A Deluge of Evidence for the Flood?

[LittlePig]

And I can't think of any reason you would make the comment you made if you weren't suggesting that the find favored your view of a worldwide flood.

Umm, because simply it's a better explanation? And the fact that it's more consistent with the Flood Model doesn't hurt either.

Except, of course, it isn't consistent with a 'Flood Model', since it isn't mixed in with any animals that we know are modern.

Before the rabbits multiply beyond control, I'll just leave my proposal as a rapid burial. Nothing more than that. For this thread, it can just be a giant mud slide.

Since it's still spring time, let's let the rabbits multiply.

Questions for Debate:

1) Does a Global Flood Model provide the best explanation for our current fossil record, geologic formations, and biodiversity?

2) What real science is used in Global Flood Models?

3) What predictions does a Global Flood Model make?

4) Have Global Flood Models ever been subjected to a formal peer review process?

[Carico]

You guys are proving that your stories are coming out of your imaginations because they're contradictory and keep changing. If an "ice age" simply means that there are polar ice sheets, then when was the world not in an ice age? Scientists have said at one time there was only 1 ice age, then 2, then 3, now 4. Why even use the term "ice age" at all if that describes the way the earth has always been? or are you going to reverse your statements and claim that at one or several times time, there was no ice on the earth? Scientists just love to play God. But they're doing a horrible job by their changing statements.

Or are scientists simply so confused, they have no idea what the difference is between fact and fantasy, science and science fiction, and clear statements and contradictions? it appears to be all of the above. One can't change the past. Apparently scientists have learned that yet either.

[Scotracer]

Whoa you have a very twisted mind

I never said anything about a total freeze on the planet earth. I just defined what an ice age is. Oh the ice last receded from Europe around 14,000 years ago so no wonder we don't have any documentation of it - writing originated only on the order of 6,000 years ago. Oh and they refer to an ice age where the ice moves away from the poles and covers significant areas within the normally temperate climes (such as Europe and North America). You are showing that you don't even have a high school understanding of geography and science! You're truly an asset to humanity!

Do you know what causes sedimentary rock? Do you know anything about plate tectonics and continent drift?

Right this is where your global flood theory falls on it's arse:

-The earth's hydrological cycle is closed - FACT
-Even if all the ice on the earth melted, the sea level would rise only by the order of feet (not the MILES for Mount Everest!) - FACT
-SO WHERE DID THE WATER COME FROM?!

[Carico]

I never said anything about a total freeze on the planet earth. I just defined what an ice age is. Oh the ice last receded from Europe around 14,000 years ago so no wonder we don't have any documentation of it - writing originated only on the order of 6,000 years ago.

Pro-tip: We're still in an ice-age, sonny Smile

Sorry, but this poster said we're still living in an Ice age. And he added that means there are plenty of witnesses. So you guys can't seem to get your stories straight because your contradictions aren't even disguised! But that's no surprise since they're conjured up in the imaginations of men.

So since you can't even define an ice age or the common ancestor, then your stories don't even make a good fiction novel. Your contradictions (lies) are blatant. Satan's lies are easy to expose. But since the secular world follows Satan who's the father of lies, then they're the last people to be able to see them. That's because one of Satan's lies is that his lies won't be noticed.

[Scotracer]

I never said anything about a total freeze on the planet earth. I just defined what an ice age is. Oh the ice last receded from Europe around 14,000 years ago so no wonder we don't have any documentation of it - writing originated only on the order of 6,000 years ago.

Pro-tip: We're still in an ice-age, sonny Smile

Sorry, but this poster said we're still living in an Ice age. And he add that means there are plenty of witnesses. So you guys can't seem to get your stories straight because your contradictions aren't even disguised! But that's no surprise since they're conjured up in the imaginations of men.

You really can't even read. I said the last ice age receded from Europe 14,000 years ago. Yes there still are ice at the caps but it's still technically an ice age!

[Carico]

I never said anything about a total freeze on the planet earth. I just defined what an ice age is. Oh the ice last receded from Europe around 14,000 years ago so no wonder we don't have any documentation of it - writing originated only on the order of 6,000 years ago.

Pro-tip: We're still in an ice-age, sonny Smile

Sorry, but this poster said we're still living in an Ice age. And he add that means there are plenty of witnesses. So you guys can't seem to get your stories straight because your contradictions aren't even disguised! But that's no surprise since they're conjured up in the imaginations of men.

