Please consider the Bible passages below:
God is love - 1 John 4:8
Love is not jealous - 1 Corinthians 13:4
The Lord thy God is a jealous God - Deuteronomy 6:15
That's like saying this:
Skippy is a cat
Cats are not dogs
Skippy is a dog
Logically impossible. Therefore God does not exist.
Question for debate: Is there any way to escape the fact that the Biblical attributes of God are logically contradictory and clearly violate the Law of Identity? Is there any way to come to any conclusion other than that God, as described in the Bible, doesn't exist?
Is God logically possible?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Sage
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:01 am
-
- Student
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:07 am
Re: Is God logically possible?
Post #2[Replying to post 1 by atheist buddy]
This is not the only impossibility the christian god has.
Apparently he is also infinetly mercifull. And also perfectly just...
Which are also contradiction, because being mercifull means that you forgive and don't require the deserved punishment for something bad. And being just implies that you actually do require the accurate payment.
He apparently is unchanging, and yet he loses patience many times in the bible, he can get angry and then calmed down again, he can change his mind, if asked for something...
He is all-powerfull which is a contradictory concept in itself.
So, no, the god from a literal reading of the bible is completly impossible in many, many ways.
This is not the only impossibility the christian god has.
Apparently he is also infinetly mercifull. And also perfectly just...
Which are also contradiction, because being mercifull means that you forgive and don't require the deserved punishment for something bad. And being just implies that you actually do require the accurate payment.
He apparently is unchanging, and yet he loses patience many times in the bible, he can get angry and then calmed down again, he can change his mind, if asked for something...
He is all-powerfull which is a contradictory concept in itself.
So, no, the god from a literal reading of the bible is completly impossible in many, many ways.
-
- Sage
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:01 am
Re: Is God logically possible?
Post #3Not to mention he is omnipotent and omniscient, which are also mutually exclusive.Freddy_Scissorhands wrote: [Replying to post 1 by atheist buddy]
This is not the only impossibility the christian god has.
Apparently he is also infinetly mercifull. And also perfectly just...
Which are also contradiction, because being mercifull means that you forgive and don't require the deserved punishment for something bad. And being just implies that you actually do require the accurate payment.
He apparently is unchanging, and yet he loses patience many times in the bible, he can get angry and then calmed down again, he can change his mind, if asked for something...
He is all-powerfull which is a contradictory concept in itself.
So, no, the god from a literal reading of the bible is completly impossible in many, many ways.
Re: Is God logically possible?
Post #4What? Lets take another look at what you just said making cat equal to love (as you suggested) and make dogs equal to suicidal;atheist buddy wrote: Please consider the Bible passages below:
God is love - 1 John 4:8
Love is not jealous - 1 Corinthians 13:4
The Lord thy God is a jealous God - Deuteronomy 6:15
That's like saying this:
Skippy is a cat
Cats are not dogs
Skippy is a dog
Skippy is a cat (cat=love)
cats (love) are not dogs (dog=suicidal)
love is suicidal
Lets continue;
man is suicidal
this man doesn't believe in suicide
this is not a man, lol
God is love, love is not jealous because love is love, but God IS a jealous God, and He is NOT love when He casts the wicked into hell. Burning in hell for an eternity is not a show of love, but a sign of evil. God can and does evil things to evil people, but will show love and compassion to those that seek good.
And you call that logic?atheist buddy wrote:Logically impossible. Therefore God does not exist.
So if they say you are a 'happy fella', and you wake up one morning all grouchy, you no longer exist? "That's not the happy fella that we know, who is this grouchy guy?"
The god as described by atheist buddy surely doesn't exist. We already have something like 38,000 Christian Religiously created god-concepts, must you add more to it?atheist buddy wrote:Question for debate: Is there any way to escape the fact that the Biblical attributes of God are logically contradictory and clearly violate the Law of Identity? Is there any way to come to any conclusion other than that God, as described in the Bible, doesn't exist?
My son just showed me a t-shirt that said; "Number One Star Wars Fan" with a picture of the Star Trek USS Enterprise on the bottom of it. This OP reminds me of that.
My humble suggestion would be for you to read and try to understand the God of the Bible first, then show He doesn't exist, because the god you are describing is NOT the Bible God.

There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil
to one who is striking at the root.
Henry D. Thoreau
to one who is striking at the root.
Henry D. Thoreau
Re: Is God logically possible?
Post #5It is obvious you haven't read, or maybe just didn't understand the God of the Bible. In the OT it goes on and on and on about the required sacrifice needed for sin (doing evil). It was doves, then for bigger sins it was lamb, and for deadly sins it was to be stoned to death. One way or another we have to 'pay' for our sins. Back in the OT days, people would repeatedly bring sacrifices before the Lord for their sins. I have never read in the OT where one dove, or one lamb covered multitude of sins, until we read of the arrival of the Messiah in the NT scriptures. (please read it, I can't sum up everything here)Freddy_Scissorhands wrote: [Replying to post 1 by atheist buddy]
This is not the only impossibility the christian god has.
Apparently he is also infinetly mercifull. And also perfectly just...
Which are also contradiction, because being mercifull means that you forgive and don't require the deserved punishment for something bad. And being just implies that you actually do require the accurate payment.
God IS just, and pure, .. and Holy, and the payment for sin, .. ANY sin is death for both body and soul/spirit. We all die, and since the soul is eternal, hell is that eternal, everlasting death.
Yes He IS 'unchanging', you will never convince Him that good is evil, and that evil is good. I doubt that people who have chosen to go to hell will be enjoying themselves there; "Oh yea God! This is fun! Evil is fun God, you see us partying here? We brought nothing but evil in here, and we are having a blast sharing it with each other! Oh yea baby!!" .. I don't think so!?He apparently is unchanging, and yet he loses patience many times in the bible, he can get angry and then calmed down again, he can change his mind, if asked for something...
Please show how Gods All Powerfulness is contradictory in the literal reading of the Bible??Freddy Sc wrote:He is all-powerfull which is a contradictory concept in itself.
So, no, the god from a literal reading of the bible is completly impossible in many, many ways.
There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil
to one who is striking at the root.
Henry D. Thoreau
to one who is striking at the root.
Henry D. Thoreau
- Divine Insight
- Savant
- Posts: 18070
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:59 pm
- Location: Here & Now
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Is God logically possible?
Post #6The irony with this claim is two-fold.arian wrote: My humble suggestion would be for you to read and try to understand the God of the Bible first, then show He doesn't exist, because the god you are describing is NOT the Bible God.
First off, you are taking the position that Atheists Buddy has clearly NOT rejected the Biblical God. According to you what Atheist Buddy has rejected is a totally false and incorrect picture of the Biblical God.
And secondly you are implying that this supposedly omniscient perfect God is a complete buffoon in having inspired the writing of religious dogma that can so easily be misunderstood by so many people. Not only non-believers, but even believes themselves apparently cannot understand these texts, for if they could there wouldn't exist so many disagreeing versions of Christianity.
Christendom itself has proven beyond any shadow of a doubt that the Bible is totally incomprehensible and could only have been inspired by a single supernatural buffoon, or by many individual mortal superstitious buffoons. The latter conclusion is the most reasonable of course.

[center]
Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]

Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1333
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 8:45 pm
Re: Is God logically possible?
Post #7Please show how Gods All Powerfulness is contradictory in the literal reading of the Bible??
Jesus looked at them and said, “With man it is impossible, but not with God. For all things are possible with God.�
Could God make Arian so proficient at debate that He Himself could not defeat him?
-
- Student
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:07 am
Re: Is God logically possible?
Post #8Oh, I certainly have read the bible! And all the things I've mentioned here are absolutly in there! Maybe YOU should read it, before questioning me.arian wrote: It is obvious you haven't read, or maybe just didn't understand the God of the Bible.
Or have you read it and just "interpreted"... oh, sorry, I mean "properly understood" everything that didn't make sense, so that it eventually made sense?
It's funny that I always hear that I "don't understand the text", when all I did was actually do nothing more than take the things the text directly says!
Ok... and this contradicts what I've said... how?arian wrote:In the OT it goes on and on and on about the required sacrifice needed for sin (doing evil). It was doves, then for bigger sins it was lamb, and for deadly sins it was to be stoned to death. One way or another we have to 'pay' for our sins.
In that case, this god was NOT mercifull! If the people had to pay, then god didn't show mercy, but rather justice (although: Killing ANOTHER creature, to pay for YOUR sins... what kind of messed-up "justice" system is that?).
That's EXACTLY what I've said in the comment you've responded to (which I have to wonder now: Have you read it?)
And who came up with that rule?arian wrote:God IS just, and pure, .. and Holy, and the payment for sin, .. ANY sin is death for both body and soul/spirit. We all die, and since the soul is eternal, hell is that eternal, everlasting death.
Oh, right! God himself! So yeah, I'm not impressed that he is pure by his own standard!
Measured by more sensible standards, he is actually quite the monster! Demanding blood-sacrifices and stuff... Holy cow, this is messed up!
So, you can call him "pure" all you want, it's your judgment here! But sorry, I don't call blood-hungry dictators pure... or just...
