Is masturbation sinful?

Ethics, Morality, and Sin

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
afton
Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:22 am

Is masturbation sinful?

Post #1

Post by afton »

Many people have debated about this, but I have not found any conclusive
answer yet. Is masturbation sinful?

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #111

Post by McCulloch »

ConiectoErgoSum wrote: sex is 100% about reproduction, be it a direct cause (fertilization) or an indirect cause (relational bonding of a male and female).
How did you come to that conclusion?
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

ConiectoErgoSum
Apprentice
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:59 am

Post #112

Post by ConiectoErgoSum »

i got fed up with thinking I was 'in love' with girl after girl, only to discover that, when I went without seeing her, the drive mysteriously dissipated. then I came to realize that physical attraction is what separates a best friend from a lover - and sex is the result of physical attraction. also, from observing couples around me, it seems that adults with kids have sex less than young couples without kids. I hypothesize that the sex drive is still necessary to hold a couple together after reproduction, for parenting purposes and to encourage further reproduction, but is less strong because said sex drive has achieved its intended result. furthermore, it makes tons of sense that the survival of the species would be one of our genetic top priorities, right up there with survival of our self. there have been studies that show how the various chemicals (testosterone, dopamine, vasopressin) contribute to sexual pleasure and drive in ways that promote reproduction and/or establish a long-term bond conducive to raising children (sorry I saw it on a Discovery Channel show, and can't provide any written references. I think it's pretty well known how these chemicals work, and you can probably see it with a google search).

from a biblical standpoint, sex is not frequently discussed except in Song of Songs (where sex is about furthering a loving bond, but my premise is that this bond is only different from any other loving bond in that it builds couples for parenting purposes), and in the Torah (in reference to what not to do), and with relation to adultery and a few other times in the new testament. in the bible, marriage is seen as a necessary thing, and expressly related to sex - one couple is intended to remain together for life if at all possible. sex is viewed as a good act in this context only. Matthew 5:27 rejects even lust outside of one's own significant other. however, marriage, and thusly sex, is viewed as something that does not exist in heaven (Matt. 22:30). scripturally, sex is then a practical way of reproducing, and its limitations are also practical and earthly. for a God who says that we should not store up earthly treasures (see Luke 12:13 and on), a thing that does not exist in heaven can only be good on earth insomuch as it furthers an eternal cause. sex does not last forever, but new lives do. thus, biblically, sex must be entirely about reproduction, be it direct or indirect.

cnorman18

Is masturbation sinful?

Post #113

Post by cnorman18 »

ConiectoErgoSum wrote:i got fed up with thinking I was 'in love' with girl after girl, only to discover that, when I went without seeing her, the drive mysteriously dissipated. then I came to realize that physical attraction is what separates a best friend from a lover - and sex is the result of physical attraction. also, from observing couples around me, it seems that adults with kids have sex less than young couples without kids. I hypothesize that the sex drive is still necessary to hold a couple together after reproduction, for parenting purposes and to encourage further reproduction, but is less strong because said sex drive has achieved its intended result. furthermore, it makes tons of sense that the survival of the species would be one of our genetic top priorities, right up there with survival of our self. there have been studies that show how the various chemicals (testosterone, dopamine, vasopressin) contribute to sexual pleasure and drive in ways that promote reproduction and/or establish a long-term bond conducive to raising children (sorry I saw it on a Discovery Channel show, and can't provide any written references. I think it's pretty well known how these chemicals work, and you can probably see it with a google search).

from a biblical standpoint, sex is not frequently discussed except in Song of Songs (where sex is about furthering a loving bond, but my premise is that this bond is only different from any other loving bond in that it builds couples for parenting purposes), and in the Torah (in reference to what not to do), and with relation to adultery and a few other times in the new testament. in the bible, marriage is seen as a necessary thing, and expressly related to sex - one couple is intended to remain together for life if at all possible. sex is viewed as a good act in this context only. Matthew 5:27 rejects even lust outside of one's own significant other. however, marriage, and thusly sex, is viewed as something that does not exist in heaven (Matt. 22:30). scripturally, sex is then a practical way of reproducing, and its limitations are also practical and earthly. for a God who says that we should not store up earthly treasures (see Luke 12:13 and on), a thing that does not exist in heaven can only be good on earth insomuch as it furthers an eternal cause. sex does not last forever, but new lives do. thus, biblically, sex must be entirely about reproduction, be it direct or indirect.

