How come nobody is upset about this?
Pelosi Says Her Policies Guided by the Values of Jesus
Moderator: Moderators
-
East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Pelosi Says Her Policies Guided by the Values of Jesus
Post #1"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
-
chris_brown207
- Sage
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 4:49 pm
- Location: Boise, Idaho
Post #51
On post 194 of the Homosexual Marriage debate, I provided you with 11 different sources, covering a multitude of different topics.East of Eden wrote: Cite. I think you are simply projecting here.
On post 196, you gave that detailed response a single line, rejecting all of the sources as "Post Hoc fodder".
That is just one example of you casually discarding any source that does not coincide your beliefs. I quite enjoy having intellectual debates with people of opposing viewpoints, however there is nothing fun about debating with an extremists (i.e. someone who wouldn't take anything into consideration that was outside of their pre-existing beliefs).
I do not see the merit in continuing this conversation. I will be moving on. Good day.
-
East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post #52
You can't even get your facts straight about this. You're confusing me with Euphrates, I had no part in the Homosexual Marriage debate at the points you say I do.chris_brown207 wrote:On post 194 of the Homosexual Marriage debate, I provided you with 11 different sources, covering a multitude of different topics.East of Eden wrote: Cite. I think you are simply projecting here.
On post 196, you gave that detailed response a single line, rejecting all of the sources as "Post Hoc fodder".
That is just one example of you casually discarding any source that does not coincide your beliefs. I quite enjoy having intellectual debates with people of opposing viewpoints, however there is nothing fun about debating with an extremists (i.e. someone who wouldn't take anything into consideration that was outside of their pre-existing beliefs).
I do not see the merit in continuing this conversation. I will be moving on. Good day.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
-
chris_brown207
- Sage
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 4:49 pm
- Location: Boise, Idaho
Post #53
You are absolutely correct. I am confusing you two. My apologies.East of Eden wrote:You can't even get your facts straight about this. You're confusing me with Euphrates, I had no part in the Homosexual Marriage debate at the points you say I do.chris_brown207 wrote:On post 194 of the Homosexual Marriage debate, I provided you with 11 different sources, covering a multitude of different topics.East of Eden wrote: Cite. I think you are simply projecting here.
On post 196, you gave that detailed response a single line, rejecting all of the sources as "Post Hoc fodder".
That is just one example of you casually discarding any source that does not coincide your beliefs. I quite enjoy having intellectual debates with people of opposing viewpoints, however there is nothing fun about debating with an extremists (i.e. someone who wouldn't take anything into consideration that was outside of their pre-existing beliefs).
I do not see the merit in continuing this conversation. I will be moving on. Good day.
