Is Evolution a Religion?

Creationism, Evolution, and other science issues

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
CJK
Scholar
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:36 am
Location: California

Is Evolution a Religion?

Post #1

Post by CJK »

Simple question.

Is Evolution a Religion?

User avatar
perfessor
Scholar
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Is Evolution a Religion?

Post #61

Post by perfessor »

jcrawford wrote:I share your religious faith and belief in electromagnetism.
You see, by your definition, the term "religion" has become so broad as to be almost meaningless. I am imagining a conversation with, say, John Doe:

Me: "So what is your religion?"
JD: "I'm a Christian."
Me: "Yes I knew that, but what about your other religions?"
JD: (scratches head, gives me a funny look)...

By your definition, I am not only a Humanist and an Evolutionist, but also an Electromagnetist, a Gravitist, a Hygienist, a Matrimonyist, and especially on cold winter mornings, a Die-Hard-Batteryist. I probably have other religions as well, but they are of a lesser importance than those mentioned.

What about you, jcrawford? What are your religions? I already know about the Christianity one.
"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist."

jcrawford
Guru
Posts: 1525
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:49 pm

Re: Is Evolution a Religion?

Post #62

Post by jcrawford »

perfessor wrote:
jcrawford wrote:I share your religious faith and belief in electromagnetism.
You see, by your definition, the term "religion" has become so broad as to be almost meaningless. I am imagining a conversation with, say, John Doe:

Me: "So what is your religion?"
JD: "I'm a Christian."
Me: "Yes I knew that, but what about your other religions?"
JD: (scratches head, gives me a funny look)...

By your definition, I am not only a Humanist and an Evolutionist, but also an Electromagnetist, a Gravitist, a Hygienist, a Matrimonyist, and especially on cold winter mornings, a Die-Hard-Batteryist. I probably have other religions as well, but they are of a lesser importance than those mentioned.

What about you, jcrawford? What are your religions? I already know about the Christianity one.
As a Christian, a Humanist or an Evolutionist, one may include their beliefs and knowledge about all those other categories as part and parcel of their religion since beliefs in natural phenomena are as much a part of religion as beliefs in anything else is.

All human thoughts, behavior and actions are fundamentally religious because we have to believe and have faith in the knowledge that what we are doing makes sense and is morally right and justified in the eyes of whoever we choose to designate as the supreme authority over our daily actions, even if that authority is ultimately none other than ourselves.

User avatar
Chimp
Scholar
Posts: 445
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 5:20 pm

Post #63

Post by Chimp »

jcrawford wrote:All human thoughts, behavior and actions are fundamentally religious because we have to believe and have faith in the knowledge that what we are doing makes sense and is morally right and justified in the eyes of whoever we choose to designate as the supreme authority over our daily actions, even if that authority is ultimately none other than ourselves.
Emphasis mine...

This is false...breathing is an action and does not fit your requirements,
in fact no reflex does, nor do any of the other autonomous functions
of the human body.

As I stand in the shower...do I wonder if showering is moral? No, I wonder
why my wife started a load of laundry when she knew I was in the shower.

jcrawford
Guru
Posts: 1525
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:49 pm

Post #64

Post by jcrawford »

Chimp wrote:
jcrawford wrote:All human thoughts, behavior and actions are fundamentally religious because we have to believe and have faith in the knowledge that what we are doing makes sense and is morally right and justified in the eyes of whoever we choose to designate as the supreme authority over our daily actions, even if that authority is ultimately none other than ourselves.
This is false...breathing is an action and does not fit your requirements,
in fact no reflex does, nor do any of the other autonomous functions
of the human body.
Deciding whether to go on breathing or not is a religious choice though.
As I stand in the shower...do I wonder if showering is moral?
No, you already made the moral choice that showering was the right thing to do before you stood under the shower.
No, I wonder why my wife started a load of laundry when she knew I was in the shower.
She was religiously inspired to do so upon learning of your moral decision to shower.

User avatar
Cathar1950
Site Supporter
Posts: 10503
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 12:12 pm
Location: Michigan(616)
Been thanked: 2 times

Post #65

Post by Cathar1950 »

No, I wonder why my wife started a load of laundry when she knew I was in the shower.
You better take her to dinner and get her flowers. I am not saying you did anything to make her mad but don't take any chances.

User avatar
QED
Prodigy
Posts: 3798
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 5:34 am
Location: UK

Post #66

Post by QED »

jcrawford wrote:All human thoughts, behavior and actions are fundamentally religious because we have to believe and have faith in the knowledge that what we are doing makes sense and is morally right and justified in the eyes of whoever we choose to designate as the supreme authority over our daily actions, even if that authority is ultimately none other than ourselves.
In that case we need a new term to distinguish between those things which are believed through superstition and those which are determined on an empirical basis. However, I humbly suggest that we retain the current association between religion and superstition and leave the rest as science.

User avatar
micatala
Site Supporter
Posts: 8338
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:04 pm

Post #67

Post by micatala »

I concur with QED.

I would suggest if jcrawford wants to give existing words new meanings, he develop his own 'Crawford's Creationist Dictionary' and define all the words as he sees fit. This way, if we want to speak crawford instead of English, we will at least know how to communicate with j. ;)

User avatar
Chimp
Scholar
Posts: 445
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 5:20 pm

Post #68

Post by Chimp »

jcrawford wrote:Deciding whether to go on breathing or not is a religious choice though.
Oh, please...when you fall asleep do you stop breathing 'til you wake?

Maybe you could ammend your statement...it is obviously false.
It is also acceptable to start over.

jcrawford
Guru
Posts: 1525
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:49 pm

Post #69

Post by jcrawford »

QED wrote:
jcrawford wrote:All human thoughts, behavior and actions are fundamentally religious because we have to believe and have faith in the knowledge that what we are doing makes sense and is morally right and justified in the eyes of whoever we choose to designate as the supreme authority over our daily actions, even if that authority is ultimately none other than ourselves.
In that case we need a new term to distinguish between those things which are believed through superstition and those which are determined on an empirical basis. However, I humbly suggest that we retain the current association between religion and superstition and leave the rest as science.
As per your recommendation if not your suggestion, we should regard and classify all religious and scientific superstition as superstitious beliefs, and qualify all empirical experiences in science and religion as equally valid forms of knowledge. Of course, most scientists are biased in that regard as a result of believing that 'science' is a superior form of experience and knowledge. Especially so-called Darwinist 'scientists.'

jcrawford
Guru
Posts: 1525
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:49 pm

Post #70

Post by jcrawford »

micatala wrote:I would suggest if jcrawford wants to give existing words new meanings, he develop his own 'Crawford's Creationist Dictionary' and define all the words as he sees fit. This way, if we want to speak crawford instead of English, we will at least know how to communicate with j. ;)
Since most Americans speak English and not Darwinese, they probably understand the meanings of the words in Crawford's Dictionary better than those occult terms in your Darwinist Enclyclopedia.

The beauty of Darwinist evolution is that everything changes and evolves over time, even the English language.

The beauty of epistomological self-conciousness is that one knows what changes in human nature and physiognomy, and what does not, ever since the beginning of human time.

Post Reply