What If...?

Creationism, Evolution, and other science issues

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
theStudent
Guru
Posts: 1566
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 6:32 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

What If...?

Post #1

Post by theStudent »

Currently, I am doing what was suggested by some on these forums.
I am researching information both for, and against evolution, and trust me - I am doing so objectively.
While I am still researching, I want to put this out, to hear the different views on it.

During my research I discovered that lately, just over the last decade or so, a lot of informations has been surfacing about fake fossils.
In fact it has now become common place for fossils sold at museums to be checked for genuineness.
I find this interesting.

Why now, is this happening?
Could it be that evidence as it always does, is now surfacing?

For example
Remember the dinosaur hoax - the one that was said to be put together using different bones?
It has recently been found out that it wasn't a hoax after all.
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2015/02/ ... ecies.html

That is quite interesting.

The fossils aren't the only things that were/are claimed to be fake.
There are the drawings, and pictures as well.
Right now, I am going through a very long document considered a case against some of Darwins picture illustrations.
But have you ever come across this one?

Pictures from the past powerfully shape current views of the world. In books, television programs, and websites, new images appear alongside others that have survived from decades ago. Among the most famous are drawings of embryos by the Darwinist Ernst Haeckel in which humans and other vertebrates begin identical, then diverge toward their adult forms. But these icons of evolution are notorious, too: soon after their publication in 1868, a colleague alleged fraud, and Haeckels many enemies have repeated the charge ever since. His embryos nevertheless became a textbook staple until, in 1997, a biologist accused him again, and creationist advocates of intelligent design forced his figures out. How could the most controversial pictures in the history of science have become some of the most widely seen?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Haeckel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Haec ... eks4-6.jpg
English: The pictures illustrate Ernst Haeckel's biogenetic law. In the beginning embryos of different species look remarkable similar, later different characteristics develop. The images initiated controversies and charges of fraud.

All of this lends to a possibility.
Consdering the fact that fossils can be faked, we must accept the fact that Darwin, and other scientists could have lied.

My question here, isn't whether he did lie or not, but rather, Does this not place evolutionists in the same position as the Christians they claim are believing in fables?

Consider:
Christians accept the Bible, as the word of God.
Here are just a few facts about the Bible.
With estimated total sales of over 5 billion copies, the Bible is widely considered to be the best-selling book of all time.
It has estimated annual sales of 100 million copies.
It has been a major influence on literature and history, especially in the West where the Gutenberg Bible was the first mass-printed book.
It was the first book ever printed using movable type.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible

Archaeological findings of the Dead Sea Scrolls, also called the Qumran Caves https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Sea_Scrolls

The evidence is there however, that the book we hold in our hand today (the Bible), contains information written centuries ago.

Atheist call the book fables - the reason I have yet to find out.
Maybe one of the reasons is that they have not seen God, or seen him write any book - whatever.
So they claim that Christians' belief in them and what they present is blind faith, and belief in stories.

However, is this not the case with those who accept the theory of evolution, where all they have to go by, is what scientists claim to be evidence?

By the way...
No one, to this day have seen them recreate the theories.
Any data they give you on species, is usually what already existed (at least what I have come across so far).
As regards other claims, all we have are pictures, and claimed fossils, which could have been edited.

So evolutionists are really believing what men claim - without any substantial proof of their claim.
How is this different to believing a book?

And what if Darwin, and others lied?


I'm just interested in you different opinions and thoughts, on the above.
Here is a nice short video of someone's opinion. Reasonable too.
John 8:32
. . .the truth will set you free.

User avatar
Blastcat
Banned
Banned
Posts: 5948
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:18 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #671

Post by Blastcat »

[Replying to post 665 by theStudent]



[center]Fallacious Religious Reasoning:
Making innuendos instead of honest arguments.[/center]

theStudent wrote:
When you say belief in God has not been tested, do you mean in a lab?
How can that be done in a lab, ad why do you suggest it has not been tested?
We can test in more than just labs, of course. Someone who is even a LITTLE familiar with how science operates would know that...

