JESUS IS NOT YHWH

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 11033
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1570 times
Been thanked: 461 times

JESUS IS NOT YHWH

Post #1

Post by onewithhim »

Jesus prayed to YHWH, the Father, not to himself. (E.g., Matthew 26:39,42; John 11:41,42; John 17:1-26.) Would he have been praying to himself?

He continually referred to himself as "God's SON," not YHWH Himself. (John 5:19; John 8:28,29; John 10:36; John 17:1.) Even the Jews who hated him recognized that fact (John 19:7). Can he be his own Son?

He applied Isaiah 61:1,2 to himself, at Luke 4:17-21, showing that he was the one anointed BY YHWH, and sent BY YHWH. There are incontrovertibly two Persons mentioned in the passage, and YHWH is the One calling the shots. The anointed one does what YHWH wants. How could they be the same Person?

Psalm 110 is also applied to Jesus at Acts 2:34,35. He is the "Lord," or Messiah, that YHWH speaks to. Was YHWH talking to Himself?


I think that just these few points would show plainly that Jesus is not YHWH. Can anyone explain how THESE REFERENCES, ABOVE, can possibly agree with the premise that Jesus is YHWH? I'm not asking for other Scriptures to be brought in without commenting ON the verses I am asking about. Please give me your reasoning concerning these particular Scriptures. Thank you.

Faber
Scholar
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 7:07 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #11

Post by Faber »

Yes, they are both God.

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 11033
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1570 times
Been thanked: 461 times

Post #12

Post by onewithhim »

Faber wrote: Yes, they are both God.
OK, then why does it say at I Corinthians 11:3 that "the HEAD of Christ is God"?


.

Faber
Scholar
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 7:07 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #13

Post by Faber »

I am the head of my wife (1 Corinthians 11:3). That doesn't make her ontologically any less of a person than me.

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 11033
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1570 times
Been thanked: 461 times

Post #14

Post by onewithhim »

Faber wrote: I am the head of my wife (1 Corinthians 11:3). That doesn't make her ontologically any less of a person than me.
The point of the I Corinth.11:3, as I see it, is that there is a head, or, a superior authority, that has the right to the last word, the final decision....in case there is a disagreement of sorts. The man is given that authority over his wife; Christ is the authority over the congregation; God is the authority over Christ. They are NOT all equal in authority.

Therefore, God and Christ are not equal.


.

Faber
Scholar
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 7:07 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #15

Post by Faber »

Functional subjection does not necessitate ontological inferiority.

That supreme worship is properly ascribed to the Father and to the Lord Jesus demonstrates that the Lord Jesus is God. In fact, just one prayer (He properly receives many) to the Lord Jesus demonstrates that He is omniscient (God).

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #16

Post by McCulloch »

onewithhim wrote:OK, then why does it say at I Corinthians 11:3 that "the HEAD of Christ is God"?
Faber wrote:I am the head of my wife (1 Corinthians 11:3). That doesn't make her ontologically any less of a person than me.
Paul is not using Trinitarian language. If he was, he would have said that the Father is the head of Christ. But he said that the head of Christ is God, not God, the Father. This head metaphor makes no sense whatsoever if Christ is God.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

Faber
Scholar
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 7:07 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #17

Post by Faber »

McCulloch wrote:
onewithhim wrote:OK, then why does it say at I Corinthians 11:3 that "the HEAD of Christ is God"?
Faber wrote:I am the head of my wife (1 Corinthians 11:3). That doesn't make her ontologically any less of a person than me.
Paul is not using Trinitarian language. If he was, he would have said that the Father is the head of Christ. But he said that the head of Christ is God, not God, the Father. This head metaphor makes no sense whatsoever if Christ is God.

Paul is using Trinitarian language. Theos primarily (although not exclusively) refers to the Father while "kyrios" primarily (although not exclusively) refers to the Lord Jesus.

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 11033
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1570 times
Been thanked: 461 times

Post #18

Post by onewithhim »

Faber wrote: Functional subjection does not necessitate ontological inferiority.

That supreme worship is properly ascribed to the Father and to the Lord Jesus demonstrates that the Lord Jesus is God. In fact, just one prayer (He properly receives many) to the Lord Jesus demonstrates that He is omniscient (God).
Then, using your logic, a husband is God also.

"But I want you to understand that Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of the Christ." (I Corinthians 11:3, NASB)

If you can use that verse to prove that Christ is God because both are "heads" , then you will have to admit that a husband is God as well.


:mrgreen: [/b]

User avatar
Willum
Savant
Posts: 9017
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 2:14 pm
Location: Yahweh's Burial Place
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 82 times

Post #19

Post by Willum »

According to Gnostic scriptures, at least SOME Gnostic scriptures, there was a being above "God," called the demiurge, perhaps this is the being to whom Jesus prayed, and the meaning has become blurred.

Donray
Guru
Posts: 1195
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 8:25 pm
Location: CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #20

Post by Donray »

From https://www.jwfacts.com/watchtower/worship-jesus.php
Jehovah's Witnesses worshipped Jesus until 1954, after which they were told such worship was idolatrous. This made them a polytheistic religion for most of their history. The core to religion is God, and to change the God you worship is to change the very essence and basis of the religion.
So originally JWs worshiped two gods.

Post Reply