What are we to make of this?
Do they not realize that they're making Jesus out to be a liar?
"Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away."
(Matthew 24:35)
"He that loveth Me not, keepeth not My sayings. And the Word which you hear is not Mine, but the Fathers who sent Me."
(John 14:24)
"Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. That's weak."
Moderator: Moderators
-
Athetotheist
- Prodigy
- Posts: 4026
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:24 pm
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 724 times
-
marke
- Banned

- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:42 am
- Has thanked: 36 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
Re: "Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. That's weak."
Post #141Marke: In spite of who indicted whom or whether or not the indictments were legitimate (democrats are famous for admitting that a crooked DA could indict a ham sandwich), there were millions of ballots cast for Biden in 2020 that were never proven to have been legitimate.The Barbarian wrote: ↑Sun Mar 23, 2025 4:42 amWell, let's take a look...
https://www.citizensforethics.org/repor ... hey-stand/
Republican officials indicted many of those criminals. So your assumption is wrong.
Some of them freely admitted their parts in the voter fraud. C'mon.
- The Barbarian
- Guru
- Posts: 1254
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2021 8:40 pm
- Has thanked: 276 times
- Been thanked: 782 times
Re: "Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. That's weak."
Post #142It comes down to evidence. Even Trump's own AG admitted that the republican claims of democrat voting fraud were "BS", while numerous republican officials were caught trying to fraudulently vote or to hide the actual election results. Either democrats are much, much smarter than republicans, or election fraud is almost exclusively a republican thing.marke wrote: ↑Sun Mar 23, 2025 5:42 amMarke: In spite of who indicted whom or whether or not the indictments were legitimate (democrats are famous for admitting that a crooked DA could indict a ham sandwich), there were millions of ballots cast for Biden in 2020 that were never proven to have been legitimate.The Barbarian wrote: ↑Sun Mar 23, 2025 4:42 amWell, let's take a look...
https://www.citizensforethics.org/repor ... hey-stand/
Republican officials indicted many of those criminals. So your assumption is wrong.
Some of them freely admitted their parts in the voter fraud. C'mon.
-
marke
- Banned

- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:42 am
- Has thanked: 36 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
Re: "Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. That's weak."
Post #143Nobody ever tried to find out whether many voting machines flipped votes from Trump to Biden like the one did that was examined. Nobody ever discovered how many illegals voted in the 2020 election. Nobody ever explained why tens of thousands of ballots for Biden mysteriously appeared in Democrat election wards after the election without the required chain of custody records. Nobody determined how many votes were cast in names of illegitimate voters that illegally remained on voting registered by the millions. And more.
Democrats and their stooge supporters can claim they committed no significant voter fraud in 2020 but they certainly have not disproven the indications that they did commit massive fraud.
Democrats and their stooge supporters can claim they committed no significant voter fraud in 2020 but they certainly have not disproven the indications that they did commit massive fraud.
-
Athetotheist
- Prodigy
- Posts: 4026
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:24 pm
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 724 times
Re: "Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. That's weak."
Post #144[Replying to marke in post #138]
Were thousands of voting machines examined after the election last year? If not, how can you be certain that there wasn't massive fraud in that election?
See how easy it is?
So because your guy lost, there must have been massive fraud?A thusand government officials from both sides of the aisle can claim no fraud occurred but their opinions are worthless as long as we never got to closely examine thousands of voting machines under democrat control and as long as we were denied access to immigration and voter registries to see how many illegals may have voted, and so forth.
Were thousands of voting machines examined after the election last year? If not, how can you be certain that there wasn't massive fraud in that election?
See how easy it is?
"The religious idea of God cannot do full duty for the metaphysical infinity."
---Alan Watts
---Alan Watts
-
Athetotheist
- Prodigy
- Posts: 4026
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:24 pm
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 724 times
Re: "Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. That's weak."
Post #145[Replying to marke in post #143]
https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-do ... a91db3f88f
Do you mean this?Nobody ever tried to find out whether many voting machines flipped votes from Trump to Biden like the one did that was examined.
https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-do ... a91db3f88f
"The religious idea of God cannot do full duty for the metaphysical infinity."
---Alan Watts
---Alan Watts
-
marke
- Banned

- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:42 am
- Has thanked: 36 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
Re: "Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. That's weak."
Post #146Marke: Not because Trump lost but because millions of votes were cast without sufficient proof of legitimacy. It does not matter who won, the fraud was evident and should have been thoroughly investigated. Those who claim there is no evidence of significant fraud are either ignorant or are lying.Athetotheist wrote: ↑Sun Mar 23, 2025 11:20 am [Replying to marke in post #138]
So because your guy lost, there must have been massive fraud?A thusand government officials from both sides of the aisle can claim no fraud occurred but their opinions are worthless as long as we never got to closely examine thousands of voting machines under democrat control and as long as we were denied access to immigration and voter registries to see how many illegals may have voted, and so forth.
Were thousands of voting machines examined after the election last year? If not, how can you be certain that there wasn't massive fraud in that election?
See how easy it is?
-
marke
- Banned

- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:42 am
- Has thanked: 36 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
Re: "Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. That's weak."
Post #147Athetotheist wrote: ↑Sun Mar 23, 2025 1:35 pm [Replying to marke in post #143]
Do you mean this?Nobody ever tried to find out whether many voting machines flipped votes from Trump to Biden like the one did that was examined.
https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-do ... a91db3f88f
Marke: There were many instances of corrupt 2020 election processes that should have been thoroughly examined but were not, making it a lie to claim that there was no fraud.
-
Athetotheist
- Prodigy
- Posts: 4026
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:24 pm
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 724 times
Re: "Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. That's weak."
Post #148[Replying to marke in post #146]
Judges, including Trump-appointed judges, concluded that there was no evidence of widespread fraud.
Trump's AG concluded that there was no evidence of widespread fraud.
Is "Let Trump Be the Winner and Every Man a Liar" part of your religion?
Election officials concluded that there was no evidence of widespread fraud.Not because Trump lost but because millions of votes were cast without sufficient proof of legitimacy. It does not matter who won, the fraud was evident and should have been thoroughly investigated. Those who claim there is no evidence of significant fraud are either ignorant or are lying.
Judges, including Trump-appointed judges, concluded that there was no evidence of widespread fraud.
Trump's AG concluded that there was no evidence of widespread fraud.
Is "Let Trump Be the Winner and Every Man a Liar" part of your religion?
"The religious idea of God cannot do full duty for the metaphysical infinity."
---Alan Watts
---Alan Watts
-
marke
- Banned

- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:42 am
- Has thanked: 36 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
Re: "Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. That's weak."
Post #149Marke: Let every official disprove the massive evidence of fraud instead of offering nothing but his unsupported opinion.Athetotheist wrote: ↑Sun Mar 23, 2025 5:42 pm [Replying to marke in post #146]
Election officials concluded that there was no evidence of widespread fraud.Not because Trump lost but because millions of votes were cast without sufficient proof of legitimacy. It does not matter who won, the fraud was evident and should have been thoroughly investigated. Those who claim there is no evidence of significant fraud are either ignorant or are lying.
Marke: If they had been wise and responsible they would not have presented their assumption as if it was the factual result of a thorough investigation which was never conducted.
Judges, including Trump-appointed judges, concluded that there was no evidence of widespread fraud.
Trump's AG concluded that there was no evidence of widespread fraud.
Is "Let Trump Be the Winner and Every Man a Liar" part of your religion?
-
Athetotheist
- Prodigy
- Posts: 4026
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 5:24 pm
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 724 times
Re: "Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. That's weak."
Post #150[Replying to marke in post #149]
https://time.com/5914377/donald-trump-n ... nce-fraud/
Think back to the first time you remember ever hearing of Trump----a time before 2016, back when he was accusing the Emmys of being political because The Apprentice didn't win. What did you think of him back then? Now think of the time since then and try to remember the last time you heard him say something without backing it up [as he frequently has] and thought to yourself, "Hmm, that doesn't sound right."
You seem to ascribe a godlike infallibility to him, to the point of demonizing his critics, and that isn't a healthy way to think about anyone.
The cases claiming widespread fraud were dismissed because there was no evidence of it. Lawyers bringing the cases had to admit that there was no evidence of it.Let every official disprove the massive evidence of fraud instead of offering nothing but his unsupported opinion.
https://time.com/5914377/donald-trump-n ... nce-fraud/
Think back to the first time you remember ever hearing of Trump----a time before 2016, back when he was accusing the Emmys of being political because The Apprentice didn't win. What did you think of him back then? Now think of the time since then and try to remember the last time you heard him say something without backing it up [as he frequently has] and thought to yourself, "Hmm, that doesn't sound right."
You seem to ascribe a godlike infallibility to him, to the point of demonizing his critics, and that isn't a healthy way to think about anyone.
"The religious idea of God cannot do full duty for the metaphysical infinity."
---Alan Watts
---Alan Watts

