1213 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 4:46 pm
Tcg wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 2:11 pm
...
How could health care issues conflict with religious beliefs?
...
One reason that I have heard of is that in the development of the vaccine, people used material from a baby that was aborted. Not only the abortion is problem, but the material was taken from the baby when he was still alive, which makes it very inhumane torture of a baby.
Second reason can be that some religious people don't want something injected to them that may cause DNA changes like the RNA vaccines basically do by making human cell to produce something that is not in human body normally.
I am against it, because I have seen no good reason to take it. And I am against mandatory vaccines, because I believe people were created to be free.
There are certain pieces of information that you hsould be aware of.
First of all, many other medicince use stem cells from abortions to do testing on. These stem cells on are about 40 to 50 years old. I bet many people who are using that as an excuse have used those medications.
Next, the Mrna vaccines do not cause DNA changes. That is misinformation.
Now, why should someone take it? Because they care about the lives of their neighbors, that's why. Even if you think you are healthy, and it won't effect you, being a source of infection for your neighbors, and your family can actually kill them. If you don't mind risking your neighbors and families lives and health, then there shouldn't be an issue. If you think that their lives do matter, then you should consider it.
OF course, if you do get it,there are long term health issues too. Covid 19 can easily effect the vascular system, which has issues with lungs, how the brain functions, stamina, heart issues, etc etc etc. The risks of covid far outweigh the risks of any of the vaccines.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella