Question for debate:
______________________
How is that not insane?
______________________

Moderator: Moderators
I read stories all the time and ponder upon the characters.Zzyzx wrote: .
It is unwise to diagnose psychological condition from stories --
I think he was just a brute of his time, a possibly fictional depiction of how a savage serves a savage God. The whole idea of a father taking his son to be slaughtered by his own knife repels us - but place it in the goodly setting of a good book and we abandon our disgust and raise Abraham to the heavens. We pretend that the man who shunned his first son, sending him and his mother away to the wilderness, is somehow hurt by spilling his second son's blood. I do not think Abraham was mad. He is as he is portrayed - brutal, despicable and the worst possible example.Willum wrote:
I have to wonder, if an entire religion is founded on the observable principles of clinical insanity, what good can come of it?
Or he was thinking straight and loved the idea of murdering someone with God's authorisation. The story is as horrible as human design can get, all the more so since the book that contains it is popularly known as a "holy book."JJ50 wrote: If he isn't just a storybook character, I think he was so indoctrinated by his idea of god, he wasn't thinking straight.