Unless you claim to have spoken to God directly on this matter and got a direct response, you are wrong. Your argument is that the Bible is God-breathed because a few of the writers of the Bible say so. And they are right, because it is recorded in the Bible, which is God-breathed. This type of erroneous reasoning is called
Begging the Question or Circular Reasoning.
A special note to careful readers. There is nowhere in the Bible where any of the writers of the Bible make the claim that the entire Bible is inspired by God. So, even if your argument was not fallacious, it is factually wrong.
daughterofthefaith wrote:It is impossible to explain to anyone the validity of the Bible without using the Bible itself.
Therein lies the difference between religious truth, which cannot be objectively demonstrated as being true and scientific truth which is open to independent validation, making science a far more reliable determination of what is true than revealed religion.
Faith is believing stuff when there is not enough evidence to adequately support belief. Faith is selective gullibility. Why would anyone consider faith a virtue?
daughterofthefaith wrote:It is very simple, God said it so I believe it and when you challenge me and question me about my belief in the God-inspired Scriptures and a Creator God, you are challenging God himself.
No, no, no. We are not challenging God himself. We are challenging the claim, made by believers, that God had anything to do with the composition of the collection of writings now known as the Bible. You presume that the scriptures you have were God-inspired. I make no such presumption.
daughterofthefaith wrote:Because all I am telling you is what God says. You can only do one of two things, take it or sadly leave it.
Before you can claim to be speaking for God, you must demonstrate that it is God who is speaking through you. Before you can claim that any particular book is the revealed word of God, you must demonstrate that it is. Why is the Bible considered the word of God and the Guru Granth Sahib is not? On what basis do you elevate this one particular collection of writings to God's lips but not other writings?