So.. you seem to hint that God has been tested IN ANY WAY AT ALL.
PLEASE ... back up that claim or drop it.

:)

User avatar
H.sapiens
Guru
Posts: 2043
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2014 10:08 pm
Location: Ka'u Hawaii

Post #672

Post by H.sapiens »

theStudent wrote: [Replying to post 666 by H.sapiens]
H.sapiens wrote:The existence of a God has been tested in many ways. It turns out that there is no god, or that he hates amputees, your choice.
...or you assume he hates amputees.
I choose the latter.
Pray tell, why does god hate amputees?

User avatar
theStudent
Guru
Posts: 1566
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 6:32 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Post #673

Post by theStudent »

[Replying to post 669 by H.sapiens]

So you are praying now? :)
That's good!

God does not hate amputees. Where did you get that idea?
John 8:32
. . .the truth will set you free.

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10260
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1452 times
Been thanked: 1757 times

Post #674

Post by Clownboat »

theStudent wrote: [Replying to post 669 by H.sapiens]

So you are praying now? :)
That's good!

God does not hate amputees. Where did you get that idea?
Because this was said: "The existence of a God has been tested in many ways. It turns out that there is no god, or that he hates amputees, your choice."
theStudent wrote:I choose the latter.
And you chose the latter.

He can't seem to regrow a tooth either, perhaps theStudent also think he hates people that have lost a tooth/teeth?
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

User avatar
theStudent
Guru
Posts: 1566
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 6:32 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Post #675

Post by theStudent »

[Replying to post 671 by Clownboat]
...or you assume he hates amputees.
I choose the latter.
Obviously the latter is the one I added. Why?
Because it's the last. O:)
John 8:32
. . .the truth will set you free.

hoghead1
Guru
Posts: 2011
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:02 pm

Re: What If...?

Post #676

Post by hoghead1 »

theStudent wrote: Currently, I am doing what was suggested by some on these forums.
I am researching information both for, and against evolution, and trust me - I am doing so objectively.
While I am still researching, I want to put this out, to hear the different views on it.

During my research I discovered that lately, just over the last decade or so, a lot of informations has been surfacing about fake fossils.
In fact it has now become common place for fossils sold at museums to be checked for genuineness.
I find this interesting.

Why now, is this happening?
Could it be that evidence as it always does, is now surfacing?

For example
Remember the dinosaur hoax - the one that was said to be put together using different bones?
It has recently been found out that it wasn't a hoax after all.
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2015/02/ ... ecies.html

That is quite interesting.

The fossils aren't the only things that were/are claimed to be fake.
There are the drawings, and pictures as well.
Right now, I am going through a very long document considered a case against some of Darwins picture illustrations.
But have you ever come across this one?

Pictures from the past powerfully shape current views of the world. In books, television programs, and websites, new images appear alongside others that have survived from decades ago. Among the most famous are drawings of embryos by the Darwinist Ernst Haeckel in which humans and other vertebrates begin identical, then diverge toward their adult forms. But these icons of evolution are notorious, too: soon after their publication in 1868, a colleague alleged fraud, and Haeckels many enemies have repeated the charge ever since. His embryos nevertheless became a textbook staple until, in 1997, a biologist accused him again, and creationist advocates of intelligent design forced his figures out. How could the most controversial pictures in the history of science have become some of the most widely seen?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Haeckel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Haec ... eks4-6.jpg
English: The pictures illustrate Ernst Haeckel's biogenetic law. In the beginning embryos of different species look remarkable similar, later different characteristics develop. The images initiated controversies and charges of fraud.

All of this lends to a possibility.
Consdering the fact that fossils can be faked, we must accept the fact that Darwin, and other scientists could have lied.

My question here, isn't whether he did lie or not, but rather, Does this not place evolutionists in the same position as the Christians they claim are believing in fables?

