The true face of atheism

Pointless Posts, Raves n Rants, Obscure Opinions

Moderator: Moderators

steps
Banned
Banned
Posts: 839
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:18 am

The true face of atheism

Post #1

Post by steps »

The atheists killed us by claiming : they are the civilized people , and the believers of God are following Barbaric laws .

In this topic , I will try to show some facts about their morals and belief toward the believers of God .


Horrific human toll of 'militant atheism' exposed

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/horrific-hum ... i44BSJR.99

http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/horrific-hum ... 60ZSBfpY3m


Image

http://www.skeptive.com/sources/110796/ ... rls/286441

The Myth that Religion is the #1 Cause of War

Image
http://carm.org/religion-cause-war#footnote3_s05weal

Next , Insha'a Allah .

steps
Banned
Banned
Posts: 839
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:18 am

Re: The true face of atheism

Post #31

Post by steps »

Danmark wrote:
steps wrote: The atheists killed us by claiming : they are the civilized people , and the believers of God are following Barbaric laws .

In this topic , I will try to show some facts about their morals and belief toward the believers of God .
This first post and therefor this subtopic makes a blanket claim and does not pose a question for debate, but an announcement of a position; and one based on incorrect facts.

Are we allowed to start a similar subtopic?

Re: The true face of Islam

The Muslims killed us by claiming they are the civilized people , and the believers of Allah are following barbaric laws.

You are welcome ,

here is my help : a website for the holy Quran , the source of my belief and laws also teachings

The holy Quran : http://www.islamicity.com/mosque/Surai.htm

Also prophet Mohammad sayings : http://www.searchtruth.com/hadith_books.php


I am sure you still remember the results of our debates

steps
Banned
Banned
Posts: 839
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:18 am

Post #32

Post by steps »

otseng wrote:
steps wrote:
I am writing and analyzing the belief of atheist through their hands and thoughts .

they should say : no , we do not believe in these , and these facts are not for the atheism leaders .

I am asking them to deny these facts .. but they cannot .
:warning: Moderator Warning


It is against the rules to publicly respond to moderator interventions.

Please review our Rules.

______________

Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
it is a debate , but from one side .

but as you want Boss .
MY respect

steps
Banned
Banned
Posts: 839
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:18 am

Post #33

Post by steps »

Regens Küchl wrote:
I am writing and analyzing the belief of atheist through their hands and thoughts .

they should say : no , we do not believe in these , and these facts are not for the atheism leaders .
No sense your sentences do here making my friend who calls King Ramses II an Atheist :confused2:
Did you mean this man ?
[youtube][/youtube]

Allah left his body a sign for the atheists

[ 92. So this day We shall deliver your (dead) body (out from the sea) that you may be a sign to those who come after you! And verily, many among mankind are heedless of Our Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs , revelations, etc.). ]

He is the leader of atheists

Overcomer
Guru
Posts: 1330
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 8:44 am
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 66 times

Post #34

Post by Overcomer »

I wanted to comment further on a statement that someone made earlier in this thread about the viciousness of Stalin and Mao, etc., being a sociological and political problem, not an atheistic one.

Here's the thing: Atheism was one of the key elements of Marxism. Marx believed that religion was responsible for class division and that, if we were to have a classless society, religion had to go. He coined the phrase that religion was the opiate of the masses, echoed by Lenin and then Stalin. His economic theory was based on atheism. There is no way to extricate it from their political and economic beliefs.

And, given the persecution of Christians in both the Soviet Union and China, it seems pretty clear that atheism led men like Stalin and Mao to eradicate religion and the people who practised it.

I am also aware that many atheists try to say that Hitler was a Christian based on excerpts from Mein Kampf in which he talked about his Lord and Savior and the power of the church. Well, anybody can talk the talk, but fewer walk the walk. Given that Christians are instructed to love their enemies (Luke 6:27) and that, in Christ, there is neither Jew nor Gentile (Gal. 3:8), its hard to make a case for him being a follower of Jesus.

If you read what Hitler said about religion in general and Christianity in particular, you will see that, when he made a speech or was out in public, he supported them. In private, he vilified and condemned them. In other words, he wanted the German people to believe he had an affinity for God because so many of them did, but, in private, he didnt bother to pretend to be a Christian. His friend, Albert Speer, noted this fact in his memoir, Inside the Third Reich.

In fact, Hitler had the same hatred of Christianity that Marx did. His mother was a devout Catholic and he was officially a member of the Roman Catholic Church (RCC), but it was a facade. He tried to sell himself and his ideals to the church early on. He signed a concordat in 1933 with the RCC which the church later came to regret. He couldnt get far with the Protestants at all. Many of them spoke out against him and helped Jews by hiding them or getting them out of the country. Many ended up in prison in result including Dietrich Bonhoeffer, one of the most outspoken anti-Nazi Lutheran pastors in Germany.

