Frankly this is one of those things that just keeps cropping up into apologetics for whatever reason.
Its proof of alien abductions
Its proof of a literal Adam and Eve
Its proof of Noah's flood
Its proof of etc.
No the only thing we can deduce from these various studies is. That there is a common matrilineal and patrilineal line. THAT IS IT nothing else that is all it doesn't say anything else. Anything added onto that is an inference based on an assumption. There is no reason to do that with any of the data.
What is even more incredulous is the selective approach to data mining that goes through with it. mixing and matching a variety of differing studies to get a desired result/argument. It is dishonest and depressing.
Unless you have a deep understanding of genetics and biology I see no reason to even try and bring this up. As any argument made using it basically revolves around bad assumptions and a misrepresentation of the data.
Mitochondrial Eve and Y chromosome Adam?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Savant
- Posts: 6224
- Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:37 pm
- Location: Charlotte
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Talishi
- Guru
- Posts: 1156
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 11:31 pm
- Location: Seattle
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Contact:
Re: Mitochondrial Eve and Y chromosome Adam?
Post #2The places where the male and female lines bottleneck are separated by over two hundred thousand years. Not even Creationists have Adam and Eve living that long.DanieltheDragon wrote: What is even more incredulous is the selective approach to data mining that goes through with it. mixing and matching a variety of differing studies to get a desired result/argument. It is dishonest and depressing.
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: Mitochondrial Eve and Y chromosome Adam?
Post #3Actually, it's a lot longer than that. Recently, in a very small number of people in one tribe, the divergence from the rest of the human race is about 340,000 years agoTalishi wrote:The places where the male and female lines bottleneck are separated by over two hundred thousand years. Not even Creationists have Adam and Eve living that long.DanieltheDragon wrote: What is even more incredulous is the selective approach to data mining that goes through with it. mixing and matching a variety of differing studies to get a desired result/argument. It is dishonest and depressing.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn ... years-old/
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella