In Paul’s oldest and first epistle, written in 51-52 AD, he states without qualification that:
“Indeed, we tell you this, on the word of the Lord, that we who are alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord,* will surely not precede those who have fallen asleep. 16For the Lord himself, with a word of command, with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, will come down from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first.g17 Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together* with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. Thus we shall always be with the Lord.� 1 Thes 4:15-17
But it didn’t happen. Thus we must conclude that either Paul or the Lord were incorrect.
How much else of what Paul told us is also incorrect?
Recall, it was Paul who reported the Resurrection in 1 Corinthians 15 written about 53-57 AD.
Was his story historically correct (did it actually happen) or is it just a story that was used by and embellished by the writers of the New Testament?
Since the basis of Christian belief is the historical fact of the Resurrection, let’s examine the evidence and see if the Resurrection really happened or can an analysis of the story show that it is improbable if not impossible.
Opinions?
Is the Resurrurredction really a historical fact, or not?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2015 3:40 am
- Location: South Africa
Post #921
Clownboat wrote:Clownboat wrote:You see, faith does not lead to the Christian god, faith is required to believe in any god concept. This makes fakes faith being hard to come by a good thing IMO. I just disagree with the part that it is hard to come by because I know far to many that are capable of having faith and then applying it to one of the many god concepts.I do not mean having faith that God exists. I mean having faith in God to lead one in one's life knowing full well He exists. A child has faith in his father. He does not doubt his father's existence.
Clownboat wrote:It matters not where you apply your faith, because faith is needed in order to believe in false things. That is the point. How is a mechanism that leads to false beliefs a good thing?
So you can't differentiate between the context of the two faiths? You seem to think that it is only possible to have faith if you start off not being sure He exists in the first place. In my case it was not brainwashing because I was never forced to believe. A lot of people stay with a religion because they are frightened of the repercussions of leaving it so they just convince themselves that their God exists. You are also assuming that all beliefs are false. I do not see the point of worshiping a god one is not sure exists unless they are obliged to.
What criteria would be needed for you to convince you that it was written by Jesus. Not only that, what would make you believe what He wrote is true? You could think he was a magician, a fraud, an anything but the Son of God.
Clownboat wrote:I don't know why you struggle with this. Don't you think a god could write in a way that is beyond what us mere humans can do? Wouldn't you expect some divine wisdom to be present in it?
Instead of using grand scriptures with magic coating to understand Him, He offers us the Holy Spirit that is the Teacher who gives us wisdom and understanding of God. That is far more valuable than any scripture.
Clownboat wrote:Your Holy Ghost is just an excuse you use to justify for the scriptures not being wise nor divine.
So my question was, "don't you think a god could write in a way that is beyond what us mere humans can do?"
Holy Spirit or not, such a divine and wise being would have wisdom/knowledge far beyond that of the humans of the time when these things were written. Yet this is not demonstrated in the Bible.
There were fallible people who wrote the Bible. You could argue, why did God make a perfect world? As I said, since when does knowledge beyond human understanding at the time automatically would be accredited to Jesus? Or inspired by God? That knowledge could be from the occult which many of the Pharisees practiced.
Clownboat wrote:Instead we have stories about a punishing (Adam and Eve, Noah...) genocidal barbaric (keep the virgin girls for yourself) god that does things that are very human in nature.
That's Yahweh you are talking about, not the Father.
Clownboat wrote:Do you not serve the god of Israel? If not, who is Yahweh when compared to this 'Father'. When I was a Christian, I was taught to pray to my 'Father god', the god of Israel. Thus my confusion.
No, I don't. When you truly research who Yahweh is, you see that he is a physical being, a Canaanite God, the son of El, who was approached by Moses by joining the Midianite tribe and was originally the god of the Kenites. So Yahweh adopted Israel.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/s ... kguide.htm
I bet you that you didn't know this. This is the problem with the Christian church. They don't want to rattle the boat by making Christians disillusioned with the Bible because the OT is mostly one big lie. So many atheists parted with the faith not knowing that not all what Christianity teaches is true. Thus the problems they had in the OT just aren't about the Father. So many atheists use the OT as an excuse to abandon the faith, not realizing that it is not about the Father at all.
Clownboat wrote:Can you point to anything in the Bible that we cannot imagine a human coming up with?
An actual divine book written by Jesus is truly needed, otherwise what is special about the current 66? Nothing that I can see.
Why would that be needed?
Clownboat wrote:Why!? Simple, you believe that there is a god concept behind the scriptures. The scriptures themselves betray you. That is why it is needed.
Does the betrayal of the OT dent my faith in the slightest? Absolutely not. I do not base my faith on the scriptures. You do understand my belief that once one knows the Teacher, whatever is written in the scriptures is not that important. If you are looking for perfection in the scriptures to have any sort of faith, you are wasting your time.
I think Revelation is indicative of the writer truly having no clue of what he was writing about. That could be divine inspired.
There are many prophetic things in Revelation that indicate the supernatural. I'm going to bring your attention to Revelation 13: 17-18Clownboat wrote:Why would you jump to such conclusions? If you were not a Christian with a Christian bias, I don't believe you would read Revelations and jump to said book being divinely inspired. I assume you have read Revelations?
The Mark of the Beast
…17so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark—the name of the beast or the number of its name. 18Here is a call for wisdom: Let the one who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and that number is six hundred sixty-six.
Now watch this:
Read this article:
http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/nbc-new ... s-3-years/
Does that Revelation passage seem more plausible now?
Revelation 8:9
"...a third of the living creatures in the sea died, and a third of the ships were destroyed."
Water covers more than 70 percent of the Earth's surface, with the largest body of water, the Pacific Ocean, taking up more than one-third of the planet's surface.
Tepco, the owners of the stricken Fukushima plants is dumping about 650 tons of radioactive water into the Pacific per day.
"According to two University of Washington scientific research papers that were recently released, a 1,000 mile stretch of the Pacific Ocean has warmed up by several degrees, and nobody seems to know why this is happening. This giant “blob� of warm water was first observed in late 2013, and it is playing havoc with our climate. And since this giant “blob� first showed up, fish and other sea creatures have been dying in absolutely massive numbers. So could there be a connection? And what is going to happen if the Pacific Ocean continues to warm up? Could we potentially be facing the greatest holocaust of sea life in the Pacific that anyone has ever observed? If so, what would that mean for the food chain and for our food supply?...
"Meanwhile, while this has been going on, scientists have also been noticing that sea creatures in the Pacific have been dying in record numbers. In fact, last summer I wrote an article entitled “Why are massive numbers of sea creatures dying along the west coast right now?� Since then, things have continued to get even worse. For instance, it was recently reported that the number of sea lions washing up on Southern California beaches is at an all-time record high…
"A record 2,250 sea lions, mostly pups, have washed up starving and stranded on Southern California beaches so far this year, a worsening phenomenon blamed on warming seas in the region that have disrupted the marine mammals’ food supply. "The latest tally, reported on Monday by the National Marine Fisheries Service, is 20 times the level of strandings averaged for the same three-month period over the past decade and twice the number documented in 2013, the previous worst winter season recorded for Southern California sea lions. "And of course fish are being deeply affected as well. Sardines have declined to their lowest level in six decades, and National Geographic says that a whole host of tiny fish species at the bottom of the food chain are dying off rapidly."
