[
Replying to post 72 by 1213]
[center]
Mangling the English language for Jesus[/center]
Blastcat wrote:
It's amazing that secular and religious English can be so different, don't you think?
1213 wrote:
Yes, it is. And it can be confusing.
I have to agree.
1213 wrote:
That is why I usually try to speak only about ideas Bible presents, rather than single words that can have modern and ancient meanings.
There are a whole lot of English words that are IN the English translations of the Bible.
1213 wrote:
For example, I think it is in this case good to think, what Bible means if person hates his own life and what it means if person loves neighbor.
The idea we are discussing is that a person should hate his family in order to love his neighbors and his enemies. Oddly, that means if his family becomes his enemies, he should love his family. I don't get it. This makes NO sense.
And your definition of hate makes no sense to me at all, either.
1213 wrote:
As shown earlier, hate can mean that person goes and follows Jesus and love means that person doesnt do anything harmful to others.
WOW.
They sure used the word "hate" differently back then, didn't they?
It means that I really don't understand most of the Bible parts that use the word.
Here is a random example of another passage that talks about hate... I think you want to use the word "hate" in the Bible as "following Jesus" or something like that.
Here is an interesting passage about hating our relatives:
1 John 4:19-20
We love because God first loved us. Whoever says, I love God, but hates his brother is a liar. The one who does not love his brother whom he has seen cannot love the God whom he has not seen.
It seems that hate means something different here.
Same Bible, different meaning. Hate seems to be used to mean the very opposite of love.
He who does
NOT love his brother... cannot love the God.
In Luke, he says this:
Luke 14:26
"
If anyone comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters--yes, even their own life--such a person cannot be my disciple."
I think that what John has to say makes sense. What Luke reports is about as close to insane and evil as I can imagine. Jesus sounds like a death cult leader.
I am not pretending to be a god, but I can sure tell you that in MY opinion, hate is always wrong. Defend someone caught promoting HATE all you like.
Do what you like.. it's your conscience.
Just don't come around HERE talking about hate.
Ok?
1213 wrote:
And in that way, I think there is no contradiction.
Sure.. you just defined the problem away.
We get a lot of that in here.
Some Christian apologists want to redefine problem words that they find in the Bible.
That's never convincing to outsiders like me.
I call that kind of argument "Ad hoc".
The ad hoc fallacy (Latin: to this) is when you invent a new reason in the moment to fend off your argument from attack. In this case, the reason is your very strange definition of the word "hate".
1213 wrote:
but if we give different meanings to those words, it can lead to problems.
Making up definitions of inconvenient words to suit your argument doesn't work.
And I have to say that your definition is quite bizarre.
