We are going to attempt this again.
I accept the above exactly as it stands -- no more, no less.Zzyzx wrote:ST_JB wrote:I am accepting the terms and format as you have suggested from the other thread.
http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... 0&start=50Zzyzx wrote:Okay, if you propose accepting the terms of the January 2009 thread, I am willing. I do not consider it as favoring either of us. If you agree we can proceed with the H2H debate.ZZ: Proposal for Head to Head debate:
Topic: Is the "Star of Bethlehem" story literally true as written in Matthew 2:1-12?Matthew2:1After Jesus was born in Bethlehem in Judea, during the time of King Herod, Magi from the east came to Jerusalem 2and asked, "Where is the one who has been born king of the Jews? We saw his star in the east and have come to worship him."
3When King Herod heard this he was disturbed, and all Jerusalem with him. 4When he had called together all the people's chief priests and teachers of the law, he asked them where the Christ was to be born. 5"In Bethlehem in Judea," they replied, "for this is what the prophet has written: 6" 'But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, are by no means least among the rulers of Judah; for out of you will come a ruler who will be the shepherd of my people Israel.'"
7Then Herod called the Magi secretly and found out from them the exact time the star had appeared. 8He sent them to Bethlehem and said, "Go and make a careful search for the child. As soon as you find him, report to me, so that I too may go and worship him."
9After they had heard the king, they went on their way, and the star they had seen in the east went ahead of them until it stopped over the place where the child was. 10When they saw the star, they were overjoyed. 11On coming to the house, they saw the child with his mother Mary, and they bowed down and worshiped him. Then they opened their treasures and presented him with gifts of gold and of incense and of myrrh. 12And having been warned in a dream not to go back to Herod, they returned to their country by another route.
Structure of debate: Closely moderated by two moderators. One moderator will be invited by each participant from the list of admin and moderators. They will closely monitor for content as well as rule infraction and will make comments as they deem appropriate.
Confused [replace] has agreed to be one of the moderators. You choose another of the moderators.
Strict adherence to forum rules http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6
Strict adherence to "Guidelines for C&A subforum" http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... php?t=9741
NO personal comments allowed.
1. Debate is to consist of a total of ten posts each â€“ alternating
2. No post shall exceed 1000 words including quotations
3. A response is to be posted within five calendar days (120 hours) unless delay is agreed
4. Ask no more than two critical questions (bolded and numbered / lettered to identify). Other questions may be asked but are not critical to be answered. One participant shall number questions sequentially from the beginning of the debate, the other shall use sequential letter designations throughout.
5. Answer honestly, openly and fully to the best of ability the two critical questions last asked by opposition or acknowledge inability or unwillingness. Answer any other questions optionally as judgment indicates.
6. Discuss additional issues only after answering the critical questions (or acknowledging inability or unwillingness). Additional points are permitted.
7. Substantiate all claims and statements challenged OR acknowledge inability or unwillingness and withdraw the claim or statement in the next post.
8. Discuss ideas, not personalities. Do not make any personal comments.
9. Standard English definitions of words shall prevail (no special, personal or esoteric definitions allowed). Merriam Webster Dictionary shall prevail. Any exceptions shall be by mutual agreement in advance.
10. Circular reasoning is not permitted (no work shall be cited to prove itself correct)