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd696.htm
So there are signs.
Post #922
If this were true, there would be Christians who know about Jesus, God and the Holy Spirit without ever having read or heard anything about either of these.Claire Evans wrote: Yet it is the Holy Spirit that is the Teacher, not the Bible.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2015 3:40 am
- Location: South Africa
Post #923
Blastcat wrote: [Replying to post 893 by Claire Evans]
Truth claims are easy to make, harder to prove TRUE.
Claire Evans wrote:
Obviously we need the Bible to tell us who Jesus is and what He did. However, knowing that and truly knowing Him can be completely different things.
I'm assuming they knew it orally as in oral tradition. Today, well, we have access to the written gospels.Blastcat wrote:And many Christians have NEVER once read the Bible. Over a thousand YEARS of Christianity went by before anyone thought of translating the Bible into the vernacular.
People just had to accept religious AUTHORITY.... or else.
BUT that wasn't your point.
John 14:25:Blastcat wrote:You said that knowing the STORIES about Jesus isn't the same as "truly knowing Him".... what do you mean by "TRULY KNOWING"?
To be more specific, what "truth" are you claiming to know?
25All this I have spoken to you while I am still with you. 26But the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have told you.
How could the disciples be taught by the Holy Spirit? By obviously accepting Him in their lives to establish a relationship. That can actually be done today. What's truths have I learnt about Him? He has conquered all evil. I would not know this if I didn't know evil and the power of it. To pray when confronted with evil and for evil spirits to flee because of that is testimony of God's power. You also know by looking back on your life at how you prayed for guidance and how events dovetailed for one's own good. Once you learn to listen to God's voice, then the truth is irrefutable.
Please note that this is not factual so please don't ask me to prove it.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2015 3:40 am
- Location: South Africa
Post #924
In the Bible, Jesus promised to send the Holy Spirit to the disciples. Obviously, they needed to know about Jesus. The Bible is how we get introduced to the faith, not the means to have a relationship with Him.Justin108 wrote:If this were true, there would be Christians who know about Jesus, God and the Holy Spirit without ever having read or heard anything about either of these.Claire Evans wrote: Yet it is the Holy Spirit that is the Teacher, not the Bible.
Post #925
We established that what the Bible says is suspect back in post 874. We can't trust what the Bible says. So why do you trust the Bible when it says the Holy Spirit guides disciples?Claire Evans wrote: In the Bible, Jesus promised to send the Holy Spirit to the disciples.
Re: Writers that don't know what they are writing about.
Post #926Oh there is? Can you prove it?Claire Evans wrote: There is such a practice called automatic writing. That is when the supernatural guides the hand of the person writing.
Like what?Claire Evans wrote:I really do believe Revelation is something to be believed because it really is starting to resemble what is happening.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2015 3:40 am
- Location: South Africa
Re: Is the Resurrurredction really a historical fact, or not
Post #927Blastcat wrote: [Replying to post 900 by Claire Evans]
Hi, Claire,
I put ten questions at the bottom of the post.
If you want, you can just skip to those.
Blastcat wrote:I never understood the requirement of belief for doing what is right. Healing people if you can is a great RESPONSIBILITY.. to NOT heal when we can is morally WRONG in my opinion. Mathew 8:5-13 almost seems to imply that Jesus would NOT have healed the servant if the owner ( I believe the man was a slave owner? ) would not have believed in the right god. Is that correct?I guess that's right. I don't bother with any faith healer either. I just go to a doctor.Claire Evans wrote:
That centurion would not have approached Jesus for healing if he hadn't got faith. If He didn't believe Jesus could heal, he wouldn't have bothered.
So, are you saying that people who go to faith healers have to have faith in order to bother going to faith healers? And... I suppose you are saying that Jesus was a REAL DEAL faith healer, and not just some charlatan about whom people wrote wild stories of his grand healings?
So, I just want to check if I understand you correctly, Claire...
Are you saying that FAITH is only required so that people will BOTHER going to a faith healer?
Is faith just the MOTIVATION that it takes to GO seek a faith healer?
Because, I could go seek a faith healer... out of curiosity, or for a study.... why is FAITH required?
Blastcat wrote:You say that we need to BELIEVE in God in order to be healed by god. Doctors just do it to help people.THINGS ARE DIFFERENT TODAY.
Oh... what are you saying here... that people AREN'T being "healed" by faith anymore? Could you clarify, please?
Blastcat wrote: "Believe this or you wont get healed"
Do you understand the moral dilemma faith healing entails?Had to demonstrate?. why did he have to?
Wasn't just FAITH needed?
So... are you saying that back then, FAITH wasn't needed.. but a demonstration was needed.
I'd LOVE to have a demonstration, but... NOW.. since you say that TIMES HAVE CHANGED... I would have to have just FAITH... is that what you mean?
It took DEMONSTRATIONS THEN.... and now it takes FAITH?
So, back then, people needed to be DEMONSTRATED that God had magical powers to heal. I see.Claire Evans wrote:
The disciples received power from God to heal to demonstrate what faith could do but they had a special purpose and that was to establish the faith.
But didn't you say that it takes FAITH to be healed by God?
I don't have much of a "perception" of Jesus other than he is a book character. But you are saying that:Claire Evans wrote:
As I said, Jesus heals in other ways today and that is also using modern medicine. I hope this changes the perception you have.
JESUS uses modern medicine?
Are you saying that Jesus doesn't heal by FAITH, but is a DOCTOR?
Well, we are all entitled to our beliefs, Claire. I can't debate what you believe.Claire Evans wrote:
For me, if there was an absence of the Holy Spirit, then the resurrection could not have happened.
BUT....
I can ask you for evidence.
How have you established that if there was an absence of the Holy Spirit, then the resurrection could not have happened?
Why should we believe these miraculous tales?
Could you explain how ESPOUSING something makes it true?Claire Evans wrote:
Christianity espouses that it is only through the conquering of sin that Jesus rose from the dead.
I can assure you that I have NO CLUE, Claire. I'm an atheist. I don't even know what the Holy Spirit is supposed to BE.
The only reasonable answer I can give you for the question is:
YOU TELL ME.
How is this "Holy Spirit" a way to know?Claire Evans wrote:
Absolutely. Without knowing the Holy Spirit, it is impossible to know for sure that Jesus did those miracles. Then it could just be made up stories. I cannot take anything I read at face value.
