God Has Didn't Wants

[JoeyKnothead]

From Post 41 here:

Ever notice how God didn't want His people to be like the nations around them?

For debate:

Please offer some means to confirm the following:

1- God has didn't wants.
2- God didn't want his people to be like the nations around them.

[nothead]

[Replying to post 1 by JoeyKnothead]


1) God has what God wants, sooner or later. Actually when God wants it to be, usually.

Or always. Most of the time. I guess. My thoughts are not His. So I'm guessing.

2) When the other nations sin, like sleepen with their sisters, God tells the Hebrews, "naughty, naughty."

"Don't be like them heathens." And the Hebrew nation either did or did not. And they got whacked on their beans accordingly. Selah.

[JoeyKnothead]

From Post 2:

1) God has what God wants, sooner or later. Actually when God wants it to be, usually.

Or always. Most of the time. I guess. My thoughts are not His. So I'm guessing.

Guessing does seem to be the best the Christian can do.

2) When the other nations sin, like sleepen with their sisters, God tells the Hebrews, "naughty, naughty."

"Don't be like them heathens." And the Hebrew nation either did or did not. And they got whacked on their beans accordingly. Selah.

Please explain how this relates to confirmation of the claims presented in the OP.

[nothead]

Guessing does seem to be the best the Christian can do.

And you guessin' there ain't no God. Your guess is as good as mine, theoretically...

...mine is reinforced by the Great Holy Spirit Baptism, the Joy Inexpressible.

So that ain't no evidence to you, except maybe I ain't only TALKIN' to you sir.

I talk to those open enough and unbiased enough to be open to mine own testimony. Which is that of the gospels and first movers and shakers too.

2) When the other nations sin, like sleepen with their sisters, God tells the Hebrews, "naughty, naughty."

"Don't be like them heathens." And the Hebrew nation either did or did not. And they got whacked on their beans accordingly. Selah.

Please explain how this relates to confirmation of the claims presented in the OP.

[/quote]

HOW it relates, God tells the Canaanites what is SIN and what is not, and these commands were in relation to OTHER NATIONS only as these other nations broke the commands God gave the (later) Israelites.

Sinful Simon. You know him?

[JoeyKnothead]

From Post 4:

And you guessin' there ain't no God. Your guess is as good as mine, theoretically...

I fail to see how your theory here is gonna help us confirm the claims presented in the OP.

...mine is reinforced by the Great Holy Spirit Baptism, the Joy Inexpressible.

So you claim. I challenge you to support this assertion.

So that ain't no evidence to you, except maybe I ain't only TALKIN' to you sir.

I've never felt that making a claim is evidence for much else than a claim just got made.

I talk to those open enough and unbiased enough to be open to mine own testimony. Which is that of the gospels and first movers and shakers too.

Please explain how an ad hom attack on folks who don't take you at your word offers confirmation for the claims presented in the OP.

HOW it relates, God tells the Canaanites what is SIN and what is not, and these commands were in relation to OTHER NATIONS only as these other nations broke the commands God gave the (later) Israelites.

Please offer some means to confirm the following:

1- God speaks.
2- God tells the Canaanites what is sin.
3- God considers some things sins.
4- God tells the Canaanites what ain't sin.
5- God tells the Canaanites all this in relation to other nations.
6- God presents commands.
7- Some nations broke these commands.
8- Commands that God gave the (later) Israelites.

Sinful Simon. You know him?

Never met him.

Have you?

[nothead]

And you guessin' there ain't no God. Your guess is as good as mine, theoretically...

I fail to see how your theory here is gonna help us confirm the claims presented in the OP.

Neither mine or yours confirms anything empirically. This is why the greatest scientists are not the greatest men of faith. I.e. king David slew a giant with a small rock. But he weren't no scientist.

...mine is reinforced by the Great Holy Spirit Baptism, the Joy Inexpressible.

So you claim. I challenge you to support this assertion.

Hoo ha, huminah huminah. Guess what language was that? Couldn't guess could you?

So that ain't no evidence to you, except maybe I ain't only TALKIN' to you sir.

I've never felt that making a claim is evidence for much else than a claim just got made.

My claims are as good but probably better'n yourn own. Why, why 'cause I smell better'n you. How do I know? Yaath, I do believeth in the Living God. Believers smell better, didn't you know? Sniff one sometime.

I talk to those open enough and unbiased enough to be open to mine own testimony. Which is that of the gospels and first movers and shakers too.

Please explain how an ad hom attack on folks who don't take you at your word offers confirmation for the claims presented in the OP.

I didn't add no hom[o] to nothing pertaining to you at all. Be as fresh and dainty as you want.

I STILL won't.

HOW it relates, God tells the Canaanites what is SIN and what is not, and these commands were in relation to OTHER NATIONS only as these other nations broke the commands God gave the (later) Israelites.

Please offer some means to confirm the following:

1- God speaks.

Spoke to Moses, in some kinda way. Maybe the same angelic speakins I spoke above. Huminah heminah, something along them lines.

2- God tells the Canaanites what is sin.

Ten commands says what NOT to do.

You think you know more than the OT? Believe me I know that you don't know any bettern ten commands then God already spoke. The epitome of morality. Believe not?

Go ahead, try your own. Let the panel of readers be the Judge and Jury.

3- God considers some things sins.
4- God tells the Canaanites what ain't sin.
5- God tells the Canaanites all this in relation to other nations.
6- God presents commands.
7- Some nations broke these commands.
8- Commands that God gave the (later) Israelites.

See above, make your own. God gots you beat hands down. Say not? Give it up then. Thou shalt not sleep with your sister. HAH. I already told you that one.

Sinful Simon. You know him?

Never met him.

Have you?

[/quote]

Yeah he the Father of Sin. The Candyman of being the bad man. The patrone of the
bad. The Bribe of the Beast. The symbol on the forehead, 666. The Bestial Man of the Cosmos.

[Ooberman]

Those are serious questions, but the christians tries to laugh it off.
What else can they do?
Provide evidence and arguments?
Hahaha. Now that is funny!

[nothead]

[Replying to Ooberman]



Me an' Joey of the same stock. Even if he a white boy, or not I dunno.

God knows many others have tried. Bad jokes may actually behoove him. Never can tell, Ooberman.

Call me a gomer, or a pug or a piker. But I ain't no Poe since I love my God.

And yes, there ain't too much empirical evidence for the One True God. The onliest way to know Him is to knock the door, and then hope He hears it.

Otherwise you outa the game before you ever got started. Kinda like a mongoloid trying to win the chess championship, uh? Long as the other ones are smart as him, he got a chance yeah?

[Wootah]

Those are serious questions, but the christians tries to laugh it off.
What else can they do?
Provide evidence and arguments?
Hahaha. Now that is funny!

Moderator Warning

Hi Ooberman,

DC&R isn't interested in this type of post. It appears to serve no purpose other than to mock.

Please review our Rules.

______________

Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.

[JoeyKnothead]

From Post 6:

I wanted to acknowledge the post, but will waste no more time begging someone to actually support their claims, only to have 'em make more empty claims in return.

I'm certain it's by now obvious to the observer that the referenced poster has nothing to offer in support of not only his own claims, but those presented in the OP.