Moderator: Moderators
So, where do you stand as to whether it is present, future, or has both a present and a future aspect?Luke 16:
6 The Law and the Prophets were until John; since then the good news of the kingdom of God is preached, and everyone is being zealously urged into it.
You are simply adding additional claims that weren't apart of your original claim. Of course if you add these claims you can pretend that your original claim was something other than what it was.JehovahsWitness wrote: [Replying to post 528 by Tcg]
Oh I see well I can only reply with a faith based statement, that as one of Jehovah's Witnesses I believe ...
We are the only international organized religion that identifies as Jehovah's Witnesses as represented by a single governing body of that group (presently located in Wallkill, New York) that preaches from door to door that God's Kindom is a literal government located in heaven that began ruling in 1914 and includes uniquely 144,000 individuals the only people that will ever go to heaven, and that all other individuals judged as righteous including bible characters such as Abraham, Sarah, King David did not and will not go to heaven but will live on this planet earth that will never be burnt up.
ONLY Jehovah's Witnesses preach a message that incorporates ALL the above elements as art of an organized centralized international group. I challenge anyone to find another organized religion that believes the identical message in ALL its aspects and preaches so from door to door worldwide.
It is not a lack of precision that is the issue. It is the change of claims that were originally made. In retail sales it would be called "bait and switch", which is a course illegal. Perhaps it is viewed differently in some circles.JehovahsWitness wrote: [Replying to post 530 by Tcg]
Okay well my original claim wasn't well expressed and for this I apologize. Anyway when I say "it" the above is what I meant the above touches on some (but certainly not all) of what I meant.
My apologises again for My lack of precision.
JW
Tcg wrote:It is not a lack of precision that is the issue. .JehovahsWitness wrote: [Replying to post 530 by Tcg]
Okay well my original claim wasn't well expressed and for this I apologize. Anyway when I say "it" the above is what I meant the above touches on some (but certainly not all) of what I meant.
My apologises again for My lack of precision.
JW
Sorry, but it is not excellent. Excellence would involve honesty.JehovahsWitness wrote:Tcg wrote:It is not a lack of precision that is the issue. .JehovahsWitness wrote: [Replying to post 530 by Tcg]
Okay well my original claim wasn't well expressed and for this I apologize. Anyway when I say "it" the above is what I meant the above touches on some (but certainly not all) of what I meant.
My apologises again for My lack of precision.
JW
Excellent.
Well I believe I agree, that is a faith based statement based on personal feelings.Tcg wrote:No. You quite clearly don't agree with me.
Given that I know I don't agree with you, your belief is clearly unfounded. Your personal feelings provide nothing of value to this discussion.JehovahsWitness wrote:Well I believe I agree, that is a faith based statement based on personal feelings.Tcg wrote:No. You quite clearly don't agree with me.
Have a good one,
JW