Blastcat wrote: I don't believe in any "resurrection" because I don't see how anyone can prove those Bible stories are really true."PERSONALLY PROVEN"
Could you explain that a bit?
Blastcat wrote:Just to be clear as to your position, I would like to ask you three questions concerning resurrection:
1. Do you believe that Lazarus actually came back from the dead?Oh boy... that is confusing to me.
You BELIEVE but you don't know for sure.
To me, that's a complete contradiction.
If you don't know for sure.... HOW do you believe?
Blastcat wrote:3. If so... how do you know these stories are true?Ok, that seems to be your most important point.
I'd like to understand what that means... I propose that I start a new thread about that.... How do we know something to be true by the "Holy Spirit".
Would you be interested?
Your belief reinforces your faith.
Yes, that makes sense.
Interesting claim.
I suppose then that you must think that anyone who doesn't do whatever he wants "HAS" the Holy Spirit?
I don't do everything that I like.. and I'm an atheist. Do I "have" the Holy Spirit?
Claire Evans wrote:
There would be no stopping evil in all aspects of life. There is definitely an war being waged against God. There are so many indications that the powers that be are expecting the Anti-Christ.
Ohhhhh I don't doubt that people believe ALL kinds of strange stuff, Claire.
I'm WAY more interested in HOW they formed those beliefs and not really what they happen to BE.
I find your ideas fascinating.
I hope you find your way into the thread about the Holy Spirit.
Now.. I realize that I ask a whole LOT of questions.. and I find it a bit frustrating because most people don't seem to answer each and every one. I don't blame them... but, maybe it's because they are scattered here and there all over my posts.
So, I just thought of a trial solution to that.... Restating the questions at the very bottom... So here goes.. these are questions that I have asked in this post. It would help me understand your position if you could answer some of them.
But those faith healers aren't Jesus! I'd say there are a lot of gullible people who go to faith healers that turn out to be charlatans.
If those people had faith, why do they believe they need a faith healer? Surely Jesus is the only who intercedes? It appears as if those who seek faith healers have more faith in the faith healer than Jesus. I'd also say there is a lot of gullibility involved. The power of suggestion needs to be taken into account and a "faith healer" just being fraudulent.Blastcat wrote:These are repeats:
1. Are you saying that faith just the MOTIVATION that it takes to GO seek a faith healer?
There are many claims as such. A stand-in priest claimed to have been healed because he had great pain in his neck and he claimed it went away. I believe Jesus can take away pain if it becomes too much to bear. The actual problem with the priest's neck didn't go away. The pain just went away. There are some things in my life that I couldn't bear anymore and then it was taken away. This is what I believe healing is.Blastcat wrote:2. Are you saying that people AREN'T being "healed" by faith anymore?
Not always. Let us take the case of the centurion in Luke 7:1-3Blastcat wrote:3. Are you saying that back then, in Gospel days, FAITH wasn't needed.. but a demonstration was needed? It took DEMONSTRATIONS THEN.... and now it takes FAITH?
After he had finished all his sayings in the hearing of the people, he entered Capernaum. 2 Now a centurion had a servant[a] who was sick and at the point of death, who was highly valued by him. 3 When the centurion heard about Jesus, he sent to him elders of the Jews, asking him to come and heal his servant.
Let us look at the blind man in John 9:
1 And as Jesus passed by, he saw a man which was blind from his birth.
2 And his disciples asked him, saying, Master, who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind?
3 Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.
4 I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work.
5 As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.
6 When he had thus spoken, he spat on the ground, and made clay of the spittle, and he anointed the eyes of the blind man with the clay,
7 And said unto him, Go, wash in the pool of Siloam, (which is by interpretation, Sent.) He went his way therefore, and washed, and came seeing.
The blind man didn't say, "No one can heal me. I have been blind all my life, why would you, Jesus, change that?" No, instead, he obeyed Jesus and had faith.
I'm not going to disregard people who claim to have been healed by faith, but I believe Jesus uses people to invent medication, etc. I say anything good comes from Him, so why not in this instance? I believe God can help suffering people by using those who care to help them. We are meant to be His mediums.Blastcat wrote:4. You said that JESUS uses modern medicine. Are you saying that Jesus doesn't heal by FAITH, but that modern medicine is actually GOD MAGIC ? Ok.. I can't really make heads or tales of this... so could you just clarify what you meant?
Because the devil would have conquered mankind and our souls. What reins in evil? Why does good still exist? If we believe all good comes from the Holy Spirit, then surely it would have died with Jesus in the grave? It is only the Holy Spirit that impedes Satan. Nothing else frightens him.Blastcat wrote:5. How have you established that if there was an absence of the Holy Spirit, then the resurrection could not have happened?
That belief of miracles comes naturally after knowing the Holy Spirit. I do not have to examine each claim and say, "This didn't happen or this did."Blastcat wrote:6. Why should we believe these "miraculous" tales?
No, espousal proves nothing. However, if I say, "This and this is the truth", then I get chastised for preaching.Blastcat wrote:7. You said that "Christianity espouses that it is only through the conquering of sin that Jesus rose from the dead. " Could you explain how ESPOUSING something makes it true?
Because the rising of the dead is what I believe Jesus can do. He is one with the Father and the Father rose Jesus from the dead. There are other stories in the NT that I don't believe are actually true but are symbolic like the wilderness story.Blastcat wrote:8. You stated that you believe that Lazarus came back from the dead, but that you can't be sure it really happened. If you don't know for sure.... HOW and WHY do you believe?
By establishing a relationship with Him.Blastcat wrote:9. How do we know something to be true by the "Holy Spirit".
I'm not saying you aren't influenced by good things which are from the Holy Spirit but the Holy Spirit cannot dwell in you because you haven't invited Him in. How can one invite Him in? By abandoning one's will for one's own life. Be prepared to take on the cross which takes suffering. Be prepared to kill the ego and all things that promote oneself. To actually get to that stage, one needs to be humiliated to realize one is nothing without God. Jesus was humiliated.Blastcat wrote:10. I don't do everything that I like.. and I'm an atheist. Do I "have" the Holy Spirit?
Cheers, Claire.
How many people are prepared to do that?
I will go to your post about the Holy Spirit but remember it cannot be classified as a debate.

Post #928
[Replying to post 917 by Claire Evans]
.
Critical thinking skills are CRITICAL for thinking well....
Many Christians STILL have not read the Bible.
It's really shocking but this is very common even in North America. Of course, it may be true that many fundamentalists do. But still, even if they DO read the Bible and learn a lot of if by heart, it still doesn't mean that anything IN the Bible is true.
So, why believe what the Bible says?
Now all you have to do is prove it's true.
Have you EVER wondered if what you believe in is TRUE, Claire?
Could you explain how accepting something leads to knowledge?
You COULD be accepting something false.
He HAS conquered all evil?