You really can't even read. I said the last ice age receded from Europe 14,000 years ago. Yes there still are ice at the caps but it's still technically an ice age!

So since your statements are contradictory, then please define an ice age. If an ice age is any age where polar ice caps exist, then please tell us when there were no ice ages on this earth and why scientists have only limited ice ages to 4.

But I can guarantee you one thing; since scientists pass along their fiction stories as true, they will absolutely change their stories again in the future. Why is that, do you think? If they know what happened billions of years ago, then why do their stories keep changing? Or don't they know what happened billions of years ago and they're simply making up stories of their imaginations? So which is it?

[JoeyKnothead]

LOL This is the worst case of projection this amateur has ever seen.

Satan's lies? Really?

Verifiable evidence?

It's getting quite aggravating to see so many theists claim stuff and not have to offer verifiable evidence or retraction.

[Scotracer]

I never said anything about a total freeze on the planet earth. I just defined what an ice age is. Oh the ice last receded from Europe around 14,000 years ago so no wonder we don't have any documentation of it - writing originated only on the order of 6,000 years ago.

Pro-tip: We're still in an ice-age, sonny Smile

Sorry, but this poster said we're still living in an Ice age. And he add that means there are plenty of witnesses. So you guys can't seem to get your stories straight because your contradictions aren't even disguised! But that's no surprise since they're conjured up in the imaginations of men.

You really can't even read. I said the last ice age receded from Europe 14,000 years ago. Yes there still are ice at the caps but it's still technically an ice age!

So since your statements are contradictory, then please define an ice age. If an ice age is any age where polar ice caps exist, then please tell us when there were no ice ages on this earth and why scientists have only limited ice ages to 4.

But I can guarantee you one thing; since scientists pass along their fiction stories as true, they will absolutely change their stories again in the future. Why is that, do you think? If they know what happened billions of years ago, then why do their stories keep changing? Or don't they know what happened billions of years ago and they're simply making up stories of their imaginations? So which is it?

A 5 second Google search could quite easily find what you need:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glacial_period

[Carico]

LOL This is the worst case of projection this amateur has ever seen.

Satan's lies? Really?

Verifiable evidence?

Your denial of the contradictions of scientists for one. The changing stories of scientists for 2. That's why science books are constantly being updated. But the truth never changes. It's lies that change with the seasons. Or are you going to lie again and claim that scientists never change their minds?

[Carico]

The Holocene is a geological epoch which began approximately 11700 years ago[1] (10000 14C years ago).

According to traditional geological thinking,

the Holocene continues to the present.

You'll notice that the criteria for the above claim is "According to traditional thinking". That proves me right that the beliefs of scientists don't come from out side reality, but the human imagination.

It also proves that the secular world believes anything they read if it was written by scientists who change their minds all the time.

So again, why call these periods ice ages at all if the world always had polar ice sheets, particularly when most of the world is not covered in ice?

[Goat]

It doesn't matter. We could provide hundreds accounts of ancient people of a global flood, (which exists), evidence of sedimentary layers all over the world, evidence of sea animals on the tops of mountains peaks, and the secular world still wouldn't believe in a global Flood. In fact, there is no more evidence to provide for a Flood. It's all there.

So since the secular world will never believe in the Flood even though every bit of evidence exists for it, then they're simply out to deny God, even if they have to make up events that no one has ever witnessed, such as a myriad of ice ages.

So since the secular world invents events, such as ices ages and fictitious beasts turning into humans, then their stories are more impossible than anything in the bible! That just proves that they have no rational reason to deny God except for Satan. Absolutely none.

So proof of Go already exists everywhere around them; in history, in the design of the universe and every living thing, in the historical accounts of Jesus, it's all there. SO the secular world doesn't want proof because they'll close their eyes and deny every bit of proof they give them. They simply want to live in their imaginations and make up their own stories. That's called deliberate denial.

Pro-tip: We're still in an ice-age, sonny

Ice age means a period of time where there are ice sheets covering parts of at least one continent. So yeah, we have plenty of people have "witnessed an ice age".

Nice try though.

One of the things that drives the ice retreating or advancing is the orbit of the earth around the sun. It is not 100% stable and 'wobbles' a bit. If it wasn't for the green house gases, we actually would be in the start of a cooling period.