The principle of atonement

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Checkpoint
Prodigy
Posts: 4069
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:07 pm
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 64 times

The principle of atonement

Post #1

Post by Checkpoint »

Or is it contrary to it?

A number of questions may be asked and answered on a thread like this.

For example:

What is the principle of atonement?

What part does atonement play in scripture, and in the old and new covenants?

How can we know what does and does not reflect the character [and ways] of God?

Justin108
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4471
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:28 am

Re: The principle of atonement

Post #91

Post by Justin108 »

BusB wrote: IMHO, It seems you believe it should all be handed us the easy way like God is just some rich man that ought to spoil his children so that they never learn anything.
Well he handed it all to Adam. Why not hand it all to us as well?
BusB wrote: If God did it all for us we would remain ignorant.
Ignorant of what?
BusB wrote: The silver spoon mentality has been well proven to be the way of fools.
Adam was born with a "silver spoon". Isn't it reasonable to expect God to treat all his children fairly and equally?

User avatar
Left Site
Apprentice
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 8:59 pm

Re: The principle of atonement

Post #92

Post by Left Site »

Justin108 wrote:
BusB wrote: IMHO, It seems you believe it should all be handed us the easy way like God is just some rich man that ought to spoil his children so that they never learn anything.
Well he handed it all to Adam. Why not hand it all to us as well?
BusB wrote: If God did it all for us we would remain ignorant.
Ignorant of what?
BusB wrote: The silver spoon mentality has been well proven to be the way of fools.
Adam was born with a "silver spoon". Isn't it reasonable to expect God to treat all his children fairly and equally?
You have your own way of seeing things.

Give me one good reason why I should seek to change your mind?

Justin108
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4471
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:28 am

Re: The principle of atonement

Post #93

Post by Justin108 »

BusB wrote:
Justin108 wrote:
BusB wrote: IMHO, It seems you believe it should all be handed us the easy way like God is just some rich man that ought to spoil his children so that they never learn anything.
Well he handed it all to Adam. Why not hand it all to us as well?
BusB wrote: If God did it all for us we would remain ignorant.
Ignorant of what?
BusB wrote: The silver spoon mentality has been well proven to be the way of fools.
Adam was born with a "silver spoon". Isn't it reasonable to expect God to treat all his children fairly and equally?
You have your own way of seeing things.

Give me one good reason why I should seek to change your mind?
Because... this is a debate site? If you didn't want to change my mind, why bother responding to me at all?

User avatar
Left Site
Apprentice
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 8:59 pm

Re: The principle of atonement

Post #94

Post by Left Site »

Justin108 wrote:
BusB wrote:
Justin108 wrote:
BusB wrote: IMHO, It seems you believe it should all be handed us the easy way like God is just some rich man that ought to spoil his children so that they never learn anything.
Well he handed it all to Adam. Why not hand it all to us as well?
BusB wrote: If God did it all for us we would remain ignorant.
Ignorant of what?
BusB wrote: The silver spoon mentality has been well proven to be the way of fools.
Adam was born with a "silver spoon". Isn't it reasonable to expect God to treat all his children fairly and equally?
You have your own way of seeing things.

Give me one good reason why I should seek to change your mind?
Because... this is a debate site? If you didn't want to change my mind, why bother responding to me at all?
"Debate" is viewed one way by some people and another way by other people.

There is "contentious debate" and then there can also be "meaningful debate. "

What determines the difference? Whether or not the person is debating genuinely to find answers or they are debating just for the thrill of outdoing someone else.

If they debate genuinely to search out answers (aka find truth) then there will be evidence of small bits of changed thinking. But if they are not really interested in truth and debating only to show their superior intellect, then there will be little or no effort by them to see any points made by others. The later situation is but futile contending.

Justin108
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4471
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:28 am

Re: The principle of atonement

Post #95

Post by Justin108 »

BusB wrote: If they debate genuinely to search out answers (aka find truth) then there will be evidence of small bits of changed thinking.
Only if the points made by the opposition is good enough to change my thinking. You haven't made a single point good enough to do that. Now instead of questioning my intentions, can you address my arguments? If not, then stop replying to my posts.

User avatar
Left Site
Apprentice
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 8:59 pm

Re: The principle of atonement

Post #96

Post by Left Site »

Justin108 wrote:
BusB wrote: If they debate genuinely to search out answers (aka find truth) then there will be evidence of small bits of changed thinking.
Only if the points made by the opposition is good enough to change my thinking. You haven't made a single point good enough to do that. Now instead of questioning my intentions, can you address my arguments? If not, then stop replying to my posts.
Nor am I trying to. O:)

I also have to accept things like that I am not strong enough to pick up a truck. So why would I try to pick up a truck? :D

Justin108
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4471
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:28 am

Re: The principle of atonement

Post #97

Post by Justin108 »

BusB wrote:
Justin108 wrote:
BusB wrote: If they debate genuinely to search out answers (aka find truth) then there will be evidence of small bits of changed thinking.
Only if the points made by the opposition is good enough to change my thinking. You haven't made a single point good enough to do that. Now instead of questioning my intentions, can you address my arguments? If not, then stop replying to my posts.
Nor am I trying to. O:)

I also have to accept things like that I am not strong enough to pick up a truck. So why would I try to pick up a truck? :D
So you admit you're unable to form rebuttals to my points?

User avatar
Left Site
Apprentice
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 8:59 pm

Re: The principle of atonement

Post #98

Post by Left Site »

Justin108 wrote:
BusB wrote:
Justin108 wrote:
BusB wrote: If they debate genuinely to search out answers (aka find truth) then there will be evidence of small bits of changed thinking.
Only if the points made by the opposition is good enough to change my thinking. You haven't made a single point good enough to do that. Now instead of questioning my intentions, can you address my arguments? If not, then stop replying to my posts.
Nor am I trying to. O:)

I also have to accept things like that I am not strong enough to pick up a truck. So why would I try to pick up a truck? :D
So you admit you're unable to form rebuttals to my points?
I know that I am relatively inferior to many if not most people. :P

Are you familiar with the analogy of mankind as one body?

Justin108
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4471
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:28 am

Re: The principle of atonement

Post #99

Post by Justin108 »

BusB wrote:
Justin108 wrote:
BusB wrote:
Justin108 wrote:
BusB wrote: If they debate genuinely to search out answers (aka find truth) then there will be evidence of small bits of changed thinking.
Only if the points made by the opposition is good enough to change my thinking. You haven't made a single point good enough to do that. Now instead of questioning my intentions, can you address my arguments? If not, then stop replying to my posts.
Nor am I trying to. O:)

I also have to accept things like that I am not strong enough to pick up a truck. So why would I try to pick up a truck? :D
So you admit you're unable to form rebuttals to my points?
I know that I am relatively inferior to many if not most people. :P

Are you familiar with why the analogy of mankind as one body?
No but I'm not particularly interested either. If you do not intend to debate the points I raise, please refrain from responding to me. Thank you

User avatar
Left Site
Apprentice
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 8:59 pm

Re: The principle of atonement

Post #100

Post by Left Site »

Justin108 wrote:
BusB wrote:
Justin108 wrote:
BusB wrote:
Justin108 wrote:
BusB wrote: If they debate genuinely to search out answers (aka find truth) then there will be evidence of small bits of changed thinking.
Only if the points made by the opposition is good enough to change my thinking. You haven't made a single point good enough to do that. Now instead of questioning my intentions, can you address my arguments? If not, then stop replying to my posts.
Nor am I trying to. O:)

I also have to accept things like that I am not strong enough to pick up a truck. So why would I try to pick up a truck? :D
So you admit you're unable to form rebuttals to my points?
I know that I am relatively inferior to many if not most people. :P

Are you familiar with why the analogy of mankind as one body?
No but I'm not particularly interested either. If you do not intend to debate the points I raise, please refrain from responding to me. Thank you
You demand a quick answer but you wouldn't understand the quick answer it because you refuse to let anyone to first prepare you so that you can understand,

When quick answers are given, you just attack them as being wrong and still refuse to let anyone help you become equipped to see why what you think is wrong is not what you think.

That is an unfortunate situation and I feel for you because I know you can't see that you do that.

IMHO, all you are actually allowing me to tell you is that you need to think more about what honestly inspecting the answers of others requires.

I used to be just like that and so I recognize it. I, too, learn the hard way.

Post Reply