What does that mean?.. There is no evil left in the world?... But forget that... I suppose you know what you mean. I want to know how you KNOW that statement is true, and not just some nice sounding phrase out of the Bible.
It's not a truth if you can't prove that it is. What you are REALLY saying, as far as I can tell is that the truth here is your BELIEF that, for example, "he has conquered evil".
It may be TRUE that you believe what you profess all the time, but are your beliefs TRUE?
It's most probably true that you have a bunch of religious beliefs. You don't seem to be able to demonstrate that your religious beliefs are true, OR that you have a sound method to KNOW if they are true. You simply accept it as true.
Acceptance isn't proof.
You don't seem to understand the difference between a FACT and a BELIEF, but they aren't the same things. Unfortunately, thinking about thinking isn't so easy at first. And you are confused about your thinking. That's why studying a bit of epistemology is so very VITAL when it comes to knowing if our beliefs are true or not.
You CLAIM to know something about HS.
You might BELIEVE you know something about HS.
But you just seem to be repeating what you understand the Bible says.
That's not understanding, Claire, that's memory.
You have been well trained. You can quote the Bible at will, and that's an impressive bit of memory work. HOWEVER, there is more to thinking than just memory.
I'm looking for your REASONING, Claire, and not your ability to quote the Bible.
But what you don't do is to explain how you know any of these beliefs are TRUE.
So many people seem to believe things that they don't know how to prove is true.
And that means.. they might believe in falsehoods.
And they don't seem to care. They "double down" instead of worrying about THAT.
They use insistence instead of investigation.
And in these debates, they do it for ALL of us to see.
It can and does lead us all to ERROR.
We have to go beyond just using our imagination... that's where critical thinking comes into the picture. When a person is ready to improve their thinking.. a few lessons is critical thinking is the way to go.
Try it... you should profit from the experience.
http://www.skillsyouneed.com/learn/crit ... nking.html
I'm asking you how you KNOW that you are "listening to God's voice" instead of your imagination which we all know you have. How do you know your God beliefs are true?
Saying that something is "irrefutable" isn't prove that it IS irrefutable.
You are just proclaiming again.
If it's not factual, it can't be TRUE, Claire.
If you wont prove your claims, you are not abiding by the rules of the forum or of an honest debate.
You make a LOT of claims, Claire.

.
Critical thinking skills are CRITICAL for thinking well....
Blastcat wrote: Truth claims are easy to make, harder to prove TRUE.
Claire Evans wrote:
Obviously we need the Bible to tell us who Jesus is and what He did. However, knowing that and truly knowing Him can be completely different things.
Blastcat wrote:And many Christians have NEVER once read the Bible. Over a thousand YEARS of Christianity went by before anyone thought of translating the Bible into the vernacular.
People just had to accept religious AUTHORITY.... or else.
BUT that wasn't your point.
I'm assuming that when I write "many Christians" I don't mean just many Christians in the PAST, Claire. I was giving an example of how religious people believing what they are told to believe.Claire Evans wrote:
I'm assuming they knew it orally as in oral tradition. Today, well, we have access to the written gospels.
Many Christians STILL have not read the Bible.
It's really shocking but this is very common even in North America. Of course, it may be true that many fundamentalists do. But still, even if they DO read the Bible and learn a lot of if by heart, it still doesn't mean that anything IN the Bible is true.
So, why believe what the Bible says?
Blastcat wrote:You said that knowing the STORIES about Jesus isn't the same as "truly knowing Him".... what do you mean by "TRULY KNOWING"?
To be more specific, what "truth" are you claiming to know?
Great.Claire Evans wrote:
John 14:25:
25All this I have spoken to you while I am still with you. 26But the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have told you.
Now all you have to do is prove it's true.
Have you EVER wondered if what you believe in is TRUE, Claire?
It's not obvious to me, Claire. sorry.Claire Evans wrote:
How could the disciples be taught by the Holy Spirit? By obviously accepting Him in their lives to establish a relationship.
Could you explain how accepting something leads to knowledge?
You COULD be accepting something false.
Claire Evans wrote:
That can actually be done today. What's truths have I learnt about Him? He has conquered all evil.
He HAS conquered all evil?
What does that mean?.. There is no evil left in the world?... But forget that... I suppose you know what you mean. I want to know how you KNOW that statement is true, and not just some nice sounding phrase out of the Bible.
It's not a truth if you can't prove that it is. What you are REALLY saying, as far as I can tell is that the truth here is your BELIEF that, for example, "he has conquered evil".
It may be TRUE that you believe what you profess all the time, but are your beliefs TRUE?
It's most probably true that you have a bunch of religious beliefs. You don't seem to be able to demonstrate that your religious beliefs are true, OR that you have a sound method to KNOW if they are true. You simply accept it as true.
Acceptance isn't proof.
You don't seem to understand the difference between a FACT and a BELIEF, but they aren't the same things. Unfortunately, thinking about thinking isn't so easy at first. And you are confused about your thinking. That's why studying a bit of epistemology is so very VITAL when it comes to knowing if our beliefs are true or not.
You CLAIM to know something about HS.
You might BELIEVE you know something about HS.
But you just seem to be repeating what you understand the Bible says.
That's not understanding, Claire, that's memory.
You have been well trained. You can quote the Bible at will, and that's an impressive bit of memory work. HOWEVER, there is more to thinking than just memory.
I'm looking for your REASONING, Claire, and not your ability to quote the Bible.
I know what the word "evil" means, and I don't "KNOW" anything about any HS or any god. So, if that's your method, it doesn't work for everyone.
To TESTIFY is to simply profess your belief. You do that a LOT.Claire Evans wrote:
To pray when confronted with evil and for evil spirits to flee because of that is testimony of God's power.
But what you don't do is to explain how you know any of these beliefs are TRUE.
So many people seem to believe things that they don't know how to prove is true.
And that means.. they might believe in falsehoods.
And they don't seem to care. They "double down" instead of worrying about THAT.
They use insistence instead of investigation.
And in these debates, they do it for ALL of us to see.
I look back on my life and how I prayed for guidance and believed in God and so forth, and now I've come to the conclusion that I was "hearing" ME and my imagination. Very powerful stuff, the imagination.Claire Evans wrote:
You also know by looking back on your life at how you prayed for guidance and how events dovetailed for one's own good. Once you learn to listen to God's voice, then the truth is irrefutable.
It can and does lead us all to ERROR.
We have to go beyond just using our imagination... that's where critical thinking comes into the picture. When a person is ready to improve their thinking.. a few lessons is critical thinking is the way to go.
Try it... you should profit from the experience.
http://www.skillsyouneed.com/learn/crit ... nking.html
I'm asking you how you KNOW that you are "listening to God's voice" instead of your imagination which we all know you have. How do you know your God beliefs are true?
Saying that something is "irrefutable" isn't prove that it IS irrefutable.
You are just proclaiming again.
NOT FACTUAL?