Consider:
Christians accept the Bible, as the word of God.
Here are just a few facts about the Bible.
With estimated total sales of over 5 billion copies, the Bible is widely considered to be the best-selling book of all time.
It has estimated annual sales of 100 million copies.
It has been a major influence on literature and history, especially in the West where the Gutenberg Bible was the first mass-printed book.
It was the first book ever printed using movable type.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible

Archaeological findings of the Dead Sea Scrolls, also called the Qumran Caves https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Sea_Scrolls

The evidence is there however, that the book we hold in our hand today (the Bible), contains information written centuries ago.

Atheist call the book fables - the reason I have yet to find out.
Maybe one of the reasons is that they have not seen God, or seen him write any book - whatever.
So they claim that Christians' belief in them and what they present is blind faith, and belief in stories.

However, is this not the case with those who accept the theory of evolution, where all they have to go by, is what scientists claim to be evidence?

By the way...
No one, to this day have seen them recreate the theories.
Any data they give you on species, is usually what already existed (at least what I have come across so far).
As regards other claims, all we have are pictures, and claimed fossils, which could have been edited.

So evolutionists are really believing what men claim - without any substantial proof of their claim.
How is this different to believing a book?

And what if Darwin, and others lied?


I'm just interested in you different opinions and thoughts, on the above.
Here is a nice short video of someone's opinion. Reasonable too.


A group of fundamentalists, creation-science people, started a vicious rumor circulating that accused Haeckel of fraud, even claimed he got fired over it. However, this was proven to be a totally false charge. You have to be very careful with creation-science people. They love to generate false rumors. A recent one going around is that Darwin made the finches central in his thinking and also misidentified their species, mistakenly thinking had more than he actually did. In point of actual fact, the finches were hardly ever mentioned by Darwin. Darwin can a preliminary classification of teh various species he felt he had found and then turned the matter over to a noted ornithologist, who had the final say, and who said Darwin actually found more species than he had originally thought. You can't be too careful these days with creation-science folk.

hoghead1
Guru
Posts: 2011
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:02 pm

Re: What If...?

Post #677

Post by hoghead1 »

[Replying to post 673 by hoghead1]

I would strongly suggest you do some more research on evolution. Forget creation-science propaganda, study what real scientists have to say, what their research shows. Evolution is probably one of the best supported theories in science. That's why it is so central in modern science. You might find it interesting and highly informative to read about AR Wallace some time. As far as I am concerned, he is the great unsung hero of evolution, the one who really came up with the idea, though Darwin published and got all the press. AR Wallace is most impressive because did so much painstaking field work and presented a huge collection of specimens, having discovered around 5000 new species of insects. It is often said that evolution hasn't been observed in the lab. That is not true. it has been doe at least once with evolving a new species of bacteria. I can send you the of this paper if you want, but it is very dry. Bottom line, if you get down to it and really study the subject, really study modern science, I know you will find tons of supporting evidence.

benchwarmer
Prodigy
Posts: 2511
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:40 am
Has thanked: 2347 times
Been thanked: 962 times

Re: What If...?

Post #678

Post by benchwarmer »

hoghead1 wrote: [Replying to post 673 by hoghead1]

I would strongly suggest you do some more research on evolution. Forget creation-science propaganda, study what real scientists have to say, what their research shows. Evolution is probably one of the best supported theories in science. That's why it is so central in modern science. You might find it interesting and highly informative to read about AR Wallace some time. As far as I am concerned, he is the great unsung hero of evolution, the one who really came up with the idea, though Darwin published and got all the press. AR Wallace is most impressive because did so much painstaking field work and presented a huge collection of specimens, having discovered around 5000 new species of insects. It is often said that evolution hasn't been observed in the lab. That is not true. it has been doe at least once with evolving a new species of bacteria. I can send you the of this paper if you want, but it is very dry. Bottom line, if you get down to it and really study the subject, really study modern science, I know you will find tons of supporting evidence.
Unfortunately your great advice will be met with continual denial and stone walling. Your debate opponent believes evolution is a religious dogma. See other threads in this sub forum. I've given up for a while I think. There are two studies that I've seen regarding evolution in the lab, both with bacteria of course due to reproduction rate. None of this was palatable either because it was too difficult to read and understand the actual scientific articles or because acknowledging what's actually happening would require at least conceding something that might destroy their argument.