And even IF I did, as I've mentioned before, this perfectly demonstrates what I've pointed out before:
In that case, it wouldn't be mercifull.
Or that his ways are actually evil and not good...arian wrote: Yes He IS 'unchanging', you will never convince Him that good is evil, and that evil is good.
Yeah, I know that kind of mind-set. And it's quite a bad thing to have, if you are unwilling to change your mind.
But either way, this did NOT adress my objection EITHER!
Go back and read my comment again!
I NEVER said, that god wasn't just (I actually DO hold that position, but that wasn't part of my original poste) and I never said that god can't be unchanging either.
If you had read my poste you would have seen, that I object to the fact that he can be unchanging (as the bible claims) and still constantly be changing his mind, or that he can be perfeclty just AND perfectly mercifull at the same time! Because these things are in direct conflict!
I doubt that any such people exist, so your point seems mute.arian wrote:I doubt that people who have chosen to go to hell...
I mean... I doubt that your hell, exists in the first place, but even if it did, I doubt that anybody choses to go there.
I never said it contradicted the bible.arian wrote: Please show how Gods All Powerfulness is contradictory in the literal reading of the Bible??
AGAIN: READ what I've actually writen!
I wrote it's a contradiction IN ITSELF!
You can't be all-powerfull, because you automaticly run into contradiction!
If you were all-powerfull you could create something that is higher than your power (if you can't you are NOT all-powerfull, by definition), and and the same time, you would have to be able to be more powerfull than that thing you've created.
It's a logical contradiction. And I don't need any additional piece of the bible, to show that. It's the concept itself that doesn't make sense.
Btw: I would apprisiate it, if you respond again, that you actually adress the points I've made. Not the ones you've wanted me to make.
Thanks.
- Divine Insight
- Savant
- Posts: 18070
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:59 pm
- Location: Here & Now
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Is God logically possible?
Post #9No. It's not possible to salvage the verbatim biblical picture of God.atheist buddy wrote: Question for debate: Is there any way to escape the fact that the Biblical attributes of God are logically contradictory and clearly violate the Law of Identity? Is there any way to come to any conclusion other than that God, as described in the Bible, doesn't exist?
Some people ask, "Can it be salvages if we are willing to ignore it verbatim and pretend that it says things that it actually doesn't say?"
I think even this second approach is actually quite futile since there wouldn't be much of the verbatim bible to salvage in this case. Moreover, whatever the result would be it clearly wouldn't be the biblical God anyway, it would obviously be something different.
So no, it's not possible to salvage the verbatim biblical picture of God.
As a second line of inquiry I would need to also ask why in the world anyone would even want to salvage the verbatim biblical picture of God, even if it could be made to make sense, which is already impossible anyway.
[center]
Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]

Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]
-
- Sage
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:01 am
Re: Is God logically possible?
Post #10You seem to be having problems with basic logic.arian wrote:What? Lets take another look at what you just said making cat equal to love (as you suggested) and make dogs equal to suicidal;atheist buddy wrote: Please consider the Bible passages below:
God is love - 1 John 4:8
Love is not jealous - 1 Corinthians 13:4
The Lord thy God is a jealous God - Deuteronomy 6:15
That's like saying this:
Skippy is a cat
Cats are not dogs
Skippy is a dog
Skippy is a cat (cat=love)
cats (love) are not dogs (dog=suicidal)
love is suicidal
Lets continue;
man is suicidal
this man doesn't believe in suicide
this is not a man, lol
God is love, love is not jealous because love is love, but God IS a jealous God, and He is NOT love when He casts the wicked into hell. Burning in hell for an eternity is not a show of love, but a sign of evil. God can and does evil things to evil people, but will show love and compassion to those that seek good.
If 1) skippy is a cat/love
and if 2) cats/love are not dogs/suicidal,
then the statements 3) cats/love are dogs/suicidal, is NOT true, because cats/love it is not possble for cats/love to be that which they are not as per statement 2.
Much like God cannot be that which he is not as per statement 2.
Well, the truth is that I am sometimes hally, and sometimes grouchy.And you call that logic?atheist buddy wrote:Logically impossible. Therefore God does not exist.
So if they say you are a 'happy fella', and you wake up one morning all grouchy, you no longer exist? "That's not the happy fella that we know, who is this grouchy guy?"
Are you saying that God has mood swings?
I see, so you're saying that the book of John, 1 Corinthians and Deuteronomy are not part of the Bible.My humble suggestion would be for you to read and try to understand the God of the Bible first, then show He doesn't exist, because the god you are describing is NOT the Bible God.
Ok, we must be talking about different Bibles. I mean the Christian Bible. Which Bible did you mean?