If it's not factual, it can't be TRUE, Claire.
If you wont prove your claims, you are not abiding by the rules of the forum or of an honest debate.
You make a LOT of claims, Claire.

- rikuoamero
- Under Probation
- Posts: 6707
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 2:06 pm
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Is the Resurrurredction really a historical fact, or not
Post #929[Replying to post 921 by Claire Evans]
Your claims here are immediately proven false by the fact that I am here talking to you as an ex Christian.
Oh so you have a method, something that works? Go on...
Your method here doesn't work.
I'm pretty sure I've told you in the past, CE, that I asked for just that. Well, to be more precise, I prayed to God to do with me as he would, to use me as his agent (maybe not using the word agent, but I hope I get the general gist across).but the Holy Spirit cannot dwell in you because you haven't invited Him in.
Your claims here are immediately proven false by the fact that I am here talking to you as an ex Christian.
How can one invite Him in?
Oh so you have a method, something that works? Go on...
As noted above, I did just that. Nothing happened. This can also be interpreted as being willing to commit suicide. I attempted that once, nothing supernatural happened (unlike stories I hear from Christians, including one from a poster here on the site who says something supernatural happened to him when he attempted suicide).By abandoning one's will for one's own life.
A literal cross, or just be prepared to suffer? Humans do that every day. If I go for long walks or hikes, I'm prepared for the pain that will result.Be prepared to take on the cross which takes suffering.
Again, reread the first line from me in this comment.. Be prepared to kill the ego and all things that promote oneself.
I've been humiliated in the past, quite a few times. No Holy Spirit though. I remember as a young child, being mocked by others in my home town for believing.To actually get to that stage, one needs to be humiliated to realize one is nothing without God. Jesus was humiliated.
Me. Tried it, no result.How many people are prepared to do that?
Your method here doesn't work.

Your life is your own. Rise up and live it - Richard Rahl, Sword of Truth Book 6 "Faith of the Fallen"
I condemn all gods who dare demand my fealty, who won't look me in the face so's I know who it is I gotta fealty to. -- JoeyKnotHead
Some force seems to restrict me from buying into the apparent nonsense that others find so easy to buy into. Having no religious or supernatural beliefs of my own, I just call that force reason. -- Tired of the Nonsense
Re: Is the Resurrurredction really a historical fact, or not
Post #930[Replying to post 921 by Claire Evans]
We would have to ask them. There are THOUSANDS of them.
However, I could imagine that they have FAITH in God and also FAITH in the faith healer.
They use FAITH... and get bilked out of their time, energy and money.
Faith healing is one of the ways that faith makes people GULLIBLE.
We know that for a FACT.
They exploit what Christians believe.. that's how the scam WORKS.
But there isn't anything SURE about Jesus.
The only thing SURE is that a lot of people sure do seem to believe.
Yep.
We agree for once.
We know for a FACT that faith healing is a scam.
People DO use faith to know things are true. AND a whole lot of them get BILKED out of their cash. And some of them forgo ACTUAL medical treatment because of the faith that they have. Faith can be and has been proven to be DANGEROUS to people and to entire societies.
That's ALSO a fact.
The rest is... some pains just go away. I don't need to be healed for that.
EVER.
Some serious conditions JUST GO AWAY.. and no prayer is needed for that. Even CANCERS go into spontaneous remission, God belief or NOT. Pray all you like... we have no proof that it's going to change anything. But if prayer makes you HAPPY.. we DO know that happiness helps.
So, BE HAPPY... if prayer makes you happy, DO IT.
But... to believe that what you pray to is REAL..... that's a stretch.
I think of the THOUSANDS of kids writing letters to Santa. I think that's a good thing. It makes them HAPPY.
But is Santa real?
Nah....
Prayer is like a letter to Santa... makes people REAL happy.
I say "good for them"... but is God real?
Nah...
I don't know how people can manage believing in something that they don't know is TRUE. BUT they sure do... it's a mental juggling act that some call "resolving cognitive dissonance".
Some use critical thinking to get out of the unpleasant feelings of being wrong, and some just dig themselves deeper and FORGET that they haven't resolved anything. Donal Trump seems to be the poster child for self-delusion. He might ACTUALLY believe his own lies.
You say that Jesus needed to PROVE that he wasn't just blowing hot air.. but today.. he doesn't need to prove it. What he NEEDS is a huge propaganda machine.. and he has that. And apparently, nothing needs ever be PROVED again.
We all have to take it on FAITH now... or burn in hell.
I ask for evidence.. if you don't give me any.. I ignore the claims.
You can believe anything that you like. HOWEVER, your belief isn't proof. It's JUST A BELIEF. You will have to do more than simply telling us over and over what you believe. I'm beginning to think you don't understand the question.
Here it is again:
HOW do you know what you believe is true?
So far, it's as if that question is MEANINGLESS to you... or transparent. We GET that you are a Bible believer.. a CHRISTIAN.... we know that already. We don't need to be told EACH AND EVERY THING that you believe in order to get it. You don't HAVE to transcribe the entire Bible in the forum. WE GET IT.
Try to focus instead on our ACTUAL QUESTIONS.
How do you know what any of your beliefs are TRUE?
Is one such question.
If you can't answer that then we have to IGNORE your beliefs as unjustified. There are MILLIONS of unjustified beliefs. We don't have to believe them ALL. Your beliefs are precious to YOU... but not to everyone, Claire. To outsiders of your faith, your beliefs are JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE'S. Your beliefs are not special at all to US. But we understand that your beliefs are special TO YOU... and that's why I find it AMAZING that you really don't seem to even UNDERSTAND the question :
How do you know your beliefs are TRUE?
Asking "why not?" is one of the WORST possible answers.
Imagine a court case... a murder trial.. something IMPORTANT as your belief in God.. and the prosecution demands "WHY did you murder that child?"... and you would answer... "Why NOT?"
Do you IMAGINE "why not" is a good justification?
Why not... be a Muslim or a Hindu or a Jew or any other of the 30,000 denominations of Christianity you reject as FALSE Christians? Why do you take JUST THE BELIEF that you happen to have as TRUE, and all the others FALSE?
I really do think you can't understand the question. If you quote the Bible as an answer, it's proof that you don't. We don't NEED a quote from the Bible that you believe is true. We are asking you REPEATEDLY to prove your beliefs TRUE.
SURE YOU DO... you believe that and it probably makes you HAPPY. And if that's the case, I am really HAPPY that your belief makes you happy.
Now... next time, I hope you bother to explain how what you believe is TRUE.
So, you justify your beliefs by even MORE unjustified beliefs. You are just digging yourself deeper and deeper into the very same epistemic hole.
It's too bad that you can't prove any of your beliefs are actually true.
Doesn't that concern you at all?
Claire, I'm sorry, but you sometimes demonstrate very bad thinking.
PLEASE consider taking a look at critical thinking.
You seem to need those skills desperately.
