Is gravity a state of force?

Creationism, Evolution, and other science issues

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
r~
Sage
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:21 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Is gravity a state of force?

Post #1

Post by r~ »

Is gravity a state of force?
a magically modern fairy tale
0nce upon a time and in the 17th century, Vatican Scientific Authority propagated the dogma that curvature of space causes sun and moon and planets and stars to obit around earth. In the 21st century, Vatican Scientific Authority still propagates the dogma that curvature of space causes moon to orbit around the earth. And I still hear from the science of stupid that curvature also causes lift.
What is force?
Is relatively equivalent to force the same as force?
Is gravity a state of force?

ItS
galileo galilei. et.al
ronw

def: glow
colden dark

User avatar
Excubis
Sage
Posts: 616
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 4:56 am
Location: (nowhere you probaly heard of) Saskatchewan, Canada

Post #11

Post by Excubis »

I am trying to find a point to debate. In context of a debate one must declare their the subject of the debate and assert one's argument so a debate can ensue. I am sorry to just ask questions seem to be more of a plan to entrap not debate, if I am wrong I do apologize. I would like to have a debate, please state your stance on topic question and I will gladly debate.
"It should be possible to explain the laws of physics to a barmaid." Albert Einstein

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2573 times

Post #12

Post by JoeyKnothead »

From Post 7:
r~ wrote: def: good
force is mass acceleration
def: better

Mass accelaration is the result of force. No mass sets to moving unless a force is applied.

def: the one about force
Merriam-Webster: Force wrote: noun \ˈfȯrs\
: physical strength, power, or effect
: power or violence used on a person or thing
: strength or power that is not physical
Sounds like a correct'n to me.
r~ wrote: def: redundant
acceleration is change in vector in verse velocity and vice versa
I find it just a bit arrogant that someone'd ask for definitions of words, then correct those definitions, like some old school ma'rm. If you wanna define something, just do it, and quit with the condescending, self-proud shenanigans, please. We're mostly all adults, we don't need to be, nor should we be, talked down to like a pack of first graders.

The previously presented definition ain't near "redundant", as it just doesn't suit your aims, whatever those may be.
r~ wrote: gravity is a force and curvature is not
newton et.al, Questions?
Why not just say that to begin with, and quit with the condescension?
r~ wrote: now is always a good time to offer better words two by two
What are two properties of force?
1.
2.
1. Affects stuff.
2. Get's defined by someone trying to answer a question, and then redefined by the one that asked it in the first place.
r~ wrote: What are two properties of mass?
1.
2.
1. Takes up space.
2. Can be affected by some, if not all forces.
r~ wrote: Does gravity force relative mass acceleration?
Yes. This can be confirmed by hopping out of an airplane, and noticing how ya start speeding up as you start speeding down.
r~ wrote: Is curvature reaction to force?
Yes. This'n can be confirmed by asking the maternal unit to stand in the middle of the living room, where it's then observed the joists set to creaking and groaning, and deflecting downwards.
r~ wrote: Might an unforeseen wind alter the course of a bullet?
Yes.
r~ wrote: What does Authority tell you so?
Observation tells me if I fire a shot at a target a mile away, I need to pray to the gods of wind to hush up a spell if I've got any hope of that bullet hitting the target.
r~ wrote: How might you tell even better?
Become either the bullet, or the wind, such that my observations'd be even that much closer to that which I observe.


Snip the pound cake recipe at the end.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2573 times

Post #13

Post by JoeyKnothead »

Excubis wrote: I am trying to find a point to debate. In context of a debate one must declare their the subject of the debate and assert one's argument so a debate can ensue. I am sorry to just ask questions seem to be more of a plan to entrap not debate, if I am wrong I do apologize. I would like to have a debate, please state your stance on topic question and I will gladly debate.
Best I can tell, the point is to ask folks to define stuff, and how wrong they are for having done it.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2573 times

Post #14

Post by JoeyKnothead »

From Post 8:
r~ wrote: challenge
ask any elementary student
I can see me, a grown man fetching after some young'n, a hollering out "Hey kid, I just wanna ask a few questions".
r~ wrote: 1. How much dirt is in a hole 1’ diameter?
Holes don't have dirt, they have hole.
r~ wrote: 2. How dense is a dark and bottomless hole 1’ diameter after 13 and a lot of 0^2 years later?
You need to tell us how long this hole is. Holes are, by your own definition of it, not bound to have a "bottom", but could be reliably measured if one tells how much long of that hole there is. Unless it's all vacuumated, and then we gotta fix that hole in the bottom of the hole, lest the vacuum doesn't hold.
r~ wrote: 3. What is the force that gravitates dust bunnies to my hoover?
An area of lower air pressure betwixt the bunnies and the hose causes the area of high pressure behind the bunnies to start scooting 'em t'wards or into the area of lower pressure.
r~ wrote: Better still ask a hyphenated physicist.
I need no physicist. All I need to do is watch the pretty thing when she sets to vacuuming the house every morning.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

User avatar
sickles
Sage
Posts: 930
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 8:30 pm

Post #15

Post by sickles »

Force is defined as the only thing capable of being able to complete "work". If "work" is done, then a force was involved. This is how you can define it.
"Behold! A Man!" ~ Diogenes, my Hero.