However, as I said, privately, he made it clear that he wanted to eradicate Christianity. For example,

"According to Baldur von Schirach, the Nazi leader of the German youth corps that would later be known as the Hitler Youth, 'the destruction of Christianity was explicitly recognized as a purpose of the National Socialist movement' from the beginning, though 'considerations of expedience made it impossible' for the movement to adopt this radical stance officially until it had consolidated power." See:

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/13/weeki ... tml?src=pm

In a book entitled Table Talk, Hitlers secretary, Martin Bormann, recorded statements the man made such as this one:

National Socialism and religion cannot exist together.... The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew.

Hitlers main influences were Charles Darwin and Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, not Jesus Christ. That should be pretty obvious by his actions.

User avatar
dianaiad
Site Supporter
Posts: 10220
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:30 pm
Location: Southern California

Post #35

Post by dianaiad »

steps wrote:

it is a debate , but from one side .

but as you want Boss .
MY respect
:warning: Moderator Final Warning

Steps, if you have a problem with moderation, PM the moderator. Do not challenge moderator decisions on the public forum.

Please review the Rules.


______________

Moderator final warnings serve as the last strike towards users. Additional violations will result in a probation vote. Further infractions will lead to banishment. Any challenges or replies to moderator warnings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.

steps
Banned
Banned
Posts: 839
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:18 am

Post #36

Post by steps »

dianaiad wrote:
steps wrote:

it is a debate , but from one side .

but as you want Boss .
MY respect
:warning: Moderator Final Warning

Steps, if you have a problem with moderation, PM the moderator. Do not challenge moderator decisions on the public forum.

Please review the Rules.


______________

Moderator final warnings serve as the last strike towards users. Additional violations will result in a probation vote. Further infractions will lead to banishment. Any challenges or replies to moderator warnings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.

I said in my comment to otseng : as you want Boss , then I ended it by saying MY respect .
I think you have a problem not me .

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #37

Post by McCulloch »

steps wrote: I am writing and analyzing the belief of atheist through their hands and thoughts .
Yes, some atheists are complete rotters. Some may even use atheism as a support for some really bad acts. But what steps has failed to do is to show how atheism has a causal link to these bad acts. I mean, some theists have done bad things too. How is it that not believing in God makes us evil?
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

User avatar
Danmark
Site Supporter
Posts: 12697
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:58 am
Location: Seattle
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: The true face of atheism

Post #38

Post by Danmark »

steps wrote:

I am sure you still remember the results of our debates

Yes, I do with pleasure. I'm surprised you haven't given up completely and become an atheist. You are close. All you have to do is open your mind and embrace the truth, my brother. :)

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Post #39

Post by Goat »

Overcomer wrote: I wanted to comment further on a statement that someone made earlier in this thread about the viciousness of Stalin and Mao, etc., being a sociological and political problem, not an atheistic one.

Here's the thing: Atheism was one of the key elements of Marxism. Marx believed that religion was responsible for class division and that, if we were to have a classless society, religion had to go. He coined the phrase that religion was the opiate of the masses, echoed by Lenin and then Stalin. His economic theory was based on atheism. There is no way to extricate it from their political and economic beliefs.

And, given the persecution of Christians in both the Soviet Union and China, it seems pretty clear that atheism led men like Stalin and Mao to eradicate religion and the people who practised it.

I am also aware that many atheists try to say that Hitler was a Christian based on excerpts from Mein Kampf in which he talked about his Lord and Savior and the power of the church. Well, anybody can talk the talk, but fewer walk the walk. Given that Christians are instructed to love their enemies (Luke 6:27) and that, in Christ, there is neither Jew nor Gentile (Gal. 3:8), its hard to make a case for him being a follower of Jesus.

If you read what Hitler said about religion in general and Christianity in particular, you will see that, when he made a speech or was out in public, he supported them. In private, he vilified and condemned them. In other words, he wanted the German people to believe he had an affinity for God because so many of them did, but, in private, he didnt bother to pretend to be a Christian. His friend, Albert Speer, noted this fact in his memoir, Inside the Third Reich.

In fact, Hitler had the same hatred of Christianity that Marx did. His mother was a devout Catholic and he was officially a member of the Roman Catholic Church (RCC), but it was a facade. He tried to sell himself and his ideals to the church early on. He signed a concordat in 1933 with the RCC which the church later came to regret. He couldnt get far with the Protestants at all. Many of them spoke out against him and helped Jews by hiding them or getting them out of the country. Many ended up in prison in result including Dietrich Bonhoeffer, one of the most outspoken anti-Nazi Lutheran pastors in Germany.

However, as I said, privately, he made it clear that he wanted to eradicate Christianity. For example,

"According to Baldur von Schirach, the Nazi leader of the German youth corps that would later be known as the Hitler Youth, 'the destruction of Christianity was explicitly recognized as a purpose of the National Socialist movement' from the beginning, though 'considerations of expedience made it impossible' for the movement to adopt this radical stance officially until it had consolidated power." See:

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/13/weeki ... tml?src=pm

In a book entitled Table Talk, Hitlers secretary, Martin Bormann, recorded statements the man made such as this one:

National Socialism and religion cannot exist together.... The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew.

Hitlers main influences were Charles Darwin and Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, not Jesus Christ. That should be pretty obvious by his actions.

You know, the problem with Table Talk is that, well, the original transcripts were BURNED by Martin Bormann, and the people who were the transcribers said that the book was not what the original transcripts said. Bormann was viciously anti-catholic. So, I consider 'Table Talk' to be highly unreliable.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
Ooberman
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4262
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Post #40

Post by Ooberman »

Overcomer wrote: I wanted to comment further on a statement that someone made earlier in this thread about the viciousness of Stalin and Mao, etc., being a sociological and political problem, not an atheistic one.

Here's the thing: Atheism was one of the key elements of Marxism. Marx believed that religion was responsible for class division and that, if we were to have a classless society, religion had to go. He coined the phrase that religion was the opiate of the masses, echoed by Lenin and then Stalin. His economic theory was based on atheism. There is no way to extricate it from their political and economic beliefs.

And, given the persecution of Christians in both the Soviet Union and China, it seems pretty clear that atheism led men like Stalin and Mao to eradicate religion and the people who practised it.

I am also aware that many atheists try to say that Hitler was a Christian based on excerpts from Mein Kampf in which he talked about his Lord and Savior and the power of the church. Well, anybody can talk the talk, but fewer walk the walk. Given that Christians are instructed to love their enemies (Luke 6:27) and that, in Christ, there is neither Jew nor Gentile (Gal. 3:8), its hard to make a case for him being a follower of Jesus.

If you read what Hitler said about religion in general and Christianity in particular, you will see that, when he made a speech or was out in public, he supported them. In private, he vilified and condemned them. In other words, he wanted the German people to believe he had an affinity for God because so many of them did, but, in private, he didnt bother to pretend to be a Christian. His friend, Albert Speer, noted this fact in his memoir, Inside the Third Reich.

In fact, Hitler had the same hatred of Christianity that Marx did. His mother was a devout Catholic and he was officially a member of the Roman Catholic Church (RCC), but it was a facade. He tried to sell himself and his ideals to the church early on. He signed a concordat in 1933 with the RCC which the church later came to regret. He couldnt get far with the Protestants at all. Many of them spoke out against him and helped Jews by hiding them or getting them out of the country. Many ended up in prison in result including Dietrich Bonhoeffer, one of the most outspoken anti-Nazi Lutheran pastors in Germany.

However, as I said, privately, he made it clear that he wanted to eradicate Christianity. For example,

"According to Baldur von Schirach, the Nazi leader of the German youth corps that would later be known as the Hitler Youth, 'the destruction of Christianity was explicitly recognized as a purpose of the National Socialist movement' from the beginning, though 'considerations of expedience made it impossible' for the movement to adopt this radical stance officially until it had consolidated power." See:

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/13/weeki ... tml?src=pm

In a book entitled Table Talk, Hitlers secretary, Martin Bormann, recorded statements the man made such as this one:

National Socialism and religion cannot exist together.... The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew.

Hitlers main influences were Charles Darwin and Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, not Jesus Christ. That should be pretty obvious by his actions.
Hitler and Marx were right: religion is a bane to society. However, I disagree with their methods. We know migraines are bad, but we should kill everyone with a headache.

However, the Purge and other state-made mass murders was, in essence, the collateral damage created by the Church. For generations, the Church held power and abused it. It's expected, and necessary, for we, as a species, to rise up against abuses in power.

Again, I think their methods were wrong, but not their motivation. It's not as if the Church was an innocent lamb. This has nothing to do with the argument that Christianity is wrong because of it (any more than atheism is wrong because of atheist actions. This is a stupid argument)

This has to do with reality. "You reap what you sow." Leaders had used Christianity to fool the public into thinking they were good people.

Atheists call good people, people who do good acts. Christians don't. They call people with the right religion Good. (Or, that is how it had been in Christendom for generations).

Declaring yourself an atheist would get you killed.

It's not surprising a smart man noticed this horrible fact of human nature, and hoped to change it. However, he created a monster.

I'm not a Marxist, and don't think his ideas are feasible. We, as a species, don't have the capacity to be as peaceable and cooperative as Marxism requires.

All in all, it's a more complicated discuss than "Look at this number compared to this number! Booooo Atheists bad."
Thinking about God's opinions and thinking about your own opinions uses an identical thought process. - Tomas Rees

Post Reply