You are using what is known as "confirmation bias" and that's not good thinking at all:
It's on the list here of fallacious reasoning. This page is well worth the reading:
http://www.iep.utm.edu/fallacy/
And you might be interested to know a little about critical thinking in general.. since it's the epistemic method that I am promoting:
http://www.skillsyouneed.com/learn/crit ... nking.html
And you seem to be EASILY persuaded to believe something, and the English word for that is :
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/defin ... h/gullible
This is a debate forum.... we are expected to DEMONSTRATE that our claims are true in here, if challenged.
I am CHALLENGING YOU.
How do you know that your beliefs are true? If you believe that the HS guarantees the truth of your religious beliefs, for example, how do you know that the HS is a true belief? IF you believe that the proof of the HS ( and I have to guess now ) is the Bible, then please explain to us how you know the Bible is true?
The Bible is full of stories.. how do you know they are TRUE stories?
You are being CHALLENGED to justify your beliefs. It's time to stop PROFESSING your beliefs, and begin to think about your REASONS ...We now have TONS of evidence that you really believe this stuff. OK.. let's go BEYOND that stage, shall we?
Then now, you have to prove BOTH are true. Don't you realize that you have made your task TWICE AS HARD?
You have to prove that the story in Lazarus is true AND you have to prove that Jesus can actually rise people from the dead. You have 2 unjustified beliefs instead of ONE to prove. How are you going to justify Jesus being able to rise people from the dead?
Are you going to base that on ANOTHER unjustified belief?
How deep is this epistemic HOLE ?
When are you going to ACTUALLY get to the bottom of this? How do you know that your beliefs are true.. do you HAVE an answer to that? Or do you NOT bother if your beliefs are true? So many people really DON'T, you know.
All too many people are THRILLED to have beliefs, and NEVER bother to think about if those beliefs are true. Some people prefer holding on to a belief rather than having TRUE BELIEFS. You have beliefs, Claire, that much is pretty evident. But what is NOT evident that your beliefs are true at all.
And you don't seem to understand the problem.
Every time that you tell us WHAT you believe instead of telling us how you know what you believe is true is yet MORE evidence that you don't understand the question.
How can I help you understand the question?
Do you begin to see the problem with your kind of answer?
Telling us WHAT you believe isn't explain HOW you know your belief is true.
I suppose that it could happen. Did it ever happen to YOU?
Maybe everyone you have met has always been perfectly truthful. How lucky if that's true. Most of us have been lied to.... and we NEVER knew it until it was too late. A lot of people get DUPED, Claire. Are you sure you aren't being duped by well meaning or not so well meaning folk?
Some of us had false beliefs, only to find out LATER that we were wrong about them. Claire, have you ever even once been WRONG about some belief? Some of us suffer from delusions, and BELIEVE that what we are thinking is true, even though, it's just not. That's sad. How do you know this so called relationship isn't just a relationship with an idea in your head, and NOT something that is actually real?
How do you know that EVEN IF the HS is really real, that it's not LYING to you or is not DELUSIONAL, or evil, or dangerous for you, or anything ELSE?
When I was a kid.. I didn't have many friends, so I invented an IMAGINARY FRIEND.. and "played" with him. I had a relationship.. but that "David" was NEVER REAL. Have you heard of imaginary friends?
How can you know that HS isn't one of THOSE?
You seem to tell us that you TRUST this "voice" in your head.
A lot of people trust voices in their heads. Not all of them should be BELIEVED, and some of them are in real trouble. If you go to a doctor and tell him that you hear voices in your head... do you imagine the doctor will be HAPPY for you?
Or will he want to give you tests?
I don't want to be rude... but I really cannot tell if you need tests or not. I won't be able to do that. But you MIGHT. How could I know?
Certainly NOT by what you write in here.
Do you see the problem?
I'm not saying that you are crazy... it's just that what you write SOUNDS crazy to me. Voices in your head.... doesn't sound GOOD to me. You believe that they are REAL... and can't seem to prove that they are.. isn't that a bit of a PROBLEM for you?
I know it would be for me.. I'd go see a doctor if I had persistent voices in my head telling me what to do and think.
And ... that you claim the HS can't come in if I don't invite him?
Well, I invite him all the time. MY DOOR is always open at all times, 24/7
It always has been. It is right now.
HS doesn't seem to care about my open invitation... so INVITATION isn't good enough, Claire.
Have you ever had a conversation with an atheist before, Claire?
Are you listening?
Why SHOULD I let him in... what's my MOTIVATION?
My MOTIVATION is that I have to be ready to abandon my LIFE? Well if you put it that way.. I don't WANT him in anymore. I am MORE motivated to KEEP my life, thank you. HS can stand outside the door.. until he goes AWAY.
Invitation REVOKED. I only allow NICE people to come into my house.
You make the HS sound EVIL.
In any case, I am not buying THAT today.
I don't really feel the NEED to be humiliated, thank you.
I also suffer ENOUGH thank you very much. YOU suffer and be humiliated all you like for Jesus.. I'll take a pass. I'd like to be as happy as possible during the short time I have left to live. I don't want to suffer or feel humiliation MORE than I already do.
If you were selling something that RELIEVED pain and suffering.. but nah.. we already HAVE medical science.
You are free to suffer all you like. If it makes you happy, do it.
Suffering doesn't make ME happy. But then, I didn't like Fifty Shades of Grey, either.
If you want to preach, I suggest the Holy Huddle... or a church.
I'm not at all interested in preaching.

How should I know?
We would have to ask them. There are THOUSANDS of them.
However, I could imagine that they have FAITH in God and also FAITH in the faith healer.
They use FAITH... and get bilked out of their time, energy and money.
Faith healing is one of the ways that faith makes people GULLIBLE.
We know that for a FACT.
Yep, most faith healers know the drill.. THEY don't heal anyone... JESUS heals.
They exploit what Christians believe.. that's how the scam WORKS.
But there isn't anything SURE about Jesus.
The only thing SURE is that a lot of people sure do seem to believe.
Claire Evans wrote:
It appears as if those who seek faith healers have more faith in the faith healer than Jesus. I'd also say there is a lot of gullibility involved. The power of suggestion needs to be taken into account and a "faith healer" just being fraudulent.
Yep.
We agree for once.
We know for a FACT that faith healing is a scam.
People DO use faith to know things are true. AND a whole lot of them get BILKED out of their cash. And some of them forgo ACTUAL medical treatment because of the faith that they have. Faith can be and has been proven to be DANGEROUS to people and to entire societies.
That's ALSO a fact.
Blastcat wrote:2. Are you saying that people AREN'T being "healed" by faith anymore?
