Did humans descend from other primates?

Creationism, Evolution, and other science issues

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Did humans descend from other primates?

Post #1

Post by McCulloch »

otseng wrote: Man did not descend from the primates.
Did humans descend from other primates?
Are humans primates or should there be special biological taxonomy for humanity?
Please cite evidence.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Post #551

Post by Goat »

Mugview wrote:
Goat wrote:
Mugview wrote:
Hence, it covers both properties as you describes.
Isn't it amazing to see such neat codes in all living organisms? The codes are not found in dead rocks, metal alloys, crystallines, etc., but even the smallest living organisms are controlled by the same programming language.
Just wondering if it all comes by chance.

I's not really a code, but rather chemistry that allows cause protiens to form in specific shapes. It is partly change, but it is chance that has what is known as a 'filter' applied so there are non-random results. That filter is known as 'natural selection'.
Chemistry also follows a strict set of predetermined laws. The number of electrons per layer, fermions per quantum states etc, are rules-of-the-game preset to keep the universe in order. The "filter" is also a preset to favor one protein conformation against the other (despite higher activation energy), specific affinity to certain optical configuration etc. and so "natural selection" has a set of prerequisites.

We have a consensus that it produces non-random results.

With more understanding of the system, it could be said "predictable based on the scientific laws".

Who set these laws or it appeared per chance?
Who said there was a 'who'. There is a difference between scientific laws and man made laws. Scientific laws a descriptive, while man made laws man made.

For describing what happens doesn't mean there is a 'who' behind it. That is doing two logical fallacies. One is the logical fallacy of equivocation, and the other of begging the question.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
Ooberman
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4262
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Did humans descend from other primates?

Post #552

Post by Ooberman »

McCulloch wrote:
otseng wrote: Man did not descend from the primates.
Did humans descend from other primates?
Are humans primates or should there be special biological taxonomy for humanity?
Please cite evidence.
I'm at a loss as to what else they could have descended from? Cats?
What else could we be if not primates? Cats?
Evidence: we dont have nines lives, so we aint cats.

Let me guess, some ignorant religious guy said something 5000 years ago and someone thonks that man was a genius... Is that why this is a question?
Thinking about God's opinions and thinking about your own opinions uses an identical thought process. - Tomas Rees

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10027
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1219 times
Been thanked: 1618 times

Post #553

Post by Clownboat »

Mugview wrote:
Goat wrote:
Mugview wrote:
Hence, it covers both properties as you describes.
Isn't it amazing to see such neat codes in all living organisms? The codes are not found in dead rocks, metal alloys, crystallines, etc., but even the smallest living organisms are controlled by the same programming language.
Just wondering if it all comes by chance.

I's not really a code, but rather chemistry that allows cause protiens to form in specific shapes. It is partly change, but it is chance that has what is known as a 'filter' applied so there are non-random results. That filter is known as 'natural selection'.
Chemistry also follows a strict set of predetermined laws. The number of electrons per layer, fermions per quantum states etc, are rules-of-the-game preset to keep the universe in order. The "filter" is also a preset to favor one protein conformation against the other (despite higher activation energy), specific affinity to certain optical configuration etc. and so "natural selection" has a set of prerequisites.

We have a consensus that it produces non-random results.

With more understanding of the system, it could be said "predictable based on the scientific laws".

Who set these laws or it appeared per chance?
Perhaps the same person that created this pothole that I'm looking at that just perfectly holds the rain water from this morning?

It's a miracle!

I suppose it's possible that the processes are just there for life to fill the universe (or at least earth) and that the pothole is just there and water filled it.
:-k
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

Mugview
Scholar
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 8:11 pm

Re: Did humans descend from other primates?

Post #554

Post by Mugview »

Ooberman wrote:
McCulloch wrote:
otseng wrote: Man did not descend from the primates.
Did humans descend from other primates?
Are humans primates or should there be special biological taxonomy for humanity?
Please cite evidence.
I'm at a loss as to what else they could have descended from? Cats?
What else could we be if not primates? Cats?
Evidence: we dont have nines lives, so we aint cats.

