Cardinal Pell found guilty of sex abuse by Melbourne court

Two hot topics for the price of one

Moderator: Moderators

Jubal
Student
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 1:43 pm

Cardinal Pell found guilty of sex abuse by Melbourne court

Post #1

Post by Jubal »

Big news :

"NEW YORK - In a decision that will undoubtedly create shockwaves around the globe, Cardinal George Pell, the most senior Church official to stand trial for sexual abuse, was found guilty on Tuesday by a Melbourne Court.

In one of the most closely watched trials in modern Catholic Church history, after nearly four full days of deliberations, a jury rendered unanimous guilty verdicts on five charges related to the abuse of two choirboys in 1996."


https://cruxnow.com/global-church/2018/ ... rne-court/

The news is all over, but still CENSORED in Australia :

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/au ... ad4f95c29c

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news ... rder-32220

https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2 ... l-offenses

Jubal

bjs
Prodigy
Posts: 3222
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 4:29 pm

Post #2

Post by bjs »

Moderator Comment

Please provide a topic for debate.


Please review the Rules.


______________

Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
Understand that you might believe. Believe that you might understand. –Augustine of Hippo

User avatar
RedEye
Scholar
Posts: 495
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2018 6:23 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Re: Cardinal Pell found guilty of sex abuse by Melbourne cou

Post #3

Post by RedEye »

Jubal wrote: Big news :

"NEW YORK - In a decision that will undoubtedly create shockwaves around the globe, Cardinal George Pell, the most senior Church official to stand trial for sexual abuse, was found guilty on Tuesday by a Melbourne Court.

In one of the most closely watched trials in modern Catholic Church history, after nearly four full days of deliberations, a jury rendered unanimous guilty verdicts on five charges related to the abuse of two choirboys in 1996."


https://cruxnow.com/global-church/2018/ ... rne-court/

The news is all over, but still CENSORED in Australia :
Australia has no censorship of the free press. What you really mean is that a court imposed suppression order is still in effect. From the Washington Post article:
  • That order has led to a blackout in Australia about the news of a figure who was once among the country’s most highly regarded Catholic leaders, the son of a gold miner who rose to become the archbishop in both Melbourne and Sydney. Major Australian outlets on Wednesday did not carry headlines about the case, but some wrote cryptic stories explaining that significant news had unfolded but was unreportable.

    “A very high-profile figure was convicted on Tuesday of a serious crime, but we are unable to report their identity due to a suppression order,� Melbourne’s paper, the Age, wrote. The newspaper said that the person “was convicted on the second attempt, after the jury in an earlier trial was unable to reach a verdict.�

    A judge in the County Court of Victoria had called earlier this year for the gag order as a way “to prevent a real and substantial risk of prejudice to the proper administration of justice.�
I'm sure that the suppression order will be lifted soon now that the trial is apparently over.
Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence.

User avatar
StuartJ
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1027
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 2:46 am
Location: Australia
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #4

Post by StuartJ »

I shall presume to pose a question for debate.

Where was Jesus when Pell and countless other were sexually and physically and psychologically abusing children?

I expect the victims were Christian children who cried out to Jesus for help.

*******************

The answer I shall give to my own question is that Jesus was nowhere.

If the Jesus character of the Christian-Jewish propaganda ever existed, he was a human who has been dead for nearly 2,000 years.

The Jesus character was NOT sired by the biblical deity Yahweh on a human virgin, because Yahweh is NOT "God".

The possibly fictional Jesus character NEVER saves the little children ...

Because Christianity is a fraud.
No one EVER demonstrates that "God" exists outside their parietal cortex.

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 9342
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 883 times
Been thanked: 1242 times

Post #5

Post by Clownboat »

StuartJ wrote: I shall presume to pose a question for debate.

Where was Jesus when Pell and countless other were sexually and physically and psychologically abusing children?

I expect the victims were Christian children who cried out to Jesus for help.

*******************

The answer I shall give to my own question is that Jesus was nowhere.

If the Jesus character of the Christian-Jewish propaganda ever existed, he was a human who has been dead for nearly 2,000 years.

The Jesus character was NOT sired by the biblical deity Yahweh on a human virgin, because Yahweh is NOT "God".

The possibly fictional Jesus character NEVER saves the little children ...

Because Christianity is a fraud.
Oh ya tough guy! Then kindly explain...uh....
Nevermind, I got nothin'.

It came to me!
God does not test us with more than we can handle. Therefore these children can handle the abuse.

We can move on now.
God is great! Amen.
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

Jubal
Student
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 1:43 pm

Post #6

Post by Jubal »

bjs wrote: Please provide a topic for debate.
Oh yes, I should have been more clear -

Is it a good thing for child abuse in the church to be kept secret ?

How has such secrecy contributed to this child abuse ?


Jubal

Jubal
Student
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 1:43 pm

Re: Cardinal Pell found guilty of sex abuse by Melbourne cou

Post #7

Post by Jubal »

RedEye wrote: Australia has no censorship of the free press. What you really mean is that a court imposed suppression order is still in effect.
Pardon ?
What is the difference between censorship and suppression ?
The court ordered suppression is a form of censorship - a common term for it.
RedEye wrote: I'm sure that the suppression order will be lifted soon now that the trial is apparently over.
Not so.
The first trial is over, and he was found guilty.

There is another trial coming up, and that is apparently why the news has been censored or suppressed or kept secret.

Jubal

User avatar
Jagella
Banned
Banned
Posts: 3667
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:01 am
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Post #8

Post by Jagella »

Jubal wrote: Is it a good thing for child abuse in the church to be kept secret ?

How has such secrecy contributed to this child abuse ?
Obviously child abuse should never be kept secret, and society needs to be protected from those guilty of child abuse. The secrecy of the Catholic Church and other religions has no doubt contributed to the abuse.

To prevent such abuse, I propose that people be warned that children are vulnerable to abuse on the part of religion. Christianity and the Bible, for example, should be exposed as contributors to child abuse. People should know the Bible passages that encourage child abuse and should be warned that those passages create dangerous environments for children.

And Christians need to honestly admit that their beliefs lead to abuse and renounce those beliefs. Otherwise, they share the guilt for child abuse. Three groups guilty of child abuse include the Evangelicals, Jehovah's Witnesses, and the Catholics.

User avatar
Jagella
Banned
Banned
Posts: 3667
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:01 am
Been thanked: 2 times
Contact:

Post #9

Post by Jagella »

Clownboat wrote:God does not test us with more than we can handle. Therefore these children can handle the abuse.

We can move on now.
God is great! Amen.
I know you're trying to be funny, but child abuse is no laughing matter. I'm a victim of religious child abuse myself, and there's nothing funny about it.

User avatar
Wootah
Savant
Posts: 9161
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:16 am
Has thanked: 186 times
Been thanked: 105 times

Post #10

Post by Wootah »

Moderator Comment
Hi all,

Just moved this to politics and religion.

Wootah

Please review the Rules.


______________

Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
Proverbs 18:17 The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him.

Member Notes: viewtopic.php?t=33826

"Why is everyone so quick to reason God might be petty. Now that is creating God in our own image :)."

Post Reply