Bible Contradictions

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
mwtech
Apprentice
Posts: 217
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 10:46 am
Location: Kentucky

Bible Contradictions

Post #1

Post by mwtech »

I used to be a Christian and only recently become an atheist after studying the Bible enough to notice the flaws. I believe the Bible in itself to be contradictory enough to prove itself wrong, and I enjoy discussing it with other people, especially Christians who disagree. I would really like to have a one on one debate with any Christian who thinks that they have a logical answer for the contradictions in the Bible. The one rule I have is that you can't make a claim without evidence, whether from the Bible or any other source. I am interested in logical conversation, and I don't believe that any Christian can refute the contradictions I have found without making up some rationalization that has no evidence or logical base.

earl
Scholar
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:30 pm
Location: Texas
Been thanked: 6 times

Post #261

Post by earl »

Danielthedragon-
"how do you resolve -------that his message would not be distorted?"


My observation is that the bible is not penned by God.
Distortions,contradictions , problems ,etc associated with a bible is man's inability to preserve such a text.
Problems such as memory,experience,recorded events accurately,language and misinformation and the list goes on is typical.
If God was to "ensure" his undistorted message then man could not be the penman.

So why did not God pen it himself?You will have to ask him yourself.
However if the biblical characters Adam and Eve were here then you could get the message directly from the horse's mouth as would the rest of the world since they would not under normal conditions have died which would make them superhuman stock.

earl
Scholar
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:30 pm
Location: Texas
Been thanked: 6 times

Post #262

Post by earl »

danielthedragon--

Biblically -the reading of the beginning of time on this Earth was not without tribulation of gigantic biblical proportions because there was war in heaven first which migrated here causing all records ,events and documentation to become distorted all because of ,as stated in paper 53 of the Urantia Book that Lucifer became an atheist - who at one point in his life said he did not believe God exists.

DanieltheDragon
Savant
Posts: 6224
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:37 pm
Location: Charlotte
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #263

Post by DanieltheDragon »

[Replying to post 259 by earl]
My observation is that the bible is not penned by God.
It doesn't need to be. The point is why would an Omniscient Omnipresent Omnipotent god allow his message to be distorted? There is no reason to let this happen if it will increase the odds of people rejecting said gods existence. An all knowing god would not have given the responsibility to fallible man in the first place. Or he would have waited until the internet so that even if the message was given to man it would not be lost or destroyed manipulated or somehow altered in anyway.

So the only observable conclusion I can ascertain from your response is that the god you worship is not particularly wise not particularly powerful and has no ability to predict the future.

So now you have a logical contradiction. In fact I would argue that the bible's mere existence negates the existence of the god it describes.

DanieltheDragon
Savant
Posts: 6224
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:37 pm
Location: Charlotte
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #264

Post by DanieltheDragon »

[Replying to post 260 by earl]
Biblically -the reading of the beginning of time on this Earth was not without tribulation of gigantic biblical proportions because there was war in heaven first which migrated here causing all records ,events and documentation to become distorted all because of ,as stated in paper 53 of the Urantia Book that Lucifer became an atheist - who at one point in his life said he did not believe God exists.
The bible does not support this in any shape form or fashion. Furthermore I don't view the bible as fact much less the Urantia book which originated in Chicago during the 20's.

User avatar
KenRU
Guru
Posts: 1584
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 3:44 pm
Location: NJ

Post #265

Post by KenRU »

[Replying to Wootah]

Sorry for the typo, it's Mark 8:30

Both Matthew and Mark contain contradictions about spreading the word that Jesus is the son of god.

Why?
"Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion." -Steven Weinberg

User avatar
Danmark
Site Supporter
Posts: 12697
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:58 am
Location: Seattle
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #266

Post by Danmark »

I'm surprised you quote from The Urantia Book, a work of science fiction. Doesn't the Bible itself contain enough science fiction, without relying on an additional book of science fiction to interpret its characters?

'The Urantia Book has been enjoyed by some as a form of science fiction, historical fiction or fantasy. The Urantia Book is noted for its high level of internal consistency and an advanced writing style. Skeptic Martin Gardner, in a book otherwise highly critical of The Urantia Book, writes that it is "highly imaginative" and that the "cosmology outrivals in fantasy the cosmology of any science-fiction work known to me." Gooch says that for nonbelievers, the book is a mixture of being "fascinating, inspiring, compelling, haunting, entertaining, annoying, incomprehensible, and always wordy."'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Urantia_Book

User avatar
Strider324
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1016
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: Fort Worth

Post #267

Post by Strider324 »

There is no end to the contradictions we find in the bible. But I would think that something as critical to the message as "How can I be saved?" would be completely without ambiguity.

Instead, what we get is:

From Acts 13:48, we learn that some gentiles are 'ordained' to be saved, BUT....

Rom 10:13 assures us that "...everyone who calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved..", BUT...

Eph 1:4 indicates that only those who were chosen before Time will be saved - BUT...

1John 2:2 gives hope for the whole world, BUT....

2 Thes 2:13 has Paul assure us that some were chosen "in the beginning", BUT...

Acts 16:30 has Jesus promise that if you just believe - don't have to be baptised, doesn't matter what crimes you commit - not only will YOU be saved, but yer whole famn damily as well!!

I'm sorry, but this is what is known among my peers as a clusterfuck. It is too much to ask for this religion to present a cogent exposition of its most fundamental premise?
"Do Good for Good is Good to do. Spurn Bribe of Heaven and Threat of Hell"
- The Kasidah of Haji abdu al-Yezdi

earl
Scholar
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:30 pm
Location: Texas
Been thanked: 6 times

Post #268

Post by earl »

Danielthedragon-


Your post on your observable conclusion is funny.
You speak as if you know how to be all wise,all powerful and predict the future.
And wait for the internet to come? Really? .
You go ahead and tell God that you know how to deliver a message better than he does.


No big deal that the bible don't support the UB neither does the Jew religion support Jesus.
Its funny you don't dare believe something because it appeared in recent history.
Nothing more here

earl
Scholar
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:30 pm
Location: Texas
Been thanked: 6 times

Post #269

Post by earl »

Danmark --
I am not surprised I quote from the UB.
The Bible is silent on the contradictions.

arian
Banned
Banned
Posts: 3252
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:15 am
Location: AZ

Re: Favorite contradictions of the Bible...

Post #270

Post by arian »

There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil
to one who is striking at the root.

Henry D. Thoreau

Post Reply