Humpty Dumpty

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Faber
Scholar
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 7:07 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Humpty Dumpty

Post #1

Post by Faber »

"When I use a word it means just what I choose it to mean" (Humpty Dumpty in 'Through the Looking Glass' by Lewis Carroll).

Those who deny the Trinity often employ the same rational as Humpty Dumpty in their approach to defining the words of the Bible. Since the proper definitions refute their doctrine they resort to attacking the meanings of the biblical words as found in the lexicons.
What they offer is simply their opinion of what they think the words ought to mean in accordance with their beliefs.
"The Bible is inspired not the lexicons" is a claim so often made. What is ignored is that the words of the Bible are to be properly defined otherwise like Humpty Dumpty words can simply mean anything we want them to. Communication will inevitably break down.

Justin108
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4471
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:28 am

Post #61

Post by Justin108 »

Faber wrote: Support your use of the word. Define it and tell why it is properly placed in your sentence.

You don't approve of the lexicons I cite so I am not going to accept how you employ the words you use.
There's a difference between using a word and referencing a source as authoritative.
Faber wrote: Two can play this game of constantly asking for proof even though sources have been given.
I acknowledge that you provided sources for your arguments. I'm now asking why these sources are to be considered authoritative? If you're going to resort to the childish tactic of demanding proof of literally every word I use as an act of desperation then so be it. I'm not going to entertain that desperation.

Faber
Scholar
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 7:07 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #62

Post by Faber »

What I have supplied says one thing but you (without any sources) insist they are wrong.

Paul wrote that there was a time when he put away childish things (1 Corinthians 13:11).

I strongly suggest you do the same.

Justin108
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4471
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:28 am

Post #63

Post by Justin108 »

Faber wrote: What I have supplied says one thing but you (without any sources) insist they are wrong.
I never insisted they are wrong. I merely asked you to give me a reason to believe they are right.

Faber
Scholar
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 7:07 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #64

Post by Faber »

And I am asking why you employ the words you do.

You have been on this forum for 4 years about debating Christianity. During that time you should have made yourself aware of the importance of several Greek lexicons concerning the New Testament.

Justin108
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4471
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:28 am

Post #65

Post by Justin108 »

Faber wrote: And I am asking why you employ the words you do.

You have been on this forum for 4 years about debating Christianity. During that time you should have made yourself aware of the importance of several Greek lexicons concerning the New Testament.
Look I'm not going to play this game. Do you have any scripture (Greek or otherwise) that states Jesus is God?

Faber
Scholar
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 7:07 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #66

Post by Faber »

The one who supplies no proof is asking for proof.

Justin108
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4471
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:28 am

Post #67

Post by Justin108 »

Faber wrote: The one who supplies no proof is asking for proof.
I'll take that as a no

Faber
Scholar
Posts: 407
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 7:07 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #68

Post by Faber »

Define "take."

User avatar
OnceConvinced
Savant
Posts: 8969
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: New Zealand
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 67 times
Contact:

Post #69

Post by OnceConvinced »

Faber wrote: Your opinion against the BDAG (3rd Edition)?

What a joke.
:warning: Above slur adds nothing to the debate
Faber wrote: What I have supplied says one thing but you (without any sources) insist they are wrong.

Paul wrote that there was a time when he put away childish things (1 Corinthians 13:11).

I strongly suggest you do the same.


:warning: Moderator Warning


Insulting other members of this site is not tolerated. You have already been warned once about this.

Please review our Rules.

______________

Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.

Society and its morals evolve and will continue to evolve. The bible however remains the same and just requires more and more apologetics and claims of "metaphors" and "symbolism" to justify it.

Prayer is like rubbing an old bottle and hoping that a genie will pop out and grant you three wishes.

There is much about this world that is mind boggling and impressive, but I see no need whatsoever to put it down to magical super powered beings.


Check out my website: Recker's World

Elijah John
Savant
Posts: 12236
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:23 pm
Location: New England
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Post #70

Post by Elijah John »

Faber wrote: The one who supplies no proof is asking for proof.
The burden of proof is on the one making the affirmative and/or the absolute claime. You have attempted to do so, but it has not been very convincing
My theological positions:

-God created us in His image, not the other way around.
-The Bible is redeemed by it's good parts.
-Pure monotheism, simple repentance.
-YHVH is LORD
-The real Jesus is not God, the real YHVH is not a monster.
-Eternal life is a gift from the Living God.
-Keep the Commandments, keep your salvation.
-I have accepted YHVH as my Heavenly Father, LORD and Savior.

I am inspired by Jesus to worship none but YHVH, and to serve only Him.

Post Reply