Let me guess, some ignorant religious guy said something 5000 years ago and someone thonks that man was a genius... Is that why this is a question?
I guess the question is more towards
"Did humans descend from humans or simians?"

There are obvious differences between humans and simians.

Taxonomists may classify humans and simians into primates, but anthropologists would insist that they deal with humans differently from simians.

Some humans may feel they descend from apes, some insist that their ancestors were humans not apes. Actually it sounds insulting in some cultures to say "your ancestors were apes".

In a strictly scientific forum, it is fine to use accepted taxonomy to discuss about humans in the primate groups.

The same things can be said for animals. Can an elephant descend from a cow, or that a giraffe from a deer?

User avatar
Ooberman
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4262
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Did humans descend from other primates?

Post #555

Post by Ooberman »

Mugview wrote:
Ooberman wrote:
McCulloch wrote:
otseng wrote: Man did not descend from the primates.
Did humans descend from other primates?
Are humans primates or should there be special biological taxonomy for humanity?
Please cite evidence.
I'm at a loss as to what else they could have descended from? Cats?
What else could we be if not primates? Cats?
Evidence: we dont have nines lives, so we aint cats.

Let me guess, some ignorant religious guy said something 5000 years ago and someone thonks that man was a genius... Is that why this is a question?
I guess the question is more towards
"Did humans descend from humans or simians?"

There are obvious differences between humans and simians.

Taxonomists may classify humans and simians into primates, but anthropologists would insist that they deal with humans differently from simians.

Some humans may feel they descend from apes, some insist that their ancestors were humans not apes. Actually it sounds insulting in some cultures to say "your ancestors were apes".

In a strictly scientific forum, it is fine to use accepted taxonomy to discuss about humans in the primate groups.

The same things can be said for animals. Can an elephant descend from a cow, or that a giraffe from a deer?
This appears to be a question best asked on a science forum, or by a science source. Im not clear why its being asked since with a little research the answer can be found.

Maybe interested parties can check the wiki page on human evolution?

As i understand, humans and monkeys evolved from a common ancestor that was not a human or monkey. Humans are part of the ape branch, but im not sure about monkeys...
Anyhow, if someone asked me the R-value of stone, id go to a source that could best answer it, not ask for opinions.
Human evolution is known and there are extensive resources that could answer the OP.
Thinking about God's opinions and thinking about your own opinions uses an identical thought process. - Tomas Rees

User avatar
wiploc
Guru
Posts: 1423
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 12:26 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Did humans descend from other primates?

Post #556

Post by wiploc »

Ooberman wrote: As i understand, humans and monkeys evolved from a common ancestor that was not a human or monkey.
We have lots of common ancestors that are neither humans nor monkeys. Bluegreen algae, for instance.

The most recent common ancestor of humans and other currently-existing monkeys was a monkey.


Humans are part of the ape branch, but im not sure about monkeys...
Humans are apes. Apes are monkeys.

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Did humans descend from other primates?

Post #557

Post by Goat »

wiploc wrote:
Ooberman wrote: As i understand, humans and monkeys evolved from a common ancestor that was not a human or monkey.
We have lots of common ancestors that are neither humans nor monkeys. Bluegreen algae, for instance.

The most recent common ancestor of humans and other currently-existing monkeys was a monkey.


Humans are part of the ape branch, but im not sure about monkeys...
Humans are apes. Apes are monkeys.
No, Apes are primates, as are monkeys'. But, the difference between a monkey and an ape is a tail
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
Ooberman
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4262
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 6:02 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Post #558

Post by Ooberman »

Image


Thousand words...


Has the OP been answered?
Thinking about God's opinions and thinking about your own opinions uses an identical thought process. - Tomas Rees

Mugview
Scholar
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed May 07, 2014 8:11 pm

Re: Did humans descend from other primates?

Post #559

Post by Mugview »

Ooberman wrote:
Mugview wrote: I guess the question is more towards
"Did humans descend from humans or simians?"

There are obvious differences between humans and simians.

Taxonomists may classify humans and simians into primates, but anthropologists would insist that they deal with humans differently from simians.

Some humans may feel they descend from apes, some insist that their ancestors were humans not apes. Actually it sounds insulting in some cultures to say "your ancestors were apes".