Okay. How does any of that make masturbation sinful?

Of COURSE sex is about reproduction; that's what it's FOR. But it's also for pleasure, in humans. That's easily proven; animals are generally only interested in sex when it's possible for the female to conceive; at other times, it's not a factor. Humans, on the other hand, are interested in sex ALL the time, and that interest often continues into later years. Seniors are far more sexually active than most younger people think - and while sexual activities can extend well into the 80s, conception presumably does not.

I'm a single guy about to turn sixty with no romantic prospects, and really no interest in pursuing a relationship. Why should I deny harmless pleasure to myself? What should I do, take up knitting?

In the Jewish faith, sexuality is a gift, not a weakness; and sex is to be celebrated - granted, within marriage - not avoided. There are no Jewish nuns or monks, and though celibacy is not considered exactly sinful, it is thought of as spitting on one of God's most precious gifts. Not a sin, but not very smart.

Masturbation is only a sin if sexual pleasure is somehow evil in and of itself. It isn't. Period, full stop.

User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Post #114

Post by McCulloch »

ConiectoErgoSum wrote: i got fed up with thinking I was 'in love' with girl after girl, only to discover that, when I went without seeing her, the drive mysteriously dissipated. then I came to realize that physical attraction is what separates a best friend from a lover - and sex is the result of physical attraction. also, from observing couples around me, it seems that adults with kids have sex less than young couples without kids. I hypothesize that the sex drive is still necessary to hold a couple together after reproduction, for parenting purposes and to encourage further reproduction, but is less strong because said sex drive has achieved its intended result. furthermore, it makes tons of sense that the survival of the species would be one of our genetic top priorities, right up there with survival of our self. there have been studies that show how the various chemicals (testosterone, dopamine, vasopressin) contribute to sexual pleasure and drive in ways that promote reproduction and/or establish a long-term bond conducive to raising children (sorry I saw it on a Discovery Channel show, and can't provide any written references. I think it's pretty well known how these chemicals work, and you can probably see it with a google search).
Similarly, it can be shown that eating serves nutritive needs. However, I do not conclude, and I would guess neither would you, that any eating that does not directly serve this goal would be morally wrong. Sex is not just all about reproduction; food is not just about nutrition.
ConiectoErgoSum wrote: from a biblical standpoint, [...]
How nice for you. I am willing to admit that the writers of the Bible may have been wrong.
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

ConiectoErgoSum
Apprentice
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:59 am

Post #115

Post by ConiectoErgoSum »

McCulloch, you're saying that there's leftover pleasure even after reproductive motives are used up. i get that. so i said that sexuality outside of reproduction is
either neutral or bad
the question in this case is whether or not it's really neutral; maybe it just seems like 'harmless pleasure' at the time, but has negative consequences later.

eating food that does not contribute to nourishment, but just pleasure, seems harmless, does it not? yet it is rather apparent from american culture that there are negative consequences. perhaps a person can eat for pleasure and not get fat. but even if they do, they've maintained only neutrality.

perhaps you're right. if it can be proven that it truly is harmless pleasure, then it's not bad. if drinking is harmless pleasure, it's not bad. Jesus was all about havin' a party.

the problem is, with something that has a tendency to be very addicting, the chances of moral neutrality are slim, and the chances of harm are great. this is especially true when it comes to sexuality.

melikio
Guru
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: U.S.A.