I had a pain in my chest. It was "taken away" by surgery. I would have died without science. That's what I believe real healing is.Claire Evans wrote:
There are many claims as such. A stand-in priest claimed to have been healed because he had great pain in his neck and he claimed it went away. I believe Jesus can take away pain if it becomes too much to bear. The actual problem with the priest's neck didn't go away. The pain just went away. There are some things in my life that I couldn't bear anymore and then it was taken away. This is what I believe healing is.
The rest is... some pains just go away. I don't need to be healed for that.
EVER.
Some serious conditions JUST GO AWAY.. and no prayer is needed for that. Even CANCERS go into spontaneous remission, God belief or NOT. Pray all you like... we have no proof that it's going to change anything. But if prayer makes you HAPPY.. we DO know that happiness helps.
So, BE HAPPY... if prayer makes you happy, DO IT.
But... to believe that what you pray to is REAL..... that's a stretch.
I think of the THOUSANDS of kids writing letters to Santa. I think that's a good thing. It makes them HAPPY.
But is Santa real?
Nah....
Prayer is like a letter to Santa... makes people REAL happy.
I say "good for them"... but is God real?
Nah...
I don't know how people can manage believing in something that they don't know is TRUE. BUT they sure do... it's a mental juggling act that some call "resolving cognitive dissonance".
Some use critical thinking to get out of the unpleasant feelings of being wrong, and some just dig themselves deeper and FORGET that they haven't resolved anything. Donal Trump seems to be the poster child for self-delusion. He might ACTUALLY believe his own lies.
Blastcat wrote:3. Are you saying that back then, in Gospel days, FAITH wasn't needed.. but a demonstration was needed? It took DEMONSTRATIONS THEN.... and now it takes FAITH?
So, Jesus thought they needed a demonstration of the "power" of faith. And then, Jesus did some god magic. Not today? No demonstration needed? Just a book, I suppose, is needed today. It seems to me that today, people are WAY more gullible than they were back then.Claire Evans wrote:
Not always. Let us take the case of the centurion in Luke 7:1-3
After he had finished all his sayings in the hearing of the people, he entered Capernaum. 2 Now a centurion had a servant[a] who was sick and at the point of death, who was highly valued by him. 3 When the centurion heard about Jesus, he sent to him elders of the Jews, asking him to come and heal his servant.
You say that Jesus needed to PROVE that he wasn't just blowing hot air.. but today.. he doesn't need to prove it. What he NEEDS is a huge propaganda machine.. and he has that. And apparently, nothing needs ever be PROVED again.
We all have to take it on FAITH now... or burn in hell.
Blastcat wrote:4. You said that JESUS uses modern medicine. Are you saying that Jesus doesn't heal by FAITH, but that modern medicine is actually GOD MAGIC ? Ok.. I can't really make heads or tales of this... so could you just clarify what you meant?
I am not DISREGARDING anyone at all. I might want to DISREGARD their unverified claims, though. If I ask for evidence, and they give me the run around.. I ignore the claims. You make a lot of claims, Claire.. a whole LOT of claims.Claire Evans wrote:
I'm not going to disregard people who claim to have been healed by faith, but I believe Jesus uses people to invent medication, etc.
I ask for evidence.. if you don't give me any.. I ignore the claims.
You can believe anything that you like. HOWEVER, your belief isn't proof. It's JUST A BELIEF. You will have to do more than simply telling us over and over what you believe. I'm beginning to think you don't understand the question.
Here it is again:
HOW do you know what you believe is true?
So far, it's as if that question is MEANINGLESS to you... or transparent. We GET that you are a Bible believer.. a CHRISTIAN.... we know that already. We don't need to be told EACH AND EVERY THING that you believe in order to get it. You don't HAVE to transcribe the entire Bible in the forum. WE GET IT.
Try to focus instead on our ACTUAL QUESTIONS.
How do you know what any of your beliefs are TRUE?
Is one such question.
If you can't answer that then we have to IGNORE your beliefs as unjustified. There are MILLIONS of unjustified beliefs. We don't have to believe them ALL. Your beliefs are precious to YOU... but not to everyone, Claire. To outsiders of your faith, your beliefs are JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE'S. Your beliefs are not special at all to US. But we understand that your beliefs are special TO YOU... and that's why I find it AMAZING that you really don't seem to even UNDERSTAND the question :
How do you know your beliefs are TRUE?
You can SAY anything that you like.. but saying something isn't giving EVIDENCE for it.
Asking "why not?" is one of the WORST possible answers.
Imagine a court case... a murder trial.. something IMPORTANT as your belief in God.. and the prosecution demands "WHY did you murder that child?"... and you would answer... "Why NOT?"
Do you IMAGINE "why not" is a good justification?
Why not... be a Muslim or a Hindu or a Jew or any other of the 30,000 denominations of Christianity you reject as FALSE Christians? Why do you take JUST THE BELIEF that you happen to have as TRUE, and all the others FALSE?
I really do think you can't understand the question. If you quote the Bible as an answer, it's proof that you don't. We don't NEED a quote from the Bible that you believe is true. We are asking you REPEATEDLY to prove your beliefs TRUE.
Claire Evans wrote:
I believe God can help suffering people by using those who care to help them. We are meant to be His mediums.
SURE YOU DO... you believe that and it probably makes you HAPPY. And if that's the case, I am really HAPPY that your belief makes you happy.
Now... next time, I hope you bother to explain how what you believe is TRUE.
Blastcat wrote:5. How have you established that if there was an absence of the Holy Spirit, then the resurrection could not have happened?
WOW... you have very interesting beliefs. They must be very special to you.Claire Evans wrote:
Because the devil would have conquered mankind and our souls. What reins in evil? Why does good still exist? If we believe all good comes from the Holy Spirit, then surely it would have died with Jesus in the grave? It is only the Holy Spirit that impedes Satan. Nothing else frightens him.
So, you justify your beliefs by even MORE unjustified beliefs. You are just digging yourself deeper and deeper into the very same epistemic hole.
It's too bad that you can't prove any of your beliefs are actually true.
Doesn't that concern you at all?
Blastcat wrote:6. Why should we believe these "miraculous" tales?
You don't bother examining claims? You just accept them if you think they fit with what you already believe?...Claire Evans wrote:
That belief of miracles comes naturally after knowing the Holy Spirit. I do not have to examine each claim and say, "This didn't happen or this did."
Claire, I'm sorry, but you sometimes demonstrate very bad thinking.
PLEASE consider taking a look at critical thinking.
You seem to need those skills desperately.
You are using what is known as "confirmation bias" and that's not good thinking at all:
It's on the list here of fallacious reasoning. This page is well worth the reading:
http://www.iep.utm.edu/fallacy/
And you might be interested to know a little about critical thinking in general.. since it's the epistemic method that I am promoting:
http://www.skillsyouneed.com/learn/crit ... nking.html
And you seem to be EASILY persuaded to believe something, and the English word for that is :
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/defin ... h/gullible
Blastcat wrote:7. You said that "Christianity espouses that it is only through the conquering of sin that Jesus rose from the dead. " Could you explain how ESPOUSING something makes it true?