In a strictly scientific forum, it is fine to use accepted taxonomy to discuss about humans in the primate groups.
This appears to be a question best asked on a science forum, or by a science source. Im not clear why its being asked since with a little research the answer can be found.

Maybe interested parties can check the wiki page on human evolution?

As i understand, humans and monkeys evolved from a common ancestor that was not a human or monkey. Humans are part of the ape branch, but im not sure about monkeys...
Anyhow, if someone asked me the R-value of stone, id go to a source that could best answer it, not ask for opinions.
Human evolution is known and there are extensive resources that could answer the OP.
It is postulated that humans and monkeys may have evolved from a common ancestor, by a series of speculations, but with no strong evidence yet. Many, who are not directly involved in the research on human evolution, are generally made to believe that the statement is "proven". However, it is not correct. Scientists tried to cover huge gaps of missing information with some assumptions, which were also speculations and highly debatable.

This so-called common ancestors are still unknown today, and their description keeps changing. Even the closest one, the so-called common ancestor of chimpanzee and human, previously thought to be chimp-like, lately was doubted, and may not resemble chimps as much as humans.

http://phys.org/news/2013-12-human-ance ... ought.html

The pathway from an "ancestor" to either simians or humans is not as direct as many would have liked to believe. The genetic mutations and stabilization leading to the branching are still murky and cannot be easily explained.
For example, more than 30% of the entire chimp Y chromosome has no counterpart in humans.

Hughes JF, Page D, et al (2010) “Chimpanzee and human Y chromosomes are remarkably divergent in structure and gene content�; Nature 463:536-539.

Thus, the diagram of primate evolution considerably simplifies the problem, pulling the lines while lacking most of the dots to connect them.

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10027
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1219 times
Been thanked: 1618 times

Re: Did humans descend from other primates?

Post #560

Post by Clownboat »

Mugview wrote:
Ooberman wrote:
Mugview wrote: I guess the question is more towards
"Did humans descend from humans or simians?"

There are obvious differences between humans and simians.

Taxonomists may classify humans and simians into primates, but anthropologists would insist that they deal with humans differently from simians.

Some humans may feel they descend from apes, some insist that their ancestors were humans not apes. Actually it sounds insulting in some cultures to say "your ancestors were apes".

In a strictly scientific forum, it is fine to use accepted taxonomy to discuss about humans in the primate groups.
This appears to be a question best asked on a science forum, or by a science source. Im not clear why its being asked since with a little research the answer can be found.

Maybe interested parties can check the wiki page on human evolution?

As i understand, humans and monkeys evolved from a common ancestor that was not a human or monkey. Humans are part of the ape branch, but im not sure about monkeys...
Anyhow, if someone asked me the R-value of stone, id go to a source that could best answer it, not ask for opinions.
Human evolution is known and there are extensive resources that could answer the OP.
It is postulated that humans and monkeys may have evolved from a common ancestor, by a series of speculations, but with no strong evidence yet. Many, who are not directly involved in the research on human evolution, are generally made to believe that the statement is "proven". However, it is not correct. Scientists tried to cover huge gaps of missing information with some assumptions, which were also speculations and highly debatable.

This so-called common ancestors are still unknown today, and their description keeps changing. Even the closest one, the so-called common ancestor of chimpanzee and human, previously thought to be chimp-like, lately was doubted, and may not resemble chimps as much as humans.

http://phys.org/news/2013-12-human-ance ... ought.html

The pathway from an "ancestor" to either simians or humans is not as direct as many would have liked to believe. The genetic mutations and stabilization leading to the branching are still murky and cannot be easily explained.
For example, more than 30% of the entire chimp Y chromosome has no counterpart in humans.

Hughes JF, Page D, et al (2010) “Chimpanzee and human Y chromosomes are remarkably divergent in structure and gene content�; Nature 463:536-539.

Thus, the diagram of primate evolution considerably simplifies the problem, pulling the lines while lacking most of the dots to connect them.
Title of the OP:
Did humans descend from other primates?

Sorry to break it to you, but apes are primates (so are monkeys for that matter).

Your link seems to support the OP and I doubt that was your motive.
:-k
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

Post Reply