User avatar
theStudent
Guru
Posts: 1566
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 6:32 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: What If...?

Post #679

Post by theStudent »

hoghead1 wrote: [Replying to post 673 by hoghead1]

I would strongly suggest you do some more research on evolution. Forget creation-science propaganda, study what real scientists have to say, what their research shows. Evolution is probably one of the best supported theories in science. That's why it is so central in modern science. You might find it interesting and highly informative to read about AR Wallace some time. As far as I am concerned, he is the great unsung hero of evolution, the one who really came up with the idea, though Darwin published and got all the press. AR Wallace is most impressive because did so much painstaking field work and presented a huge collection of specimens, having discovered around 5000 new species of insects. It is often said that evolution hasn't been observed in the lab. That is not true. it has been doe at least once with evolving a new species of bacteria. I can send you the of this paper if you want, but it is very dry. Bottom line, if you get down to it and really study the subject, really study modern science, I know you will find tons of supporting evidence.
Thank you.

I'm not sure what it is you think I don't understand about evolution, or why you conclude I don't understand, or what makes you think that reading what I have already read will make any difference.
However, I understand that it is easy to assume that we know.

Since I don't know what you know, or don't know, I would like to suggest that if you haven't done so already, please feel free to accept a free home Bible study with Jehovah's Witnesses. Those studies will help you to understand, not only the question of how life got here, but why.
It addresses a lot of unanswered questions that science have not, and cannot answer. And its answers does not leave one to accept a long series of impossible coincidences, which the evolution theory is built on.
Additionally, the theories that support evolution are in no way provable.

Expanding on this...
There is something we know as copyright infringement - A violation of the rights secured by a copyright.
Someone originates something. Someone comes along after. Rather than giving credit to the originator, they take the credit for themselves, or place it elsewhere.

That's the theory of evolution in a nutshell, imo - a copyright infringement.
Life was created - the genetic code was no accident. The owner of it masterfully designed it for the purpose of variants in all living things.
The advocates of evolution, seeking to deny the owner the credit due, claim that this code, because it is found in all living things, must have originated with one common ancestor, and passed down through generations for millions of years.
They also take the purposefully designed reproductive system responsible for extending those variants, and claim that this is evolution in action.
What an absurd, and reprehensible assertion.

The seriousness of the violaton is more obvious by the fact that, after more than a century, they have failed to prove that claim, by any solid evidence.

I know. I know. "We don't understand it." "We are blinded by religion." The song of the twentieth century.

Belief in the Theory of Evolution Versus Religious Faith
Religious groups have represented the most serious and prolonged opponents of the theory of evolution and preach and teach at great length against it, putting off many believers from researching the topic and leaving them only with misinformation. This is especially damaging in countries with poor public education. Many highly religious countries have banned it (although not always everywhere), such as Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, the United States, Nigeria, and Turkey, "to the point where a significant percentage of their populations are firmly against it without even knowing what it is". In the developed world, the USA has the highest percept of creationists and is also the most religious highly developed country, whereas Iceland, Denmark and Sweden have the strongest belief in evolution, and are some of the least religious countries in the world. Needless to say, education in the Muslim countries of the Middle East are heavily and horribly biased against evolution, with understanding of science even amongst teachers being poor.

The fact that so many believers are misinformed about human evolution is partly the fault of religion's continual attack on science education. [...] Highly religious nations such as Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, the United States, Nigeria, and Turkey, for example, have banned or avoided the teaching of human evolution in schools to the point where a significant percentage of their populations are firmly against it without even knowing what it is.