User avatar
r~
Sage
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:21 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

truth condescends dogma.101

Post #16

Post by r~ »

So why not just admit force is inertial pressure differential and curvature is not and gravitation is a state of force and curvature is not? Fore I know of no observation of gravity not consistent with inertial pressure differential and you offer not better.
yes
Attraction and repulsion are too properties of force and inertia and gravity are too properties of mass and gravity forces mass acceleration and curvature does not. Fore no matter how far from firmament to dome to sphere to cycle by epicycle; relatively equivalent alphanumeric images are and were and will not ever be closer to same as same as. Fore dirt matters not inside a hole and bottomless means no length or dense no matter time.

beware the wake 0f dark monkey lake
A particular force and energy haunts the crystal clear waters of dark monkey lake. Boats and rubber duckies float and drift a round the center, faster in slower out. Even speediest boats curve more the closer they brush center. From flatland level, boats wake and wave even spin and axial and simply disappear passing through center.

def: waters
fluent matters
syn: no matter energetic state
dark to unenlightened

sew many questions
What force draws matter toward?
What force reaches extent of waters?
a) inertial pressure differential
b) curvature of lakespace

Are there any observations of gravity not consistent with inertial pressure differential?
Were Michelson and Morley looking in the right direction?

ItS
truth and self evident observation
rw

ask not always means not already know

User avatar
Ancient of Years
Guru
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2015 10:30 am
Location: In the forests of the night

Re: listen up, reptile brains

Post #17

Post by Ancient of Years »

r~ wrote: What is the force that gravitates matter toward vacuum energy differential?
Is curvature a force? Really?
When a car accelerates, the occupants feel a force. An observer in free fall does not feel a force. It is when the ground or other obstacle intersects the spacetime curve that a force is experienced. The point is that curvature is NOT a force.
Name an observation of gravity that is not consistent with inertial pressure differential.
The displacement of light passing near a gravitational source to a degree much more than explainable by ‘force’ gravitational theory but exactly consistent with General Relativity spacetime curvature theory.

The anomalous perihelion progression in Mercury’s orbit not explainable by ‘force’ gravitational theory but exactly consistent with General Relativity curvature theory.

The adjustment required to the clocks in GPS satellites to account for the greater time dilation in the more strongly curved spacetime at ground level (as well as the speed difference). This is not explainable by ‘force’ gravitational theory but is exactly consistent with General Relativity spacetime curvature theory.

All of these things are explained very neatly in numerous in various easily accessible sources. Here is a beginning.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introducti ... relativity

If you wish to discuss this further, please give a precise definition of ‘inertial pressure differential’. I am familiar with inertial forces and with pressure forces. But they are not the same thing. If they were then there would be no such thing as Euler number, the ratio between the two. If there were no Euler number, pressure washers and fire hoses would not work. I can assure you that they do.
To see a World in a Grain of Sand
And a Heaven in a Wild Flower,
Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand
And Eternity in an hour.

William Blake

User avatar
r~
Sage
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:21 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

entropy proves asymmetry

Post #18

Post by r~ »

action at time and distance.101
Long before Ancient Brains first washed, tailings of spooky force stirred the waters and precessed boats around and around curvature of dark monkey laketime.
Enclose a volume of air at monkey see level. Inertia and pressure are same as and no difference in side and out. Inertial pressure differential is currently constantly 0 and Euler and Bernoulli and Holy Curvature are Naught.

pressure abhors difference, entropy feeds
As volume levitates, inertial pressure differentiates in side over out. And entropy is fed. Pressure undifferentiates by states of bang and torus and vortex and streamline and seep until last plank drops down and out. And entropy is fed.

Inertial pressure differential predicts fluent spacetime aether and dark matter is a fudge factor because relative curvature of spacetime according to mass fails at calculating the acceleration of planets and galaxies and Michelson and Morley were looking the wrong way to measure the drag and direction of the aether wind.

Does mass increase exponentially with velocity?
Is matter a state of mass and energy?
Does matter hold states of inertia and gravity?
Does dark matter hold states of inertia and gravity?

bonus questions
How close to the speed of light must dark matter bits be to accelerate grams by meters over seconds squared?
Is there a way to measure the inertial pressure of dark as it gravitates through matter towards earth and center of mass near light speed?

that I ask means not I know not right
ron

to see is to change the course of dark matter
How about you?

User avatar
Ancient of Years
Guru
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2015 10:30 am
Location: In the forests of the night

Re: entropy proves asymmetry

Post #19

Post by Ancient of Years »

[Replying to post 18 by r~]










...what?



I had no idea James Joyce knew anything about physics.
To see a World in a Grain of Sand
And a Heaven in a Wild Flower,
Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand
And Eternity in an hour.

William Blake

Post Reply