Leave it Between God and the Individual

Post #116

Post by melikio »

I think it best to leave the efficacy of masturbation between God and the individual human being.

I think there are some scientific/health reasons that 'may' support masturbation being beneficial for men; but I don't think one should ever hope to use it as a substitute for intimate relationships.

Now, when we're talking about people who are celibate, it is a reality that not all people have the will or opportunity to be 'partnered'. And in those cases that may be their only outlet.

Even people observing celibacy have a libido (it doesn't just SNAP OFF like a switch)... so I think there are good reasons why a person would masturbate.

Be all that as it may, I think the question is something that is between a person's conscience and whatever other moral factors they hold within.
"It is better to BE more like Jesus and assume to speak less for God." -MA-

User avatar
FinalEnigma
Site Supporter
Posts: 2329
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:37 am
Location: Bryant, AR

Post #117

Post by FinalEnigma »

after a week or two of not having sex or masturbating, ones sperm becomes old and inactive, thus reducing fertility.
God said to be fruitful and multiply. I can't see how doing something to increase one's chance of that could possibly be a sin.

Masturbation is also extremely good for your health. It reduces pain, relieves stress, and frequent masturbation can greatly reduce the risk of prostate cancer in men.

God did not make rules that are bad for our health.
We do not hate others because of the flaws in their souls, we hate them because of the flaws in our own.

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Post #118

Post by Goat »

FinalEnigma wrote:after a week or two of not having sex or masturbating, ones sperm becomes old and inactive, thus reducing fertility.
God said to be fruitful and multiply. I can't see how doing something to increase one's chance of that could possibly be a sin.

Masturbation is also extremely good for your health. It reduces pain, relieves stress, and frequent masturbation can greatly reduce the risk of prostate cancer in men.

God did not make rules that are bad for our health.
Not to mention reduces the risk of prostate cancer (that old and inactive sperm has a detrimental effect). Of course, there will be those that say 'Well, that is why God made women'.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
FinalEnigma
Site Supporter
Posts: 2329
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:37 am
Location: Bryant, AR

Post #119

Post by FinalEnigma »

goat wrote:
FinalEnigma wrote:after a week or two of not having sex or masturbating, ones sperm becomes old and inactive, thus reducing fertility.
God said to be fruitful and multiply. I can't see how doing something to increase one's chance of that could possibly be a sin.

Masturbation is also extremely good for your health. It reduces pain, relieves stress, and frequent masturbation can greatly reduce the risk of prostate cancer in men.

God did not make rules that are bad for our health.
Not to mention reduces the risk of prostate cancer (that old and inactive sperm has a detrimental effect). Of course, there will be those that say 'Well, that is why God made women'.
the only problem with that reply is that it implies you can go out and get sex whenever you want. It doesn't work that way. Could try prostitutes, but that's a sin.
and I mentioned that about prostate cancer. :p
We do not hate others because of the flaws in their souls, we hate them because of the flaws in our own.

Flail

Post #120

Post by Flail »

FinalEnigma wrote:
goat wrote:
FinalEnigma wrote:after a week or two of not having sex or masturbating, ones sperm becomes old and inactive, thus reducing fertility.
God said to be fruitful and multiply. I can't see how doing something to increase one's chance of that could possibly be a sin.

Masturbation is also extremely good for your health. It reduces pain, relieves stress, and frequent masturbation can greatly reduce the risk of prostate cancer in men.

God did not make rules that are bad for our health.
Not to mention reduces the risk of prostate cancer (that old and inactive sperm has a detrimental effect). Of course, there will be those that say 'Well, that is why God made women'.
the only problem with that reply is that it implies you can go out and get sex whenever you want. It doesn't work that way. Could try prostitutes, but that's a sin.
and I mentioned that about prostate cancer. :p
Your masturbation is irrelevant to me...and your opinion of my masturbation is none of my business.

Post Reply