or suffering into the world. It plainly states that this is the will of a depraved society, the depraved heart of mankind. It is God that prevails despite this depravity. It is God Who takes the depraved heart of a fallen man and gives it the gift of repentance and "begets" them as a new creation, and subsequently enabling them to resist the sinful inclination. While the iniquity and suffering aren't caused by God, they do spotlight God's sovereign power to prevail over them.

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #720

Post by ttruscott »

As a believer in our pre-conception existence, I am anathema to Calvinists but I do share a faith in election and predestination somewhat the same as theirs, so I will answer too, eh?
help3434 wrote: [Replying to post 705 by shnarkle]

Why does God choose to save some people and condemn others?


GOD allowed us all pre-earth to choose to be in HIS church or eternally on the outs. Those who accepted HIM as their GOD and HIS promises about heaven were chosen to be HIS elect. Those who decided to believe HE was a false GOD with no power rebelled and became the reprobate, fit only to be discarded.

HIS promise of election included the promise of salvation from all sin. The 'some HE chooses to save on earth' are the sinful elect HE has sown here to live with the reprobate and learn what they need to learn about sin as part of their redemptive sanctification. As eternally addicted to sin the reprobate cannot be sanctified nor make the true free will choice to accept HIM as their GOD and live here as their judgment is prepared by the sanctification unto true holiness of the sinful elect.
Why do Calvinists bother Evangelizing?


No one knows who is an elect addicted to sin and in need of the Word to start HIS redemption.
How can you Calvinists worship such a capricious God?
I can't say why they do this but I do know they go to great lengths to mitigate the harshness of their doctrine about GOD creating us sinners in Adam and creating some to be damned. The fancy dancing gyrations they pull off are an amazing display of double-think.

PCE theology has no such problem, basing election, salvation and damnation upon our own true free will choices, pre-earth.

Peace, Ted
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

Post Reply