Because it IS preaching and NOT debating. In this debate forum, you have to do MORE than simply saying "This and this is the truth". You have to DEMONSTRATE to the skeptic that what you believe in is true.Claire Evans wrote:
No, espousal proves nothing. However, if I say, "This and this is the truth", then I get chastised for preaching.
This is a debate forum.... we are expected to DEMONSTRATE that our claims are true in here, if challenged.
I am CHALLENGING YOU.
How do you know that your beliefs are true? If you believe that the HS guarantees the truth of your religious beliefs, for example, how do you know that the HS is a true belief? IF you believe that the proof of the HS ( and I have to guess now ) is the Bible, then please explain to us how you know the Bible is true?
The Bible is full of stories.. how do you know they are TRUE stories?
You are being CHALLENGED to justify your beliefs. It's time to stop PROFESSING your beliefs, and begin to think about your REASONS ...We now have TONS of evidence that you really believe this stuff. OK.. let's go BEYOND that stage, shall we?
Blastcat wrote:8. You stated that you believe that Lazarus came back from the dead, but that you can't be sure it really happened. If you don't know for sure.... HOW and WHY do you believe?
You believe something because you believe something ELSE?
Then now, you have to prove BOTH are true. Don't you realize that you have made your task TWICE AS HARD?
You have to prove that the story in Lazarus is true AND you have to prove that Jesus can actually rise people from the dead. You have 2 unjustified beliefs instead of ONE to prove. How are you going to justify Jesus being able to rise people from the dead?
Are you going to base that on ANOTHER unjustified belief?
How deep is this epistemic HOLE ?
When are you going to ACTUALLY get to the bottom of this? How do you know that your beliefs are true.. do you HAVE an answer to that? Or do you NOT bother if your beliefs are true? So many people really DON'T, you know.
All too many people are THRILLED to have beliefs, and NEVER bother to think about if those beliefs are true. Some people prefer holding on to a belief rather than having TRUE BELIEFS. You have beliefs, Claire, that much is pretty evident. But what is NOT evident that your beliefs are true at all.
And you don't seem to understand the problem.
Every time that you tell us WHAT you believe instead of telling us how you know what you believe is true is yet MORE evidence that you don't understand the question.
How can I help you understand the question?
Again, you offer us WHAT you believe but not at all WHY.Claire Evans wrote:
He is one with the Father and the Father rose Jesus from the dead. There are other stories in the NT that I don't believe are actually true but are symbolic like the wilderness story.
Do you begin to see the problem with your kind of answer?
Telling us WHAT you believe isn't explain HOW you know your belief is true.
Blastcat wrote:9. How do we know something to be true by the "Holy Spirit".
Have you ever had a relationship with someone who was DUPING you?
I suppose that it could happen. Did it ever happen to YOU?
Maybe everyone you have met has always been perfectly truthful. How lucky if that's true. Most of us have been lied to.... and we NEVER knew it until it was too late. A lot of people get DUPED, Claire. Are you sure you aren't being duped by well meaning or not so well meaning folk?
Some of us had false beliefs, only to find out LATER that we were wrong about them. Claire, have you ever even once been WRONG about some belief? Some of us suffer from delusions, and BELIEVE that what we are thinking is true, even though, it's just not. That's sad. How do you know this so called relationship isn't just a relationship with an idea in your head, and NOT something that is actually real?
How do you know that EVEN IF the HS is really real, that it's not LYING to you or is not DELUSIONAL, or evil, or dangerous for you, or anything ELSE?
When I was a kid.. I didn't have many friends, so I invented an IMAGINARY FRIEND.. and "played" with him. I had a relationship.. but that "David" was NEVER REAL. Have you heard of imaginary friends?
How can you know that HS isn't one of THOSE?
You seem to tell us that you TRUST this "voice" in your head.
A lot of people trust voices in their heads. Not all of them should be BELIEVED, and some of them are in real trouble. If you go to a doctor and tell him that you hear voices in your head... do you imagine the doctor will be HAPPY for you?
Or will he want to give you tests?
I don't want to be rude... but I really cannot tell if you need tests or not. I won't be able to do that. But you MIGHT. How could I know?
Certainly NOT by what you write in here.
Do you see the problem?
I'm not saying that you are crazy... it's just that what you write SOUNDS crazy to me. Voices in your head.... doesn't sound GOOD to me. You believe that they are REAL... and can't seem to prove that they are.. isn't that a bit of a PROBLEM for you?
I know it would be for me.. I'd go see a doctor if I had persistent voices in my head telling me what to do and think.
Blastcat wrote:10. I don't do everything that I like.. and I'm an atheist. Do I "have" the Holy Spirit?
So, now you claim that anything good I do is proof of the HS?Claire Evans wrote:
I'm not saying you aren't influenced by good things which are from the Holy Spirit but the Holy Spirit cannot dwell in you because you haven't invited Him in.
And ... that you claim the HS can't come in if I don't invite him?
Well, I invite him all the time. MY DOOR is always open at all times, 24/7
It always has been. It is right now.
HS doesn't seem to care about my open invitation... so INVITATION isn't good enough, Claire.
Have you ever had a conversation with an atheist before, Claire?
Are you listening?
Why SHOULD I let him in... what's my MOTIVATION?
That sounds HORRIBLE.
My MOTIVATION is that I have to be ready to abandon my LIFE? Well if you put it that way.. I don't WANT him in anymore. I am MORE motivated to KEEP my life, thank you. HS can stand outside the door.. until he goes AWAY.
Invitation REVOKED. I only allow NICE people to come into my house.
You make the HS sound EVIL.
Masochists for Jesus? Who knows? You seem to imply that there are LOTS of you willing to be humiliated for Jesus. I think that's sad, by the way. Very, very sad.Claire Evans wrote:
Be prepared to take on the cross which takes suffering. Be prepared to kill the ego and all things that promote oneself. To actually get to that stage, one needs to be humiliated to realize one is nothing without God. Jesus was humiliated.
How many people are prepared to do that?
In any case, I am not buying THAT today.
I don't really feel the NEED to be humiliated, thank you.
I also suffer ENOUGH thank you very much. YOU suffer and be humiliated all you like for Jesus.. I'll take a pass. I'd like to be as happy as possible during the short time I have left to live. I don't want to suffer or feel humiliation MORE than I already do.
If you were selling something that RELIEVED pain and suffering.. but nah.. we already HAVE medical science.
You are free to suffer all you like. If it makes you happy, do it.
Suffering doesn't make ME happy. But then, I didn't like Fifty Shades of Grey, either.
I'm ONLY interested in a debate in a debate forum, thank you.Claire Evans wrote:
I will go to your post about the Holy Spirit but remember it cannot be classified as a debate.
If you want to preach, I suggest the Holy Huddle... or a church.
I'm not at all interested in preaching.