"The proportion of western European adults who believed the theory 'absolutely false' ranged from 7 percent in Great Britain to 15 percent in the Netherlands", whereas in the USA about one third "firmly reject" the idea of evolution. Inside the USA, belief in evolution is inversely correlated with religious beliefs. Only 14% of American adults say they definitely believe in evolution. Europe is much lessreligious, and "in European countries, including Denmark,Sweden, and France, more than 80 percent of adults surveyed said they accepted the concept of evolution". Quotes and data from the National Geographic (2006).

In the United States a Gallup poll conducted last year found that only 15% of people agreed with the proposition that 'humans developed over millions of years', up from 8% in 1982. Acceptance of evolution varies around the world, with the most ardent believers being in Iceland, Denmark and Sweden. [...] A country's belief in evolution is inversely correlated with its belief in God.
The Economist (2009)
There were several reasons for these inflated U.S. numbers. Miller said the most significant factor was the influence of fundamentalist religions.

The total effect of fundamentalist religious beliefs on attitude toward evolution was nearly twice as much in the United States, he said, which indicates that individuals who hold a strong belief in a personal God " and who pray frequently " were significantly less likely to view evolution as probably or definitely true than adults with less conservative religious views.
Surprising Number Of Americans Dont Believe In Evolution

It's the same with alternative lifestyles, isn't it?
Americans less accepting of homosexuality than other westerners " religion may be one reason
This aticle highlights a blatant message for the reality of the reasons for evolution and other dogmas being pushed on people.
In recent years, same-sex marriage has been legalized in some parts of the United States and in 15 countries worldwide, in part because of the publics changing views about the subject and because of increasing acceptance of homosexuality.
Notice the message - The public's changing views, and increasing acceptance of something should motivate everyone to do the same.
I don't think so! How ridiculous and senseless!

Isn't that called peer-pressure? Isn't that against principles we may have been taught when growing up? Be a leader, not a follower?
We walk into a room where everyone is smoking pot, and we are the only "odd man", the only idiot, so change our views and be like everyone else.
I say it all the time - the twentieth century has produced the most backwards societies of all.
True religion does not produce backward people imo.

So, here's the thing. What are they going to do about that?

We are aware that they will try to force us to believe, but will that make us believe?
No. Even if they try to destroy religion, and imprison those who refuse to accept, will that make us accept?
No. We have faith that they are the ones who will be forced to acknowledge the very one they are trying to deny.
And those who don't deny God, but feel pressured to believe that somehow God was involved in evolution - they too will be forced to acknowledge.
That's what I believe.

If you believe different, fine.
We are all entitled to believe in what we want.
I believe I know all I need to know about the theory of evolution - It's a lie.

Let me share a bit more on why evolution fails so miserably, in my view.
Aside from the fact that they can show no evidence of the common ancester, and evolution of varying organisms through that process, those who support evolution cannot even properly argue for it.
Take for example...
When someone (A) asks for evidence for something and they are given information, they should be able to produce a counter argument if they disagree. If they do not respond, then the person (B) has good reason to believe their argument is sound.
Likewise, if A responds with a counter argument against B's argument, and B refuses to counter it, then A has good reason for believing his argument is sound.

Do you see the point I am making?
When you really give it some thought, you realize that the situation from both positions are not very different.
True, they are some Christians who really don't know much about evolution, but who reject it anyway - perhaps because they believe the Bible and Jesus Christ has the truthful answers.
But they are also people who don't know much about evolution, but accept it anyway - perhaps because they don't want to follow the Bible's teachings, or they think that they fit in with the educated since it is taught that the highly educated accept it, or other reasons.
Then there are people who don't believe the Bible, even though they don't understand it (even if they think they do), or know very little about it. Neither do they care to understand it.

So how different are we? Not much.
We simply are making choices - choosing to believe either, by being informed, or misinformed.
Either way, we made the choice.

I hope you understand the position I am trying to put before you.
John 8:32
. . .the truth will set you free.

hoghead1
Guru
Posts: 2011
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:02 pm

Re: What If...?

Post #680

Post by hoghead1 »


Post Reply